Empowerment of Women in Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It, and The Taming of the Shrew

Empowerment of Women in Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It, and The Taming of the Shrew

Length: 1718 words (4.9 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Empowerment of Women in Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It, and The Taming of the Shrew  


   In Shakespeare’s comedies, many – possibly even most - of the female characters are portrayed as being manipulated, if not controlled outright, by the men in their lives: fathers, uncles, suitors, husbands.  And yet, there are women inhabiting Shakespeare’s comedic world who seem to enjoy a greater degree of autonomy and personal power than one would expect in a patriarchal society.  Superficially, therefore, Shakespeare’s comedies appear to send mixed signals regarding the notion of female empowerment.  Some women are strong and independent, others are completely submissive, and the behavior of either seems to be influenced more by theme or plot than by any qualities within the characters themselves.

A closer look, though, should make it evident that this is not the case; as in many of Shakespeare’s plays, appearances can be deceiving.  In some cases, the exterior behavior is a deliberate façade to mask the character’s real feelings; in others, it is an acculturated veneer that is burned away as a result of the play’s events.  Despite their outward appearances, though, most of these comedic women belong to one of two opposing archetypes.  An examination of these archetypes allows the reader to see past such deceptions to the real personality beneath.

 

The “Daughter” and “Niece” Archetypes

Within Shakespeare’s comedies, many of the female characters are portrayed as submissive and easily controlled.  Like dutiful daughters, these women submit to patriarchal repression with little complaint.

Perhaps the best example of a “daughter” character in Shakespearean comedy is the role of Hero in Much Ado About Nothing.  Hero is completely under the control of her father Leonato, especially with regard to courtship.  When, in Act Two, Leonato believes that Don Pedro may seek Hero’s hand in marriage, he orders Hero to welcome the prince’s advances despite the difference in their ages: “Daughter, remember what I told you.  If the Prince do solicit you in that kind, you know your answer” (II.i.61-3).  Thus we see that Leonato controls not only Hero’s actions, but even her words as well.

In fact, Hero is so thoroughly repressed by the male-dominated society in which she lives that she submits not only to her father’s will, but to that of nearly every other man in the play.  She is easily wooed and won by Don Pedro posing as Claudio (II.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Empowerment of Women in Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It, and The Taming of the Shrew." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Nov 2018
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=8168>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Women in Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing and Taming of the Shrew Essay

- During the early modern period, despite Queen Elizabeth’s powerful rule in the mid-sixteenth century, women in England had very few social, economic, and legal rights. According to the British system of coverture, a married man and wife became one person under the law, thus, “all the legal rights and responsibilities a woman had when she was single transferred to her husband upon marriage” (McBride-Stetson 189). Additionally, once married, the entirety of a woman’s property and wages came under the husband’s control; thus, in essence, women became the responsibility and property of their husbands (McBride-Stetson 189)....   [tags: Much Ado About Nothing Essays]

Research Papers
1905 words (5.4 pages)

Essay Much Ado About Nothing: A Comedy with Deep Meaning

- Much Ado About Nothing:  A Comedy with Deep Meaning      Much Ado About Nothing--the title sounds, to a modern ear, offhand and self-effacing; we might expect the play that follows such a beginning to be a marvelous piece of fluff and not much more. However, the play and the title itself are weightier than they initially seem. Shakespeare used two other such titles--Twelfth Night, or What You Will and As You Like It--both of which send unexpected reverberations of meaning throughout their respective plays, the former with its reference to the Epiphany and the topsy-turvy world of a saturnalian celebration, and the latter with its implications about how the characters (and the audience it...   [tags: Much Ado About Nothing Essays]

Research Papers
1272 words (3.6 pages)

Stereotypical Views Held About Women by Elizabethan Men in William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing

