Galileo and Newton

Galileo and Newton

Length: 1168 words (3.3 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Galileo believed the physical world to be bounded. He says that all
material things have "this or that shape" and are small or large in relation to
other things. He also says that material objects are either in motion or at
rest, touching or not touching some other body, and are either one in number,
or many. The central properties of the material world are mathematical and
strengthened through experimentation. Galileo excludes the properties of tastes,
odors, colors, and so on when describing the material world. He states that
these properties "reside only in the consciousness." These latter properties
would cease to exist without the living creature so the mathematically defined
properties are the most accurate in describing the material world. Galileo
seems to test his beliefs through experimentation and mathematical reasoning.
He sites examples in life that support his hypothesis. His argument is of a
scientific nature because he is making a hypothesis on a distinctive type of
concept. The conclusions that Galileo made relate directly to the work in
physics for which he is so well known. His conclusions put emphasis on shapes,
numbers, and motion which are all properties that lend themselves to support
through "reasoning back and forth between theory and experiment." I feel that
Galileo's argument is a valid one because it explains relations in nature and
the physical world through mathematical analysis. This allows him to define a
world outside of human existence that can be logically calculated and explained.
His view describes the world in which living creatures live and not contrasts it
to the world within living creatures. The problem with Galileo's view is that
it pioneers a scientific outlook but never actually fulfills it.
     Newton believes the world is ultimately made up of hard particles that
can retain different properties. The central properties are solid, massy,
impenetrable, and movable particles. He believes God created matter in the
beginning in such a way to allow the particles to take on mathematical forms.
His approach is a scientific one because he practices the continual interaction
of experiment and theory. It is the hard particles that move in such a way that
can be assigned certain mathematical principles that clearly explain the
interaction of bodies. Newton's conclusion seems to be a strong one because it
deals with the world being made up of particles and shows how these particles
act with each other in a way that can be explained scientifically. I like the
idea of organized flow in the world and God being the creator of it all. The
mathematical/scientific approach offers explanation to how the particles are

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Galileo and Newton." 123HelpMe.com. 12 Dec 2019
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=66684>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Sir Isaac Newton: Standing on the Shoulders of Galileo and Aristotle Essay

- The general and widespread acceptance of Sir Isaac Newton’s models and laws may often be taken for granted, but this has not always been so. Throughout history, scientists and philosophers have built on each other’s theories to create improved and often revolutionary models. Although Newton was neither the first nor the last to bring major innovations to society, he was one of the most notable ones; many of his contributions are still in use today. With the formulation of his laws of motion, Sir Isaac Newton contributed to the downfall of Aristotelianism and provided a universal quantitative system for approximating and explaining a wide range of phenomena of space and the physics of motion,...   [tags: Contributions of Isaac Newton]

Research Papers
1458 words (4.2 pages)

Philosophy: If Nature is Governed by Laws, What is the Orign of the Laws?

- Some of my thoughts lately. If nature is governed by laws 3 questions arise: 1. What is the origin of the laws. 2. Are there any exceptions to the laws, ie., miracles. 3. Is there only one set of possible laws. Many scientists, philosophers, and theologians have tried to answer these questions. Kepler, Newton, Galileo, and Descartes-- and their answer to the first question was traditionally God as the embodiment of the laws of nature. Unless one endows God with some other attributes such as being the God of the Old Testament employing God as a response merely substitutes one mystery for another....   [tags: Kepler, Newton, Galileo]

Research Papers
707 words (2 pages)

The Scientific Revolution And Its Impact On Society Essay example

- The Scientific Revolution was defined by four main people; Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, and Sir Isaac Newton made numerous discoveries in the fields of Astronomy, Calculus, Physics, and more generally in Mathematics and Science. Without these people, we would be nowhere near the present day life that we are at today. Each person had their own separate actions that helped shaped this revolution, but all were equally important. Some even worked off of each other’s works, so most accomplishments went hand in hand with each....   [tags: Isaac Newton, Galileo Galilei, Sun]

