Essay PreviewMore ↓
Lambert's Day" (I, i, 199), the reader could mistake this act of 'showmanship' as the act of a leader who was ready to stand up and take action when a problem arose. However, as we see later, in Act 1 scene 3, Richard's order for Mowbray and Bolingbroke's lives to answer their accusations was only to fuel Richard's own desire to be the centre of attention; it was his 'showman' quality that lead him to do this, not his ability to take action when a situation that required good leadership skills arose.In Act 3, scene 2, Richard, on his return to England, finds that his 'favourites' (Bushy, Bagot and Greene) have all been killed by Bolingbroke. Richard is struck down with immense sorrow and self-pity and illustrates very clearly his passive nature. Instead of becoming extremely angry and wanting revenge for his friends' deaths, he says that they should "sit upon the ground / And tell stories of the death of Kings" (III, ii, 155-156), and talk only of death and other morbid topics. When someone is murdered, people that knew them usually become very angry towards the murderer and often try to seek revenge. In 'Richard II', Richard, the king of England, has had his best friends, his 'favourites' killed by his worst enemy, a person he had banished from the country, a person who is clearly trying to steal the throne from Richard, and all Richard can do is sit around and tell sad stories and speak about death.
How to Cite this Page
"King Richard." 123HelpMe.com. 20 Jul 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Complex Character of King Richard II A general conclusion of most critics is that Richard II is a play about the deposition of a "weak and effeminate" king. That he was a weak king, will be conceded. That he was an inferior person, will not. The insight to Richard's character and motivation is to view him as a person consistently acting his way through life. Richard was a man who held great love for show and ceremony. This idiosyncrasy certainly led him to make decisions as king that were poor, and in effect an inept ruler.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
3453 words (9.9 pages)
- The Evil King in Shakespeare's Richard III Richard is an actor, a fully evil actor, who through his mastery of the stage has come to appreciate his skill. Richard Moulton, in his Shakespeare as a Dramatic Thinker, proclaims Richard's wonder at his own command of the stage: "Richard has become an artist in evil: the natural emotions attending crime-whether of passionate longing, or horror and remorse-have given place to artistic appreciation of masterpieces" (40). And Robert Weimann, comparing Richard Gloucester to a character in Shakespeare's King John states: "Both characters exemplify a strenuous need to perform, 'toiling desperately' to play a role, 'to find out,' and, for better or wor... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
1880 words (5.4 pages)
- The Tragedy of King Richard the Second: The Garden of England In Act 3, Scene 4 of The Tragedy of King Richard the Second by Shakespeare, the Queen finds that she is unhappy due to an unexplained intuition. While in the Duke of York’s palace, the Queen’s waiting-women try to comfort her until the gardeners interrupt the failed attempts to reach a happiness. As the Queen secretly listens into the gardener’s conversation, she hears that they are speaking about binding the apricots and plucking the weeds.... [tags: england, downfall, nobles]
1162 words (3.3 pages)
- ... The Queen rejects all of these attempts, until she expresses, “…here come the gardeners…/They will talk of state, for everyone doth so/Against a change" (3.4. 28-29). What is important to note in this statement, is that the kingdoms political state seems to be an ordinary conversation topic between common men because of Queen Isabel’s expectation for such topic. However, the gardeners need to hide the real messages about the rule under metaphor so they do not risk executing any form of treachery towards the King.... [tags: shakespeare, royalty, england]
571 words (1.6 pages)
- Chapter 18 KING RICHARD AND QUEEN CONSORT ANNE NEVILLE OF WARWICK SUMMARY OF THE REIGN OF KING RICHARD III III (Reign, 1483-1485) Richard III: life dates, 32 years, October 2, 1452—August 22, 1485; reign, 2 years, June 26, 1483—August 22, 1485. Richard of York Duke of Gloucester was the youngest of eight children and fourth of four sons of Richard Plantagenet, Duke of York, and Cecily Neville Countess of Westmoreland. His father, Richard Plantagenet, was the primary York protagonist at start of the Wars of the Roses, but after his death in the Battle of Wakefield in 1460, York leadership was taken over by his eldest son Edward who became Edward IV.... [tags: Royal History]
2023 words (5.8 pages)
- Richard King: Cattleman and Pioneer When people think of Texas, one of the first images that come to mind are cattle and the cowboys that work them. Some of those cowboys amassed fortunes and assets that helped to write their names into the annals of history, but one of the great cattle barons achieved a status that is somewhat legendary. Richard King. Capt. King, as he was known during his steamboat days, soared from an indentured jewelry apprentice to the king of an empire. Forever immortalized through the town and ranch that bear his namesake, King lived up to his last name while establishing the King Ranch and, after his death, the town of Kingsville.... [tags: US Civil War, Texan history]
