The rise of corporations is one of the utmost wicked stories in modern history, a reality the youth of today must live in. Growing up in an era of Disney tales allows the youth of today to see the world in two separate parts, the good and evil. We age with the belief that there are villains and then there are the heroes, who save us from harm’s way. Regardless of what happened, we knew that the heroes would always win at the end of the story, and the villains would always fail. ‘The Corporation’ by Joel Bakan, can be presented, idealistically, as an incredible story of heroes and villains. However, in Bakan’s version of the story the villains are conquering. It is evident that corporations have become a component in the everyday lives of the current generation. Bakan views corporations as evil entities that have manipulated and succeeded to such a degree that they dictate the majority of the decisions we make in our lives. The author argues that corporations are on a ‘pathological pursuit of profit and power.’ He views corporations as narcissistic, entitled, and selfish. Based on the definition that Bakan has provided, it is clear that corporations have no moral consciousness, because moral judgment and consciousness are what makes us human. Accordingly, while corporations are ‘persons’ under the law, in reality they are not living entities that can make decisions about the amount of profit they want, or ways in which they can gain more control; living entities dictate these decisions. The corporations are just instruments that ‘villains’ use to mask their evil greed, selfishness, and narcissism. Bakan’s argument that corporations are on a ‘pathological pursuit of profit and power’ is a somewhat legitimate argument. Some corporate...
... middle of paper ...
...of Adam Smith. The Worldly Philosopher: The Lives, Times, and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers (7 ed., pp. 54-55). New York, NY: Touchstone.
Heilbroner, R. L., & Milberg, W. S. (2002). Modern Capitalism Emerges in Europe . The making of economic society (13th ed., p. 119). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education .
MacGregor, Mary, E & Plourde, André. (1987). Regulating and deregulating Canadian natural gas. Toronto: Policy and Economic Analysis Program, Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto.
McNally, David. (2009). The Great Panic of 2008: Global Slump: The Economic and Politics of Crisis and Resistance. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing. Pp. 14-38.
Weinstein, Marc. "The Industrial Revolution & The Impact of Technology." Social, Political and Economic Themes in Western Civilization. TEL 1005, York University, Toronto. 2 Dec. 2014. Lecture.
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, (London: 1776), 190-91, 235-37.
Capitalism, is among one of the most important concepts and mainframe of this application paper. According to the 2009 film “Capitalism a Love Story,” capitalism is considered as taking and giving, but mostly taking. Capitalism can also be defined as a mode of production that produces profit for the owners (Dillon, 72). It is based on, and ultimately measured by the inequality and competition between the capitalist owners and the wage workers. A major facet of capitalism is constantly making and designing new things then selling afterwards (Dillon, 34).Capitalism has emerged as far back as the middle ages but had fully flowered around the time o...
Adam Smith often called the “founder of modern economics,” utilizes his observational assumptions to construct his own rationale for society, economics, and human nature. His observations are based on sentiments regarding issues that are far ranging. Within the Wealth of Nations Smith makes claims regarding human nature, such as “self-love” is inherent, the faculties of reason and speech, and the nature of humans to “truck and barter.” Smith examines the notion of a free market economy that is based upon reason rather than belief. This poignant observation on human nature has its bias and facts, with regards to Smith’s examination of society.
In the Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero introduces Adam smith as a Scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and a key figure in the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith also known as the Father of Political economy, is best known for one of his two classic works An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Fiero looks at Smith’s work because the division of labor is important. One thing Smith thinks is even more important for creating a wealthy nation, is to interact and have open trade with different countries. Fiero states,“It is necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter,
"Adam Smith." Adam Smith. Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008. Web. 4 Feb. 2011. .
Martello, Robert. "Industrial Revolution." . Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics. , 1 Jan. 2005. Web. 1 Apr. 2014. .
Richard sennet, 2006. The culture of of the new capitalism. Yale university press. Pg 10-14
Adam Smith is widely regarded as the father of modern economics and one of the greatest economists throughout the course of history. He is mainly famous for a two books that he wrote, these two books are considered thee base and infrastructure of the world of economics. The two books he wrote were, “The Theory of Moral Sentimental” and “The Wealth of Nations”. But although Adam Smith was such a great economic philosopher, he wasn’t a very good foreteller or future predictor. The economic scenario now is very different from the economic landscape of the 1700’s. Giant super-corporations can now govern the flow of the market, unlike Smith’s time’s. Even though elements of Smith’s ideas have changed over time, some of his beliefs remain important factors in economics to this day. One of those truly unique philosophies is the “Invisible Hand”.
Let’s get started with Adam Smith and his second coming. Adam smith was one of the greatest economics minds that have ever existed, teaching us that our wealth is not just in gold and silver but in the products that we produce and commerce we engage in! Much like today we can understand the idea of Gross National Product and how we can better adjust our habits and ourselves. Smith unlike most economists of that age understood the value in hard work and social aspect behind our decisions.
Adam Smith is considered as one of the most influential economists in the 18th century. Although his theories have been criticized by several socialist economists, however, his idea of capitalism still has great impact to the rest of the economists during classical, neo classical periods and the structure of today’s economy. Even the former Prime Minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher had praised on Smith’s contribution on today’s capitalism market. She commented “Adam Smith, in fact, heralded the end of the strait-jacket of feudalism and released all the innate energy of private initiative and enterprise which enable wealth to be created on a scale never before contemplated” (Copley and Sutherland 1995, 2). Smith is also being recognized as the father of classical political economy and he has two famous published works that laid out the reasons to support his ultimate idea of capitalism.
Industrial Revolution, which took place over much of the nineteenth century, had many advantages. It provided people with tools for a better life; people were no longer dependent on the land for all of their goods. The Industrial Revolution made it possible for people to control nature more than they ever had before. However, now people were dependent on the new machines of the Industrial Age (1). The Revolution brought with it radical changes in the textile and engine worlds; it was a time of reason and innovations. Although it was a time of progress, there were drawbacks to the headway made in the Industrial Revolution. Granted, it provided solutions to the problems of a world without industry. However, it also created problems with its mechanized inventions that provided new ways of killing. Ironically, there was much public faith in these innovations; however, these were the same inventions that killed so many and contributed to a massive loss of faith. These new inventions made their debut in the first world war (2) ).
Milberg, Wand Heilbroner, R.L (2009). The Making of Economic Society. 12th ed. US: Pearson International Edition . 54-62
Along with the advance and development of the society, capitalism is acquired by lots of countries among the world. But in the meantime, an increasing number of problems are brought to our attention, one of which is the pros and cons of capitalism. As to whether it is a blessing or a curse, people take different attitudes. Capitalism can be traced back to the Middle Ages in Europe, and this economic system has been contributing to the whole human race for centuries. However, people are attaching more importance to what capitalism is really doing to us, and they start wondering if another world is possible. My paper will focus on the question “Is capitalism good or evil”, and discuss different views about it.
To begin with, In the XVIII century, Western Europe was under feudalism stage. However ending of the transition to a capitalist economy was obviously close The main events of this era were in the social and economic sphere. Origin and formation of the bourgeois economic relations, competition domination at rapid growth of the industry. Industrial revolution in England, growth of economic and political value of the bourgeoisie, strengthening of anti-feudal movement, village submission by the city, almost full replacement of traditional ties between people the monetary relations.