Essay PreviewMore ↓
The process of co-optation is closely related to this iron triangle. Co-optation is defined as the transition from guardian of the public interest to defenders of private interests. This happens for three reasons. First, once a regulatory agency is established, the public tends to lose interest. Second, the regulators tend to come from the industry being regulated, bringing with them the industry’s perspective and bias as opposed to the public interest. Third, regulators have personal relationships with representatives from the industry who are generous to members of the agency. Basically, the regulatory agencies come to represent the interest of the industry they were created to control as opposed to the public interest. The part of the iron triangle where this occurs is where the interest group sends the agency information and support.
How to Cite this Page
"Kupor." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The ambiguity of Morality and Ethicality is a subject that is not sufficiently addressed within the discussion or experiments undertaken by Gino and Mogilner (2014). There are religious factors, such as Christian salvation, as well as cultural and socio-economic factors that facilitate an individual’s discernment of morality (Csordas, 2014). A difference in perception due to a variance in circumstance can turn an act of benevolence into an act of corruption, as explored by Torfason, Flynn and Kupor (2013) as they examine the altruistic act of tipping against the immoral act of giving a bribe.... [tags: christian salvation, moral code]
862 words (2.5 pages)
The iron triangle is not a subversion of democracy, but co-optation is. The iron triangle works well in theory. As long as the information is unbiased, legislation will still be passed that serves the public good. As long as the agency regulates the industry with strict standards, that serves the public good. As long as the interest group sends unbiased information, and legal contributions, that serves the public good. However, if the agency and the interest group are working together to help the industry, that does not serve the public good and it is clearly co-optation. Co-optation is clearly a subversion of democracy because it does not serve the public good. The only way to improve the situation of co-optation would be to have unbiased regulators with strict standards, as well as unbiased information. That would serve the public good.