Essay PreviewMore ↓
To explain these powers, Hamilton said it would be natural - or implied - that the federal government would gain control over any territory gained through conquest of purchase, although the Constitution made no mention of territorial control. In essence, Hamilton wished to use the implied powers to build a strong and authoritative central government.In 1789, the Minister to France Thomas Jefferson, to Francis Hopkinson of Pennsylvania, protesting that "I am not of the party of the federalists. But I am much farther from that of the anitfederalists." However, the situation was so sensitive that he could not help but chose a side. In 1795, Jefferson wrote to a congressman from Virginia, William Giles, that he "held "t honorable to take a firm and decided part." The group he sided with, the Democratic-Republicans, favored a strict interpretation. As their leader, Jefferson argued that all powers not enumerated by the Constitution belonged to the States. The basis for his argument was the old English "compact" theory.
This theory stated that various individuals, in this case the states, joined together in a formal agreement of government. Since the states had drawn up the contract and given power to the federal government, it should be up to them to decide who received the power, not the body they created.This debate over interpretation thus sparked one of the first and major issues that eventually led to the Alien and Sedition Acts: should a strong central government be formed (federalist desire), or should the individual states have control. And wild attacks of the ensuing debate also ignited the second issue, public defamation, which led to the Sedition Act.
How to Cite this Page
"The Alien And Sedition Acts." 123HelpMe.com. 10 Dec 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 exposed bitter controversies between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. The four bills placed extremely strict regulations on incoming immigrants and prohibited freedom of speech among the people. John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, the most notorious Federalists at the time, reasoned that the Alien and Sedition Acts were a necessity in order to keep America safe. However, disputes arose from this because they were many underlying possible true reasons as to why the acts were put into place.... [tags: Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Federalist Party]
1687 words (4.8 pages)
- The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 The debate of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 revealed bitter controversies on a number of issues. Most of the controversies had, however, arose even before these acts; as far back as the penning of the Constitution. The writers of the Constitution knew that as time proceeded, the needs and demands of the nation and of the people would change, leading to controversy. By not assigning specific powers to specific groups/parties, governments, they unintentionally created a vast problem in the years to come.... [tags: American America History]
750 words (2.1 pages)
- The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 The Alien and Sedition Acts were not merely intended for immigrants who spoke out against the government but more to detain the growth of the Democratic - Republican Party. These four Acts coercively lessoned the likelihood of the party mounting power by eliminating its majority group; soon to be citizens. Many issues led up to the creation of the Acts. This Cause and Effect can be traced all the way back to George Washington's Presidency; a few years after the creation of the Constitutional government after the Articles of Confederation were expulsed.... [tags: Political Science]
1488 words (4.3 pages)
- The debate over the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 revealed bitter controversies on a number of issues that had been developing since the penning of the Constitution. The writers of the document knew that over time the needs of the nation and its people would change, and therefore provided for its amendment. But by not expressly delegating powers to specific organizations, whether the federal government, state governments, or the people themselves, they inadvertently created a major problem in the years to follow: Constitutional interpretation.Shortly after the Constitution's ratification, two distinct camps formed, each believing in opposite manners of interpretation.... [tags: essays research papers]
1738 words (5 pages)
- Two popular parties in America during the formation of a new nation debated for decades over different laws, policies and other various government issues. These two parties were know as the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans also known as the Jeffersonian Republicans. Popular names in the Federalist party included John Adams, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay while James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were the most know Democratic-Republicans. Perhaps the largest debate was over the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798.... [tags: federalists, republican, debate, government]
650 words (1.9 pages)
- ALIEN AND SEDITION ACTS In 1798, when Congress passed both the Alien and Sedition Acts, it was very much constitutional. These acts were definitely in the best interest of America. America was a significantly young nation, at the time, and could not afford to create problems caused by foreigners coming to America. They did not have enough national power to sustain order if everyone was attacking the newly created laws, and many of those rebels being citizens from foreign countries, nevertheless.... [tags: essays research papers]
