One of the most well-known weapons, the atom bomb, has the potential, due to its explosive power, to threaten harmony and safety as can be seen in history through the events of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As described by the US army, the atom bomb is a weapon of mass destruction which has an explosive energy equivalent to 20,000 T.N.T. explosions. The atomic explosion takes place above a target and occurs when Unranium-235 is transformed into energy. The atomic explosion causes damage through heat and radioactivity (US Army). During World War II, the United States exploded atom bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and August 9th respectively. Despite the atom bombs effect being only a few hours, a total of 200,000 casua...
... middle of paper ...
... devastating effects.
All in all, it is safe to say that weapons of mass destruction lead to disruption of amity, safety threats, while making it very problematic for humankind to survive. The atom bomb, as seen through the events of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, destroyed well developed cities completely as well as taking over 200,000 lives. The use of chemical weapons in the Great War and future events led to the death of well over 90,000 as well as human defects. These defects from the chemicals can be seen today as well, as they were passed down through generations. On top of these weapons, the use of biological weapons have also lead to several human disabilities and casualties. As can be seen from the examples given above, the use of these weapons of mass destruction can cause great security fears, while disrupting peace and making it difficult for human survival.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The term weapon of mass destruction has been in existence since the 1930’s. Weapons of mass destruction can be better identified as nuclear weapons, biological weapons, chemical weapons, or radiological weapons. A true definition of weapons of mass destruction is “any destructive device; any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors; any weapon involving a biological agent, toxin, or vector; any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life”.... [tags: Chemical Weapons]
1056 words (3 pages)
- Throughout history people have searched high and low for weapons to turn the tides of war. With modern technology we have reached a point that at the push of a button we could destroy our entire planet. The question now is, are the weapons needed for protection, or should they be destroyed in an effort to save the world from potential destruction. There are no right answers, only the loss of power or the loss of humanity. Which should we choose. We must all learn the dangers of weapons of mass destruction to decide which side to stand up for.... [tags: nuclear power and weapons, laser technology]
1153 words (3.3 pages)
- Should Weapons of Mass Destruction be stopped from being created because of the harm that they do or continue to be created for their use in protecting society. This question continues to bother American’s daily. Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons that are used to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release of toxic or poisonous chemicals. It’s also a weapon that is used to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life. They also cause damage to human made structures as well.... [tags: politics, disarmament]
1193 words (3.4 pages)
- Nuclear weapons are the safest defense mechanism in the world. Although nuclear weapons can lead to mass destruction and the loss of thousands of lives when detonated, they are the optimal solution to the conflicts between countries in the future. The actual use of the nuclear weapon is not the deterrent, but rather just the mere fact that a country could use it against another country which avoids the large scale conflict. Thus, nuclear deterrence presents itself as a preferred security option.... [tags: global issues, weapons of mass destruction]
1888 words (5.4 pages)
- Moral Risk and Nuclear Weapons See the Cat. See the Cradle. "'See the cat?' asked Newt. 'See the cradle?'" (Vonnegut- 183). The day the atomic bomb dropped, August 6, 1945, was the day in which Newt Hoenikker's father tried to play a game with him. Felix, one of the scientists who had helped create the weapon, wanted to play cat's cradle. It is a game played with string looped over the fingers. After a series of movements, one is supposed to be able to see what appears to be a cradle shape. To most, it simply looks like a tangled string.... [tags: Nuclear Weapons Essays]
1295 words (3.7 pages)
- Has the international law been able to tame the manufacture and use of BW. In the face of ever increasing terror attacks, autocratic regimes lead by crazy men (Syria as an example), the control of BW has to be successful. In 1972 the use of BWs was outlawed by 165 states, however several nations still research on the same for defense purposes. The argument here is that defense can be interpreted differently by different states; as a good defense is a good offense. Nothing can stop South and North Korea from attacking each other in the name of defense with the BWs, which would have a cause effect the world over.... [tags: BWs, small pox, syria, law]
1500 words (4.3 pages)
- Chemical weapons, devices used for the sole purpose of hurting or killing humans, are widely considered one of the four types of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Chemical weapons are devices that spread a certain toxic chemical to incapacitate people. The two most dangerous kinds of chemical weapons are nerve agents and vesicant, or blister, agents. Types There five kinds of chemical agents. Lethal, Incapacitating agents, Riot control gases, Harassing agents, and Defoliants. (Hersh, 1) Lethal agents include Nerve agents, Vesicants, Blood agents, and Pulmonary agents.... [tags: nerve agents, vesicant, type]
576 words (1.6 pages)
- On March 20th, 2003, the United States invaded Iraq, based on President George W. Bush and his administration’s false claim that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), and that Iraq had ties to al-Qaeda, a group who had carried out the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Nine bloody years of war followed until the war officially ended on December 15th, 2011, under the direction of President Barack Obama. A total of 4,487 US soldiers, and an estimated 100,000 Iraqis died in the conflict.1 Most US media sources were irresponsible when it came to covering not just the rush to war with Iraq, but also the misguided and dangerous approac... [tags: Weapons of Mass Destruction, USA]
1640 words (4.7 pages)
- Chemical Weapons When most people consider the threat from weapons of mass destruction, the nuclear bomb is likely to come to mind. While nuclear weapons certainly pose a huge risk to our nation and modern world, they are costly to develop and mostly out of reach from terrorist organizations. Chemical weapons, on the other hand, are much more available worldwide and can often be created using commercially available materials. Beginning in 490 B.C, when the Spartans burned pitch and sulphur together to create a toxic gas, chemical weapons have been used to wage war around the world.... [tags: Nuclear Weapons]
823 words (2.4 pages)
- Chemical Weapons - Weapons of Mass Destruction Chemical weapons and their use is one of the most important issues facing the world today. Not only is the use of such weapons highly controversial, but also the very idea of such weapons of mass destruction being in the hands of dangerous leaders. Next to nuclear weapons they are the most feared, and the prospect of these weapons not only concerns people, but also frightens them. As a result of these fears, America has entered a new war that could bring devastating effects upon our world.... [tags: Exploratory Essays Research Papers]
1758 words (5 pages)