Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Length: 1871 words (5.3 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Religious Freedom Restoration Act

     In this paper I will describe the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
This Act was used to contradict the decision of the court case of Employment
Division v. Smith, which allowed the government to forbid any religious act
without giving a reason. The RFRA brought back the requirement that the
government provide an adequate reason to forbid any religious act. The
government once again had to show that the act was of compelling interest
against the state.

     In 1993 one of the most important acts that has gone thorough Congress
was passed (Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA). This was the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 (Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA). This act
was passed to answer the 1990 court case Employment Division v. Smith (Questions
and Answers, Map of the RFRA). Employment Division v. Smith was a court case in
which the issue was whether “Sacramental use of peyote by members of the Native
American Church was protected under the free exercise clause of the First
Amendment, which provides that ‘Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the
free exercise of religion'.”(Questions and Answers, Map of the RFRA). According
to Justice Scalia, “if prohibiting the exercise of religion was merely the
incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the
First Amendment was not offended.” (Questions and Answers, Map of the RFRA).

"...the government no longer had to justify most burdens on religious exercise.
The free exercise clause offered protection only if a particular religious
practice was singled out for discriminatory treatment. In short, free exercise
was a sub category of equal protection. This placed religious rights in an
inferior position to other First Amendment rights such as freedom of speech and
press." (Questions and Answers, Map of the RFRA).

This court case caused a series of court cases about religious freedoms
(Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA). Congress enacted the RFRA to contradict
the negative affect that court cases had recently had on religious
freedoms(Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA).

     The RFRA is what it states it is in the title, a restoration
act(Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA). Congress decided that in Employment
Division v. Smith,

"the supreme court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government
justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion
and the compelling interest test as set forth in prior Federal court rulings is
a workable test for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and
competing prior governmental interests."(Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA)

In other words, the government did not have to have a reason to impose laws

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Religious Freedom Restoration Act." 24 Feb 2020

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

The United States Religious Freedom Restoration Act Of 1964 Essay

- The issues the court must address in this case are: Does Cakes and Pies Bakery not engage in interstate commerce. Can the federal government tell states what laws they must pass. Can a person’s religious freedom infringe on another’s personal freedoms. The issues of what the court should address in this case are: Does the United States Religious Freedom Restoration Act violate the U.S. Constitution. Can the U.S. Government create a United States Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The issues the court could address in this case are: Does Cakes and Pies Bakery violate anti-discrimination laws set forth by the Civil Rights Act of 1964....   [tags: U.S. state, United States Constitution]

Research Papers
1108 words (3.2 pages)

Controversy Over Religious Freedom During The United States Essay

- Controversy over religious freedom has long been an issue in the United States of America. The beginning of religious freedom in the United States started with the ratification of the Constitution which provided a provision that the government would not involve itself with any religion. However, the Constitution is not at all the only source for legislation/decisions on what religious freedoms entail in the United States of America. Over the years, the United States Supreme Court has had great influence over the amount of religious freedom in this country....   [tags: United States, Supreme Court of the United States]

Research Papers
1467 words (4.2 pages)

Essay on Hobby Lobby’s Health Care Provisions

- Hobby Lobby’s Health Care Provisions The issue that is at hand is if the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 is being violated, which says that the federal government “shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion” unless that burden is the least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest, allows a corporation the ability to deny its employees the health coverage of contraceptives to which the employees are entitled by federal law, based on the religious objections of the corporation’s owners....   [tags: religious freedom, affordable care act]

Research Papers
740 words (2.1 pages)

Contraception Insurance Mandate: The Religious Exemption Debate Essay example

- ... According to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, even if organizations aren’t required to pay for contraceptives directly, “forcing their religiously affiliated institutions to facilitate access to contraception- the use of which clashes with fundamental tenets of the Catholic faith- violates their religious conscience” (Corbin 2013, p. 1471). These groups do not want to facilitate behavior that they deem immoral; some corporations are challenging the requirement that they cover the full range of contraceptives while others are contesting providing coverage for emergency contraception, as they believe it is an abortifacient, despite the fact that the FDA classifies it as a...   [tags: preventative, catholic, freedom]

Research Papers
1620 words (4.6 pages)

What Does One Define Religious Freedom And Prisoner Rights? Essay

- How does one define religious freedom and prisoner rights. Religious freedom is defined in the First Amendment “to practice his or her own religious, or no religion at all”. Religious Freedom was established to help individuals express and/or practice their own beliefs without anyone having to say what they can’t believe in or practice. Prisoner rights under the eighth amendment, paraphrase Prisoners do not have full Constitutional rights as anyone else but they do have protection Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment....   [tags: Prison, Human rights, Religion]

Research Papers
1903 words (5.4 pages)

