Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negatives of anonymity online
Negatives of anonymity online
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negatives of anonymity online
Volatility within Electronic Communication
It has been noticed on several different forums for several decades that communicating on the internet can be downright mean. Anonymity, lack of accountability, absence of visual cues, and perceived distance has led to the increased hostility and rudeness on internet social media. This uncivil communication has also been shown to “hurt the perpetrator more than it hurts whoever is on the receiving end” (Rope, n.d.). As a result, it has been determined that face to face communication is more productive and healthy than communication via electronic formats for all parties involved in the conversation.
This volatile communication is not a recent development following the explosive growth of social media sites. Lee Sproull, PhD was quoted by Rope in her article, Why Is There So Much Negativity on the Internet?, saying “an escalation of critical comments, and an increase in the frequency with which people would respond with short negative messages” (page 1). These first virtual conversations were referred to as “flame wars” (Rope, n.d.) in the 1970’s, when scientists first started communicating virtual. From that point forward, virtual communication has been on a downward spiral, with evidence in almost every blog, news feed, review, and any other social media sites.
So why is virtual communication taking this negative turn? Wolchover states that there are three factors that make up a “perfect storm” (page 1) of conditions in which generate aggressive commentary in public forums. These three factors include anonymity, distance, and the ease of being volatile in writing. Being anonymous, the writer is not required to atone for the volatile comments that are made. Take away consequ...
... middle of paper ...
...nd/human-brain/psychological-reason-mean-on-internet.htm
Gardner, A. (2012, August 2). Troll Psychology: Why People Are So Mean on the Internet - Health News and Views - Health.com. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://news.health.com/2012/08/02/troll-psychology-mean-internet/
Eveleth, R. (2012, September 16). Why you're so mean on the internet - SmartPlanet. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/science-scope/why-youre-so-mean-on-the-internet/
Rope, K. (n.d.). Why Is There So Much Negativity on the Internet? | Real Simple. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.realsimple.com/work-life/technology/communication-etiquette/negativity-00100000073022/
Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2013, March 3). This Story Stinks - NYTimes.com. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/opinion/sunday/this-story-stinks.html?_r=0
CyberBullying.com - CyberBullying. US. Cyberbullying Research Center, n.d. Web. The Web. The Web.
In the editorial, Alex Lickerman claims that technology can separate people and pull them away from the physical world. He argues that people use electronic media to make confrontations with others easier. Lickerman points out that using the media blocks negative emotional replies that argumentative messages can make, and convince us we are not doing harm. He claims that internet users favor electrical relationship above a real relationship. Using an electronic system, you cannot receive the same emotional connection with someone if you cannot hear their tone of voice or read their facial expressions therefore receiving the connection in hiding. Lickerman points out the importance of never trading a real relationship with electronic
It is evident that Ruth Marcus’s “Cyberspace Dunderheads” and Goldwasser’s “What’s the matter with kids today?” share common objectives. Both articles concur that advances in technology have restructured our present and future existence in various ways. Communication, social networking, and obtaining knowledge have all been affected from technology’s advances, according to the two authors. Although their articles have similarities, all of their views and opinions do not coincide .Goldwasser and Marcus chose different avenues of expressing their opinions.
The public sphere has been falsely represented as a virtual place where one can share and debate opinions; ...
Although Carr’s sources may be highly praised in their field or study, they are not experts in the effects the Internet has on our minds. Bloggers are often very opinionated and do not pose as reliable sources for information. The fact tha...
The Web. The Web. 09 Feb. 2014. Anonymous. I am a naysayer.
middle of paper ... ... Internet. The Internet. The Internet. 20 Nov. 2013.
Social media has changed the way people communicate with each other and in turn, has affected our ability to empathize in both negative and positive ways. One of the most harmful consequences is the rise of cyber-bullying. Another negative issue has been the trend of trolling in comments sections of websites, chat rooms, and other online venues of communication. In spite of this, there have been constructive consequences due to social media such as the ability for family and friends to keep in touch on a regular basis. Because of social media, many people are finding support and resources to help them when they fall on hard times or experience tragedies like death and illness. Overall, social media is an exciting new world that changes as it grows and it will be up to society to utilize it for good.
