Essay PreviewMore ↓
Being yourself, being who you are. When you hear those two lines you may think they mean the same thing but do they? Think about it, you were born into this world a tiny little baby with no ideas, or preferences, but as you grew you developed a personal identity, but did it really develop or was it in you to begin with. Such questions are what leads to the great debate of nature vs nurture. If you believe you were born already with a personality, then you take the side of nature. on the other hand if you believe that your personality developed based on influences in your life beginning when you were a child then you believe in nurture. Two totally different theories, both which are believed to make us who we are.
Nature, the more scientific theory of the two, is the belief that hereditary traits found in our genes make us who we are, believable but not very convincing when we consider the theory of nurture. Human beings learn new things everyday, as soon as we come in to the world, our learning process begins. As a newborn baby, we slowly learn and adapt in order to survive in a new environment which is unlike that of our mothers wombs, our first environment in which we first grew, adapted to and developed in. The home environment parents and siblings play a huge role in determining personality. Influences from outside the family are also very important to the development of ones personality. But everything starts at home.
One can't enjoy snowboarding or claim to like it, until one tries it, without the experience its impossible to say you enjoyed it. Correct? Or do you think its already embedded in you're genes that you'll like snowboarding. Unlikely right? Exactly, experiences and influences are what make us who we are. On the other hand think about it, what if you went snowboarding for the first time and broke your arm; deciding then that you hated snowboarding. Well then it couldn't have been embedded in your genes that you'd like it.
Scientists make a good point about genes but I believe physical aspects come through genetics, but that personality development is shaped based solely on how a person has been nurtured through their lives. All children are bad at one time in their lives; consider this, a 4 year old girl throws a book at her brother, and is punished she is put in the corner.
How to Cite this Page
"Free Nature vs. Nurture Essay." 123HelpMe.com. 31 Mar 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- What is inborn and what is learned. The discussion as to whether nature or nurture were the driving force shaping our cognitive abilities, was for a long time considered interminable. In the 18th century, Locke and the English empiricists claimed that individuals were born with a tabula rasa and only experience could establish mind, consciousness and the self. On the continent, Leibniz envisaged the self as a monad carrying with it some knowledge of a basic understanding of the world. Until the 1960s, this dispute was still very vivid in the behavioral sciences: B.... [tags: essays research papers]
484 words (1.4 pages)
- Nature vs Nurture The exponential growth of scientific and biological knowledge over time has facilitated the genesis of radical fields of specialization, namely biological determinism, sociobiology and eugenics, just to mention a few. The common thread between these fields is this- their proponents collectively postulate that all human traits, including weight, strength, intelligence, aspects of personality such as temperament (aggression for example), criminality and morality, are ultimately determined by the information encoded in DNA.... [tags: Biology Genes Science Essays]
535 words (1.5 pages)
- Nature vs. Nurture: State Development Edition In his well known piece, Guns, Germs and Steel, Jared Diamond proposes that the differences between populations of different continents is not due to differences in the people, but of the environment. There are, of course innumerable differences to be found among the environments that each continent has to offer, however, Diamond stresses only a few. They include: wild plants and animals native to the area- which affect a society’s surplus thus allowing the society to move beyond their basic need- a group 's ability to travel and/or migrate both intercontinental and to other continents- this would allow for trade and access to other goods, and e... [tags: Free market, Capitalism, Market economy]
1158 words (3.3 pages)
- Are you born with the personality and behavior you have or the way you were raised. Nature refers to heredity, the influence of inherited characteristics on personality, physical growth, intellectual growth, and social interactions. And nurture refers to the influence of the environment on all those same things and includes parenting styles, physical surroundings, economic factors, and anything that can have an influence on development does not come from within the person (White 312-313). Nature vs Nurture Twin studies are a vastly important tool in dissecting the nature vs nurture controversy, one study included were two identical twin girls that were adopted in China by different parents;... [tags: Nature versus nurture, Tabula rasa, Human nature]
855 words (2.4 pages)
- The classic debated topic of Nature versus Nurture has been and will always be a quarrelsome subject in the scientific world. Meaning, the issue of the level to which environment and heredity sway behavior and development in a person. Nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. This means the behaviors is based on the inherited makeup of an individual and is an influence of the growth and development of that individuals’ all through life. On the other hand nurture is causes of behaviors that are environmental.... [tags: child development, psychology]
974 words (2.8 pages)
- Nature vs Nurture Debate Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.... [tags: Socialization Genes Science Nature Essays]
454 words (1.3 pages)
- Nature vs Nurture Nature vs nurture has been an ongoing debate for many decades among some of the greatest minds in psychology. Everyone is trying to figure out the source of human personality. Does our personality develop primarily by genetics, known as nature or is it based off of our environment and the way we were raised, nature. I believe it is a bit of both, but in my opinion nurture plays a bigger role. What is nature and how does it play an important role in our development. Nature is our genetics.... [tags: Mother, Family, Gene, Father]
1008 words (2.9 pages)
- For all livings thing must one day go back to nature to fertilize her fields. Nature is the natural environment which evolves around us and cares for us and nourishes us at every moment. It provides us a natural protective layer surrounding us to prevent from the damages. We are not able to survive on the earth without nature like air, land, water, fire and sky. Nature includes everything around us and on mother earth as in the plants, animals, rivers, rain, forests, graceful birds, sea, loud thunder, shining sun, elusive moon, weather, atmosphere, the rocky mountain,the Arabian deserts, vergent hills, dense cold ice, etc.... [tags: Natural environment, Nature, Human, Life]
830 words (2.4 pages)
- For centuries psychologists have argued over which plays the larger role in child development, heredity or environment. One of the first theories was proposed in the seventeenth century by the British philosopher John Locke. Locke believed that a child was born with an empty mind, tabula rasa (meaning "blank slate") and that everything the child learns comes from experience, nothing is established beforehand. Years later, Charles Darwin brought forth his theory of evolution, which led to a return of the hereditarian viewpoint.... [tags: genetics vs environment]
1766 words (5 pages)
- Nature vs. Nurture The human brain is not an empty vessel — right from the start it is packed with knowledge, some of which is built into every structure. A newborn baby just knows, for instance, that crying will bring other members of the species to its aid — it doesn't learn it or work it out. (Carter, R. Consciousness, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, p. 143) When Darwin's Theory of Evolution was published (See Darwin, C. (1859) On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray), proposing that simpler structures evolve into more complex organisms, the old certainties were threatened because the adaptations of creatures to their surroundings no longer needed to be explained in term... [tags: Science Biology Genetics Essays]
2498 words (7.1 pages)
As we grow older, we are projected to the outside world, media and friends bring us new theories, which can again change who we are. We may have been brought up being told by our parents that stealing was bad or that being an average weight was okay. But the media could easily change that belief, or friends could convince one that stealing is okay. This represents that humans are constantly changing and easily influenced. Proving that nothing about who we are is a fixed fact, the theory of nature doesn't work.
In conclusion, it's obvious that the theory of nurture makes more sense then that or nature. Without influences from the world around us where would we be. We'd lack all basic skill's, we'd be unable to talk, or walk, we'd be completely different people. One's personal identity must develop through the environment it is what makes us who we are.