Essay on Muslims in America: The Fight For Freedom

- The United States of America: once a small colony, now one of the world’s most powerful nations; a nation that has been fraught with wars, protests and continuous conflicts between religion and state. This essay will investigate the relationship between the religion and state, discuss the states declaration’s about this relationship and the practice of these declarations. Americans, after the September 11 attacks, have marginalised the Muslim community, which is largely due to their Christian origins and misinterpretations of Islam....   [tags: Religion]

Research Papers
1238 words (3.5 pages)

The Contraception Mandate: A Complex Debate Between Religious Freedoms and a Woman’s Right to Health

- Arguably, citizens of the United States of American are endowed with “certain unalienable rights.” Our forefathers fought to establish a government that would enable its citizens to protect these rights should they be challenged. Recently the rights of two different groups have been called into question surrounding the Contraception Mandate, which is part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), signed into law by President Obama on March 23rd 2010. The mandate states that employers who offer health care insurance are required by law to provide “minimum essential” health care coverage to their employees’, part of which includes the coverage of contraceptives....   [tags: family planning, women's rights]

Research Papers
1932 words (5.5 pages)

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Essay

- The urbanization of the indigenous people of North America has been an ongoing process since the inception of the United States of America without many successes. The development of the Indian gaming, that occurred in the 20th century, was thought to be a way of allowing Native people to raise themselves up. In 1988, the National Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (NIGRA) was passed to provide a legal basis to promote economic development, self-reliance, and strong Tribal Government. This was a big step towards tribal sovereignty in the United States among the native people....   [tags: Native Americans in the United States]

Research Papers
883 words (2.5 pages)

Significance of the Toleration Act Essay examples

- Significance of the Toleration Act Religious intolerance was normal practice throughout the Middle Ages, the Reformation bringing with it much persecution. Christian Anti-Semitism fuelled the religious insecurity prevalent in Europe but by the end of the sixteenth century Poland, the Dutch Republic and France had reached a state of ‘tolerance’, being in contrast to the religious intolerance still present in England at this time....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
632 words (1.8 pages)

Workplace Religious Freedom Act Essay

- Significant facts In 2009, Oregon State Legislature passed the Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act (OWRFA). The allows employees to observe their religious practices while at work. Employers are required to grant employees the right to wear religious clothes, grow beards, and take specific days off for religious purposes. The bill specifically states that public schools are excluded from the act. As a result, Sikhs have been barred from teaching in Oregon due to the fact they wear religious clothing, including turbans....   [tags: oregon, teachers, public schools]

Research Papers
983 words (2.8 pages)

Related Searches

against a religious act.

     Thus the purpose of this act was “to restore the compelling interest
test as set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v.
Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) and to guarantee its application in all cases where
free exercise of religion is substantially burdened.”(Religious Freedom, Map of
the RFRA) The other purpose of this act was to “Provide a claim of defense to
persons whose religious exercise is substantially burdened by the government.”
(Religious Freedom, Map of the RFRA) “The government may not substantially
burden a person's exercise of religion even if the burden is a result of a
general or neutral law.”(RFRA Summary, Map of the RFRA)The only exception to
this rule is,

"if the government can demonstrate the following three things , that there is a
compelling state interest, that a particular law, rule, decision or action
actually furthers that compelling state interest, if there is a compelling state
interest and this action furthers it, then the government must use the least
restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. Notice
that the burden is on the government; the government cannot simply state that it
has a compelling interest but it must also demonstrate each of the three
requirements above. This section also states that this Act provides a cause of
action or a defense for any person whose religious exercise has been burdened,
and provides for legal fees. It is important to note that the term, "person,"
can refer to corporate bodies as well -- such as church or religious
organizations."(RFRA Summary, Map of the RFRA)

Section five of the RFRA included an important definition. This section defined
“government” to include any “federal, state or local branch, department, agency,
instrumentality, official or other person acting under color of law.”(RFRA
Summary, Map of the RFRA) So now any part of the government had to provide the
three requirements that are defined above to issue laws against a religious
practice. No longer could the government just do what they wanted to do, they
had to prove that the religious act is a compelling state interest.