665 words (1.9 pages)
- With a new system of government came unprecedented decisions, and the decisions to be made about numerous matters created infinite disagreements among the diverse population of America. People were thinking about this new system of democracy, a system that anticipated and called for changes, leaving the future open to concerned minds. With the ability to influence the law of the land came the fear of abuse. Decisions made or ideas presented were seldom view without bias, and quick accusations of right and wrong began as the major split between ideals formed.... [tags: ap US history Document Based Question]
1006 words (2.9 pages)
- The debates that built up over the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 revealed bitter controversies on a number of issues that existed since the making of the Constitution. If something went wrong with the Constitution, the Founding Fathers planed to amend it, but they did not consider how they would amend a splitting nation’s views. It became evident that the nation was tearing apart due to opposing view points. These differences could not be changed by the amendment of the Constitution. On numerous accounts they did not see eye to eye: on the meaning of the Constitution itself, on many Domestic Issues, and became evident in Foreign Policy.... [tags: Political Science]
1202 words (3.4 pages)
- The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by Congress on July 14th, 1798. At this time in American history, John Adams was President and the Federalist had complete control over the federal government. On the surface, the Federalist and the Adam’s Administration appeared to be supporting these laws with the concern of national security and the safety of our borders. However, it became evident that the Federalist had political motives to destroy the Republican Party and anyone who agreed with them.... [tags: Federalists, Laws]
837 words (2.4 pages)
- You are back in the year 1798, the government has just passed a law saying what ever they do and create it will be the standard. You have no say or any comment on it, because frankly they just don’t care. You are now placed back in the year 2001, would it be possible to apply a law of such magnitude to our society today. I don’t think so. Our country is based upon individual rights, we are allowed to say what we feel, and do what we want. It is what has shaped our country into what it is today.... [tags: essays research papers]
1303 words (3.7 pages)
And regardless of whether or not they publicly professed their beliefs of monarchial systems, Jefferson noted that they would surly "transmit these principles to their children." Being Americans, theses same people would also have a share in government, and would "infuse into that spirit, warp and bias its directions, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass." Yet perhaps the person who best displayed the American attitude toward immigrants was John Adams. In 1797, during a speech to a special session of Congress, Adams implied that people from foreign countries were enemies of the nation as their leaders had taught them impressed upon then undemocratic principles. Said Adams, "The speech of the President [ of the French Directory]...evinces a disposition to separate the people of the United States from the government...whom they themselves have chosen to manage their common concerns." Such distrust of immigrants led to the passing of the Alien act in the summer of 1798. The Alien act required a fourteen year residency period for aliens prior to naturalization as a citizen allowed the restraint and removal in time of war of resident adult aliens of the hostile nations, and gave the President the power to deport "all such aliens as he shall judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United Sates." Most Americans had little problem with the first part of the Act, but the latter parts were controversial. The Republicans viewed this bill as nothing short of an attempt to strengthen the federal government and subvert the power of the States. Edward Livingston, a Republican congressman from New York, in a speech to the House of Representatives on June21, 1798, remarked: "...by this act the president alone is empowered to make the law, to fix in his mind what acts, words, what thoughts or looks, shall constitute such a crime." The Congressional allowance of such a delegation and the Supreme Court's collaboration (via not condemning the Act) "comes completely within the definition of despotism - a union of legislative, executive, and judicial powers." Another Republican, James Madison, also noticed the beginnings of monarchy.
In a letter to Jefferson on May 20, 1798, Madison wrote, "The abolition of Royalty was it seems not one of his [Adams'] Revolutionary principles." Jefferson also noticed the rising aristocratic tide in a letter to Philip Mazzei of Italy in 1796, "...an Angli! can monarchial, and aristocratical party has sprung up, whose avowed objective is to draw over us the substance...of the British government." The Federalist, ware of the growing opposition, defended their principle. They claimed to be trying to put the country on solid footing: Hamilton with his financial plan and others following their own building designs. In a letter to Colonel Edward Carrington of Virginia in 1792, Hamilton commented, "Mr. Jefferson and Mr.
