Essay PreviewMore ↓
It is clear Hamlet can be interpreted from a multitude of perspectives on numerous levels. I cannot quite grasp Mr. Bloom's contention that this is a work of near biblical importance nor can I accept his allusions to Jesus or the Buddha. "Hamlet remains apart; something transcendent about him places him more aptly with the biblical King David, or with even more exalted scriptural figures."(Bloom, 384). My immediate response is that when Mr. Bloom shuffles off this mortal coil, I don't believe Billy Shakespeare will be waiting with a pint of ale.
Professor Schechner's enjoyable production increased my appreciation of the value of wardrobe and inflection of voice. Prior to this performance I did not see Polonius as a buffoon (as portrayed by Mr. Shapli), nor the incestuous nature of Ophelia's familial relationships (Ms. Cole's ability to transform from coquette to lunatic was shocking). Doubtless there are near as many interpretations of Hamlet as there are Shakespearean aficionados.
My own expertise lies in the political arena. I believe Hamlet could be construed as a treatise on aggressive, imperialist behavior.
Throughout the Dramaturgic Analysis of Hamlet Prince of Denmark the indecisiveness of Hamlet is noted. He does not immediately seek vengeance but continually schemes, rants and raves (both in his rational and insane moments). Whether cowardice, caution, or simply indifference dominate his persona is unclear - what is clear is his distaste for his own behavior: "How stand I then, That have a father kill'd, a mother stain'd,...And let all sleep, while to my shame I see The imminent death of twenty thousand men... (sic)." (Shakespeare, 116).
The impending doom of the twenty thousand men alludes to a campaign waged by Fortinbas, the Prince of Norway. Though the battleground is said to be of little value, Fortinbas is warring on principles of honor and the subsequent expansion of Norway.
An enraged Hamlet mistakenly slays Polonius. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are sent to their inconsequential deaths only when he is inspired by pirates to save his own life. These murders involved no elaborate schemes but were simply enacted. Yet with all his planning, his opportunities, his justification, why can he not kill Claudius?
The portrayal of the pirates as "merciful thieves" (Shakespeare, 124) and the fact that warlike Fortinbras succeeds in Poland and obtains the Kingdom of Denmark by play's end - may be a commentary on decisive, imperialistic behavior.
How to Cite this Page
"Free Hamlet Essays: Hamlet Interpreted." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Jun 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Women in Hamlet William Shakespeare’s Hamlet takes place in Elsinore, a city in Denmark, during the middle ages, a time populated and controlled by men. In the beginning of the play, two women, Gertrude and Ophelia, appear to be weak, insignificant characters in the play but as time passes their roles and involvement with the main plots is amplified. In the beginning of the play Gertrude has a lot to gain from the actions of others, Ophelia mirrors Hamlet in his decline into insanity due to their struggle with internal conflicts.... [tags: Characters in Hamlet, Hamlet, Gertrude]
1022 words (2.9 pages)
- Presentation of main themes can alter the audience’s perspective on characters. In William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet and Franco Zeffirelli’s movie version of Hamlet there are apparent differences between the presentation of the theme death. A key difference between the play and the movie is how each medium showcased the character’s deaths. In turn, this changes the audience 's point of view of the characters and their traits. The differences between the execution of the deaths in the well known play Hamlet and Franco Zeffirelli’s cinematic interpretation of Hamlet are through the portrayal of Hamlet (I)’s death and funeral, the hysterical grieving of the Queen and Ophelia, as well as the pe... [tags: Hamlet, Gertrude, Characters in Hamlet, Hamlet]
1142 words (3.3 pages)
- Hamlet Essay: Freud and Hamlet Freud believed that Hamlet did not kill Claudius the first time he saw him because Hamlet saw himself as the enemy. This sounds like a solid reason to me. Who am I to say that it is not? However, I also find Samuel Taylor Coleridge's reasoning very interesting. He believed that Hamlet did not kill Claudius the first time because he was praying. This sounds almost too easy, although very legitimate. Now, I am not one to say which interpretation is right, or even ponder if either is right; however, they both come credible critics.... [tags: GCSE Coursework Shakespeare Hamlet]
425 words (1.2 pages)
- Keys to Interpretation of Hamlet William Shakespeare's Hamlet is, at heart, a play about suicide. Though it is surrounded by a fairly standard revenge plot, the play's core is an intense psychodrama about a prince gone mad from the pressures of his station and his unrequited love for Ophelia. He longs for the ultimate release of killing himself - but why. In this respect, Hamlet is equivocal - he gives several different motives depending on the situation. But we learn to trust his soliloquies - his thoughts - more than his actions.... [tags: The Tragedy of Hamlet Essays]
