It was clear that Dr. Kevorkian had good intentions in helping his patients commit suicide. However his approach to good will was contradictory to what Kant believed as being good will. Without question, his actions were done outside of what would be considered moral. Although in a way he was helping his patients in ending their suffering, he did so in committing the act of murder. He violated Kant’s Moral principle to never commit the act of murder regardless of his good intention.
According to Kant good will is “like a jewel, it would still shine by its own light, as a thing which has its whole value in itself” (582 Cahn). He believed that an action must be “good in itself”. In this case, the act of murder, is never justified regardless of Dr. Kevorkian’s intentions that he may have believed was good. The act of taking an indiv...
... middle of paper ...
...ated the Hippocratic Oath, but led to question the role of the physician whose job is to treat the sick and not determine when a person could die. Although he have granted his patients what they wanted and believed that he was acting in his role as a physician, the outcome reinforces Kant’s philosophy to act in an absolute manner.
Kant believed that in order to act morally an individual must act in an absolute manner. His philosophy supports the mindset that small events lead to larger more significant events, thus immorally and unethical actions are no different. For Dr. Kevorkian to use his patients as a means to an end under the guise of good intention, he violated his role as a physician by deciding to kill his patients. He violated his duty and good will by deciding to commit an immoral act that lead to the death of his patients who he had an obligation to cure.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the article “What makes us moral” by Jeffrey Kluger, he describes how morality is defined and how the people follow rules. Kluger discusses about scientific research that has been done to point out the important reasons of morality. Kluger explains that a person’s decision to do something good or bad is based on empathy, that humans tend not to do bad to those they sympathize with. Kluger also compares humans with animals and thinks that morality is the only thing that separates us from animals.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Human, Moral]
928 words (2.7 pages)
- Moral relativism is the concept that people’s moral judgement can only goes as far a one person’s standpoint in a matter. Also, one person’s view on a particular subject carries no extra weight than another person. What I hope to prove in my thesis statement are inner judgements, moral disagreements, and science are what defend and define moral relativism. Inner judgements are critiques about a person’s particular behaviour and what they should or should not have done. Judgements include labels that outline a person’s behaviour or lifestyle.... [tags: Morality, Human, Moral relativism]
1003 words (2.9 pages)
- Worldwide societies differ in what they believe to be right and wrong. Moral relativism is the idea that moral principles are relative to one culture or society and independent of others, according to this practice there is no universal moral standard. This moral belief is widely rejected and is seen as unfit in today’s worldwide society. One way which moral relativism can be useful in today’s society is when comparing our society to yesterday’s. The underlying idea of time is what most influences our relative beliefs of morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Moral]
1018 words (2.9 pages)
- Can we assume an action is moral just because it is normal and accepted by the majority of people. According to moral relativism, the answer is yes. Relativism is the belief that says moral principles are valid, but are different by individuals (subjectivism) or by culture (conventionalism). Conventionalists like Ruth Benedict claim that cultures cannot judge one another, since they have different principles (Pojman, 514). On the other hand, Pojman argues that there are some serious issues with relativism.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
964 words (2.8 pages)
- Despite his two claims being about morality in general, Williams focuses his argument on cases of internal justification based on internal moral assessments. He claims that whether an agent views himself as justified may depend largely on luck. However, this justification may never be pertinent to external agents, insofar as external agents have no obligation to listen to personal justifications. Notably, Williams isn’t arguing against a particular philosophy but against a common-sense view that morality is both immune from luck and a supreme value.... [tags: WIlliam, arguments, moral assessments]
959 words (2.7 pages)
- My purpose in this essay is to explain and discuss the importance of the “moral twin earth” argument. This theory focuses on the argument first proposed by Hare, which states that in order to have a genuine moral disagreement there needs to be a common understanding of the concept in question. This theory holds importance because it openly refutes Cornell realism, which denies that moral terms, like ‘right’, are synonymous to any non-moral terms that may be part of the properties that ‘right’ picks out; the properties that are attached to moral terms, like ‘right’ are responsible for their usage.... [tags: theory, concept, realism, moral, practice]
742 words (2.1 pages)
- Someone you love very much is dying from an illness. This person might be your significant other, a parent, a child, or maybe a close friend. Their only saving grace is a drug discovered and owned by a local pharmacist. There’s just one problem: you cannot afford the drug and must make a life or death decision on what to do next. This situation is known as the Heinz Dilemma, and most of the subtopics of this chapter can all be tied back to this core issue. Do you steal the drug and save a life, or follow the law and let someone you love die.... [tags: Kohlberg's stages of moral development, Morality]
737 words (2.1 pages)
- Moral theory helps us determine what is right or wrong. It helps us to answer and respond the question, what makes an act right or wrong and how can we correct the conclusions about our morality. The practical goal of moral theory has to do with our desire to find the answer between right and wrong. For example, Descartes used rationalism to try to find the solid foundation for knowledge. He tries to find something that does not have any doubt or error to it. Ethics keeps people and our Earth morally grounded.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue, Virtue ethics]
1455 words (4.2 pages)
- When a hero slaughters many innocent, what does that make the hero. The idea of good or evil is based on one word, that word being morality. Morality itself is just human conception and innovation. In general morality is “the human attempt to define what is right and wrong about our actions and thoughts, and what is good and bad about our being.”(Jones, 2) But what makes an action, object, or person good or bad. Pleasure, happiness or any other good feelings, or lack of, is what makes something moral.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Oscar Wilde, Moral]
1570 words (4.5 pages)
- In this philosophical study, an argument in support of “negative responsibility” will define the important ethical implications of a critique of Utilitarian ideology in the writings of Bernard Williams. Williams argues that the important issue of moral responsibility in Utilitarian philosophy is missing in the idea that personal responsibility for an act can actually be a positive influence for the grater good. In fact, the “negative responsibility” of the individual. The utilitarian tends to believe that a person is not accountable for an act, as long as it preserves the greater good of society.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Morality, Ethics, Decision making]
1235 words (3.5 pages)
- The Effect Of Nox2 On Macrophages And Neutrophils As Critical Modulators Of Inflammation
- Speech : ' Heart Break '
- President Nixon 's President Of The United States
- The Existence Of A Patriarchal System
- Lass Marketing Objectives For Coconut Milk Covered Almonds
- Developmental Plasticity And Evolution, West Eberhard Presents `` Six Points Of Confusion And Controversy