1) Who is the ideal or intended audience for this piece?
The intended audience would probably be students (college, high school, maybe middle school age). It should be read by anyone who participates in sports in anyway. Include any parents of children participating in sports because many times those parents are the driving force behind the attitude of the child and the influence for the way the child plays the sport.
2) In what ways is audience important to the work?
Audience is important because you need to know what level you need to be using to get your message across. If you're writing for high school level, you probably shouldn't use college level or above phrasing and language. You need to write at the appropriate level for your audience's understanding, interest, and enjoyment.
3) Where and how does the writer appeal to the audience?
I believe it's in paragraph four of the argument. Mosher says,"We ask ourselves: Where have all the heroes gone? Where is the nobility of the sport? Who holds true to the ideals of the game? Who cares about sportsmanship and playing fair? Is it all just about winning?" These are all good appeals. Appeals that can make us think long and hard.
4) What audience values does the writer appeal to?
He appeals to the fairness in us, putting the "fun" back in the game, and maybe looking closer to home and community for heroes to look up to.
5) How and where does he or she do so?
Throughout the argument. All his points express to me that the values I mentioned previously (fairness, ect.) are needed to bring into perspective hero worship of professional athletes.
6) Why will the audience read this work?
I think they will begin to read it because the title will grab their interest. Then once they start reading, Mr. Mosher's writing skills will keep them reading. It's a very interesting and informative piece.
7) What benefit will they receive by doing so?
They will receive many good facts about different sports figures(things I didn't even know)and facts about changes in sports throughout the ages.
Former NFL linebacker, Leon Searcy said, “Guys competed just as hard off the field as they did on the field.” Corben includes anecdotal evidence and expert opinions to strength the idea of more money more problems. The sports industry uses meritocracy, the payment method of how well you play is how well you get paid. A large portion of athletes don’t get paid in the millions but buy like they do. Because of this spending technique many live paycheck to paycheck which is an example of expert opinion. An example of Corben using anecdotal evidence is when he included the story of Mike Tyson, Mike had multiple tigers and got sued because a man got mauled. Corben included this evidence to prove to the audience having nice, expensive things don’t always have a nice outcome. A particular athlete wrote a check to a credit card company for $108,000 for one month. With big bucks, it becomes easy to swipe the card. This anecdote strengthens Corben’s argument by giving a personal
6) Clark, Liz. “Athletes Say They Deserve to Be Paid.” Charlotte Observer. (Charlotte, N.C.). April 3, 1994: pg. 4G. Sports. Eleanor Goldstein. Vol. 4. Boca Raton: SIRS, 1994. Art. 65.
Another argument would be capitalism with athletes and commercials, Zirin explains how sports was suppose to be pure and untouched by the outside world but have been defile by commercialism. Zirin stated "It seems only commercialism is capable of making sports safe for politics...more than anything else, I 'll argue it is corporate power and fear of a backlash from sponsors that drive the anti political attitude that we find in our sports culture and make athletes afraid to rock the boat." Commercialism involving sports athletes shows how the big corporate power have control over athletes from taking a political stands against something that impact a certain group, which limit their say on a issues but their goals is to present their product and not say a word that involve
...cle uses many rhetorical tools to support his argument. He includes an adequate amount of statistics, authorities, and appeals for credibility. Robe strengthens his argument further by making concessions to commonly held beliefs about the benefits of college sports, while putting forth convincing counter arguments. His argument are well rounded, examining the effects of college athletics on both academic institutions, as well as individual athletes. Some logical fallacies and ineffective language do have a negative effect on the argument, however, on balance the effective supports outweigh the ineffective, further convincing Robe’s intended audience.
The audience of a paper effects the entire tone and feel of it. When I first wrote the rhetorical analysis essay I considered my audience as the professor. I assumed this because she would be the one reading the essay. My assumption caused me to omit details and kept my writing too formal. By revising my audience, it allows for a larger scope of focus for the essay. Once I figured out that my audience was my peers the essay flowed much better. For example, I explained the idea of logos and other types of appeals. After I had revised my audience the essay began to sound and flow
Lapchick, Richard E. Fractured Focus: Sport as a Reflection of Society. Toronto: Lexington Books, 1986.
In efforts to examine how genealogy evolved into its modern manifestation, Weil’s, Family Trees: A History of Genealogy in America is a “genealogy of genealogy.” Family Trees is a study of genealogy in America and its reciprocal effects on society. Weil divides his book into four chronological regimes of genealogy in America, each presented with their own set of problems. These problems did not just disappear after each
There can be no question that sport and athletes seem to be considered less than worthy subjects for writers of serious fiction, an odd fact considering how deeply ingrained in North American culture sport is, and how obviously and passionately North Americans care about it as participants and spectators. In this society of diverse peoples of greatly varying interests, tastes, and beliefs, no experience is as universal as playing or watching sports, and so it is simply perplexing how little adult fiction is written on the subject, not to mention how lightly regarded that little which is written seems to be. It should all be quite to the contrary; that our fascination and familiarity with sport makes it a most advantageous subject for the skilled writer of fiction is amply demonstrated by Mark Harris.
