Essay PreviewMore ↓
We Need the United Nations in Our War Against Terror
The United Nations has often been criticized, but events after the terrorist attack of September 11 show how essential it is to international peace and security. The United Nations Security Council, in particular, has proved its value in the present crisis.
To combat terrorism, and specifically Osama bin Laden's network and the governments of Iran, Iraq, North Korea and other countries, a broad and diverse coalition is necessary. President Bush quickly realized that the active cooperation of other countries, including Muslim countries, was essential to the intelligence and policy work needed to find terrorists and destroy their networks. The support of these countries was also important to avoid a severe political backlash against the use of military force in Afghanistan.
To secure such cooperation and support, country-by-country negotiations were necessary, but they were not sufficient. The campaign against terrorism needed to be rendered legitimate in the eyes of the world - particularly in countries whose governments and people are suspicious of the United States. Unilateral American action could have too easily been portrayed as lashing-out by the powerful "hegemon" at the expense of the poor and the weak.
To be legitimate, action had to be authorized collectively, in a public forum representing the whole world. No such forum exists except the Security Council of the United Nations. Its fifteen members currently include three Muslim countries - Bangladesh, Mali, and Tunisia. Hence unanimous resolutions by the Security Council belie the claim that efforts against terrorism are "anti-Muslim."
The Security Council has passed two unanimous resolutions on terrorism since September 11. Meeting in New York the very next day, it adopted Resolution 1368, which unequivocally condemned the terrorist attacks on the United States, and called on the international community to redouble its "efforts to prevent and suppress terrorist acts." Resolution 1368 also referred to the "inherent right of individual or collective self-defense," in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. In effect, it declared that military action by the United States against those responsible for the attacks would be lawful.
Last Friday, September 28, the Security Council passed a more specific and equally far-reaching resolution, Resolution 1373. In this resolution it acted under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which gives the Security Council authority to order states to carry out "the measures decided upon by the Security Council.
How to Cite this Page
"Free Terrorism Essays: We Need the United Nations." 123HelpMe.com. 24 Feb 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- We Need a Precise Definition of Terrorism In early 1974, the Secretary General of the United Nations, U Thant, invited the Palestinian Liberation Organization to attend the General Assembly gathering on November 13, 1974, and in doing so gave legitimacy to the Palestinian Liberation Organization as a governing body. In Yasser Arafat’s speech to the General Assembly, he thanked the United Nations for recognizing his organization and its legitimacy. When Arafat addressed the General Assembly, he made the argument that the actions taken by his government were not acts of terrorism, but these were acts of revolution and their purpose was to regain control of Palestine’s occupied original territ... [tags: Terrorism]
1559 words (4.5 pages)
- In the interview, Horowitz used couple of different types of theories to criticize the United Nations. He starts out the interview with a clip from his documentary and they portray the United Nations as an organization that is useless. The clip of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then president of Iran being selected to give a speech at the United Nations human rights conference, it is ironic since he isn’t someone you think of when you think of human rights. When the host asks how does someone like Ahmadinejad gets to lead the human rights conference, Horowitz go on to say the United Nations messed up because if they actual followed the ideals they claim to, then they wouldn’t have done that.... [tags: Human rights, United Nations]
1410 words (4 pages)
- On September 11, 2001, the United States (U.S.) experienced an act of overt terrorism unparalleled in its history. The extremist terrorist group, al Qaeda, attacked the U.S and briefly paralyzed a nation. This was a physical attack on the US, but in retrospect, a global attack on democracy. The U.S. and its coalition partners came to the realization that this act of terrorism was potentially a precursor to an asymmetric warfare campaign that had global impact. After carefully analyzing the magnitude of this event, the U.S.... [tags: Terrorism]
1705 words (4.9 pages)
- Terrorism: There is no set definition for terrorism, this is because each country have a different definition of terrorism, but it is commonly recognized as violence from groups with political, religious or ideological ideas. Terrorism tries to bring about change with violence and their targets are usually unsuspecting civilians. However, freedom fighters understand terrorism to be violence against the government and government policy to bring about political, and social change to better their way of life.... [tags: Terrorism, September 11 attacks, Al-Qaeda]
1312 words (3.7 pages)
- Intro: There is no set definition for terrorism, this is because each country has a different definition of terrorism, but it is commonly recognized as violence from groups with political, religious or ideological ideas. Terrorism tries to bring about change with violence and their targets are usually unsuspecting civilians. However, freedom fighters understand terrorism to be violence against the government and government policy to bring about political, and social change to better their way of life.... [tags: Terrorism, September 11 attacks, Al-Qaeda]
1878 words (5.4 pages)