10. Suler, John. The Psychology of Cyberspace. Course Home Page. Department of Psychology, Rider University. (1996) Access: http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/psycyber.html Retrieved: November 18, 2004
In the PRC survey, 1 in 4 teens said they have been in an argument with their friends because of something said online or in a text. Normally, these arguments are caused by misunderstandings because the tone of voice isn 't heard. However, some are also caused because people are not themselves when they are online,77% of teens don 't feel authentic online. The screen that people sit behind becomes like a mask, a person can say whatever they want to someone else online because they don 't have to sit there and look them in the eye while they say it. The connection of looking at someone has a great impact on what is said because of empathy and compassion. With the screen blocking out the connection, people are less likely to care. Which is probably why, according to the PRC survey, 88% of teens say people share too much online, 68% said they have personally seen someone stir up drama online, 53% say they saw posts about events they were not invited to, and 42% say they have seen things written about them that they can not change. The actual connection between people is needed in order for people to know how or if what they are saying affects someone else. People need to actually sit down and talk instead of saying what they feel
Because cyberbullying is a relatively new phenomenon, there is some degree of variance in its definition. In its early inception, cyberbullying was thought to be limited to the internet. However, the rapid creation of new technology tolls has expanded the boundaries to include cell phones, instant messaging, chat rooms, and email (Campfield, 2006). Campfield (2006) conducted a study of middle school students to determine the incidence rates of cyberbullying. She found that nearly 70% of students were involved in cyberbullying in some capacity, as a bully or victim. In a similar study, Li (2007) found that 39% of students have been involved in cyberbullying, while 52% were aware of a peer being harassed through electronic m...
Over the last century, information technology, such as the Internet, has brought our society forward and helps us get through life more efficiently and conveniently. In addition, it helps making global communication easier and faster as compared to hand-written mails that may take days if not weeks to reach its intended recipient. However, with such luxury and convenience, there is a debate whether the way we currently interact with fellow human beings with the help of technology is good or bad to our personal relationships. The Internet has increased the amount of communication globally, yet ironically the very technology that helps us increase our communication hinders our ability to socialize effectively in real life and create a healthy interpersonal relationship.
Internet has been acknowledged as one of the most efficient way to collect and reflect public opinions, for that people with different classes and races can express their opinions with no obstacles in virtual network spaces. People can speak out whatever they want just by typing on the keyboard within a second. Dr. Heather Savigny mentions in her article “Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet” that “The expansion of the internet as a new method of communication provides a potential challenge to the primacy of the traditional media and political parties as formers of public opinion” (1). People realized that the power of internet public opinion in the focus on social issues can be used as a weapon to affect government decision-makings. However, does public opinion only brings positive effects?
One of the main reasons why social media has positively affected our society is because of how it has made communicating with people much easier. “Today, four out of five active internet users maintain at least one social media profile” (Moe, 3). Using these websites, such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and etc., people talk about everything with anyone from what they are planning to do, also what they are eating and much more (Moe, 24). Also we can also send private messages to other users of these websites about personal m...
“In order to maintain a positive on-going relationship in any difficult face-to-face circumstance, an individual must learn the appropriate socialization rituals. Knowing these rituals and being able to play a proper front stage role is crucial in order for an individual to get along with others (Brignall and Valey, 2005).” With the relatively recent rise of social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, the means for maintaining relationships through these platforms rather than speech communication and face-to-face communication are becoming much more apparent and widespread throughout society. However, it is difficult to maintain these relationships without knowing proper social skills especially if these skills are not practiced or introduced to an individual. Although, “Communication frequency and self-disclosure play a role in computer-mediated communication and the formation of online friendships just as they do in face-to-face interactions and offline friendships (Subrahmanyam and Greenfield, 2008).” Yet, in our vast digital world that we reside in today, the ways in which we choose to communicate are becoming hindered by our participation in online communication. “We must have a philosophical understanding of the purpose and importance of communication to individuals and based upon this understanding, shape our attitude and value toward the communication process (McFarlane, 2010).” It is extremely crucial to understand communication’s importance and to not tuck the original beliefs and values regarding the tool underneath the rug, resorting and succumbing to communicating poorly in a fashion that mimics what we have now experienced via our devices. “As with any social change, we also believe there is a need to study and understand the impacts that change might have, regardless of whether such changes are viewed as positive or