Research Papers
1573 words (4.5 pages)

Christianity And The Scientific Revolution Essay

- Christianity and The Scientific Revolution: The Big Bang of Christianity The Enlightenment and the Scientific Revolution had a large impact on Christianity and the development of society. Although the Christian worldview may have prompted the seeking of knowledge which led to the Scientific Revolution, many discoveries and ideas from scientists over time changed the way people thought about the world around them. Early scientists, with Christian worldviews only sought to further their knowledge of the world....   [tags: Isaac Newton, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler]

Research Papers
1918 words (5.5 pages)

Essay on From Aristotle to Newton: The Development of Modern Physics

- In the fourth century, Aristotle developed the first systematic set of ideas to describe the natural world, often referred to as Aristotelian physics. In his research, Aristotle made many discoveries dealing with the dynamics of motion. He believed that the natural motion of an object was primarily determined by the nature of the substance that made up the object, in terms of the four basic elements: earth, air, fire and water. Therefore, a stone, when released from the hand, fell to the ground because it was made of similar substance as the Earth....   [tags: Galileo, Scientific Method, Scientific Discoveries]

Research Papers
1597 words (4.6 pages)

The Contributions of Sir Isaac Newton Essay

- Isaac Newton was a well-known English scientist. He accomplished a lot during his time and influenced the world a great deal. He is considered to have contributed more to science than any other person. His life can be divided into three periods. The first one was his early childhood, he second was the time of his accomplishments, and the third is his later life. Isaac Newton was born on December 25, 1642 in Woolsthorpe, Lincolnshire, England. His family was poor and his parents farmed for a living....   [tags: Contributions of Isaac Newton]

Free Essays
930 words (2.7 pages)

Essay on The Contributions of Isaac Newton

- Sir Isaac Newton was a well educated person. He wrote on many topics including math, science, religion, and even philosophy. He also held many high ranking positions such as a member of the Royal Society and being the Master of the Mint. Information about his life and achievements will be discussed in the following paragraphs, along with how the achievements relate to the humanities base theme of faith and reason. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Christmas Day in 1642. This is the same year that the great astronomer and scientist, Galileo, died....   [tags: Sir Isaac Newton Essays]

Research Papers
1350 words (3.9 pages)

The Contributions of Isaac Newton Essay

- Isaac Newton was born in England in 1642. He grew up never knowing his real father but resenting his step father. At age 19, Newton went off to Trinity College in Cambridge where he studied philosophers and astronomers such as Descartes, Galileo, Kepler, and Copernicus. It was here; while he obtained his degree, that Newton devised the theory of Calculus. He obtained his degree in 1665 and then dedicated his time to the binomial theory and Calculus.1 By 1666 Newton was the most advanced and enlightened mathematician our world had yet to see.2 Newton wrote in these beginning years as a physicist, “the nature of things is more securely and naturally deduced from their operations on on...   [tags: Sir Isaac Newton Essays]

Research Papers
865 words (2.5 pages)

Essay on Sir Isaac Newton

- Born on Christmas Day, 1642, Isaac Newton spent his early childhood in a small farm-house in the hamlet of Woolsthope, sixty miles northwest of Cambridge and one hundred miles from London. Newton's biological father died before he was born and his mother remarried two years later to the Reverend Barnabas Smith. Newton attended the King's School at Grantham at the age of twelve but was brought home by his mother at nearly the age of sixteen to manage the estate. Luckily for science, Newton showed little interest in farming....   [tags: Sir Isaac Newton Biography]

Research Papers
864 words (2.5 pages)

