Essay PreviewMore ↓
Democracy can be easily defined as a “rule of government by the people, and for the people”. Whilst incorporating the principles of majority rule, the protection of minority rights, equal participation, fair and frequent elections and the rule of law. This is done through elected representatives by the public. In our government we have political parties (interest groups) of people acting in politics to secure goals which they think are important and nearly always acting on behalf of other people whom they say think these goals are important too. The common complexity of this is that these goals often clash with other political party’s that have other issues and views. The biggest example of this is the clash between the Liberal Party and the Australian Labour Party. The goal of Democracy is to let the people have there say and for the representatives to decide on the best decision for the Commonwealth and the people.
A definition of Efficiency can be described as productive whilst using the minimum waste or effort. In relation to politics, our system is an efficient and working government. Our Legislative sector of government has proven itself as a working system in our commonwealth and has had no major issues with its process.
In most cases after elections the party with the majority in the lower house which has formed government usually does not have control of the upper house. The control usually hangs with the smaller parties and independents and they hold the balance of power which can decide the fate of bills that have been sent from the lower house.
How to Cite this Page
"Parliament works best when the government controls both houses.." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The American Government: The Arduous Path Towards Balance People in the United States live during a time of confusion. This confusion intensifies only because of how an individual’s environment shapes everyone’s views. Media spreads shocking and negative news like wildfire, but look at it this way: people seem attracted to the biggest fires. It seems that many individuals would like to live the world vicariously, seeking information, without knowing how to process this information. With the news constantly bombarding the public with negativity, positivity becomes something difficult to conceptualize.... [tags: United States Constitution, U.S. state]
2112 words (6 pages)
- “Every breath you take, every move you make…every step you take, I'll be watching you” (Sting 1983). These lyrics to the classic song “Every Breath You Take” by Sting, depict both the acts of Big Brother in the novel 1984 and today’s media. Big Brother, like today’s government, watches every move society makes. The government controls the media and according to Peter Jennings of ABC, “Whoever controls the media controls reality”. The media, to Jennings specifically the government, controls what we think, what we know and what we want.... [tags: Masses, Control ]
525 words (1.5 pages)
- The questions that surround the issues of gun safety have resurfaced again since the recent shootings in Arizona. (Luo) Are background checks enough to help prevent shooting violence. Do guns that have the capacity to fire several rounds without having to reload have any influence on the number of deaths that occur due to shootings. Should mental health screening go beyond the current set standard as a preventative safety measure. Perhaps we the American people will never have the answers to these questions, because of the interference piloted by the NRA.... [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
1583 words (4.5 pages)
- In every country investment of life insurance funds has been subject to government control, although the nature and dimension of such control have differed from country to country and from time to time according to circumstances. The main object underlying such control is to safeguard the interest of the insured against any embezzlement or misuse of funds by unscrupulous insurers for their own benefit. The government, therefore, must maintain strict vigilance upon the manner in which these funds are utilized.... [tags: Investment, Insurance, Risk, Pension]
958 words (2.7 pages)
- Two Power Houses in a Powerless land. In April 2009, United States president Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev grabbed attention in the London G20 summit by saying that they would give US -Russia relation a fresh start. They stressed that the United States and Russia will now focus on mutual interest. After being invited to Russia a few months after the G20 summit President Obama and Russian President Medvedev announced the Obama–Medvedev Commission to improve communication and cooperation between the United States and Russia.... [tags: two power houses in a powerless land]
772 words (2.2 pages)
- American stockholders have billions if not trillions of dollars invested in various publicly traded companies throughout the country. With that much money involved, it is only wise that there be control measures and safeguards put into place protect these investments from any unlawful or irresponsible activity. Publicly traded companies are required by law to develop such measures. These measures are often referred to as internal controls. These internal controls exist for two main reasons. One reason being, to keep the employees honest.... [tags: Internal Controls, ]
868 words (2.5 pages)
- Internal controls are methods and procedures for promoting lawful financial practices in business. Their main purposes are to ensure that assets are properly safeguarded from theft and improper use, as well as to ensure that financial records are accurate and reliable, free from errors and are done in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles. In 2002, congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley act, this act made it so that Corporations are required to pay closer attention to financial reporting practices and to make sure that their internal controls are working properly.... [tags: Internal Controls, ]
857 words (2.4 pages)
- How is our character revealed through our interaction with the natural world around us. Do we adapt to fit in with nature, or do we force the landscape to conform to our ideals of lifestyle. In the short story “The Shining Houses”, Alice Munro addresses the contrast in lifestyle ideologies between two generations through their interactions with the natural environment they populate. The older generation is content to live in harmony with the existing natural world and develop its infrastructure amongst the present landscape.... [tags: The Shining Houses]
677 words (1.9 pages)
- Internal Controls Internal controls are all of the protocol and methods by which a company or organization protects its assets and ensures the correctness and reliability of its financial and accounting records. Tight internal controls are essential to any company that desires confidence in its stockholders and clients. Recent accounting scandals at companies such as Enron and Tyco have necessitated the need for strong internal controls and accounting procedures. As a result of these accounting scandals new legislations and organizations have been developed to audit private companies and ensure that the proper controls are in place.... [tags: Accounting ]
1304 words (3.7 pages)
- Separation of powers is defined in our textbook as, “Constitutional division of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, with the legislative branch making law, the executive branch applying and enforcing the law, and the judiciary interpreting the law. More simply explained, separation of powers is a concept the framers of the constitution developed to divide specific governmental powers among the three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judicial. The framers believed it was important to separate the powers between the three branches to keep the majority from having complete rule over everything.... [tags: US Government Political]
739 words (2.1 pages)
This power for a party allows many bills to be passed in both houses without much rejection to slow the bill from being passed. This creates a fast and efficient government and allows issues to have a resolution passed in both houses without any rebuttal to change or amend the bill. Our parliament has been said to be a room full of arguing idiots, in short terms, too much disagreement, too much difference, too much arguing and not enough solutions and compromises being formulated. With this power in just one party it resolves this problem by having less force against the bills being sent into the upper house and passed there. But is this the right solution? Yes, this resolves the problem of slow moving bills in the upper house but is it right one? Does having the government control both houses still keep our system as Democratic as it should be?
This issues sparks many concerns and controversies as it has been brought up that this creates a government that has no second view on issues, that it rules out a lot of the oppositions power and only allows the parliament to be run by a single dominate party. There are still many members of other parties in both houses but because only one party has the majority, there say in the proposed bill may be heard, but if the dominate party does not support the view in any way then there is little that the other parties can do then just sit back and be out voted. This just allows for only a one sided say, a one sided point of view and creates a one eyed system. Just like a Dictatorship but instead of having one representative with the final say it is spread out onto a party with the same say.
A fast and efficient government does not combine well with a democratic system. We may have a smooth and efficient government but only to the degree of still holding our democratic features and quality, which is the foundation to our system. Our system should be kept as Democratic as it can be. Our system was created so that all views could be brought into consideration and the views of the people. Democracy is not about the efficiency of our government but solely about making the best decisions for the people. With only one view, Democracy in our government becomes degraded and the decisions made will only benefit a limited amount of Australians.
The government controlling both houses affects our Democracy in our parliaments. With Democracy being affected this is a push away from our system of government. This may be distinguished in many ways and looked upon with different views but the fact of the matter is that any step away from Democracy in our government cannot be a good one. Parliament may necessarily work better in the sense of faster flowing bills through both houses but does it work better and maintain the democratic features that our parliaments have grown into over the many years of their existence? Looking at the issue from a Democratic view, this is an incorrect step in our system and democracy should constantly be more significant and vital then the efficiency in our parliaments.