Essay PreviewMore ↓
Reading Lord of the Flies, one gets quite an impression of Golding’s view
on human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong, true or not, is a
point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of
humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. This
opinion, in fact, is a point that many have disagreed with when reading
his work. There are many instances throughout Lord of the Flies that
state Golding’s opinion suggesting an evil human nature. Each of these
instances are the bricks holding together his fortress of ideas that are
constantly under attack.
Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding’s to construct the
idea of human nature in the minds of his readers. Throughout the novel,
it is stated that all humans are evil. It is said that this evil is
inescapable and will turn everyone evil. At one point in the book, when
the Lord of the Flies is representing all evil, this theory is stated as,
“The Lord of the Flies was expanding like a balloon” (Golding 130). Along
with this idea is the religious symbolism that is used for ineffectively
confronting the evil. At a point in the book, Golding has Simon, symbolic
of Jesus Christ (a Christian deity), confront the Lord of the Flies. This
is a pig’s head on a stick that is imagined to talk and represent the evil
in all humans. Simon tries to act and spread the knowledge of this evil
to others but is killed. This is a direct reference to the death of
Christ, alluding to the Holy Bible.
At many points throughout Lord of the Flies, Golding writes for the
characters to become gradually more and more evil. This attribute even
reaches the symbols of goodness and order, such as Ralph. Once, when
Ralph and Piggy go to the feast on Jack’s beach, they begin to meld with
the others and their evil ways. “Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the
sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly
secure society” (Golding 138). This really only proves their common
longing for a place with others, not any depth of evilness. Golding also
has all of the characters eventually participate in the hunts, his
representation of an evil ritual that humans perform. By having all of
the characters practice this, he illustrates his belief of everyone being
susceptible to turning evil. This fact is not necessarily true. Humans
develop their own dedications to their own beliefs, morals, and ethics.
How to Cite this Page
"True Human Nature (criticism Of Lord Of The Flies)." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Jul 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The trials and tribulations all humans face becomes prominent as each individual succumbs to evil in attempts of recreating his or her lost civilization. Out of each dark moment the individual faces, flourishes a new state of human consciousness that is consistent in revealing one’s true nature. In the Lord of the Flies, the transition the three young boys make into adulthood is evident as their significance and their newfound identity becomes more pronounced. Simon’s particular incident involves his encounter with the ‘Lord of the Flies’, where he comes to terms with the innate evil that resides within all humanity, causing him to be an ambassador for self-realization.... [tags: Lord of the Flies, Self-Realization, ]
959 words (2.7 pages)
- Simon as Christ in Lord of the Flies The role of the prophet changes with the society in which he lives. In modern society, a prophet is a visionary, telling people what they can become; in Biblical times, a prophet was the voice of God, telling his people what they had to become to fulfill their covenant with God. In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, the prophet is a peaceful lad, Simon. He alone saw that the jungle, which represented freedom and the lack of civilization, was not to be feared but to be understood; he alone knew that the mythical Beast of the island, feared by all the boys, was, in fact, their own inherent savagery.... [tags: Lord Flies Essays]
873 words (2.5 pages)
- In the novel, "Lord of the Flies," a group of British boys are left on a deserted island in the middle of nowhere. Throughout the novel, they have conflicts between civilization and savagery, good vs. evil, order vs. chaos, and reason vs. impulse. What would it be like if the boys were replaced by a group of girls. Would they behave the same way they did in the novel. I believe that the girls would act in the same behavior as the boys in all ways because, everyone is installed with evil inside them which is their natural instinct, also because in life there is always a power struggle in all manners, and the outcome with the girls would be similar-since both sexes would plan on getting resc... [tags: Lord of the Flies]
4475 words (12.8 pages)
- In Lord of the Flies and “I Only Came to Use the Phone”, the setting and actions of the characters work together. Both are used to show the many cases of irony in the stories. The irony in both stories reveals the true and basic nature in all humans. First, the authors show readers irony through the customs that the isolated characters bring with them from their previous homes. Ideally, the setting that Maria and all the boys come from represents civilization and order. It is seen that in the beginning, the character’s actions still reflect their old home.... [tags: lord of the flies, william golding ]
875 words (2.5 pages)