Galileo Essay

- "Galileo was that guy who invented the telescope." This is what most people say when they think about Galileo. However, Galileo did not even invent the telescope; he only made improvements to it so it could be used for astronomy. Galileo did use it to make many important discoveries about astronomy, though; many of these discoveries helped to prove that the sun was the center of the galaxy. Galileo also made many important contributions to Physics; he discovered that the path of a projectile was a parabola, that objects do not fall with speeds proportional to their weight, and much more....   [tags: essays research papers fc]

Research Papers
1514 words (4.3 pages)

Related Searches

moving. Galileo and Newton differ in certain aspects of their understanding of
the physical world. Galileo doesn't put much emphasis on the role of creativity
in science. Newton believes in the mathematical and experimentation outlook of
science pioneered by Galileo but he believed that new concepts are the product
of creative imagination. He felt that math should explain the concepts imagined.
Newton extended ideas pioneered by Galileo on issues of forces, masses, shapes,
and forms. Newton didn't feel that the scientific theory needed to answer every
question asked about a phenomenon in order to be useful.
     Galileo and Newton make a strong argument for the lack of purposes or
values in nature. Their scientific minds sought answers on a logical scale.
They could analyze the material world through calculations and in this math was
suitable explanation. In the study of physics, purposes are irrelevant.
Physics looks for the mathematical explanation of concepts and doesn't need to
analyze the purpose behind such. It is concerned simply with what happens and
how it is happening. The philosophy of physics could extend the concepts to
incorporate purpose. The world is the product of the chance concourse of atoms.
Everything is comprised of atoms and it makes up the known world to which
mathematical principles analyze. If there are no purposes in the universe and
this fact is supported through scientific study, then there is purpose in that
science works to break down the material world to series of facts that are
constantly adapting to one another.
     The world view introduced by seventeenth century mechanists is science.
Science became the answer or way to the answer. Aristotelian view is concerned
with the final state whereas as the scientists thought the important information
was the entire process, or efficient causes. It is also concerned with the
purposes and values that are at work in nature while mechanists see nature as a
mechanism that operates blindly, and the forces of nature are in themselves
entirely indifferent to purposes or values. Newton, in opposition to Aristotle,
didn't believe in unknown causes. He wanted answers that were or could be
proven. I feel that Newton has the stronger view because his deals with
observable facts and not just concepts. Newton's ideas about the world extend
the concepts of Democritus. Newton strengthens the mechanistic view by
providing it with mathematical reasoning. Aristotle's argument of Democritus
weakens when dealing with Newton. He had scientific evidence that backed up his
claims. However, Newton still doesn't concern mechanism with the answer of
"why" but rather looked to understand the immediate "how." Newton would agree
that Democritus didn't support his arguments with fact and that they are mostly
conceptual views. Newton would have to support Democritus for initiating the
atomic theory and would probably say that his ideas are relevant and not over
simplified. Form in the world is the effect of other causes in a long,
scientific chain of efficient causes by the interactions of atoms.
     In a way Newton's cosmological ideas are better because he was able to
support interactions within the universe with mathematical reasoning. He
eventually came to the belief that "there is no scientific explanation for the
pattern of the planets," holding that coplanar orbits with velocities in the
same direction cannot be accounted for by natural causes. This lead him to the
answer that God prevents the universe from collapsing. I feel this is better
than Timaeus's view of patterns in the cosmos because he has to discard certain
information because he himself can't find mathematical proof for these theories.
Later, Laplace will be able to account for the coplanar character of the solar
system by showing inadequacies in Newton's science. This is a credit to Newton
in that if he couldn't back a theory with mathematical reason and experiment, he
wasn't just going to assume it to be true. Galileo and Newton along with Plato
believed in atoms or particles as the material of which all things are made of.
I also infer that they would somewhat agree on how truth can be perceived
differently in the same manner that opinion is different from knowledge (this
idea was illustrated by Plato in his divided line analogy). For the mechanists,
opinion is a perception of truth but an incorrect one because it is not
supported with mathematical reasoning and experimentation, which would then make
it knowledge.
Return to 123HelpMe.com