Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of emotions on decision-making
The impact of emotions on decision-making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of emotions on decision-making
As a visual representation for Blink, I chose a watercolor brain. This book is focused on the intuitive decisions made in the brain: abstract and concrete. The bright colors bleeding into each other represent the thought process that is based on emotion and attraction. These characteristics of the abstract decision making are personal and cannot be defined. Malcolm Gladwell explains how these factors blur our reasoning and, “Disrupt this gift” (Gladwell 262) given at birth known as instinctive decision making. However, our brains also make snap judgements based on fact, experience and reasoning. This concrete way of thinking is represented in the painting in the bottom right side of the brain. The symmetrical horizontal lines and the constant color show the stability and precise nature that correlates to the logistical side of thinking. The difference between the emotional and factual side of the mind are key to Blink because they both factor into the human’s decision making process. Persona Author of Blink, Malcolm Gladwell, is part of the writing staff This genre was chosen by Gladwell to increase credibility and to satisfy the audience’s expectations on informational literature. Nonfiction appeals to the ethical side of the audience because it increases the trust in Gladwell. If the book was anything but nonfiction, the topics discussed would become worthless because the audience wouldn’t believe anything Gladwell stated. The audience expects any informative text to be nonfiction so they can trust the validity of the argument and the concepts discussed. The topic of Blink is, “There can be as much value in the blink of an eye as in months of rational analysis” (Gladwell 17). Blink is a nonfictional book describing how we think without thinking. Blink describes choices that appear to be instinctual and immediate, and explains the in-depth reasoning behind every decision
I agree with the quote "A work of literature must provide more than factual accuracy or vivid physical reality... it must tell us more than we already know.". I feel like when reading a book it shouldn't be all about facts or just story lines. A book should should mix things up so it makes us want to read them and not focus on one thing. The Book Sold tells us facts about sex trafficking but it also provides us with something else, how a life of young girl is sold into sex trafficking by her step father so she can help the family with money. The second book "Eleanor and Park" talks about vivid details and also has a story line about relationships.
Few books exemplify the consequences of misconceptions more than Farenheit 451. The book speaks of a world in which in citizens think they are living in a utopia, when in fact their world is constantly devoloving into a place where no human could ever flourish. This delusion along with the misconception that books are thing to be feared is the precise reason that the general populace is so easily controlled. The reason behind the propaganda campaign against books is so the people do not realize that their lives are unsatisfying and dull. In other words, this, misconception propagated by the governing force, fuels the illusion of a perfect world. The myth that the world...
For “Ketchup Conundrum” I think that Gladwell mostly focuses on logos. More of logical facts are presented to the readers to show his research in the field of mustard and ketchup. Logos means persuading by the use of reasoning. It is used by Gladwell. Gladwell uses it to show the clarity of his claim, the logic of its reasons, and the effectiveness of its supporting evidence. Gladwell uses it in terms of induction and deduction. In “Something Borrowed” Gladwell uses two main ways or rhetorical appeals to convince his audience. First, he uses Logos to give logical facts about the copyright laws and his true opinion about them. The opinion could be classified to be Ethos because he was talking about an area of his expertise. In ethos, which means credibility, Gladwell covers his ideas so he can express his feelings towards the central problems of argumentation is the text to leave an impression to the reader that he is someone worth listening to. In other words he made himself stand on such a position in the authority on the subject of the paper that the audience will believe that he is someone who is likable and worthy of respect.
Often, dystopian novels are written by an author to convey a world that doesn’t exist, but criticizes aspects of the present that could lead to this future. Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1951 but discusses issues that have only increased over time. The encompassing issue that leads to the dystopic nature of this novel is censorship of books. The government creates a world in which it is illegal to have any books. Firemen are enforcers of this law by being the ones to burn the books and burn the buildings where the books were found. By censoring the knowledge found in books, the government attempts to rid the society of corruption caused by “the lies” books are filled with in hopes the people will never question. In Fahrenheit 451, censorship is a paradox.
The theme of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 can be viewed from several different angles. First and foremost, Bradbury's novel gives an anti-censorship message. Bradbury understood censorship to be a natural outcropping of an overly tolerant society. Once one group objects to something someone has written, that book is modified and censorship begins. Soon, another minority group objects to something else in the book, and it is again edited until eventually the book is banned altogether. In Bradbury's novel, society has evolved to such an extreme that all literature is illegal to possess. No longer can books be read, not only because they might offend someone, but because books raise questions that often lead to revolutions and even anarchy. The intellectual thinking that arises from reading books can often be dangerous, and the government doesn't want to put up with this danger. Yet this philosophy, according to Bradbury, completely ignores the benefits of knowledge. Yes, knowledge can cause disharmony, but in many ways, knowledge of the past, which is recorded in books, can prevent man from making similar mistakes in the present and future.
Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence on the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our Democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books.
In Bradbury’s dystopia, books are banned and are to be burned if found, because they cause people to become too intellectual. In The Giver, a supposed utopia, the government tells the members of the community what jobs they will have, and how many children are acceptable in each family. In each of the novels, the main characters, reveal their deep animosity towards the government and its policies. They work to end the prolonged oppression faced. The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 attempt to change for the better; On the contrary The Giver takes a turn for the worst. Contemporary works, such as The Hunger Games, Fahrenheit 451, and The Giver, portray utopic and dystopic societies through the eyes of the narrators, and the properties of these societies are inverted as the government’s of each novel oppress the citizens. The elements of idealistic societies, generally develop into dystopias; Whereas dystopian societies begin to adapt to quixotic ideals as the narrators begin to see the world
Orwell’s main concern with the destruction of literature was the resulting loss of an external reality in which people could communicate and preser...
The entirety of Ray Bradbury’s life revolved around literature. Ever since Bradbury was a child, he had possessed an affinity towards to writing. Bradbury’s writings were not purely influenced by his passion of literature, however. Growing up the author would’ve learned about the frail nature of books: the destruction of the Library of Alexandria, the Nazi’s book burnings, and Stalin’s “Great Purge”. Bradbury also witnessed the golden age of radio and its transition into the golden age of television, all of which Bradbury believed detracted from the beauty and knowledge that could be attained through a written medium. The American author worried about the fall of his beloved literate dreams.
Fahrenheit 451 illustrates a realistic future society where the definition of thought and reason are unknown. Books are banned because they contain too many conflicting ideas and therefore offer no actual value. Every moment of the citizens’ lives is full of stimulation, whether wall-sized interactive television, murdering strangers, or listening to music on wireless radio headsets. Everyone is taught not to ask questions or think beyond the decision of which show to watch. Being a pedestrian is something one can be arrested for and the concept of casually chatting or watching the world pass-by is considered suspicious activity.
The biological perspective examines how brain processes and other bodily functions regulate behaviour. It emphasizes that the brain and nervous system are central to understanding behaviour, thought, and emotion. It is believed that thoughts and emotions have a physical basis in the brain. Electrical impulses zoom throughout the brain’s cells, releasing chemical substances that enable us to think, feel, and behave. René Descartes (1596–1650) wrote an influential book (De Homine [On Man]) in which he tried to explain how the behaviour of animals, and to some extent the behaviour of humans, could be like t...
Imagine a world of uniformity. All people look the same, act the same, and love the same things. There are no original thoughts and no opposing viewpoints. This sort of world is not far from reality. Uniformity in modern day society is caused by the banning of books. The novel "Fahrenheit 451" illustrates a future in which the banning of books has risen to the extent that no books are allowed. The novel follows the social and moral implications of an over censored society. Even though the plot may seem far-fetched, themes from this book are still relevant today. Although some people believe that banning a book is necessary to defend their religion, the negative effects caused by censorship and the redaction of individual thought are reasons why books such as "Fahrenheit 451" should not be banned.
War veterans wrote Slaughterhouse-Five and The Things They Carried. Some parts of the book are made for readers to believe and the other parts give realistic examples of war. The authors introduce their plots as truth-based on purpose. In the chapter “Notes”, O’Brien admits: “that part of the story is my own.” (O’Brien 151). In the first chapter of Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut begins with: “All this happened, more or less.” (Vonnegut 1). The authors create a picture for the reader on their past experiences to make their stories real. Even the parts that are fiction are not lies, because the writers have the knowledge to be able to generalize, shorten, and produce events in the book. O’Brien writes: “story-truth is truer sometimes than happening-truth.” (O’Brien 172). It seemed as if Vonnegut and O’Brien used fiction to make the story more exciting. They write abo...
Nonfiction is seen everywhere and people see and read it everyday. Whether that be watching the morning news, or reading an article in the newspaper. Nonfiction contains concepts like rhetorical modes and appeals, a purpose, an audience, and a voice.
Blakslee, S. (1993, August 31). The New York Times. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from www.nytimes.com: http://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/31/science/seeing-and-imagining-clues-to-the-workings-of-the-mind-s-eye.html