Why A Person Doesn T One Remain The Same?

2006 Words5 Pages

A person may change throughout their lives whether that be physically, mentally, emotionally, and/or psychologically; however, regardless of the fact that a person has changed, they still feel as if they are the same person. But how is it that we are the same person if we have changed? How is it possible for a person to change yet remain the same? Are you now the same person you were 15 or 20 years ago? What is it that makes us the same despite these changes? Some may say that a person stays the same due to their memories and past experiences that allow them to keep a part of who they were and used to be with who they have become. Memories from childhood experiences, family members and friends that are always there for looking back or reminiscing. …show more content…

One may ask how this is possible, but the question simply isn’t how, but rather why not. Why can’t a person change permanently from who they once were without having to still be the same? What makes a person the same? Could the answer be their name, sex, DNA, or physical appearance? Unfortunately no because those things can change. Some believe that what makes a person the same is their memory and their soul. Our memories and past experiences should not determine the fact that who we once were will always be part of who we will become, and that there is a possibility for our souls to change, allowing us to break free from the chains that once held us captive to our past. If someone were to commit a crime or had possibly done something in their past, should that dictate their future regarding the fact that they have transformed themselves and have become a new man? If the answer is no, why shouldn’t the answer be yes? People from this side of the spectrum might believe no simply because no person can be held accountable for something they did not do. Why did they not do this someone might ask? The answer lies within the fact that they are not the same person they once were 15 or 20 years ago; therefore, who they have become truly did not commit the crime and should not regret that something from their past they are not responsible for. Parmenides of Elea was an early …show more content…

Why is this the case? Perhaps because no matter how we change or when we do, there is a piece of us that remains inside which makes us who we are. But what makes us who we are and how are we able to identify ourselves? People who believe although we change we still remain the same might say that it is because of our soul. A person can change their physical appearance, or their name, etc., but who we are will always and forever stay attached to its true owner. Just as a finger print stays the same for every single individual despite any other changes that may occur to that person; therefore, those who believe in this theory would conclude that we never really change. Let us take the previous example if someone were to commit a crime or had possibly done something in their past, should that dictate their future regarding the fact that they have transformed themselves and have become a new man? If the answer is rather yes than no, why shouldn’t the answer be no? People from this side might say no because your past is always a part of who you are; therefore, no matter how much time has passed, a person will and should always be held accountable for their actions. If not that person then who? Should an innocent, single father of two young children be the answer to this question? What about a lonely, old woman who uplifts people through her words of encouragement? If

Open Document