The author's purpose has certainly been achieved, as his arguments are logical and objective. He builds his arguments through verifiable evidence, that primarily involves reference of other literary works or people, in order to draw out a logical conclusion. His arguments has persuaded me into thinking that cheating has not only been widespread and accepted in America but it has also penetrated into Canada. I am able to support my opinion since I myself have experienced foul play at my regional soccer games. Moreover, the final sentence of the essay where the author mocks Pooley for believing "sports should not be immoral rather it should be fun" creates a balanced persuasive effect with a bit of sarcasm.
Entering my first year of college I didn’t have any idea of what I wanted to do. I still didn’t choose a major let alone a career. I was stuck in between wanting to make enough money that my family would be taken care of financially and choosing a career that I wouldn’t mind going in to work every day. The one thing that I was certain of was that I wanted to be able to help people in whatever I chose to do. After careful consideration and exploring the options available to me, I have come to the conclusion that I want to have a career in physical therapy. Physical therapy is the treatment of disease, injury or deformity through physical methods rather than through drugs or surgery.
The tyrannies of silence can be described as, “cultural and individual silences that regulate social and individual visibility and undermine the likelihood of social change,” (The Tyrannies of Silence, slide 2). The idea that, if you are not the one doing the oppression then you are not responsible to act, is a very outdated idea. Bystanders are just as guilty for the negative acts that occur. Silence is a chain reaction; if one person does not do anything then the next person also feels not obligated to step in. Discrimination is one of the main topics where silence can be observed. As shown in the video by Tess Paras, ethnicity is often observed as a trait that is limiting (Paras, 0:43-1:10). As a society, we have set up ethnic stereotypes that limit people based on their ethnicity. In the music video by Tess Paras, she identifies common roles in shows such as, “over-sexed Asians, urban girl with flavor,” (Paras, 1:17-1:19). When people naturally follow these stereotypes, they think that they are doing nothing wrong. However, being silent about the “typical” roles associated with ethnicity creates the stigma that there is nothing wrong with it. Another major area of silence is gender stereotypes. When people silently obey to these stereotypes, it makes it more difficult to identify who is being hurt and who is benefiting from these silences (The Tyrannies of Silence, slide 5). In the TED talk, Tony
Jessica Statsky, in her essay, “Children need to Play, Not Compete” attempts to refute the common belief that organized sports are good for children. She sees organized sports not as healthy pass-times for children, but as onerous tasks that children do not truly enjoy. She also notes that not only are organized sports not enjoyable for children, they may cause irreparable harm to the children, both emotionally and physically. In her thesis statement, Statsky states, “When overzealous parents and coaches impose adult standards on children's sports, the result can be activities that are neither satisfying nor beneficial to children” (627). While this statement is strong, her defense of it is weak.
Even with knowledge of Mosher’s Ph.D. in Sports Studies, the essay would have been stronger if it included additional credible resources. I agree with Mosher’s unstated evaluative claim that society should not expect someone to possess the characteristics of a hero simply because they are a sports athlete. Yet, Mosher asserts that society unrealistically demands their sports athletes to possess traits of high character. After reading this essay, I still ask; why not?
Abstract: Society is affected every day by many different kinds of sports. These sports often govern society's way of life. People all over the nation turn their TVs to sporting events, such as golf, during the weekends. Scott Stossel states that "more than six million Americans enjoy watching golf on the weekends." Parents use sports as a teaching tool for their children. Kids learn teamwork and discipline from team sports programs and sports have also helped many students with their grades. Kids who want to compete in school sports are taught to keep their grades up or they won't be able to play, but the greedy coaches and schools often look around grades to keep their "star athletes" in the games. Adults have been affected by sports in their bank accounts. Tax increases for funding a new stadium, golf course and even school programs have hurt the middle class Americans. Sports have taken control of small communities and soon will take control of society
In brief, when you turn on your television and see Sports Center discussing athletes’ salaries, there will be critics and supporters, no doubt. There always will be. In reality, though, you know that these athletes are not entirely deserving of the money they receive. An athlete’s performance on a television screen alone is not nearly enough to get millions of dollars. So then why are we willingly handing these people this amount of cash? Why do we not keep in mind the variety of other things our money could be usefully going to instead? The check these athletes procure is in no way proportional to their valiant effort in a game or their aid in helping a sports team advance.