1028 words (2.9 pages)
- The problem with Richard is that he is not really a man of action; he confronts and deals with difficulties by internalising and talking about them.Richard is not at all a man of his action. Whenever a problem arises, he internalises and talks to himself or the surrounding people, but does not do anything to resolve the problem. He is not ready to stand up and do something about it, and instead complains about the situation to himself. I think that it is because of this trait that Richard loses the kingship of England, and Bolingbroke, a man who is always ready to take action when a problem arises wins the throne over Richard.In the first scene, where Bolingbroke accuses Mowbray of killing... [tags: essays research papers]
957 words (2.7 pages)
- The Character of King Richard II in William Shakespeare's Play Shakespeare wrote ‘King Richard II’ in the 16th/17th Century, about 200 years after Richard was on the throne. His initial intent was to point out key factors within the Elizabethan monarchy. Queen Elizabeth was compared to King Richard because of her lack of an heir, her inclination towards heavy taxes and the indulgence of her favourites. Elizabethan critics viewed the play as being politically dangerous towards Queen Elizabeth’s monarchy.... [tags: Papers]
939 words (2.7 pages)
- The Character of King Richard III in William Shakespeare's Play In my opinion Richard is definitely not a hero, he is nothing more than an immoral villain. He is a cunning, callous and carefree murderer. However, for much of the play the audience view him as a hero. Throughout my essay I aim to argue why Richard is an immoral villain whilst contrasting why many may perceive him as a hero. For much of the play Richard may be seen as a hero. One reason for this is his dramatic language.... [tags: Papers]
676 words (1.9 pages)
- Relation between Nature and Man in A Midsummer's Night's Dream, King Richard II, and King Lear A Midsummer's Night's Dream, King Richard II, and King Lear all represent different philosophies people hold regarding the phenomenon of their lives. The relationships between humans and outside forces differ between the plays too. A Midsummer's Night's Dream emphasizes natures part in human life. It is seen as the driving force for everything good and bad. Divine decree is the emphasis in King Richard II.... [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]
1948 words (5.6 pages)
Bolingbroke has done so much to Richard and yet even after he has killed his friends, Richard still makes no attempt to stop Bolingbroke, or at the very least avenge his death of his friends. This short speech by Richard shows the reader that Richard is certainly not a man of action.I believe that a true 'man of action' would not simply accept what was happening to him as fate; he would fight back and try to do something about it instead of just accepting it and letting it happen. In the play, we see Bolingbroke take the above action. He is banished by Richard for a crime he did not commit, but instead of accepting it and making a new life for himself, he fights back and returns to England to take back what was rightfully his.
Richard, on the other hand, who is not a man of action, accepts what is happening to him as fate, as something he cannot stop, and so he just lets Bolingbroke continue. "Our lands, our lives and all, are Bolingbroke's, / And nothing can we call our own but death" (III, ii, 151-152) Richard says when he discovers that his 'favourites' have been murdered by Bolingbroke. He has clearly given in to Bolingbroke and accepts what is happening, instead of making a stand and fighting against Bolingbroke. Later, in Act 4, Scene 1, when Richard meets Bolingbroke and his supporters, he finally hands the crown over to Bolingbroke. He does this without even trying to do anything about Bolingbroke, he talks about the problems he has with Bolingbroke and his leadership, but never does anything about it. He then gives up the crown himself, without being forced at all - "Now, mark me how I will undo myself" (IV, i, 203).
The hand-over of his leadership is totally his decision.Throughout the play, Richard becomes less a man of action and more passive, a man who thinks about the situation and internalises his thoughts, instead of making a stand. He accepts what is happening to him as fate, as something he cannot change, and I think, gives in too easily. These qualities that Richard has makes him an inadequate and poor king, not ready to make a stand against the people that threaten his country and its people. A king cannot simply accept what is happening to his country if it is being invaded or overrun, he must enable armies and fight the intruders to stand up for his country and actually rule the country.
Richard does not do this. His country is being 'taken over' by Bolingbroke and Richard simply gives in to him, handing over the crown himself.Richard is a passive man, and an inappropriate king. He internalises his thoughts and thinks about his situation, making him a poor ruler. People want to see their ruler making a stand against what is wrong and what is against the people's morals. Richard, instead thinks about problems and does nothing about it. Throughout the play, Richard deals with problems badly and suffers because of the decisions he makes. He is certainly not a man of action, but a passive man, who internalises his feelings and thoughts.