Essay PreviewMore ↓
According to David Hume, God is not different from the order that exists in the universe1. Training our thoughts along this line, one might doubt the commonly held view that Science and Religion are entirely different and exist at the opposite ends of a spectrum.
Science is based on observation. Religion on the other hand makes arguments analytical in nature (like the Ontological Argument by Anslem) and requires some unquestioned faith. In spite of leading us through somewhat different paths, both try to find the basic stuff2. The goal thus in both cases is to determine the constituents of what form the reality. The routes though may not seem similar.
In the essay, The Dynamic Universe, Fritjop Capra explores the philosophies on which various eastern religions like Hinduism, Taoism and Buddhism are based upon. He is of the view that the world is conceived in terms of movement, flow and change2. He then cites the examples of sub-atomic physics and the field of galaxies and heavenly bodies. Science studies them as units, which are in a state of constant motion. By doing this, he tries to class Science as well as Religion under the same heading, which is concerned with finding the basic reality.
The next question that comes to the forefront then is what is the thing that we are after? What constitutes this reality that we all are in pursuit of? A scientist might call this as the order in the universe or the Energy, which is diffused in the world we live in. Religions like to call this ultimate reality as God. The order that the scientists describe implies a mind working behind it. This entity capable of setting an order in the universe is nothing but what religion defines as God. Science and Religion then appear to be tied up like two versions of the same notion. God, I feel, is the ultimate quest for which both these allegedly opposite views are after.
His physical form is not visible to us. But his existence could be argued using aposteriori arguments based on the observation of what is around us.
How to Cite this Page
"Are Religion And Science One?." 123HelpMe.com. 28 Mar 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Science and religion are often regarded as colliding topic areas because of the principles they are based upon. They both provide an explanation of the world and of the human being, but while science is based on the scientific evidence, meaning that it requires empirical proof, religion is faith driven, therefore belief without evidence. As mentioned by professor Skakle during the lecture, 4 models for science and religion interaction have been identified and can be described as conflict between the disciplines, independence between the disciplines, dialogue between the disciplines and integration of both in one field (Barbour, 2002).... [tags: Science, Scientific method, Religion, Faith]
873 words (2.5 pages)
- The author, sociologist Elaine Howard Eckland, who studied at Rice University, interviewed 275 scientists and surveyed more than 1,700 scientists to get the more open point of views to the long debate “Science vs. Religion”. The author investigates the unexamined assumption that science and religion are irreconcilable. The reason she has done this research is to hear the voices that have been overlooked in the debates and that could have powerful contributions to the translation of information to a broader audience, specifically the religious audience.... [tags: Religion, Faith, Philosophy of religion, Science]
701 words (2 pages)
- The relationship between science and religion is a difficult one and the two sides have tested each other and debated each other in many forums. Some believe there are major differences in science and religion and that the two can never coexist while others believe that science is in fact evidence that religious views are correct. To better understand and answer the question of whether the two sides really do conflict we will look at: my view on the subject, the definitions of both science and religion, basic arguments of both sides, scientific evolution, differing religions and religious views, the compatible versus incompatible argument, how religion has influenced science and views from t... [tags: Science, Religion, Evolution]
1818 words (5.2 pages)
- Title of Assignment Is science just another form of religion, with people like physicist Stephen Hawking among its high priests. Are science and religions simply both similar social constructions. In your response to this question, specifically consider how irrational social factors influence everything, including science and religion. Introduction One of today's most disputable and warmed issues is whether the clash between science and religion could be accommodated. The verbal confrontation between science and religion is never out of the news.... [tags: Science and Religion]
1400 words (4 pages)
- Science and Religion dialogue has been a bitter-sweet topic for many people over the years. The controversy is not only common between one sole community, but affects a variety. The beliefs held about these topics has the potential to personally effect an individual, whether it be positively or negatively. In the United States, we draw only a fine line between religion and science, often failing to realize that the two benefit each other in copious ways but are not meant to interpreted in the same way.... [tags: God, Theology, Religion, Religion and science]
894 words (2.6 pages)
- In the United States, the average child goes through public funded schools that have a basic curriculum. According to the Texas Education Agency, some of the subjects include science, mathematics, social studies, English, and more. Nowhere in the subject is religion included. The basic curriculum is made in order to give students skills, knowledge, and to help develop the minds of the future. In science class, evolution is taught either briefly or detailed. It is taught because it is a popular theory that did not seem to choose a certain religion.... [tags: Religion vs Science Essays]
990 words (2.8 pages)
- Charles Darwin was a scientist and naturalist, primarily recognised as the first and most influential advocate of the evolutionary theory through natural selection. After the publication of his book in 1859, “On the Origin of Species”, people began to identify the foundations of humanity very differently. However, even though the scientific approval of his theory was close to becoming worldwide, there have been countless opposition groups, predominantly amongst the religious believers. (Darwin, 2008) According to Darwin, the relationship between science and religion is commonly represented as an issue that is irreconcilable where one side is claiming something, the other can’t accept;... [tags: theory, natuarl, science, religion]
1780 words (5.1 pages)
- "Great is our fear of the unknown." Titus Livius made this statement in a time when science and religion were one and the same; a time when pagan mysticism gracefully intertwined itself in the sparse gaps of scientific knowledge. The two have since diverged and people-- society-- have had to make a choice: will science, or religion, sate the innate curiosity borne by human beings. This is a question that haunted me for the first fifteen years of my life, a question I constantly pondered. As a young boy, one could say I was a religious person; certainly, my parents wanted me to be religious and I trusted in that judgment.... [tags: Religion]
674 words (1.9 pages)
- Science and religion have always been in conflict with one another because they each represent complete opposite ideals, science is about how nature controls how the universe works and religion is about how God controls how the universe works. In the five models on science and religion I believe that Conflict best describes the relationship between the two. Conflict tells how either science is completely right and religion is wrong or the other way around and that religion and science are completely different.... [tags: Science Religion Creation ]
803 words (2.3 pages)
- Science and religion have always collided. Science is based on observation and what we can prove. Religion on the other hand makes arguments analytical in nature and requires faith. The basis though may not seem similar. A scientist might call this as the order in the universe or the Energy, which is transmitted in the world we live in. Religions like to look this ultimate reality as God. This entity is capable of setting an order in the universe and is nothing but what religion defines as God. Science and Religion then appear to be tied up like two versions of the same subject.... [tags: Religion, comparative]
1441 words (4.1 pages)
Is this God we talk of, an anthropomorphic being? Are his features well defined? How do we describe the qualities of such a being? If He is perfect, his attributes bearing the highest level of virtue, then in short He and His working are beyond our understanding. We might label his qualities with terms like wisdom, knowledge, mercy and power. But these terms just suggest our limitations in expressing things not described by our language. It is possible we might not have experienced those unknown qualities He possesses and thus have no knowledge about them. Not only this, we do not have the faintest idea of His physical presence or form. We humans then are in no situation to understand this all-powerful entity who is full of mystery. In such a situation, we have no other choice but to accept this incomplete meaning of God and have faith in his ways.
One may conclude that our search for some basic reality, we might find that religion and science have a common ground and are not as far apart as they are commonly believed to be.
1). David Hume : Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
2). Fritjop Capra: The Dynamic Universe