Essay PreviewMore ↓
The role of the king to the public during the reigns of Louis XIV of France and Philip II of Spain were not predetermined, so each king created for himself what he thought monarchy ought to be. Louis XIV and Philip II were both absolutists, and believed that they should be the supreme rulers of France and Spain, respectively. However, Louis XIV did not want to be a national symbol serving no legitimate purpose. He wished to control the military, economy, foreign affairs, and the administration of the kingdom and of justice. He believed that the king of France should be the best that France has to offer- being served by even the most powerful lords of France. Conversely, Philip II thought of himself as Catholic first, and king of Spain second. Opposite to Louis XIV, Philip II preferred to sit in the Escorial and pray, pour over records, and live more as a monk than as Louis XIV’s conception of a king. Philip II never wanted to take much of an active part in the administration of his kingdom, except for the times when he wanted to use some of his various powers. However, after he had used it for a while (waging war, raising taxes, etceteras) he would let it lay dormant and return to his documents. Nor did Philip II ever wish to control most of the Spanish economy. The parts that he did control were ones that directly affected himself or his revenues, so vital in order to keep his army of immense proportions.
How to Cite this Page
"Spanish And French Monarchial Beliefs - The Escorial And Versailles." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of 1918, marks the day that WWI descended into armistice. However, the involved countries reached an agreement as to the events following the war on the 28th of June, 1919. The famous Treaty of Versailles was known for its role in ending war. But it was not known for being a double-edged sword, as the ending of war came with the consequence of causing future war. The Treaty consisted of uncontested biases due to Germany's unconditional surrender. The Allies held a gun to Germany's head, with their trigger finger tense.... [tags: the allies, WWII, versailles treaty]
957 words (2.7 pages)
- When Louis XIII built his hunting lodge on the hillside of Versailles in 1623 , I suspect he never imaged the true master piece of French Baroque architecture it would become and that it would continue live throughout history in all its glory, almost viewed as a physical timeline of the history of France. Versailles was the seat of absolute monarchy and became its own symbol, it became the physical representation for power. Looking past its extensive historical background, the palace of Versailles has such a complex architectural and artistic influence as nearly four generations of French king royals have lived in the palace continually expanding and renovating it to match the current style... [tags: Louis XIV of France, Palace of Versailles]
1681 words (4.8 pages)
- In the year 1919 the world coordinated a Treaty that would change the world. This treaty was the notorious Treaty of Versailles. It followed World War II which was fought between the Allied Forces (Britain, France, Italy, Russia, and the US) and the Axis (Germany, the Ottoman Empire, and Austria-Hungary). After the war the treaty was hosted by France in the french palace of Versailles. It was coordinated by the three world powers at that time, referred to as the Big Three. The Big Three consisted of Britain, France and the US.... [tags: Treaty of Versailles, Germany, Adolf Hitler]
1682 words (4.8 pages)
- On June 28, 1919 the Treaty of Versailles was signed and World War 1 had officially come to an end. Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versaille because they could no longer afford to participate in the war. The Treaty of Versailles was put in place to punish Germany. (New York Times) There were three things that greatly affected Germany caused by the war and the Treaty. First Germany lost much of its land and territory and during this time the condition of Germany’s economy was terrible. The Treaty of Versailles caused many debts and limitations.... [tags: World War II, Germany, Treaty of Versailles]
806 words (2.3 pages)
- To what extent did the Treaty of Versailles contribute to the rise of Fascism in Germany. The Treaty of Versailles officially ended the war between Germany and the Allies (England, France and the US) on 28th June 1919. While the delegates of the victorious countries should have been concerned with the prospects of future peace in Europe, they instead focused solely on making Germany as weak as possible. Graebner and Bennett (2011) argue that “the democratic powers at Versailles had the opportunity in 1919 to set an aggrieved Germany, one that scarcely resembled Hitler’s, on a different course.” They of course failed.... [tags: World War I, Treaty of Versailles, Adolf Hitler]
1656 words (4.7 pages)
- The Spanish Civil War began in July of 1936, and ended in April 1939. Spain of the early 1930s was a deeply divided nation. There were two main factions in Spain- those of the left, and those on the right. Contrary to the political system in the United States, on the left were the Republicans (also called Loyalists) and on the right were the Nationalists. The Republicans were a conglomerate of many groups that banded together over the main thing they had in common—their opposition to fascism. This group consisted of Communists, monarchists, socialists, anarchists, and many of the common people (such as peasants and factory workers).... [tags: World History, Spanish Hostiry, Spaniards]
