The Others

The Others

Length: 1396 words (4 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
The Other
     Gananath Obeyesekere argues that “one cannot escape the politics, ethics, and quandaries of representation even as we try to describe the Other.” This argument has lead to a great debate between him and another anthropologist, Marshal Sahlins. Obeyesekere believes that even though we try to give an objective portrayal of another, we cannot help judging them by our own standards. Sahlins on the other hand, says that it is possible to describe other people in an objective way, as long as you have evidence. These anthropologist’s arguments were focused around the apotheosis of Captain Cook. The major debate between the two resides in the idea of representation, and an outsider’s ability to understand another culture. This debate on the concept of representation can be applied to the movie, My Son the Fanatic, in which two cultures are represented- Western and Muslim.
     In the movie My Son the Fanatic, we see two cultures being represented. The first is that of a Western Capitalist, racist- acted out by the character, Schitz, who was a German businessman. The other culture was that of violent, Muslim fundamentalists- acted out by Farid, the son of Parvez. This movie was written by Hanif Kureishi who was the son of a Pakistani father and an English mother. Because Hanif was a Pakistani, it is expected that he would be able to objectively portray the Muslims in the movie. I think that he did a good job at doing so. He showed that some of the Muslims were violent fundamentalists such as Farid, and he also showed examples of Muslims that were not so extreme such as Parvez. Farid led violent riots to destroy the prostitutes, burned down their house and attacked Bettina, a prostitute that was also Parvez’ friend. If this was the only type of Muslim portrayed throughout the movie, it would have been a stereotypical film; however, Hanif also showed that there were Muslims such as Parvez that were not violent fundamentalists- Parvez even befriended a prostitute.
     Unlike his un-bias representation of Muslims, Hanif lacked objectivity in the representation of the Western culture within the film. This culture had only one character that was portrayed as being evil; it seemed very stereotypical on this behalf. The character of Schitz was portrayed as a Western Capitalistic, racist. Schitz was personified as being very selfish, only thinking about his on pleasures and money. The idea of Westerners being all about money is a major stereotype.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"The Others." 27 Jan 2020

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Analysis Of The Movie ' The Lives Of Others ' Essay

- Within the German Democratic Republic, there was a secret police force known as the Stasi, which was responsible for state surveillance, attempting to permeate every facet of life. Agents within and informants tied to the Stasi were both feared and hated, as there was no true semblance of privacy for most citizens. Directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, the movie The Lives of Others follows one particular Stasi agent as he carries out his mission to spy on a well-known writer and his lover....   [tags: The Lives of Others]

Research Papers
1151 words (3.3 pages)

The Lives Of Others By Florian Henckel Von Donnersmarck Essay

- I have always been one to spend my time watching things that others wouldn 't think to watch. I have seen things like “The Wind Rises” by Hayao Miyazaki, “Queen” by Vikas Bahl and my favorite “Mary Kom” by Omung Kumar. From documentaries to animes, to silent films. I have dabbled in a little of everything so far. I am known to watch a few of these to pass my summer as well. So, when it came time to watch the foreign film “The Lives of Others” directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, I was fully aware of what to expect....   [tags: The Lives of Others]

Research Papers
1088 words (3.1 pages)

The Movie ' The Lives Of Others ' By Florian Henckel Von Donnersmarck Essay

- Following the Berlin Wall’s construction in the 1960’s, citizens within the East German state were under heavy surveillance from the Ministry for State Security, or the Stasi, in an attempt to “know everything about everyone.” Directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, the movie The Lives of Others follows one particular Stasi agent as he carries out his mission to gather information on a well-known writer and his lover. As the film progresses, the audience is able to detect the moral transformation of Stasi Captain Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler primarily through the director 's manipulation of the script, colors and lighting, and music....   [tags: The Lives of Others]

Research Papers
1127 words (3.2 pages)