- Stereotypical Views Held About Women by Elizabethan Men in William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing Introduction ============ Much Ado About Nothing exemplifies a kind of deliberately puzzling title that seems to have been popular in the late 1590s. Indeed, the play is about nothing; it merely follows the relationships of Claudio and Hero, and in the end, the play culminates in the two other main characters falling in love, which, because it was an event that was quite predictable, proves to be much ado about nothing The pronunciation of the word "nothing" would, in the late 16th Century, have been "noting," and so the title also apparently suggests...   [tags: Papers Shakespeare Much Ado Nothing Essays]

Research Papers
3293 words (9.4 pages)

Comparing Katharina, of The Taming of the Shrew and Beatrice of Much Ado About Nothing

- Comparing Shakespeare’s Katharina, of The Taming of the Shrew and Beatrice, of Much Ado About Nothing Shakespeare’s Katharina, of The Taming of the Shrew and Beatrice, of Much Ado About Nothing, are very similar characters.  Each is plagued with unrequited love, and depressed by their inability to woo the suitor of their choosing.  Neither will accept the passive female role expected by society. Yet, both women seem to accept their role as wife by the conclusion.  Upon further examination, one will find that Beatrice is a much more complex character.  One would have to agree with the critic who said, "Katharina is a character sketched in bold, rapid stokes, with none of Beatrice's sophisti...   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]

Research Papers
1324 words (3.8 pages)

Analysis of Much Ado About Nothing Essay

- Analysis of Much Ado About Nothing Much Ado About Nothing illustrates a kind of deliberately puzzling title that seems to have been popular in the late 1590s (ex "As You Like It"). Indeed, the play is about nothing; it follows the relationships of Claudio and Hero (which is constantly hampered by plots to disrupt it), and in the end, the play culminates in the two other main characters falling in love (Beatrice and Bena*censored*), which, because it was an event that was quite predictable, proves to be "much ado about nothing"....   [tags: William Shakespeare Plays Essays]

Research Papers
3675 words (10.5 pages)

The Taming of the Shrew: A Comedic Approach Essay

- Tragedy, irony and modernism are only a few interpretations of the valued play The Taming of the Shrew by the respected writer William Shakespeare. However, one of the most intriguing and popular of these analyses is comedy. Shakespeare is recognized for writing several plays with comedic genres, a few of which include Much Ado About Nothing and The Comedy of Errors. Comedy, being a complex genre, is composed of many different concepts. This particular play can be interpreted as a Shakespearian comedy, a screwball comedy, a farce, or slapstick....   [tags: William Shakespeare plays]

Research Papers
1347 words (3.8 pages)

William Shakespeare 's The Taming Of The Shrew Essay

- ... After Petruchio catches up with her they seem to switch roles. Petruchio is now the one with no modesty as he forces Katherine to stay and hear him out. Once they are on their way back to Petruchio’s home, the changing of roles intensifies as Petruchio treats Katherine as nothing more than a hindrance. When they finally arrive at the castle, Petruchio’s servants seem like they want to treat Katherine well, however Petruchio has a different plan. He ruins the whole dinner saying it is not fit for such a woman and sends Katherine off to bed hungry and tired....   [tags: Interpersonal relationship, Love]

Research Papers
1059 words (3 pages)

William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew Essay

- William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew The battle between these two characters thus becomes much more than a merely physical one and moves into the realm of wit-combat with a carefully thought out central theme-matrimonial relationships-which gives structural form and meaning to the entire play. Themes Basically the play deals with the traditional comic situation in which a shrewish woman is tamed into a wife who is submissive to her husband....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
1061 words (3 pages)

Benedick’s Change of Heart by the End of Act 2 Scene 3 of William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing

- Benedick’s Change of Heart by the End of Act 2 Scene 3 of William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing ‘Much ado about nothing’ is one of William Shakespeare’s popular comedy plays. With regards to the title of the play, the word ‘nothing’ in the title suggests it links with how characters in the play create so much bother about nothing. Speculation has occurred among people over the word ‘nothing’ in the play’s title. The word ‘nothing’ has a double meaning. Noting and nothing sounded identical in Shakespeare’s time....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
2304 words (6.6 pages)