     The RFRA was supported by many people. RFRA is enthusiastically
supported by more than fifty religious and civil liberties groups in the
political and theological fields. Never has a broader coalition been assembled
to support Congressional legislation. This was no ordinary coalition. It
included the American Civil Liberties Union, and the National Association of
Evangelicals; People for the American Way, and Concerned Women for America; the
American Muslim Council, and the American Jewish Congress; the Traditional
Values Coalition, and B'nai Brith of the Anti-Defamation League. In the opinion
of the Reverend Oliver Thomas, Chairman of Coalition for the Free Exercise of
Religion, and former General Counsel of the Baptist Joint Committee, this was
the most diverse coalition of religious and civil liberties. All of these
organizations have been willing to lay aside their deep ideological differences
in order to unite behind a principle -- religious liberty for all
Americans.(Questions and Answers, Map of the RFRA) The lead Senate sponsors
were Ted Kennedy and Orin Hatch. (Questions and Answers, Map of the RFRA) Among
the House sponsors were Newt Gingrich and Barny Frank. (Questions and Answers,
Map of the RFRA)

     This act was enacted for one main reason. The religious freedom of the
country was being threatened by the Employment Division v. Smith case because
this case took away the qualification that you prove that the law against the
religious act be of compelling interest to the state. The RFRA was issued to
reinstate the qualifications for laws against religious freedoms.

     The change this Act has brought is already significant. During the three
years prior to RFRA -- between the time that the Smith decision was handed down
(1990) and RFRA was enacted (1993) -- there have been approximately 60 cases
which have relied on the Smith decision. All of them were decided against the
free exercise or First amendment claims. From the time RFRA was enacted in late
1993 until May 1995, there have been over 87 court cases that have made
reference to it. Although some courts have found a sufficient compelling
governmental interest to warrant restriction of religious freedom, many courts
have supported the free exercise rights -- some courts have found that the
governmental interest was insufficient to warrant the burden on religion; others
found that the government had not used the least restrictive means of achieving
that interest.(RFRA Summary, Map of the RFRA)

     "The Religious Freedoms Restoration Act is the most significant
legislation effecting religion in the history of the republic because it
provides strong protection for religious liberty for all Americans,
conservatives and liberals alike."(Questions and Answers, Map of the RFRA) This
Act also effects many people.

     The first way it can effect a person is as a citizen. Simply put, you
should know your rights whether you practice a religion or not. “Apathy or
indifference to the freedoms we have will always lead to erosion of those
freedoms”.(What Does It Mean To Me?, Map of the RFRA) Our rights don't come free,
they require constant vigilance. The First Amendment in the Bill of Rights
begins by listing freedom of religion before speech and press. We should all
carefully consider if the emphasis our founding fathers put on the free exercise
of religion is outdated or just as needed today.(What Does It Mean To Me?, Map
of the RFRA)

     The second way that the act can effect a person is as a legislator.
Lawmakers have a special privilege and responsibility to be aware and sensitive
to the religious practices of others and the impact legislative language can
have on such practices. This especially applies to minority religions, whose
religious rights are so often ignored in the introduction of bills.
Understanding is the key to drafting good language. “Taking the time to
understand the needs of others in the religious community will not only protect
a particular religious practice, it really benefits us all.”(What Does It Mean
To Me?, Map of the RFRA)

     The third type of person effected is the churchgoer. If those who
practice religion don't defend their freedom, who will? “The diversity of the
68 plus organization that supported RFRA through Congress should encourage all
churchgoers to be active in their support and knowledge of this law.”(What Does
It Mean To Me?, Map of the RFRA) The Religious Freedom Restoration Act wasn't
just thought up and enacted by lawyers and politicians. It is a fine example of
lawmaking in the best sense of the word. Many of those who worked long hours on
RFRA's passage into law were motivated by their devotion to their church and
considered this act vital to their own religious freedom as well as of those
around them. It was for most an unselfish labor of love.(What Does It Mean To
Me?, Map of the RFRA)

     The fourth type of people the RFRA has an impact on is Doctors and
Nurses. Most physicians, nurses, health care providers and hospital
administrators today are aware of advance directives, refusal of blood
transfusions, diet restrictions, and the refusal of medical treatment in general.
Often religious practices underlie these individual decisions and approaches to
health care. Whenever a religious practice conflicts with the convictions of
those involved in the health care profession, RFRA should be consulted,
respected and understood to help accurately weigh the rights of each individual.

     The last person that the act effects is the Attorneys and Judges.
Ignorance of the law by those who practice law or make legal decisions can be
devastating to a sense of justice and individual rights. RFRA's wording in law
is specific and exact and intended to raise a clear and high standard for the
freedom of religious practice. It deserves careful thought as to its meaning and

     The Religious Freedom Restoration act is a document that has helped to
undo the damage that the Employment Division v. Smith did to our freedoms as a
country. In less than four years over 60 court cases were used against the
people because of the decision of the courts in the Employment Division v. Smith
case, but sense the RFRA was put into action over 80 cases have come up
regarding it, and most of these cases have been ruled in favor of the people.
This act just brought back some of the freedoms that our fore fathers guaranteed
us, by reinstating the right to have a reason to take away our religious
freedoms. Now the government needs to find a reasonable reason of importance to
the state to stop any religious practice.
Return to