Essay PreviewMore ↓
The Second Amendment to the Bill of rights of the United States Constitution states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In order to understand that right, the modern reader must understand the semantics of the eighteenth century. The term "Well Regulated" meant well trained according to James Madison, the principle author of the Constitution. The term militia, according to the Militia Act of 1792, referred to all able-bodied male citizens. The meaning then of the Second Amendment is made quite clear. It is meant to serve as a chain upon the government to prevent the infringement of government power upon the Civil Liberties of Americans. Further proof of this can be seen in a quote from George Madison. "I ask, Sir, What is the Militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." (George Madison, Three Elliot, Debates at 425-426). Richard Henry Lee, in his Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer of 1788 stated, "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves.and include all men capable of bearing arms." Title Ten section 331 of the U.S. code states "The Militia of the United States consists of all able bodied men at least seventeen years of age."
The founding fathers of the United States believed that government is a necessary evil. They wrote the Bill of Rights, as stated earlier, to serve as a chain, which would limit government power over its citizens. Civilian ownership of firearms would, in the founding fathers' view, be the " American Peoples' liberty teeth." (George Washington). This is to say that, despite attempts by some hypothetical future government to impose a tyranny, the American people would be able to resist it without armed force. The same founding fathers had only thrown off the yoke of tyranny during the revolution. They knew full well the value of an armed citizenry in fighting off tyranny. The minutemen assembled at Lexington and Concord to prevent the Royal Fusiliers from seizing the munitions of the militia as General Gage had ordered (Order of General Gage, April 18,1775).
How to Cite this Page
"Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Violates The Second Amendment of the Constitution." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Oct 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Civilian ownership of firearms has for more than two hundred years been the very cornerstone upon which the liberty of the public has been supported. The very reason that Americans have never suffered a tyranny on the scale of Nazi-Germany has been due to the proliferation of firearms in the hands of the general public. The Second Amendment to the Bill of rights of the United States Constitution states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In order to understand that right, the modern reader must understand the semantics of the eighteenth century.... [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms]
977 words (2.8 pages)
- Spencer Sullivan Engl 401 Marino Fernandes Gun Control and the Second Amendment Gun control has always been a popular debate, but it has recently resurfaced due to the multitude of current crimes committed in the United States involving guns. This outbreak has caused man to push heavier gun laws which could potentially restrict gun ownership. Background checks and limiting magazine size is the staple of most gun bills. Gun control is controversial because it is a contemporary issue that has a group of Americans in uproar over the lack of firearm restrictions.... [tags: Gun politics in the United States, Firearm]
2470 words (7.1 pages)
- Introduction As long as security remains a core subject in America’s public, it is next to impossible not to weigh in on the controversial gun control debate that is reignited every time there is a shooting. The recent San Bernardino shootings and other previous shootings in institutions of learning have personified the extent and depth of the gun debate in America. At the very least, the gun control discourse in America encapsulates legal, social, and moral issues that threaten to not only redefine America’s way of life, but also fundamental civil rights outlined in the US constitution.... [tags: United States Constitution, Firearm, Constitution]
951 words (2.7 pages)
- On December 17, 2012, a man shot twenty-seven people—twenty of which were children—at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Had there been a gun for the school’s defense, the amount of those killed could have been significantly lower. As Adam Lanza entered the building, armed and ready to kill, a good guy could have shot him, saving many lives. Guns control prohibits good people from having the ability to stop the bad guys. Gun control laws should be loosened because they violate the Constitution, decrease protection, and it is proven that gun control laws only result in higher crime rate.... [tags: gun control, mass shooting, adam lanza]
1070 words (3.1 pages)
- The United States constitution has an amendment process that has been included in the Bill of Rights. The amendment allows Americans to make changes on the September 17, 1789 United States Constitution was ratified and made law. The amendment of the Bill of rights has made America to continue growing in prosperity through the years and to become one of the most powerful nations in the world. The United States constitution was created with an amendment in Article V. This amendment process allows the constitution to adapt to the changes in the American society.... [tags: bill of rights, bear firearms, amendments]
1026 words (2.9 pages)
