Essay PreviewMore ↓
The roots of Carnegie's internal conflicts were planted in Dunfermline, Scotland, where he was born in 1835, the son of a weaver and political radical who instilled in young Andrew the values of political and economic equality. His family's poverty, however, taught Carnegie a different lesson. When the Carnegies emigrated to America in 1848, Carnegie determined to bring prosperity to his family. He worked many small jobs which included working for the Pennsylvania Railroad where he first recognized the importance of steel.
With this recognition, he resigned and started the Keystone Bridge Company in 1865. He built a steel-rail mill, and bought out a small steel company. By 1888, he had a large plant. Later on he sold his Carnegie Steel Company to J. P. Morgan's U.S.
Steel Company after a serious, bloody union strike.He saw himself as a hero of working people, yet he crushed their unions. The richest man in the world, he railed against privilege. A generous philanthropist, he slashed the wages of the workers who made him rich. By this time, Carnegie was an established, successful millionaire. He was a great philanthropist, donating over $350 million dollars to public causes, opening libraries, money for teachers, and funds to support peace.
In the end, he gave away about 90% of his own money to various causes. He also preached to others to do the same as in giving money for education and sciences.The problem, however, was that there was such a contrast between the rich and the poor. By this he was referring to the inequalities in rights, hereditary powers, and such things. He also felt we should have a continuum of forward progress, i.e.
civilizing, industrializing.Apparently in his time there was a movement to drift back into a time when there was little advance in modernizing and technologically advancing; when "neither master nor servant was as well situated.
How to Cite this Page
"Andrew Carnegie On The Gospel Of Wealth." 123HelpMe.com. 09 Dec 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Gospel of Wealth Reality In Andrew Carnegie’s “The Gospel of Wealth” he outlines what the rich man’s responsibilities to the public is regarding his wealth. Andrew Carnegie was one of his times wealthiest men and wrote this in 1889. He states that, “Our duty is with what is practicable now-with the next step possible in our day and generation. It is criminal to waste our energies in endeavoring to uproot, when all we can profitably accomplish is to bend the universal tree of humanity a little in the direction most favorable to the production of the good fruit under existing circumstances (Carnegie 23-24).” In his writing he talks about the best way to dispose of the wealth one has acqu... [tags: Wealth, Poverty, Distribution of wealth]
733 words (2.1 pages)
- In the “Gospel of wealth”, Andrew Carnegie argues that it is the duty of the wealthy entrepreneur who has amassed a great fortune during their lifetime, to give back to those less fortunate. Greed and selfishness may force some readers to see these arguments as preposterous; however, greed is a key ingredient in successful competition. It forces competitors to perform at a higher level than their peers in hopes of obtaining more money and individual wealth. A capitalist society that allows this wealth to accumulate in the hands of the few might be beneficial to the human race because it could promote competition between companies; it might ensure health care for everyone no matter their soci... [tags: Greed, Duty, Fortune]
960 words (2.7 pages)
- Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth Andrew Carnegie believes in a system based on principles and responsibility. The system is Individualism and when everyone strives towards the same goals the system is fair and prosperous. Carnegie’s essay is his attempt to show people a way to reach an accommodation between individualism and fairness. This system can only work if everyone knows and participates in his or her responsibilities. I will discuss Carnegie’s thesis, his arguments and the possible results of his goals.... [tags: Papers]
568 words (1.6 pages)
- Andrew Carnegie was born in Dunfermline, Scotland in 1835. His father, Will, was a weaver and a follower of Chartism, a popular movement of the British working class that called for the masses to vote and to run for Parliament in order to help improve conditions for workers. The exposure to such political beliefs and his family's poverty made a lasting impression on young Andrew and played a significant role in his life after his family immigrated to the United States in 1848. Andrew Carnegie amassed wealth in the steel industry after immigrating from Scotland as a boy.... [tags: essays research papers]
1210 words (3.5 pages)
- Andrew Carnegie was a multimillionaire tycoon who, along with the likes of John Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan, is ranked highly in the pantheon of American industrialists. He innovated and perfected the process of “horizontal integration” in industry and made a fortune selling his massively successful Carnegie Steel Corporation at the turn of the 20th century. However, there is more that paints the picture of this man’s success than his industrial pursuits. His origins as an obscure dream seeker from Scotland are what make his rise to fame and fortune all the more endearing.... [tags: Andrew Carnegie, Philanthropy]
708 words (2 pages)
- Andrew Carnegie was born on November 25, 1835 in Dunfermline, the medieval capital of Scotland. His parents were William Carnegie, who was a linen weaver; and Margaret Carnegie, who made shoes. The town of Dunfermline was strongly based in linen weaving, and when the industrial revolution hit, linen workers such as William Carnegie found themselves out of work. Margaret quickly took on additional jobs to help the family, opening a grocery store and fixing shoes. This was an important turning point in Andrew Carnegie's life.... [tags: Gospel of Wealth, Philantropy]
1127 words (3.2 pages)