Essay on Kate in William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew

- Kate in William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew Katharina or Kate, the shrew of William Shakespeare's The Taming Of The Shrew is sharp-tongued, quick-tempered, and prone to violence and violent outbursts, especially to anyone who tries to win her love. This is shown from the beginning in Act One with the scene among Hortensio and Gremio and her. When Gremio proclaims her "too rough" (I.i.55) and Hortensio claims that they want mates "of gentler, milder mould" (I.i.60), she strikes back with such words as "To comb your noddle with a three-legg'd stool and paint your face and...   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
1768 words (5.1 pages)

Related Searches

i.80-93).  She is just as easily undone in a single speech when Claudio pronounces her an adulteress (IV.i.30-41).  Even Don John, through his nefarious schemes, is able to manipulate Hero, very nearly to her death.  Despite the influence of the more liberated Beatrice in her life, Hero shows no sign of acting under her own volition anywhere in the play.

Unlike Hero, however, other female characters in Shakespeare’s comedies do not submit easily to the will of a patriarchal character, or indeed, that of any man.  Just as Much Ado About Nothing presents us, in Hero, with the very model of a dutiful “daughter” character, so it delineates the archetypical “niece” character, the quick-witted Beatrice.  The “merry war” (I.i.58) she wages with Benedick may showcase her character to best advantage, but it is clear from the first scene of the play that Beatrice does not easily submit to the commands or beliefs of any man.

In fact, it often seems that Beatrice would liberate her cousin Hero from patriarchal repression as well.  While virtually every main character in the play is conspiring to arrange Hero’s marriage, Beatrice counsels Hero to follow her own desires, despite contemporary custom:

[I]t is my cousin’s duty to make curtsy and say, “Father, as it please you.”  But yet for all that, cousin, let him be a handsome fellow, or else make another curtsy and say, “Father, as it please me” (II.i.49-52).

 

Beatrice’s willfulness continues even through the final scene of the play.  Despite her earlier vows to requite Benedick’s love (III.i.109-16), when he at last proposes, she makes sure to emphasize that they are to be married only because she agrees, not because he wills it (V.iv.72-95).

 

The “Daughter”/“Niece” Binary in The Taming of the Shrew

Although Kate is (literally speaking) a daughter to the patriarchal figure Baptista, she seldom submits to her father’s authority, in matters of behavior or of courtship.  She therefore fits better with the willful “niece” characters than she does with the obedient “daughter” types; the archetype is informed by the behavioral, not familial, relationship.  It is Kate’s disobedience – her “niece” behavior - that provides the impetus for the play’s action.

By contrast, Kate’s sister Bianca is presented as a “daughter” character throughout most of the play: “[W]hat you will command me will I do/So well I know my duty” (II.i.6-7).  Even the play’s minimal stage directions emphasize Bianca’s submissive nature: Bianca enters and exits scenes only at the behest of a male character (or Kate, in Act II and again in Act V).  Her subjugation to her father is especially evident with regard to her potential suitors: Baptista proclaims in his first lines that Bianca may not be courted until Kate is married (I.i.49-51).  Bianca, in fact, is outwardly so submissive that she even professes to be willing to stand aside and allow Kate her choice of Bianca’s many suitors (II.i.10-18).

The final scene of the play, however, reverses these archetypal characterizations completely.  Once married to Lucentio, Bianca immediately becomes willful and disobedient, refusing to respond to his summons (V.ii.79-85).  Kate, on the other hand, comes dutifully when Petruchio calls for her (99-104).  At his request, she fetches Bianca, and delivers her long speech regarding wifely duty (140-183).