738 words (2.1 pages)
- “The truth will set you free” is a commonly used expression, but whether this is correct is up for debate, especially in Hamlet by William Shakespeare. In Hamlet by William Shakespeare the binary opposition of truth versus unawareness is expressed within the characters and the happenings around them. In this case, the word within the binary opposition that society believes to be privileged is ‘truth’. Despite this, the theme of truth within Hamlet leaves the characters worse off than they would have been had they been unaware to the affairs around them.... [tags: Hamlet, Characters in Hamlet, Prince Hamlet]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- Finding Fault in Hamlet The old English is difficult enough to understand when it is clearly spoken in a direct manner, but it is even more difficult when Hamlet, Prince of Denmark speaks so sarcastically and indirectly. Throughout Shakespeare' play, Hamlet is very indirect and speaks in a way that is not easily interpreted by the other characters. It seems as though he never speaks in an honest manner, never disclosing his true thought to anyone. Even if Hamlet ever says something that sound sincere, the audience is not sure of whether it is yet another of Hamlet's games, or if he is really telling the truth.... [tags: Shakespeare Hamlet Essays]
574 words (1.6 pages)
- Importance of Minor Characters in Hamlet A now-dead philosopher once said that people need three relationships in life—confidant, lover, mentor. Horatio acts as Hamlet’s confidant, fulfilling that relationship for Hamlet. As a result, we can contrast Hamlet’s dialogue with Horatio to Hamlet’s soliloquies. In Act III, Scene 2, lines 65-70 Hamlet tells Horatio about his idea: to use the players to prove Cladius’s guilt. There is a play to-night before the king; 65 One scene of it comes near the circumstance Which I have told thee of my father's death: I prithee, when thou seest that act afoot, Even with the very comment of thy soul Observe mine uncle… 70 Hamlet isn’t commanding Horatio... [tags: GCSE English Literature Coursework]
516 words (1.5 pages)
- Show Me a Hero: Aristotle’s Harmatia in Shakespearean Tragedies The genre of tragedy has captivated audiences for centuries. Despite rather macabre subject matter, tragedies are amongst the most revered and elevated pieces of art. Greek philosopher Aristotle proposed the idea of hamartia, a phrase that captures the ideal element of a tragedy. Aristotle believed that a flaw or error could be found in the hero’s actions that set into place the tragic events to befall the hero. Aristotle’s concept is useful in trying to understand Hamlet and Othello, two Shakespearean tragedies.... [tags: Hamlet, Tragedy, Characters in Hamlet]
1398 words (4 pages)
- That ambiguity exists within the Shakespearean drama Hamlet is a fact accepted by literary critics. Ambiguity of both word and action occur in the play. Let us examine the problem. Ruth Nevo in “Acts III and IV: Problems of Text and Staging” explains the ambiguity present within the hero’s most famous soliloquy: The critical problem arises from the perception that the speech apparently confuses two issues. Since we know what Hamlet’s obligatory task is, we cannot but register the possibility that the taking of arms and the “enterprises of great pitch and moment” refer to the killing of Claudius, though the logic of the syntax makes them refer to the self-slaughter which is the subjec... [tags: Free GCSE Coursework]
3059 words (8.7 pages)
- Onyekere 1 Chinelo Onyekere Julie Rea Eng 112 Date 08/14/2014 Hamlet 's statement “Frailty, thy name is woman” In Shakespeare 's, Hamlet is not happy with his mother 's remarriage to his uncle. He is referring to his mother when he makes the statement “ Let me not think on 't: Frailty, they name is woman / A little month or ere those shoes were old” (Act I.ii.146-147).... [tags: Love, Hamlet, Characters in Hamlet, Marriage]
1143 words (3.3 pages)
- A Tale of Two Cities Essays: A Sad Tale Of Two Cities
- Free Ulysses Essays: Buck Mulligan and Stephen Dedalus
- Analysis of Fable by Nina Cassian
- Decisions in Robert Frost's The Road Not Taken
- Sir Gawain and Green Knight Essays: The Power of Three
- Allen Ginsberg’s America and Kerouac’s Vanity of Puluoz
A dying Hamlet states "On Fortinbras, he has my dying voice." (Shakespeare, 152). Fortinbas is thus rewarded with Hamlet's adulation (considering his disdain for his contemporaries - quite an accomplishment), and by the acquisition of new lands. In my mind, Shakespeare clearly condones strong aggressive action to further one's ends - a viewpoint more in line with the burgeoning British Empire rather that the teachings of the Buddha or Christ.
1. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. New York: Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press, 1994.
2. Kitchen, Jeffrey. Dramaturgic Analysis of Hamlet Prince of Denmark. 1991.
3. Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare The Invention Of The Human. New York: Riverhead Books, 1998.