The Lives of Others Essay

- ‘Das Leben der Anderen’ (The Lives of Others) is a striking example of how a director can convey narrative links within a film by employing various styles and film techniques. The Lives of Others relies upon these visual means to assist with the telling of the story as much as it relies upon the script. In this selected sequence of the film, several narrative links are drawn here to form the conclusion of ‘Operation Lazlo’. These narrative links are further cemented by Donnersmarck’s use of various lighting styles, diegtic and non-diegtic sound, revealing camera shots and intricate mise-en-scene....   [tags: Film Analysis, Techniques, Style]

Research Papers
1482 words (4.2 pages)

Essay on The Lives of Others

- 1984, East Berlin. 100,000 East German Secret Police. 200,000 informers. In a society where more than one-third of the population is victimized by surveillance, people are forced to choose: to betray or to silence. A secret police Gerd Wiesler (Ulrich Mühe) and a successful playwright Georg Dreyman (Sebastian Koch) in The Lives of Others are no exception. At first, they appear to be securing a firm stand. Upon Jerska (Volkmar Kleinert)’s death, however, they start questioning their stances. The movie unfolds as the two main characters become alike....   [tags: film movie]

Research Papers
1591 words (4.5 pages)

Essay on The Others

- The Others This film begins with a totally black background with white subtitles. On this background is the name of the company presenting the film. As soon as they subtitle's leave the screen a woman's voice can be heard. It is a soft voice. The woman is talking to some children. She starts telling them the story of evolution and how God made the world. The woman or the children are not scene though all that can be seen on the screen are Black and White Pen and Ink Drawings. These are lit up by candle light....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
640 words (1.8 pages)

Essay on Personal Consideration for Others

-    We all live in the one society. Nobody can exist alone, and everything we do will directly or indirectly affect each other. From this point of view, transposition thinking and personal consideration for others contribute to the harmonious coexistence between people.    Personal consideration for the sake of others helps you develop good character. Because transposition thinking for others, sometimes asks for your sacrifice of own interests, time, energy or other aspects. Especially in today's society that various social problems emerge in an endless stream, most of the people around tend to care for only their own interests....   [tags: Interpersonal, Interaction, Respect]

Research Papers
952 words (2.7 pages)

Essay about Perception of Others

- Perception of Others There is no second chance for a first impression. Perception has never been random, since the beginning of time it has been human nature to judge others before really getting a chance to know them. People immediately cast others into stereotypes in every situation: they form a schema, or an organized set of thoughts about something containing properties and uses. These schemas effect the way people carry themselves around others. Schemas are usually formed with in eight seconds of getting the initial impression of a person....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
834 words (2.4 pages)

Living With Others Essay

- Describe a time when you lived with others (outside of your family). Describe your role in that living situation. What do you know about yourself and how you relate to others in groups. Honestly, living here in the dorms at Santa Clara is my first time actually living with people outside of my family. I was a little hesitant at first too, because it meant that I had to step outside the comfort of my family who accept me regardless and enter into a whole new world I was completely unfamiliar with....   [tags: essays research papers]

Free Essays
606 words (1.7 pages)

Respecting Others Essay

- Respecting Others The many problems we face today as a society seem to become more and more overwhelming. I believe that respect for one other is a big social issue we face today in our generation of tomorrow. We see this problem in teens, in so many places. For example, in school there is a lack of respect for students from other fellow students. At home there is a lack of respect from the children of this generation to their parents. There is also a lack of respect from young adults to most authoritative figures....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
677 words (1.9 pages)