This final scene demonstrates that the “daughter” and “niece” characterizations are actually masks that each sister has used to obtain the sort of husband each desires.  Bianca poses as a dutiful, obedient “daughter” to attract a husband of means; once she has done so, she can drop the façade and become the pampered, petulant child she has always been.  Kate, on the other hand, wields her “shrewishness” to rid herself of suitors whom she cannot respect.  When Petruchio resolves to wed her anyway, she realizes that he is just the sort of husband she can be happy with, and so becomes a loving, obedient wife (whether to please him, or because that is the sort of relationship she desires).  It is fitting, in a play so concerned with disguise, that both Kate and Bianca exercise power by exploiting the guises provided by their respective archetypes.

 

The “Daughter”/“Niece” Binary in As You Like It

The “daughter” and “niece” archetypes, of course, are not universally applicable to all women in Shakespeare’s comedies.  In As You Like It, there are other female characters which defy such classification.  Phoebe, for example, exhibits traits of both “niece” (in her willful pursuit of the erstwhile Ganymede) and “daughter” (as when she readily submits to Ganymede’s stipulation that she marry Silvius), while the country wench Audrey cannot easily be assigned to either category.  Still, the archetypes once again prove useful in an examination of the relative empowerment of the play’s central female characters, Rosalind and Celia.

On the surface, Rosalind appears to be one of the most independent, and thus empowered, women in any of Shakespeare’s works.  Like Beatrice with Benedick, Rosalind is able to dictate completely the terms of her relationship with Orlando; throughout most of the play, he obeys her every whim – and this despite his belief that she is only a simulacrum of Rosalind.  In a time when marriage was customarily (judging by the texts) a business arrangement between the groom and the bride’s father, Rosalind actually arranges her own union with Orlando, albeit in disguise (V.iv.5-10); further, she even arranges the marriage of Silvius and Phoebe (V.ii, V.iv.11-25).  The dramatic irony of this chain of circumstances, in fact, is the basis for the play’s comedic action: Ganymede, who exerts such control over the lives of others, is really a woman.

It may be contended that Rosalind gets what she wants not because she is a truly empowered woman, but because she poses as a man, and that before adopting this disguise, she has no agency.  Duke Frederick, to whom Rosalind is a literal as well as archetypical niece, robs her of control over her own fate when he summarily banishes her from his court (I.iii.39-87).  Yet even here we can see that Rosalind already possesses the potential to become empowered.  When asked why she is sentenced to exile, the duke replies, “Let it suffice thee that I trust thee not . . . Thou art thy father’s daughter” (I.iii.53, 56).  The duke, rightly or wrongly, views Rosalind as a threat, and only an empowered woman would pose a threat to him.  Viewed in this light, the masculine disguise only unlocks the latent power that the “niece” archetype already possesses.

Celia, on the other hand, is clearly a “daughter” character.  Her sole act of volition in the entire play comes when she determines to join Rosalind in exile (I.iii.83-103), and even this one act of defiance is motivated more by Celia’s loyalty to her cousin than by any desire of her own.  When, in the play’s final act, Oliver determines to marry Celia, only Orlando is given any right of decision over her lot (V.ii.1-15); Celia has apparently consented to be wed (l. 7), but is not really a party to the negotiations.

Thus, even while presenting a strong, independent female character, As You Like It seems to reinforce the patriarchal notion of women as subjugated beings.  Rosalind exercises some control over her own destiny, but only after she disguises herself as a man; lacking such a guise, Celia is virtually powerless to determine her own fate.  But this superficial view is an inadequate interpretation.  The Ganymede disguise – indeed, the entire journey to Arden – is the crucible that releases Rosalind’s latent personal power, but the power has always been there; like Kate and Bianca, she has always been a “niece.”  Celia remains subjugated not because she chooses to travel as a woman, but because she is, at heart, a dutiful “daughter.”

Works Cited

Bevington, David, ed.  The Complete Works of Shakespeare.  4th ed.  New York: Longman-Addison Wesley Longman, 1997.

Shakespeare, William.  As You Like It.  Bevington 288-325.

---.  Much Ado About Nothing.  Bevington 216-51.

---.  The Taming of the Shrew.  Bevington 108-46.

 

 
Return to 123HelpMe.com