Essay PreviewMore ↓
In essence, nothing is worse than our right to life itself being diminished in value from the theological perspective. The debate of legalizing euthanasia is not about the right to commit suicide or to assist in suicide. It is about placing the lives of the weakest among us in the hands of people other than themselves who often have self-serving agendas. Once society gives a group of people the right to end life, our right to life disappears behind red tape. The principle of the sanctity of human life is a fundamental ethical norm and the value of life is not negotiable. Therefore, a reasonable prudent person should not accept the practice allowing their lives be taken away by others.
Secondly, from the sociological perspective, euthanasia is the tragedy arises from pressure exerted by a materialistic, self-centered society which increasingly embraces the notion of “throwing away” human beings. There are people who would allow physicians to kill their parents and grandparents once they cease to function as providers of life’s necessities and opportunities. After many years of service, mom and dad, granny and grandpa are treated like dogs, they are sent to the hospital to be injected with a lethal overdose of drugs. Supporters of euthanasia lie to themselves and others by saying that they want to end suffering. Their true motive is to get rid of those who become a problem, so they can enjoy their lives with more time and money.
Thirdly, from the medical morality perspective, euthanasia is assisting suicide that violates the morals and values of the medical world.
How to Cite this Page
"Euthanasia should not be legalized in America." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Nov 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- As terminally ill patients come to terms with an end-of-life diagnosis, one of their main concern is dying with dignity, and not left to suffer a long and drawn out death. Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, is a sensitive and very controversial subject. In the opinion of several people, doctors should not participate in any action that ends a person’s life due to the Hippocratic Oath stating that doctors are obligated to save lives. Although, euthanasia is considered to be immoral and even murder, it should be legalized when a person’s quality of life, due to an incurable illness, is gradually going to become slim to none.... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Medical ethics]
1293 words (3.7 pages)
- Regardless of one’s desire to be euthanized, all people deserve the right to euthanasia. The question we must ask ourselves is not whether or not we want to be euthanized but whether or not we want that decision made for us. Just as one may not wish to be a doctor and another may, there are varying degrees of willingness to live. However much it may pain us, we must admit that there are, in fact, people with separate wills from our own living among us (Emanuel, Ezekiel J, and Diane L Fairclough).... [tags: Euthanasia, Medical ethics, Death]
1255 words (3.6 pages)
- Euthanasia is an assisted death to those with incurable diseases who wish to die peacefully instead of going through pain and suffering; on the other hand, euthanasia can be seen as legalized murder and used for the selfishness of family members. Since euthanasia has been legalized in the United States, debate has developed from the different views whether it is deliberate killing or an end to unbearable suffering. Also, there are two different kinds of euthanasia; passive euthanasia, which would be pulling the plug on life support as opposed to active euthanasia, which is an actual poisoning shot.... [tags: Euthanasia, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Death]
1073 words (3.1 pages)
- Euthanasia is defined as “the act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die, as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering from an incurable, especially a painful, disease or condition, painless death.” (Dictionary.com) Euthanasia should be seen as an option that allows patients to make the decision of how they want to spend the rest of their life. People have a right to make the decision of using euthanasia to end their life because it is their choice to live or go through life with discomfort.... [tags: Life, Death, Euthanasia]
1036 words (3 pages)
- I. Introduction An admired man, loved and respected by his family, was burdened with a life or death situation; his. At the age of 72, this man was diagnosed with cancer and being middle class, the costs of treatment seemed more painful than the cancer itself. He was distressed with the thought of putting his family through financial hardships. Living in Oregon, with the Measure 16 law just passing for the legalizing of euthanasia, he felt he had no other choice. Knowing his family would disagree, he decided to ask for his doctors’ advice.... [tags: Euthanasia, argumentative, persuasive]
1350 words (3.9 pages)
- Should opting out of life be an option for those who are sick or hurt people. With euthanasia, that is something now available for terminally ill patients. “The definition of euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma, or the intentional termination of life or the intentional interruption of procedures intended to prolong life by a physician” (Oxford Illustrated Companion to Medicine). Other names it is known by is mercy killing, or assisted suicide.... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Medical ethics, Suicide]