- Following the attacks by the terrorist organization Al Qaeda on September 11, 2001 the United States entered into a war that can be best described as ubiquitous and ambiguous. The declaration of the “War on Terrorism” is quite literally as open ended of a declaration as one could possibly imagine given the interpretation of winning a war relies on the defeat of an enemy. Clausewitz describes war as “an act of force to compel our enemy to do our will” (Clausewitz, 75) and perhaps the most commonly quoted portion of his theories of warfare being “war is merely the continuation of policy by other means” (Clausewitz, 87).... [tags: Al-Qaeda, United States, War on Terrorism]
726 words (2.1 pages)
- ISIS Terrorism is one of the biggest threats our world faces today. For many years, innocent people have been killed by terrorist organizations. One terrorist group, ISIS, is now one of the most well-known extremist groups in the world. Because of religion and individual people’s opinions on rights and beliefs, the threats of these fanatics will only get worse unless people change the way they live and try to make peace with each other. Afghanistan is a hotbed for radical Islam. Many people in Afghanistan are born and trained to become terrorists.... [tags: Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, United States, Barack Obama]
1536 words (4.4 pages)
- Counter-terrorism strategy has been a key issue since September 11, 2001. Daniel Byman posits, “Most elements of counter-terrorism strategy address one of two different goals: disrupting the group itself, and its operations; or changing the overall environment to defuse the group’s anger or make it harder to raise money or attract recruits” (pg. 121). However, there are some fundamental flaws concerning these simplistic, straightforward approaches. Byman analyzes seven strategic options to combat terrorism; “Unilateral, multilateral action, containment, defense, diversion, delegitimation, and transforming terrorist breeding ground” (pg.... [tags: terrorism, United States]
1305 words (3.7 pages)
- Terrorism and Morality In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks of 2001 and the U.S. military action in Afghanistan, moral questions have arisen. This essay will consider such questions. Many Church leaders and leading thinkers in the United States have strongly defended the U.S. use of military force in the wake of Sept. 11. Yet outside the States the talk is less about just-war and more about economic and social inequalities. The first and overriding inequality Americans face at the moment is this one: The real murderers, the architects of these murders, are alive and determined to kill again, while the murder victims have been robbed of their lives, their futures, their hopes, drea... [tags: September 11 Terrorism Essays]
1048 words (3 pages)
- On the morning of September 11, 2001 people around the world turned on their televisions and became witnesses the most devastating terrorist act ever carried out on U.S. soil. Much time has passed since then and the United States has changed in the succeeding years. Billions more than before, are now going into defense funds. American citizens have lost many conveniences as well as bits and pieces of privacy. Many American's have even added many words to their vocabulary. Words like Al-Queda and Anthrax are thrown around in everyday conversation.... [tags: September 11 Terrorism ]
1043 words (3 pages)
- Placing Me Before We in Ayn Rand's Anthem
- Billy Budd Essay: Comparing Christ to Billy
- Free Billy Budd Essays: A Deconstructive Reading
- Romanticism's Sublime Style in Rip Van Winkle, Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Billy Budd
- Free Billy Budd Essays: Justice in Billy Budd
- A New Historical Reading of Billy Budd
Resolution 1373 uses strong language. It calls upon all states to "deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support or commit terrorist acts, or provide safe havens." It also calls upon all states to cooperate "to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and take action against perpetrators of such attacks."
In other words, a unanimous Security Council, including three Muslim states, has not only recognized the right of the United States and its allies to self-defense, but has ordered all other states to cooperate in rooting out terrorism. Resolution 1373 constitutes extraordinary evidence of a global resolve to defeat terrorism. After its passage, no one can seriously declare that the fight against terrorism is merely an American struggle.
Resolutions 1368 and 1373 build on two years of United Nations resolutions against terrorism. In 1999 the Security Council called upon all states to fight terrorism and demanded that the Taliban turn over Bin Laden to authorities in a country where he had been indicted. In December 2000 it specifically condemned the Taliban's sheltering and training of terrorists, and demanded, under the mandatory provisions of Chapter VII, that it "cease the provision of sanctuary and training for international terrorists." These resolutions, defied by the Taliban, established a record that justified focusing responses to the September 11 attack on that regime and on Osama bin Laden.
If the United Nations did not exist, obtaining such a collective endorsement of the struggle against terrorism would be impossible. Osama bin Laden and his supporters could more easily claim that attacks against them are "crusades" by the hegemonic United States and its clients.
We should draw a long-term lesson from these events. Global international organizations are potentially valuable resources in crises. It is fair of us to criticize their shortcomings, but myopic to withhold our financial and political support from these institutions because we are irritated at criticism of United States policy. On the contrary, during peaceful and prosperous periods we should seek to expand the capacity of international organizations such as the United Nations, so that in difficult times we can call upon them for support, such as the Security Council has shown during the past three weeks.
If the United Nations Security Council did not exist, it would have to be invented. But it could not be invented at a moment's notice. Without its continuing presence, our struggle against terrorism would be more difficult, and less likely to succeed.