Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how spontaneous generation was disproved
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how spontaneous generation was disproved
From the beginning of time it was believed that living things could come from nonliving things. This process was known as spontaneous generation. However, in the middle of the 17th century and then through the next 100 years, this idea was disproved by three important experiments. We now know that a nonliving object or group of objects can not turn into a living organism. Spontaneous generation is impossible in the atmosphere that we have today.
In the early 1600’s, people believed that living organisms could evolve from nonliving organisms. They proved this by saying that if a piece of meat was left out uncovered, that maggots would appear in a few days. These worms did not come from anything that they could see, so they assumed they came from the nonliving meat. In 1668, a man named Redi designed and completed an experiment that showed how this was not true. He took two pieces of raw meat, and left them out. He covered one so that nothing could get in, and left the other one open. The open one grew maggots, and the covered one did not, proving that the dead meat did not produce the worms as they had previously thought.
In the 1700’s a man named Spallanzani proved Redi’s idea to a further extent. He noticed microbial growth on boiled pond water after being exposed to the air. To prove that this growth came from something living in the air, and not from the nonliving water, he designed an experiment. He boiled pond water to kill all the microbial growths. He then poured that water into two separate test tubes. He sealed one so that no air could get in, and left one open to the air. The one that was left open slowly became more and more cloudy with microbial growths. The sealed tube stayed as clear as it had been when it was boiled. This experiment proved that the growths could not come from nonliving organisms, but had to have been transported there through the air. When Spallanzani presented his results to the public, he was criticized. Other scientists said that he made the air unfit for living growth, and that they needed the air to change from nonliving to living.
Pasteur did the third experiment, in 1862. He took Spallanzani’s experiment, and the critic’s statements, and combined the two. He boiled pond water to kill all the living organisms.
There are various interpretations of what causes the narrator to go crazy in the short story “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. These interpretations include suggestions that the narrator is possessed, that she is oppressed by society and is acting out, that she has suffered from a traumatic childbirth, and so on. While all of these ideas hold merit and are supported by evidence in the short story, there is an alternative explanation that fits the story just as well, if not better. That explanation is that the reason the narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper” acts strangely and sees images in the wallpaper of her room is that she is suffering from the disorder of postpartum psychosis. During this essay I will be going into depth on a psychological analysis of “The Yellow Wallpaper”.
Alcohol is a is a beverage that is known as a drug and it depresses the CNS. Lowering the drinking age will cause this effect to take over young adults, and this is a huge factor why the drinking age is now 21. After a couple a drinks many people will start to slur their speech, their motor ability slows down, and alcohol also causes blurry vision. We can sum up the reasons why the drinking age was raised to 21 because many people don’t really think when they are drunk on alcohol. Young adults find it fun to have sexual intercourse when they drunk which leads to pregnancy because they don’t think about condoms when they are drunk because they don’t think before they act. Alcohol also impairs vision which of many young adults end up in fatal car accident because of heavily drinking, and
Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make a lot of sense in the world. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make more sense. It would be better for the teens that drink on college campus. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because you can vote at eighteen, buy tobacco, it’ll reduce the thrill of breaking the law, evidence supports that early introduction of drinking is the safest way to reduce juvenile alcohol abuse, and college people that are not 21 drink also.
The writer states she is able to see people out on the lawn, even though she has been told there is no one there. She is also paranoid that John and Jennie will find her papers and states she is sure she found them snooping in her things. At one point, she writes she can smell the wallpaper, this screams psychosis. She is convinced that the wallpaper is shaking and that there is a lady who loves behind the paper and when this woman creeps around it causes the shaking. She describes her inability to sleep at night so that her caregivers are glad when she is able to get rest. They even go so far as to make her rest for an hour after her
The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, is a first person account/narrative of a mentally ill woman who suffers from depression which then later progresses to hallucination disorder. Gilman wants her audience to see, through the narrator's first hand experiences, that in the 19th century mental illness was not taken seriously by physicians and family members, causing the patient’s condition to deteriorate.
Some Critiques explain that the middle aged woman in the story is truly crazy, She was diagnosed as being mad crazy and is being treated as a patient in her own home by John, her husband. The woman’s husband is a doctor and proclaims that this is true and that she is actually sick and needs help. Throughout the entire story she is being ceased from doing things that the average person would do on a daily basis, which is suppose to help her. The woman is being stopped from writing, reading and sometimes even thinking. Her husband doesn’t want her working or doing any other physical activities either. All of these treatments are eventually suppose to help her and she will soon become a normal person again. Throughout the narration the woman does not follow what is being prescribed to her by her husband. She still reads and writes letters, therefore her condition worsens. Towards the end of the story she becomes mad crazy about the wallpaper that is in the room that she is trapped in. She starts to see herself in the paper. When she looks at the paper she sees another woman in the artwork of the wallpaper....
