Analysis Of The Charlie Hebdo Tragedy

1442 Words3 Pages

Since January 7th 2015, Voltaire seems to have come back to public media spotlight. The famous quote of Voltaire: "I do not agree with what you say but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it", is now equalized with the very famous: "Je suis Charlie". Why 40 world leaders abandoned the affairs of their own countries and flew to Paris when the Charlie Hebdo's cartoonists were killed? We know the whole massacre is horrific, but the guilt "thrives" in both speech and bullets. Let us first start with the story of 7th January, 2015. The date that alarmed the whole world and whose events raised controversial questions of political, social and human nature. On 7th January, 2015, at around 11:30 am, two Islamist terrorists entered the satirical …show more content…

No one has the right and "privilege" to decide the physical existence of other humans. However, the Charlie Hebdo tragedy indicates the enormous extent of racism, inequality and terror-oriented society we live in. It is of tremendous significance to ask ourselves, how come the obliteration of 12 lives draws more attention than the obliteration of millions Muslims, Palestinians and Arabs? Is Charlie Hebdo magazine morally correct? On 3rd of November, the cover of the satirical newspaper exhibits Muhammad saying: "100 lashes if you don't die laughing". That kind of title I call "irresistible, consistent arrogance". France is one of the countries where Arabs are the most underprivileged and exploited people in the world! The freedom of speech that Charlie Hebdo magazine exercises mocks the Islamic world, Muhammad, their religion and traditions. The "hilarious" cartoons produced by the magazine are imprisonment of religion, not a freedom of one. Issue 1099 of the magazine brutally mocked the massacre of thousands of Egyptians, saying that the Koran is "shit" and it "doesn't stop bullets." So, how can we justify the bullets shot in the bodies of the Charlie Hebdo staff? The guilt of the shooting is to a great extent found in the degrading, trivialized cartoons and ideas of the French magazine. Religion is not a thing we should degrade and brutally mock, when the world is trying to erase religious

Open Document