Hanif neglected to show that there are other sides- not all Westerners are racist bastards, just as not all Muslims are violent fundamentalists. It seems as if Hanif did not care to portray the different sides of Western culture- he focused only on the negative aspects.
     Obeyesekere would have mixed feelings about the film. He would interpret the representation of the Western culture in a negative way. He believes that describing a culture as irrational, as the Western culture was portrayed in the film, would perpetuate a stereotype. When it comes to the representation of the Muslims, I think that Obeyesekere would view it in a positive way because Hanif, himself, was a Pakistani. Obeyesekere seems to believe that he had a better understanding of the way the Hawaiians thought because he was a Sri Lankan. He appears to believe that only someone of a particular culture can objectively portray that culture.
     Sahlins’ interpretation of the representations would differ from Obeyesekere. Unlike Obeyesekere, Sahlins would not find the movie to be stereotypical, but rather closer to reality. Although Obeyesekere would view the portrayal of the Westerners being irrational as negative, Sahlins would take a different approach. Being a relativist, Sahlins believes that the representation of another as being irrational does not make them bad, but rather it makes them different. Sahlins would view the Western culture just as having a different way of thinking; Obeyesekere on the other hand, being a universal thinker, would try to find similarities between the cultures and then judge them both on the same scale.
     Obeyesekere’s interpretation of the film, as well as his interpretation of the apotheosis can be better explained by considering Said’s theory that the Middle Eastern scholar accentuates the other. Said would say that Hanif chose to portray the Westerners in that fashion because of the way he has been treated by them. When you bring Obeyesekere into the argument, he would say that this bias view exists because an outsider cannot objectively represent another culture because their will always be other motives involved. Obeyesekere following Said says that Sahlins is inadvertently misrepresenting the natives of Hawaii. He says that Sahlins thinks of the natives as only being a part of the other, and not capable of modern thinking. This view shows how much of a universal thinker Obeyesekere really is. He believes that it is possible to downplay culture and find causes for behavior that are universal to all people. He uses his Sri Lankan background to justify his claim that the Hawaiian natives did not think of Cook as a God; he says this never happened in the history of his people, thus it probably did not happen in Hawaii. Sahlins takes this argument and puts a twist to it. Sahlins says that Obeyesekere is speaking on the behalf of the Hawaiians- this is negative because he is silencing the Hawaiians. Being a relativist, Sahlins feels that this should not be done- you cannot compare two different cultures to one another because each has its own uniqueness. Sahlins said, “Different culture, different rationalities”- this can be applied to the Cook story as well as the film. When applying it to Cook, Sahlins is implying that the Sri Lankan culture may have different views then the Hawaiians, thus making it possible for their actions to be different. When you try to put all cultures under one roof, a conflict may arise. This can be seen within the context of the film. Similar to Huntington’s argument, Sahlins would say that the father and the son had so many problems because they were both trying to impose their beliefs on the other- they are too different to accept and understand the ways of each other. They see things differently because of their beliefs.
     I believe that Sahlins has a stronger argument on the apotheosis of Cook. Obeyesekere is correct in his assumption that “one cannot escape the politics, ethics and quandaries of representation, even as we try to describe the Other.” Even if we try really hard just to focus on what the person is trying to say, we will still incorporate our views which will cause us to focus on certain aspects and overlook others. However, I feel that we can control the extent to which our values get intertwined in the framing of the Other. I agree strongly with Sahlins when he says that Obeyesekere cannot give a more accurate depiction of the event just because he was Sri Lankan. You can not use the same scale to measure two different cultures. I feel that every culture, and every person is unique- one group should not be compared to another, they should be judged separately. Just because one group of people react in particular does not mean the next group will do the same. Sahlins seems to deal with the political and ethical quandaries better because he does not assume that he knows everything about the Hawaiians. He finds evidence before he makes a claim. Obeyesekere, however, does not do this. He commits unethical acts such as speaking for the Hawaiians- he feels that coming from a non-Western background gives him a better understanding of what happened in Hawaii, but it does not. Obeyesekere was s Sri Lankan, not a Hawaiian; therefore he should not take on the responsibility of speaking for them. He says that the Westerners make up these myths about the natives, but Obeyesekere himself, puts words into their mouths- he silences them and their culture. Obeyesekere was not in Hawaii at the time of Cook arrival and death, thus his ideas about the events that took place are just as outlandish as Sahlins. The only difference is that Sahlins backs up his statements with evidence, whereas Obeyesekere backs up his statements by repeatedly bringing up the fact he is not a Westerner, and thus must have a better understanding of the Hawaiians.
Return to