Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essays on ethics in the workplace
Ethics in the workplace
this importance of ethics and integrity in academic work
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essays on ethics in the workplace
I. What are Dwight’s Alternatives and Ethics Involved
A. Whistle Blower
Utilizing this method of approach Dwight’s can use the corporate code of conduct policy to guide his decisions. It is typical to find guidelines on how business and behavior is conducted within the organization. The policies are designed to lay out the framework and establish clear boundaries on what is and is not acceptable creating a path for unethical behavior and disciplinary actions. Dwight will report the conduct and be impartial to the process, offering only the facts. There are several options in reporting unethical behavior, Dwight can report the tip anonymously and allow the investigation to unfold. The decision to use the infrastructure of reporting ethics violations
…show more content…
Dwight will inform Michael how his actions have placed himself in a compromising position and that he needs to work on his alcohol problem. Michael stands to lose his license, here is where Dwight can step in and offer direct support. This method of intervention with Michael is the most complex in regards to seeing a successful outcome and it hides the fact that there was a code of conduct violation. In addition, these actions place a large burden of responsibility for Dwight to help resolve the drinking and DWI challenges Michael …show more content…
In doing so, he compromises his own moral ethics; however, the chance of Dwight being exposed is limited. If caught, Dwight can fall back on the training relationship and how being a trainee his career would be likely ruined by Michael if he reported him. In addition, many case studies provide evidence where the whistleblower is punished indirectly through limited advancement opportunities or other various forms of retaliation. By choosing to ignore the company policy and accept the reward for his silence, Dwight has sacrificed his personal ethics.
II. Who are the stakeholders
A. Dwight
He is the primary individual in the scenario that has the ethical dilemma on whether he should or should not report Michael.
B. Michael
The perpetrator of the unethical behavior, he has offered Dwight rewards for helping cover up the incident involving the DWI. He is knowledgeable of the new substance abuse policy and repercussions for violations.
C. Jan
Held meeting with Dwight and Michael at a fancy restaurant, which may have resulted in a violation of code of conduct at Scranton Corporation.
D. Blunder Whifflin Company
Michael had shot off the rifle that killed Jenna’s father. Michael had accidentally shot it into the sky to show his best friend, Joe, how it works. Michael then heard about Jenna’s father’s death and knew instantly that it was his fault. He “remembered the story about the girl who choked on a stone” (page 32) and knew that he was also choking on his guilt. Michael keeps denying that he killed Mr. Ward but he knows in the end that it was him. Michael has also lied to the police about where the gun is and how his best friend Joe borrowed it. Michael should be honest and tell the police what has actually happened and maybe he will not get into so much trouble. Michael has also cheated on his girlfriend with Amy Ruggerio. That has affected him throughout the story because his ex girlfriend was spreading rumors about him. In conclusion, Michael has done deeds that affect him in the whole
...k with less than noble intentions. In the Baron, Michael discovers there are people willing to take advantage of children when he is coerced into breaking and entering. The narrator Michael explains that it was not until years into the future that he realized his misleading.
Leigh Anne sees that Michael is a good kid. He is caring, respectful, and protective. He loves his mom so much even though he knows she has her problems. He will always watch over her because he cares so much about her. He is also very respectful. He never asks for more food or more clothes or more of anything for that matter. One thing that stood out to me is that at Thanksgiving when the whole family sat on the couches to watch the game and eat, Michael sat politely at the dinner table just out of respect for his family. Finally, Leigh Anne sees that Michael is protective. He will do anything to protect the people he loves. For example with SJ in the car accident. Michael protected SJ from the air bags and saved SJ’s life. Also, when Michael and Leigh Anne went into the bad part of town he told her to just stay by him and he would protect her.
Michael soon decides that if he can trust Joe enough to keep in silence, he may be able to out wit the police. When Michael makes his decision, he never considers the ramifications that will come of it. For example, Michael never even considers the long agonizing nights he will stay awake or the ling pain filled days he will go through thinking of Jenna Ward and her mother suffering day after day. On the contrary, Michael thinks he will be able to just move on and forget about it.