Madison have been found among those who are disposed to narrow the federal authority...[They] in my judgement, are subversive to the principles of good government and dangerous to the Union, peace, and happiness of the country."The debate over federal authority and states' rights continued on and the parties continued to bitterly attack one another. In late 1798 and early 1799, a young Englishmen visiting the United States, D. M. Erkshire, noticed the ferocity of the attacks. "...they think nothing of wishing each other destroyed each Party openly descanting upon the probability of its becoming a matter of necessity to extirpate the opponent one...Politics has so divided men and so far do they carry it that it seldom happens that a person of one way of thinking visits any body in the opposite." Erkshire's statement was by no means incorrect.
Jefferson and Adams, once good friends, were so decidedly against the other that they did not communicate with each other for over ten years. Such rifts in society were not just the result of differing opinions on government, though. The defaming attacks by both sides on each other were extremely harsh.In his letter to Colonel Carrigton of Virginia in 1792, Hamilton described the republican attachment to France "womanish" and their resentment of England as "womanish" as well. Later that year, Jefferson struck back at Hamilton in a letter to President Washington. Said Jefferson, "His system flowed from principles adverse to liberty, and was calculated to undermine and demolish the Republic." Hamilton also attacked Jefferson and his republicans through Washington. Hamilton, in writing Washington's farewell address, wrote, "They serve to organize faction and to put in the stead of the delegated will of the whole nation, the will of a party, often a small minority of the whole community." Hamilton continued to attack Jefferson's favor of France, wrote in 1797 that "The man who...shall be the apologist of France, and who attacks his own government, is not an American.
The choice for him lies in being deemed a fool, a madman, or a traitor."The attacks kept going back and forth between the two groups, and they continually became more viscous as the years went by. The country was beginning to split and that worried many people. In a 1798 letter to the secretary of the treasury, Oliver Wolcott, Hamilton observed that civil war was not improbable. The federalists thus pushed forward an act that would hopefully resolve the problem, namely, the Sedition Act.The Sedition Act prohibited combination or conspiracy against the United States government and the publication of "scandalous and malicious" writings against the government or its officials, under penalty of fine or imprisonment. John Allen, a Federalist congressman from Connecticut, supported the act in a 1798 speech to the House of Representatives. Said Allen, "The freedom of the press and opinions was never understood to give the right of publishing falsehoods and slanders, nor of exciting sedition, insurrection, and slaughter, with impunity.
A man was always answerable for the malicious publication of falsehood..." Some were not as dedicated to the Sedition Act as Allen, but they still supported it. In his letter to Wolcott, Hamilton confided, "I hope the thing may not be hurried through. Let us not establish a tyranny. Energy is a very different thing from violence. If we make no false step, we shall be essentially united, but if we push things to an extreme, we sh! all then give to faction [the republicans] body and solidarity." Hamilton's hope was not realized though, as the republicans were given body.
Albert Gallatin, a republican congressman from Pennsylvania, in a speech before the House of Representatives in 1798, concluded, "...this bill must be considered only as a weapon used by a party now in power in order to perpetuate their authority and preserve their present places." Gallatin, for the most part, appears to be correct. The Sedition Act was a direct violation of the first amendment, but a federalist Congress, a federalist president (Adams), and a federalist appointed panel of justices approved it. Knowing that they could do nothing to change the Sedition Act in the federal government, the republicans turned to the states. They argued that the federal government had stepped beyond its powers, powers delegated to it by the states via the Constitution (Jefferson's "compact" theory). Thus the states had the right to repeal the act, or at the very least, ignore it. Only two states followed the republicans, Virginia and Kentucky. Although the Sedition Act went out of effect in 1801, it kept alive the old debate of states' rights and central authority.