- In the Bjorn, MN case of restricting “Animal Attractions” from selling the video, Hands Up!, the cities obscenity law directly violates the United States constitution, and the First Amendments guarantee of freedom of speech and expression. In the past, the Supreme Court of the United States had written that sexual materials could be deemed obscene if they were found to be "utterly without redeeming social importance" (Roth v. United States, Alberts v. California). This broad restriction, however, received numerous additions in the 1973 case, Miller v.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1540 words (4.4 pages)
- Few issues incite americans more than the issue of rising crime and violence. This problem can easily be linked to the availability of guns."The debate over whether guns are a hallowed tradition and a right guaranteed by the Second Ammendment of the U.S.constitution or whether they are a fearful danger contributing to crime and violence." ("gun control") Due to the outbreak of violence in our society, some people feel that repealing the Second Ammendment would solve the problem. These people feel that repealing the Second Ammendment would solve the problem.... [tags: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms]
1568 words (4.5 pages)
- “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” This quote from Benjamin Franklin illustrates how an emphasis on safety can drastically reduce the freedoms enjoyed by citizens of the United States, especially the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which states that “...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” However, with active shooter situations such as Columbine; the Tucson, Arizona shootings, which nearly killed former Representative Gabrielle Giffords; and recent situations at Newtown, Connecticut; Los Angeles International Airport; and Westfield Garden State Plaza mall in New Jersey... [tags: Constitution, US, gun control, federal government]
1421 words (4.1 pages)
- The right to bear and keep arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Liberals are looking to amend the Constitution or misinterpret the intent of the Second Amendment in order to carry out their desire to ban handguns, even though research has revealed that gun control cannot halt citizens from committing crimes. Gun control laws and restrictions should not be put in place as it would violate our rights and freedom under the Constitution of the United States. Keywords: Constitution, freedom, gun control, Second Amendment While the Founding Fathers of the United States were making a structure of the nation, as stated before in the Constitution, people were afraid that... [tags: Gun politics in the United States, Firearm]
1489 words (4.3 pages)
- Gun Control: What’s More American Than Keeping Our People Safe. On June 12, 2016, forty-nine people were murdered and fifty-three injured when an American gun-owner, Omar Mateen, opened fire in an Orlando gay nightclub with a legally obtained firearm. It was by far the deadliest mass shooting in United States history, but not the only one (Nelson). Four years earlier, another mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School brutally took the lives of nearly thirty people, twenty of which were children (CNN Library).... [tags: Gun politics in the United States, Firearm]
960 words (2.7 pages)
Advocates of gun control state that control of firearms would prevent crime. This statement is flawed. According to the Uniform Crime Reports of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the cities with the highest crime rates are also the cities with the strictest gun control laws. (F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports, 1994). In Washington D.C., it is almost impossible for a civilian to own firearms, yet it is universally seen as the murder capital of the United States. Vermont, a state where civilians do not need a license to carry firearms, has the best crime rate in the nation. Since Texas recently liberalized its concealed carry laws, crime rates have dropped 8.5 percent. (Gary Kleck, Florida State University, 1996).
With these facts in mind, one is forced to ask the question of what the ulterior motive of gun control advocates really is. According to the Civil Rights group, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, every major genocide has been preceded by a wide ranging gun control law. For example, 1.5 million Armenians were murdered by the Turkish government in 1915. Just four years earlier, article 166 of the Penal Code prevented common citizens from bearing arms. During the Stalinist era in the Soviet Union, an estimated 20 million citizens were killed by their own government. They were prevented from owning firearms by article 182 of the Penal Code. The Nazi Weapons Law of March 18,1938 was the law that prevented their victims from owning firearms. Interestingly, the U.S. 1968 Gun Control Act is almost a word for word translation of that particular document. It is an arguable point that the Nazis would never have attacked these people had they been armed. Proof of this is illustrated by the fact that Nazi Germany never invaded Switzerland despite having occupied the rest of Europe. The Swiss people are free to own and carry any firearm they choose.
Gun control, therefore, can be looked at as a tool by which tyrants have historically taken power. With a historic perspective, the modern reader can make a more informed statement when asked for his or her opinion. In light of recent government infringements of the Constitution, as at Waco, Texas in 1993 or Ruby Ridge, Idaho in 1992, the modern reader must ask whether or not the founding fathers fears were well grounded.