Essay PreviewMore ↓
Terminally ill patients should have the legal option of physician-assisted suicide. Terminally ill patients deserve the right to control their own death. Legalizing assisted suicide would relive families of the burdens of caring for a terminally ill relative. Doctors should not be prosecuted for assisting in the suicide of a terminally ill patient. We as a society must protect life, but we must also recognize the right to a humane death. When a person is near death, in unbearable pain, they have the right to ask a physician to assist in ending their lives.
40 percent of Americans say they would consider committing suicide if they were in severe pain, suffering from an incurable disease. 40 percent of Americans also say they would help a family member, in the same situation, kill them selves. But only 12 percent say they thought of killing them selves. In 1950, fewer than four in ten Americans supported physician-assisted suicide. Today seven in ten support it.
Some people think that people who are in mental anguish are going to be able to get a physician to assist in their suicide. This should not and will not happen, because they are not terminally ill and are able to be treated with therapy.
There are problems with the title “Terminally ill patient” but there is a way to fix it. We must change the definition for “A Terminally ill patient” to: having an expected life span under 3 months, there is absolutely no way of helping the patient and are doomed to die. But a patient has to suffering from severe pain and be terminally ill to be able to get a physician to assist in their suicide.
Although widely condoned around the world, only one nation, the Netherlands has made physician assisted suicide legal. Five states tried Washington in 1991, California in 1992, Michigan in 1998,and main in 2000, Oregon in 1994 approved the “Death with Dignity Act” it won 51 percent to 49 percent. 91 people committed suicide with the aid of a physician in the first four years the law was in effect.
The approach of physician-assisted suicide respects an individual’s need for personal dignity. It does not force the terminally ill patient to linger hopelessly, and helplessly, often at great cost to their psyche. It drive’s people mad knowing they are going to die in a short period of time, suffering while they wait in a hospital bed.
How to Cite this Page
"Should Physcian-Assisted Suicide be Legal." 123HelpMe.com. 20 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Imagine a scenario where you’re in tremendous pain and you want to end the pain before death comes over you. Even if you wanted to make that choice, the government of the United States has already made this choice for you by illegalizing what is called assisted suicide. There are 3 different kinds of suicide involving the assistance of others; assisted suicide, euthanasia and passive euthanasia, and mercy killing, these came to be a hot topic during the 1990s when doctors and nurses started going to jail because of helping their patients kill themselves, not for financial gain but because it was the humane and just thing to do(Ackerman).... [tags: Death, Suffering, Euthanasia, Suicide]
1755 words (5 pages)
- Physician Assisted suicide is the intentional suicide of an individual, with the aid of a physician. In physician-assisted suicide the patient self administers the drug that ends their life. Euthanasia differs in that the physician administers the lethal drug. Physician-assisted suicide is an increasingly controversial topic in the United States that brings up many moral, ethical, and religious debates. Assisted suicide is currently legal in some parts of the United States, including Oregon, Montana, Washington, Vermont, and California.... [tags: Suffering, Death, Suicide, Life]
1851 words (5.3 pages)
- Recently, the topic of assisted suicide was thrust into public consciousness, with the story of now deceased Brittany Maynard creating heated conversations. On sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr, advocates on both sides of the argument holding fierce debates about the consequences of Maynard’s post-mortem celebrity (Lee). The main theme seemed to be whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be legal, without much thought to the most concerning aspects of the argument. There are three important considerations to the assisted suicide debate: a concentration on the history of euthanasia in our country, why certain communities fear it, and what alternatives should be promoted inste... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Medical ethics, Suicide]
1332 words (3.8 pages)
- Assisted Suicide has been a controversial issue for some time now. It is also confused with the term euthanasia; however the two do not mean the same thing. Euthanasia is the killing of another to relieve their pain; whereas assisted suicide is the practice where an individual assist the person committing suicide. The practice of both of these issues reliefs the person that is in pain. Assisted suicide has positive and negative issues. There is a debate on whether it should be legal or not. Some of the positive issues on assisted suicide are it reliefs a person from the pain they are in.... [tags: Argumentative Essays]
1553 words (4.4 pages)
- Assisted Suicide should be legal for terminally ill patients. It is unethical that it is illegal in forty six states for a physician to humanely assist a terminally ill patient who had the mental capacity to sign a directive stating that they wished to end their life on their own terms. Assisted suicide is by no means a new concept; in fact, it has been debated throughout the history of the world (procon.org, 2013). According to Murphy (2011), the issue really came to the forefront in the United States of America in the late eighties and early nineties when Dr.... [tags: Euthanasia, Terminal Illness, Medical Ethics]