Whether or not she actually has this mental illness at the beginning is debatable. However, certain indications can be made that she is succumbing to hysteria throughout the story. Most apparent is the development of her excessive fascination with the yellow wallpaper in her bedroom. She uses a relatively normal choice of words to describe its repulsiveness: “The colour is a repellant, almost revolting; a smouldering unclean yellow, strangely faded by the slow-turning sunlight,” (Gilman, 649). This preoccupation with the wallpaper became the primary focus of her writings and her thoughts during the story. The words the narrator uses to explain the wallpaper become much more obsessive, with the tiniest details, whether or not they are actually there, noticed by the narrator: “Sometimes I think there are a great many women behind [the pattern], and sometimes only one, and she crawls around fast…” (Gilman, 654). This narration forces the reader to identify with this obsession with the wallpaper. It is very quickly what the story becomes to be about, even though it was originally only meant to be her journal during the Rest
According to Center for Disease Control and Protection, about 4,700 people under age twenty one die from injuries involving underage drinking every year. Illegal alcohol consumption has been a major problem with high school students around the nation. Lowering the drinking age from twenty one would result in major consequences for America’s adolescents. By lowering the drinking age, alcohol would be more accessible to those who choose to participate in underage drinking. The desire to drink for teens and young adults between the ages of fourteen and twenty can be caused by peer pressure or an act of rebellion. One beer might not seem like a big deal at the time, but it could lead to a life of addiction and alcoholism.
happen? If not, then why should science teachers teach that life evolved over billions of
... age in the U.S. The drinking age is 21, but several reasons show that it should be brought down to 18. Drinking goes on with people under the age of 21, however, by lowering the age there will be less alcohol related problem. Being able to drink is a sign of maturity and growing up, and most people are becoming more independent, and make their own choices as 18 year olds. When they make their own choices they will take full responsibility for their actions. If someone is mature enough to smoke, they should be allowed to drink. The U.S. government should lower the drinking age to 18 based on the positive effects it will have in the communities, states, and nation. Lowering the drinking age in the United States is one of the topics that has been debated for years. However, it should be lowered, and in doing so this will make the U.S. a better and safer place to live.
Some laws even make it easier for teens to drink, like in some states if a parent purchases the alcohol it is fine for the teen to drink. That law is abused though since one parent will buy beer for a complete party and not just for their teen. There have been some cases where the cops have cracked down on this problem but not enough. Teens are not seeing underage drinking as something wrong whether it be because they think it will help them fit in or to cover up feelings of sadness or hatred. When a teen sees the "cool" kids drink they want to join in so that they ...
Related to thought disorder is obsession, which the protagonist displays in her relentless thoughts about the yellow wallpaper which covers her bedroom walls. The narrator begins her obsession with the yellow wallpaper from the very beginning of the story. "I never saw a worse paper in my life," she says. "It is dull enough to confuse the eye in following, pronounced enough to constantly irri...
In 1892 Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote a short story called the The Yellow Wallpaper. The story is told from a first person viewpoint, as the speaker writes within her journal. One of the themes in the story is a husband trying to deal with his wife’s mental illness. The speaker is a woman that is suffering from post-partum depression after recently having a child. During a summer vacation her husband, John, makes her stay in an upstairs room because of her mental state. John believes that keeping her in this room relieves stress within her mind. The speaker begins to develop psychosis because she has no mental stimulation other than her journal. She begins to obsess over the yellow wallpaper on the wall, the only visually stimulating thing within the room. She begins to think that another woman is watching her
“The greatest mystery of existence is existence itself” (Chopra). Chopra, a world-renowned author, perceives the existence of life as a truly mystifying cerebration. The pending question that many scientist, and even theists, attempt to answer is how life ultimately began. Currently, the mystery is left with two propositions, evolution and creation. While both approaches attempt to answer the origins of life, evolution and creation are two contrasting concepts. Evolution views life to be a process by which organisms diversified from earlier forms whereas creation illustrates that life was created by a supernatural being. Creation and evolution both agree on the existence of microevolution and the resemblance of apes and humans but vary in terms of interpreting the origins of the life through a historical standpoint. A concept known as Faith Vs Fact comprehensively summarizes the tone of this debate, which leads the question of how life began.
Francis Crick, co-discoverer of DNA, has said that “the origin of life appears to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have to be satisfied to get it going” (Horgan 27).2 Noted evolutionary astronomer Frederick Hoyle has described the chances of life having evolved from nonlife to be about as likely as the chances that “a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein” (Johnson 106). Why do respected scientists doubt what textbooks teach as fact? It would appear that these scientists know something that current theories describing the origin of life fail to explain. While current theories describe scenarios in which genetic material such as RNA becomes entrapped in a protective cell membrane as a likely recipe for the formation of life, they generally do not focus on the difficulties of forming and concentrating all of these components in the first place.3 To clarify, current theories suffer from what I call the “cookbook mentality.