The incident happened long ago, but nobody ever seemed to remember. Except for Michael. After all these years, every piece of the pain was carved in his memory, as if he was always there, always making the mistake. He was eleven, an appropriate age to start to learn things.
The act of whistle-blowing is an ethical issue that all employees have the right to. Whether they decide to make the corrupt information known publicly or anonymously, the information they provide can protect everyone involved. The ethical and moral sides of whistle-blowing can go both ways. In order to protect the customers, patients, or consumers of the harmful products the companies are offering, employees that have morals and feel the need to make the truth be known have an ethical responsibility to do so. Issues of being a whistle-blower are more controversial than the responsibilities of the employees doing so. When a whistle-blower takes action, they expose information from their company that it not meant to be public. They basically turn their backs away from their company and colleagues by revealing the truth. When surveying these issues, an employee who is torn by exposing information or keeping silent must decide whether it is more ethical to stay loyal to their organization or to the organization's
Although Hollate introduced a compliance program and code of conduct when it went public, the programs were put on “the back burner”. This outcome is not surprised for that the company does not pay attention to the programs. It is, therefore, important to “reinforce the values” and “employee a boundary system when actions are inconsistent with the code of conduct” for the purpose of early detection. Tyco provides a good example after its scandal, by initiating “mandatory annual compliance training for all its employees worldwide” and creating the Tyco Guide to Ethical Conduct to familiarize employees with company expectations and help them make ethical decisions. As tips is the most useful method for internal and external sources to detect frauds, the whistleblower hotline should be well communicated with encouragement on reporting any suspicious activity. In addition, to improve the effectiveness of the compliance program and code of conducts, Hollate should implement management monitoring and evaluation on a regular
Therefore, making one decision can have a huge impact on others. This is why it is important to think of the consequences that could occur before you make any decision. Both the soldier and Ronnie face challenges to make the decision whether they should be loyal to their leader or friend, or whether they should do the opposite. They later regret the decision they make and face the consequences that come along with it. Ronnie goes through an emotional state from lying to the sergeant, and the soldier feels guilty for killing Gregory. This is why you should think of others before you make any decision, and be loyal to those who you trust and think are right.
So, is Jones morally responsible for what he does? Frankfurt describes three different ways to play the role and reaction to the situation:
Set in the 1950s, Michael now stays in Lake Tahoe, Nevada. The scene opens with party held in Michael’s house to celebrate the communion of his son, Anthony. Inside the house, he conducts business with Nevada Senator, Pat Geary, who bluntly express his hatred towards Michael and intend to blackmails him. The second meeting is with a man named Johnny Ola, Hyman Roth’s messenger man, who sends word for the hope of future partnership with Michael. The
Michael has a criminal history and somehow he is tried as a juvenile and only spends a short period of time in juvenile detention.
Lael Matthews is facing an ethical dilemma issue. She need to decide which of three managers to promote. Each manager has their advantage and disadvantage own, and Lael’s superior has his or her own preference and concern as well. Lael have to make a decision that is moral, and hopefully can satisfy all the parties involved.
The ethical dilemma in this case is one that Daniel Potter is faced with. Daniel is a staff
Whistleblowing is an ethical procedure when there is clear evidence of serious evidence, that will harm the public and the blower has tried to find an internal solution to effect change. The whistleblower who is associated with the unethical activity has a moral responsibility to do the right thing.
Whistle blowing is an attempt of an employee or former employee of a company to reveal what he or she believes to be a wrongdoing in or by a company or organization. Whistle blowing tries to make others aware of practices that are considered illegal or immoral. If the wrongdoing is reported to someone in the company it is said to be internal. Internal whistle blowing tends to do less damage to the company. There is also external whistle blowing. This is where the wrongdoing is reported to the media and brought to the attention of the public. This type of whistle blowing tends to affect the company in a negative way because of bad publicity. It is said that whistle blowing is personal if the wrongdoing affects the whistle blower alone (like sexual harassment), and said to be impersonal if the wrongdoing affects other people. Many people whistle blow for two main reasons: morality and revenge.