1773 words (5.1 pages)
- With the discussion of assisted suicide being a viral topic, there are many different opinions whether or not people are for or against it. As for me, I am against assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is currently legal in five states including Oregon, Vermont, Washington, California, and Montana. Methods in the way it is done may vary from state to state, but I still believe any type of assisted suicide is wrong. In the article “Always Care, Never Kill: How Physician-Assisted Suicide Endangers the Weak, Corrupts Medicine, Compromises the Family, and Violates Human Dignity and Equality,” it states that allowing physician-assisted suicide would be a big mistake for the four following reasons: “... [tags: Medicine, Medical ethics, Hippocrates, Physician]
732 words (2.1 pages)
- Physician-assisted suicide is legal in five U.S. states such as Oregon, Vermont,Washington, and California ("Physician-Assisted Suicide Fast Facts"). Other states believe that helping someone to end their life is immoral, but these people don’t see many patients suffering from a terminal illness looking for a life without misery. To overcome this struggle physician-assisted suicide should be their outlet through the distribution of prescription drugs. Although physician-assisted suicide, which is an aggressive approach, is illegal there is a passive approach that physicians have vowed to take.... [tags: Death, Suicide, Suffering, Euthanasia]
1511 words (4.3 pages)
- Do You Have The Last Say. There is a big debate throughout the country on whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be legal in all fifty states. There are only five states in the US where “physicians cannot be prosecuted for prescribing medications to hasten death” (CNN Library, 2016). While all patients should be able to make decisions on their life without including the government, physician-assisted suicide should only be legal with very specific circumstances because it does put too much pressure on loved ones of the patient, it gives some societal approval to suicide, and it is true that some patients who are terminally ill can make a full recovery.... [tags: Death, Patient, Suicide, Physician]
1085 words (3.1 pages)
- In this day in age the medical science industry has advanced in their practices and their technology, yet there are still incurable diseases such as cancer that disable a normal life of a patient making them miserable and suffer until their dying day. Today physician assisted suicide is a contradicting topic to many people and physicians. Howard Ball shares his beliefs on why physician assisted suicide should be legal. On the other hand, Bill Muehlenburg states that assisted suicide is immoral and should not be legalized.... [tags: Suicide, Death, Suffering, Medicine]
1138 words (3.3 pages)
- People are diagnosed with life-threatening diseases everyday. Those people have to change their entire lifestyle to fight against their unfortunate fate. Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia, has been a controversial topic for many years. Some people believe that death should not be an option; however, they fail to recognize that death may be the only choice. Therefore, physician-assisted suicide should be legal in every state. Admittedly, some people believe that euthanasia goes against a doctor 's job.... [tags: Death, Pain, Suffering, Suicide]
1139 words (3.3 pages)
Six percent of doctors say they have written a prescription to hasten death for a terminally ill patient. Most of them do it illegally. Making such assistance legal would permit it to be government regulated. Having it regulated by the government would prevent abuse, and permit physicians to do what many are currently doing illegally.
One example was Dr. Jack Kevorkian who publicly acknowledged helping 130 people commit suicide. He was convicted of second-degree murder in 1999 and sentenced to 10 to 25 years for giving a lethal injection to one terminally ill man. He was enjoined by an Oakland judge from aiding in any suicides except the one he was convicted of.
There is no real difference between recognizing the legal right to medical assistance in dying, and the already accepted practice of removing life-sustaining treatment when a patient desires. The only difference is that the person who has his life-sustaining treatment removed suffers (Terry Schiavo a woman who had her feeding tube removed slowly starved to death over a two-week period), and physician-assisted suicide is usually accomplished by administering a lethal injection a much more humane way of dieing.
We also can’t only look at the patient but the people affected by watching a person suffer. By allowing physician-assisted suicide the burden their families might face would be lifted.
The level of support goes up with the education the public has. Only half of Americans with a high school diploma support physician-assisted suicide, while the level of support gets higher with Americans who are college or post-college graduates. Other studies showed that Blacks and Hispanics are more likely than the general public to oppose assisted suicides.
Insurance companies should be required to provide health and life benefits to people who die with medical assistance. Although the insurance companies should be paid for the period of time the terminally ill person was expected to live. The reason the companies need to pay is that people may keep on living in great pain just so they don’t leave their families with nothing, which should not happen.
Life must be protected, but we must also permit people to have a humane death. Terminally ill patients should be allowed to determine when they die. They deserve the right not to suffer from great pain. Physician-assisted suicide needs to be legalized. We also must make it a socially accepted, and stigma free procedure for the patients who need it.