- 1. The writer of this document is Andrew Carnegie. Andrew Carnegie was born in 1835 in Allegheny City, Pennsylvania to a happy family of weavers. Although Andrew Carnegie did not make his fortune in weaving, it took the death of his father in 1855 to kick start his mindset to the importance of school and learning. He began to study theatre and drama and got his first job at a telegraph office as the messenger boy. Soon after he became the secretary to the superintendent of the Pennsylvania Railroad, which in this time period would have been a great job considering the importance of the railways during this time.... [tags: Poverty, Working class, Wealth, Middle class]
1317 words (3.8 pages)
- The richest man in the world, in his time, was Andrew Carnegie. His story of success was truly one of rags to riches. After coming to the U.S. from Scotland as part of a working-class family, he moved from job to job, eventually becoming more influential and gaining a large sum of money. Soon he was using his wealth to contribute to many public services, such as libraries and schools. Andrew Carnegie's life and actions have left a long-standing legacy and have contributed greatly to the American way of life, particularly toward education.... [tags: Biography]
1718 words (4.9 pages)
- Andrew Carnegie Essay In the nineteenth century, when I hear the word Captain of Industry the name Andrew Carnegie comes to mind. Rather than being a Robber Baron, I believe Carnegie deserves the title Captain of Industry for many reasons. One reason would be that he came from being a poor young boy in Scotland, to being one of the richest men in America years after he and his family immigrated to the United States of America. The next reason would be that he provided many of his workers high earnings of money as well as how he funded certain public places.... [tags: Biography]
955 words (2.7 pages)
- Wealth “The Gospel of Wealth” written by Andrew Carnegie discusses the post Civil War industrial expansion era, a time that produced immense wealth for many business tycoons. Andrew Carnegia, an elite industrialist, created a very large wealth for himself during this time. Some of the elite industrialists tried to change their “robber baron image by curbing their often ostentatious lifestyles and seeking opportunities to enhance the community.” Andrew for one, decided that it was imperative for wealthy individuals to disperse their wealth throughout the society for the advancement of the community.... [tags: essays research papers]
464 words (1.3 pages)
Since the wealth inevitably goes to a concentrated amount of people in the best possible set of circumstances, the question is what to do with the money in order to best serve the general public. So what can a man do with the excess wealth he has amassed? His money is not just for "competence," but rather surplus money. There are three solutions that Carnegie gives for this. The first includes leaving one's money to his family or his oldest son, a common practice in western Europe. This is a "misguided affection", and a bad idea according to Carnegie, because one cannot duplicate the styles and strategies of another no matter how hard he tries.
A son can make mistakes and lose his fortune or he can lose it "from the fall in the value of land." It has also been proven that it is not good for the state for a son to take his father's place as a leader. He could mean that the son has been given all of these treasures from birth and does not appreciate what he is getting. He also may not be sensitive to all that is necessary in the processes of development. Another way one could dispose of surplus wealth is to have all the money earned be spent by the one who earns it. This is not always possible these days and perhaps also back then, because ther is no limit to what one can earn. But spending frivolously just because one can isn't exactly the best trait; one should live in modesty.One other way Carnegie suggests the money could be distributed would be to donate it to public services.
This is the one he personally chose because it serves the most good to most amount of people possible. It is therefore not detrimental to the value of money to others, and is enjoyed by he who earned it - a very fair way of disposal. The objective, however, he wished to achieve may not be achieved after he's gone because he can't oversee the operation of the distribution, and there's nothing he could do about it then. Taxing the hoards of wealth obtained by a recently deceased man is a great way of giving back to the community what was taken over the years. It also condemns the lifestyle of the "selfish millionaire's unworthy life." This helps make men deal with the distribution of their money while they're still alive, with the intent that the best possible solution would be achieved and finding the way that would be "most fruitful for the people." There is only one solution which pleases both rich and poor and works out best for everyone. This idea differs from communistic ideals of spreading wealth evenly throughout, at all times, and doesn't require an overthrow of the government, rather an "evolution of existing conditions." The idea is that each individual work for himself in attaining wealth (as in the concept of laissez-faire); each man fighting for his place, creating competition.
In the end, there will still be a concentration of wealth in a few, but they will spread their wealth to the masses through public services, thus benefiting all, instead of money coming to all people in small increments as suggested by communistic ideas. This appealed to the people especially in the concept of anti-communism sprinkled in Carnegie's document. This also gives concrete evidence proving U.S. superiority in understanding their nation's needs. Finally, there are specific duties of the rich in order to maintain the balance.
The wealthy must be modest in their ways. They must provide modestly for those dependent on him and he must think and administer his money in the best possible manner to benefit the most possible people. We trust in this wealthy man because he obviously became wealthy through superior wisdom, etc.... - This I believe may be immodest, but true nonetheless.