Essay PreviewMore ↓
The Wal-Mart Corporation is a multi-billion dollar low-cost retail organization, consisting of 6400 stores and 1.8 million sales associates worldwide. Wal-Mart’s influence on the retail world and the enormity of their corporate size is unparalleled. Wal-Mart can easily report sales of $312.4 billion dollars per fiscal quarter and net profits of $3.8 billion dollars. Wal-Mart promises her customers "Always low prices. Always!" and upholds this motto by providing low prices to her customers and high return on investment to her stockholders. One way that Wal-Mart has managed to maintain a competitive edge over other low cost retail giants and provide low prices is by cutting wages and by not offering too many company benefits to their employees. Full-time employee working at Wal-Mart only make $8 an hour, while only 45% of the workers can afford to be covered by health insurance. Wal-Mart also increase part time employees from 20 percent to 40 percent so that they do not have to cover all of their employees for health insurance . Although Wal-Mart may not provide excellent benefits to her employees, it successfully performs as a legitimate business operating in a capitalistic society. Wal-Mart upholds the primary fiduciary duty to satisfy her stockholder and follows free the market libertarianism model, which states that a business should not interfering with the free market. In a free market Wal-Mart has a direct responsibility to her primary stockholders rather than the employees of a company.
According to philosopher Milton Friedman the only Corporate Social responsibility a
Corporation has is to increase profits for its stockholders. Through a utilitarian perspective, we can see that Wal-Mart is acts in a way to product the greatest possible balance of good over dissatisfaction for their stockholders. Wal-Mart upholds the fiduciary duties to their stockholders by not increasing wages of their employees, instead they take the sum of money and return it back to their stockholders and shareholders such as customers and suppliers. Wal-Mart creates the happiness for the amount of people who invest in the company. Ethics is about the consequences of an action and the consequence of Wal-Mart’s actions creates the greatest amount of good for the people who are the primary stockholders of the corporation.
We can argue that Wal-Mart’s pursuit of profits does not lead to the greatest collective good for society because many small business owners and Wal-Mart employees have to declare bankruptcy.
How to Cite this Page
"Wal-Mart and Corporate Social Responsibility." 123HelpMe.com. 26 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Corporate Social Responsibility As a customer, if something ethically or socially wrong is done to you while shopping you would want justice right. Possibly file a lawsuit even. Well here at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. we understand that such cases will happen and to reduce chances of ethical situations occurring the company has mapped out the standards of ethical business conduct through which all employees and shareholders must be held accounted for. Wal-Mart serves a unique and diverse group of cultures throughout the world with the mindset to help them save money, while keeping to a code of integrity and serving the community.... [tags: Business ethics, Ethics, Greenhouse gas]
986 words (2.8 pages)
- ... That is to say that Wal-Mart must operate under current legal requirements in each location and community it serves. This includes local legal requirements for corporate law as well as environmental and employment laws. From an Ethical standpoint, Wal-Mart must meet all social expectations for how it treats its employees and the community. Good ethical companies cannot merely limit their ethical responsibilities to those limitations of the law but must also be good stewards of the community and strive to make employees feel happy and whole.... [tags: protecting the community and environment]
784 words (2.2 pages)
- 5. What ethical challenges does Walmart have to face while operating in Germany. There are serious issues why Wal-Mart 's business methodology fizzled in Germany. Social aptitudes, Customer Service, and Cultural self-importance all added to what one market analyst alluded to as a disappointment. Yet, under these essential monetary choices were a large group of fundamental culturally diverse errors that fuelled the organization 's poor vital arranging. Germany 's social mentalities Wal-Mart neglected to check Germany 's social mentalities, particularly with respect to such matters as work law and the part of unions.... [tags: Supermarket, Wal-Mart, Germans, German language]
832 words (2.4 pages)
- Wal-Mart and Target are two similar global corporations. If one asks each of these store’s customers why they shop there, somewhere in their answer one will find them saying that they can find everything. The difference between these two corporations is their mission, marketing, and quality. Each of these stores are looking to offer a different experience despite selling similar goods. So, when profits are not changing in the United States, they’ve opted for an expansion into other countries.... [tags: Wal-Mart, Target Corporation, Hypermarket]
1002 words (2.9 pages)
- It has long been regarded that for a company to have economic success it must abide by the ethical framework set by societal morals. A corporation, measuring success off a profit basis, often utilises the successful implementation of socially responsible practices in order to gain public awareness, and thus consumers. However with the introduction of market-dominating corporations, such as Wal- Mart, consumers have been faced with no choice but to continue endorsing unethical processes. As the largest private employer within America, Wal-Mart’s 54 years of operation have been plagued with allegations of neglect for employees, illegal waste distribution, and intentional corporate sabotage- al... [tags: Corporate social responsibility]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- Times have changed drastically for businesses since the Internet and social media have become part of our everyday lives. It’s now easier than ever for the individual to gather data and follow organizations to ensure they are performing legally, morally, and ethically. Stakeholders believe that organizations have a social obligation to operate their business in an ethically, socially, and environmentally responsible way. The term for this idea is Corporate Citizenship. Corporate Citizenship is “the extent to which businesses are socially responsible for meeting legal, ethical and economic responsibilities placed on them by shareholders.... [tags: Company, Employees]
1409 words (4 pages)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a business approach which has increasingly become recognized as a reflection of companies’ values and ethical standards, especially within the international community. This is especially significant as Multinational Corporations (MNCs) continue to increase in number in order to maintain competitiveness within their respective markets. Since the 1960’s, the number of MNCs has increased in number from 7,000, to 80,000 in 2006, as reported by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).... [tags: Corporate social responsibility]
1528 words (4.4 pages)