2000 words (5.7 pages)
- The ethical and moral debate on Euthanasia has been going on for years. The ultimate question: Should Euthanasia be legalized or not. In my opinion, the practice of Euthanasia can be great and should be legalized. I believe that what Dr. Kevorkian and his practice was doing was the right thing. Before moving forward, it is very important, appropriate, and necessary to say that religion should never play a part in the argument of Euthanasia especially dealing with it from a legal point of view.... [tags: Assisted Suicide]
1782 words (5.1 pages)
- Euthanasia A terminal disease can take a toll on a person physically, mentally, and emotionally. Sometimes a disease can eat and eat at someone until they are tired of it and just want it to end. Euthanasia is a way that the pain and suffering can end for these miserable people. Euthanasia is assisted suicide by a doctor for people that have a terminal disease. Euthanasia could help a lot of people end their suffering and pain, but euthanasia is only legal in a few places. Euthanasia should be legal because it will save money for the economy, the alternatives are horrifying, it improves the quality of life and can be properly regulated.... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Medical ethics, Suffering]
1794 words (5.1 pages)
- When people hear the word suicide it invokes controversy. Although it is a taboo subject; if a loved one was faced with a terminal illness becoming extremely critical this would pose a moral question. Could a person be willing to accept the fact their family member intended to use medical assisted suicide. Very few individuals would agree with this, but in the same instance should a human being want their relative to be in unbearable pain. According to the author, “Indeed, physician-assisted suicide implies not a resistance to but an extension of medical power over life and death” (Salem).... [tags: euthanasia, ethics]
1071 words (3.1 pages)
- To Legalize or Not to Legalize Euthanasia Euthanasia, formerly known as Physician Assisted Suicide, was introduced to America in the early 1990’s by Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Jack Kevorkian was a strong believer that people had the “right to die,” opposed to The Constitution that states we have the “right to live.” He began reaching mass media when he expressed his thoughts on inmates facing the death penalty or life in prison and that they should be able to choose how they die whether it be a usual execution, which was electrocution at the time, or a form of anesthesia which would allow them to donate their organs to science.... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Medical ethics]
1187 words (3.4 pages)
Moreover, from the legislation perspective, the height of arbitrariness, injustice and abuse is reached if euthanasia is legalized, since there is no sufficient legal resort to exercising euthanasia. It is accepted the possibility that even other people may sign a request for euthanasia on behalf of the incapacitated patient and in the presence of witnesses. In addition, the law doesn’t provide any specific punishment against physicians giving euthanasia without the necessary requisites. The choice of euthanasia becomes serious when it takes the form of a murder committed by others on a person who has in no way requested it and who has never consented to it.
In addition, if euthanasia is allowed, there will be a huge increase in suicides. Suicidal people who temporarily suffer from depression typically undergo severe emotional and physical strain. Depression which contributes to the sense of hopelessness is the primary trigger of most suicidal behavior. When patients are suffering greatly from the pain, they are very likely to give up medical treatment to end their lives easily. However, depression can be treated and the feeling of hopelessness can be re-channeled in more rational and positive ways. Legalizing euthanasia will deprive a significant part of suicide attempters of their chances to pursue medical and professional psychological assistance to overcome depression.
Finally, I think the reason that many people support to legalize euthanasia, is not because they really respect people’s freedom of living and dying, but because they do not care about this issue at all. If euthanasia is legalized, many patients might face the cold reality that the society and other people do not care about their lives. Those patients will be disadvantaged by apathetic public judgment. A simple “yes” or “no” decision will significantly affect a small and weak group of people’s fates. However, the debate of legalizing euthanasia is a complicated and controversial issue that relates to people’s fundamental rights of living and dying, which should not be decided in such a normative and irresponsible way.
In conclusion, the debate of legalizing euthanasia is a complicated issue relating to morality. Americans should not cross the line of moral boundaries. There are no theological, sociological, moral, and legal bases to allow euthanasia. Legalizing euthanasia will increase the rate of suicide and harm patients’ rights. American people should not sell their fundamental rights of living over to the agenda of euthanasia.