1466 words (4.2 pages)
- After any major altercation between multiple nations comes to a conclusion a seemingly never ending amount of decisions needs to be made. After the First World War ended in November 1918 the leaders of the world needed to come together to determine how to restore European society. In June 1919 the Treaty of Versailles was finalized, outlining what was to take place in the post-war world. Because World War I was such an important event in world history a great deal of literature has been written about the events before, during and after the war.... [tags: Treaty of Versailles, World War I, Woodrow Wilson]
1428 words (4.1 pages)
- Mahatma Ghandi once said “Be the change you want to see in the world” (“Mahatma”). This is a very famous quote that many people try and follow, including Thomas Woodrow Wilson. In 1919, Wilson won the Nobel Peace Prize for doing just that, taking initiative and coming up with a plan to create a change. The Treaty of Versailles was an event that followed after World War I, four countries were invited: The United States, Italy, France, and Britain (“Thomas”). From the treaty, Britain wanted money, France and Italy wanted land and The United States wanted peace (“Thomas”).... [tags: World War I, Woodrow Wilson, Treaty of Versailles]
939 words (2.7 pages)
- In 1923 a British ship the “S.S. Wimbledon” was to deliver 4200 tons of artillery to a naval base. (The shipping company went by Les Affréteurs réunis) At this time World War 1 had just shortly ended and countries were still in their recovery phase. After the war the Treaty of Versailles was signed which said that Germany was to come to peace with the allied countries (France, U.S. British Empire, Japan, and Italy) The S.S. Wimbledon carried weapons to deliver to Poland (specifically the area of Danzig) in order to support them in the war with Russia.... [tags: Germany, World War II, Treaty of Versailles]
716 words (2 pages)
- The Taino and the Spanish Cristóbal Colón landed on an unknown island in the Caribbean on October 10, 1492. He planted banners in the beach claiming the land for the Spanish throne. Colón’s perceptions and interactions with the indigenous people, the Taino, sparked the events that lead to the colonization of the Americas. Colón’s perceptions of the Taino were misinterpreted by him. His misconceptions about the Taino were built from a compilation of his own expectations, readings of other explorers, and strong religious influence in Western Europe.... [tags: History Spanish Historical Papers]
1223 words (3.5 pages)
In both France and in Spain, each monarch set a different level of priority to his popularity. Louis XIV once said, “L’état, c’est moi- ‘the state is myself’”1. This is saying that Louis XIV represents the French people, government, society, and civilization- the ‘Sun King’- representing the center and the very best of France. On the other hand, Philip II only seemed to wish to be seen as a devout Catholic, at the service of the Holy See, and not caring much what other people thought of him.
Religious duties were much more evident in the life of Philip II than Louis XIV. Philip II would stay up for nights on end praying for his own salvation and the salvation of others. Inside the Escorial, there was a church and a monastery where Philip II would also commonly spend hours in every day. When not in his church, Philip II often read his Bible and other religious writings. The main goal of Philip II’s life was even religious- to re-Catholicize Europe. Although both monarchs were Catholic, religion played much less of a role in daily life at Versailles, where many secular affairs were dealt with. At Versailles, religion was not absent, but seemingly ignored commonly.
In the fourteenth through the sixteenth centuries, France and Spain were both rather powerful countries, but power was often distributed throughout the plutocratic aristocracies differently. Louis XIV preferred to delegate power to new nobles, or affluent bourgeois who had recently received their noble status from the king. The lords who were not hereditary nobles had not yet had enough time to gain any actual power that could be used in rebellion against the king. Philip II, however, did not diversify the existing hierarchy of power, but embraced it. Upon the building of the Escorial, many new Hidalgos were not created just to satisfy the needs of a larger bureaucracy. In addition, the Roman Catholic church even went inside the walls of the Escorial. This shows Philip II’s embrace of the existing power of the Holy See. Conversely, at the court of Versailles, Louis XIV did not make the church a significant part of his chateau, therefore removing most of the internal persuasion from the clergy. (Even if there was a large religious influence at Versailles, by the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges (1438), the ‘Galician’ church was politically independent from the Holy See.)