- Corporations deal with a wide variety of social issues and problems; some directly related to their operations, some are not. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be defined as “the actions of an organization that are targeted toward achieving a social benefit over and above maximizing profits for its shareholders and meeting all its legal obligations” (Ghillyer 78). If this is the case, establishing appropriate and practical ethical guidelines in the workplace seems to be a reasonable request as a basis for corporate operations.... [tags: Social Responsibility Essays]
885 words (2.5 pages)
- The term Corporate Social Responsibility refers to a company’s responsibility to provide a benefit to the society the company affects. Corporate social responsibility incorporates dimensions of corporate responsibility, and corporate policy which include a company’s policy to hire minority or disabled workers, or taking a stance on social and political issues that benefit the community. The social portion of corporate social responsibility includes corporate charitable business contributions and expands on this common social business practice by invoking corporate social initiatives.... [tags: Social Responsibility Essays]
1332 words (3.8 pages)
- Wal-Mart is currently eradicating some of its negative images by going green, keeping prices continuously low, contributing to disaster relief, community service and a health enticement for Americans to lose weight. Research shows that Wal-Mart believes that by making these changes now, it would help them come closer to the company’s main objectives of respecting the individual, servicing the customers with superior and excellent customer service. Wal-Mart also wants and has the expectations of its suppliers to adhere to these beliefs in their contracting, subcontracting, and other business relationships.... [tags: eradicating some ot its negative images]
567 words (1.6 pages)
In support of a company’s fiduciary responsibility to its stockholders Friedman’s argues three major points, starting with, a corporation does not have an obligation to its employees because the only social responsibility a corporation has is to increase profits for it’s shareholders. So the manager of a company would only have a direct responsibility to the owners of the firm, and the owners of the firm are its stockholders. If stockholders desire that the company make as much profit as possible, the company needs to honor that decision and find ways to decrease costs and increase profits. Thus, a manager has the direct responsibility to maximize profits for the firm, even if it means to reduce the pay and benefits the company’s employees. Friedman also argues against the unjust taxation of stockholders because if a manager spends money on Corporate Social Responsibility activities, he or she is essentially imposing unjust taxes on the stockholder. For it is only the government’s role to impose taxes on the stockholders, and not the corporate manager’s. Thus, it is not ethical for the manager to spend money on CSR .A corporate manager should ideally have no knowledge of CSR if contributing to the society independently (Friedman). Kant supports this argument by stating the example that it would be unethical to violate an innocent person’s right of life in order to save five, thus it is unethical to tax the stockholders for the benefits of the shareholders. Lastly, Friedman mentions that if a manager’s actions reduce returns to stockholders, then the manager is spending the stockholder’s money. It is unethical to spending the stockholder’s money in a way that does not benefit the stockholder or is different than the way stockholder would have spent the money. Essentially managers are stealing from the stockholders. Stealing is ethically wrong, therefore any action such as Corporate Social Responsibility that reduces returns to would be considered ethically wrong.
The philosopher Freeman argues against the stockholder theory and presents us with the stakeholder theory. Which states that a Corporation should partake in Corporate Social Responsibility because the government alone cannot maintain the well being of the society by using tax revenues alone. Wal-Mart should extend their fiduciary duty to include their employees’ in order build trust, unity and company spirit in order to succeed. A successful business needs to have a good fiduciary relationship with its stakeholders in order for both parties to grow, a company should “keep employees satisfied with their morale high because employees are innovation and idea driven”(Freeman). Freeman argues that a corporation has a responsibility to remain true to its mission statement and corporate values. Wal-Mart’s mission statement is: “to give ordinary folk the chance to buy the same thing as rich people.” (Wal-Mart). Most of Wal-Mart’s employees are ordinary people, who shop at Wal-Mart after receiving their paychecks (High Cost). But if Wal-Mart doesn’t manage to pay their employees enough to shop at Wal-Mart, then they are not staying true to their mission statement. Freeman continues that “a mission statement and corporate values does not state profit maximization as a fundamental purpose”, thus a corporation’s main goal should not be profit maximization rather it should be to provide service to their customers.
The Wal-Mart Corporation is an attractive employer for many Americans because it a provider of numerous jobs throughout the country. Wal-Mart work policies are also not in direct violation of U.S. Labor Laws. Unfortunately Wal-Mart uses abusive labor practices at home and abroad by paying their employees low wages and aggressively seeking to keep wages down. This in turns reduces the standard of life for many people and pushes them towards poverty. On average “ Wal-Mart workers earn an estimated $8.00/hour with a 32 hour work week. This equals $256 a week or $13,312 a year. The Federal poverty level for a family of three is $14,630(Markkula)” Therefore we see many single-parent families who can’t afford to afford health insurance for their families and have to work multiple shifts to make ends meet. Wal-Mart also has been charged because they “lay off older workers to bring in younger and cheaper employees. Some 40 lawsuits accuse Wal-Mart of a failure to pay overtime”(Markkula).Kant would point out the lack of ethics in Wal-Mart’s relationships with its employees by arguing that a corporation should “act so that we treat humanity as an end and never as a means only”. According to Kant Wal-Mart should not take advantage of its employees as a means to increase revenues for their stockholders, because all of mankind has value in society. It is unfair to treat some groups of people better than others.
Chang, Michael, Phil 116 Lectures 10/307 to 10/29/07. University of California, Riverside.
Freeman Edward, A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation. Ethical Theory and
Business, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994), 66-74
Friedman Milton, The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, New York
Times Magazine, September 12, 1970. The New York Times Company.
Markkula Center for Ethics: Santa Clara University. “Is it Ethical to Shop at Wal-Mart?” 09
Shaw, William and Vincent Barry. “Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics” in Moral Issues in
Business, 8th Ed, Belmont: Wadsworth, 2001, 59-69.