- In William Golding's Lord of The Flies, the boys try to maintain civility, but nature pulls them into savagery. Nature always seems to pull man in, even when man tries to fight it; the boys give in by hunting, fighting, and doing whatever they please. All of this is because there is no authority in nature. The boys try to maintain civilization on the island, but nature is gradually luring them in and revealing their true human instincts. The Lord of the Flies is based around these boys and their want to get off the island.... [tags: Civility, Nature, Savagery, Literary Analysis]
892 words (2.5 pages)
- Inherent Evil in Lord of the Flies Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers. To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.... [tags: Lord Flies Essays]
838 words (2.4 pages)
- The End of Innocence in Lord of the Flies William Golding wrote the novel Lord of the Flies "to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature."(Golding) He wanted to show that humans naturally live in savagery and ignorance with little knowledge on how to live together peacefully. To accomplish his premise Golding strands a group of boys on an island who then must set up government in an attempt to survive. The story uses heavy symbolism to compare the life on the island to the entire civilization of the world.... [tags: Lord Flies Essays]
950 words (2.7 pages)
- In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, a young group of boys crash on an uncharted island. In the beginning the boys are excited to be alone, unsupervised by adults. But as the novel progresses, the boys begin to show their true nature. Through the boys, Golding attempts to expose the true nature of humankind, the good, the evil, and the in between. Simon represents the rare, truly good people in the world, the ones that do not do what they do to look good in another’s eyes, or because that is what is expected of them.... [tags: William Golding, Lord of the Flies, evil, ]
704 words (2 pages)
- Simon as Silent Prophet of Lord Of The Flies The role of the prophet changes with the society in which he lives. In Modern America, a prophet is a visionary, telling his people what they can become; in Biblical times, a prophet was the voice of God, telling his people what they had to become to fulfill their covenant with God. In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, though, the prophet told his people nothing; he realized what they had already become, and he dared not tell them because he knew they would turn against him.... [tags: Lord Flies Essays]
1130 words (3.2 pages)
- A Malevolent Society in Lord of the Flies by William Golding Humans, by nature, are genuinely good people who show compassion and concern for others, right. Well true, if we all lived in a utopian land. Unfortunately, humans are, in fact, evil and easily corrupted by others. In William Golding’s 1954 published Lord of the Flies, the boy’s on the island learn that a peaceful civilization is easily destroyed without cooperation or agreement. The frustration manifested itself, making a transformation of the boys into meat hungry, hunters, who even try to hunt the other boys who don’t follow the pack.... [tags: Lord Flies William Golding]
1402 words (4 pages)
Each person has the decision of acting how they wish. Many acts are
considered “bad” by the ruling body of government and are punishable.
Other acts are considered “good” and are rewarded. However, it must be
seen that each individual decides for himself what is “good” or “bad” for
him to do. Thus, most people act on what they consider good. This can
seem unusual, for a serial killer may consider brutal murder a good act
and helping a friend as an extremely evil action. One must see, that some
people also act on what they consider bad. This may be as a rebellion of
all that was forced on them by society. It might also be due to
overwhelming circumstances as well. But, it is still apparent that each
person has the choice of acting upon their own goodness or evil.
Golding also makes it clear that the island that is the focus of the
novel is merely a microcosm of the entire world. He develops his world as
one having a destructive nuclear war. This is meant to demonstrate that
everyone, no matter who or where, will turn evil. He paints the image of
nuclear war as pure and vile evil. This is not entirely, or at all, true.
A nuclear war could simply be a power struggle that has mass power behind
it. It might also be the elimination of those who oppose what is
considered “good.” Anyway, the way Golding demonstrates and terms many
things in Lord of the Flies creates a large and almost impenetrable
illusion to support his claim of the evil human nature. No one thing can
be all evil or entirely anti-good. Many things can be usually bad or
mostly considered bad, but there is some good to be found in everyone.
One should not be mistaken, though, that anything could be all good
either. All people, actions, and things have the potential to be neutral.
This can easily be sustained. It can also be tipped to favor good or
bad, but nothing is purely one or the other.
As shown above, Golding has a misguided view of all humans being bad.
This cannot be, for nothing can be entirely good or bad. When considering
this, one must also remember that each individual had his own
consciousness, thus has the ability to choose. This also applies to good
and bad actions. If one does mostly good actions, they might be
considered good. If one does mostly bad actions, they might be considered
bad. This should be kept in mind when thinking about human nature, rather
than some twisted concept of everyone being uncontrollably bad.
Golding, William. Lord of the Flies. New York: Putnam Publishing, 1954.