Louis XIV and Philip II had some similar and some different methods for handling foreign affairs. Louis XIV deployed the French army against many different peoples, being always at war or preparing for war in order to keep peace at home, and war abroad. Philip II also deployed his armies against various people, however, he did so in order to expand the boundaries of Catholicism. Concerning diplomatic relations, Louis XIV was much more involved than Philip II. Louis XIV was always making or breaking one treaty or another, threatening war, making bribes to various German states such as Bavaria, receiving some world leader or an emissary thereof, and sticking his nose into the policies of any country that he could gain some control over. On the other hand, Philip II did not receive many emissaries or diplomats. He sent them out when need be, in order to prevent any unneeded wars, but never made much of an attempt at making alliances- at least in the quantities obtained by the French.
In some ways the two kings’ purpose for their militaries were strikingly similar. Both were created to expand the thoughts and beliefs of their chief commander (i.e. Louis XIV and Philip II, respectively), and to protect the people from whence the military came. Nonetheless, the purpose of the two militaries were also quite different. Louis XIV multiplied the number of the French men-at-arms, centralized the military and forbade anyone but the king to have a military, thus preventing war between nobles. This made the French military a very effective offensive and defensive force. Philip II, however, only bothered with his military because it was his key to the re-Catholicization of Europe. Thus, the Spanish military as more of a offensive force than a defensive force.
The expansion of Louis XIV and Philip II’s thoughts and beliefs was essential to the aspirations of each monarch. Louis XIV wished to make France appear great to all of Europe, and to establish an almost universal monarchy by obtaining the entire Spanish inheritance. On the other hand, Philip II did not wish to make much of a secular or worldly advantage by re- converting Europe to Catholicism. Therefore, both monarchs had the need to expand their own thoughts and beliefs; however, Louis XIV’s aims were secular, and Philip II’s were religious.
The architecture of the Escorial is somewhat dissimilar to that of Versailles. The Escorial is rather closed in, compact, and forbidding. This corresponds to the nature of Philip II, who was rather introverted. In the center of the Escorial lies the church, which is also the tallest building in the entire palace. The rotunda of the church seems to point toward the heavens, trying to reach God, which is also similar to the attitude of Philip II. Along the walls that enclose the Escorial lie the other ‘less important’ buildings intended to deal with secular issues. At Versailles, one has a feeling of openness, with the expansive chateau eventually funneling down to the main chateau where Louis XIV lived, the centerpiece of Versailles. This shows the importance of secular issues at Versailles, and religious issues at the Escorial.
The artists’ interpretations of Versailles and the Escorial show some similarities and differences between Louis XIV and Philip II. In the picture of the Escorial, the only things shown are the Escorial and part of Philip II’s army. Everything shown is the king’s. This symbolizes Philip II’s status as a European leader: he wasn’t much of one in anything but the military. However, the picture of Versailles includes the surrounding area, some aristocratic homes, and, in the periphery, a church. The presence of a church in the periphery signifies just about all of the religious influence at Versailles. The presence of the expansive mountains leading off into the distance demonstrates that Louis XIV was a great world leader, where his power was not only concentrated in France, but off beyond its borders. In the picture of Versailles, there is no military. This exhibits the sense of civil security felt by the Frenchmen under Louis XIV. In other words, there is no constant defensive force present, so Louis XIV must not need one. After all, the French military contained 400,000 people, there were definitely enough soldiers to guard the palace if need be. The presence of aristocratic homes signifies the Frenchmen’s awe of power and wealth. Or, more specifically stated, the french were not only held in awe of the magnificent palace of Versailles, but of the wealth and power accumulated by the French aristocracy.
The two given pictures of Versailles and the Escorial, and general knowledge of Louis XIV and Philip II, allows one to see many similarities and dissimilarities between the two kings’ conceptions and practices of monarchy. This has been demonstrated through various examples of the methods of handling administrative, military, foreign, economic, and religious affairs used by Louis XIV of France, and Philip II of Spain.