Essay PreviewMore ↓
In order to establish the desirability of the journal’s goal of a world without artificial systems of control, the opposition of nature and artifice is a crucial first step.
How to Cite this Page
"The Anarchist Journal, Mother Earth." 123HelpMe.com. 07 Apr 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Perhaps one of the largest contributors who helped shape what anarchism is regarded as today is Emma Goldman. Goldman was born in 1869 in Russia to a Jewish family, and later went on to come to prominence as a modern anarchist, with her ideas being highly valued in Europe and the United States. One of the earliest anarchist rebellions Goldman was a part of was the Homestead Strike. It was there that she developed her relationship with long-term lover and fellow anarchist thinker, Alexander Berkman.... [tags: Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman, Anarchism]
1402 words (4 pages)
- There is an old proverb in Kabati, Kenya claiming that people should strive to be like the moon. This means that people should always be on their best behavior and be good to others. We complain when there is too much sun and it gets unbearably hot, or when it rains too much or is cold. But, no one grumbles when the moon shines. Maybe this saying should not be so limited as to only pertain to being good to people. Maybe we, as a people, should be on our best behavior when caring for the planet, our only home.... [tags: climate, atmosphere, earth]
838 words (2.4 pages)
- Each week I have been writing in my identity journal and each time it seem to help answer the question of how do I identify who I am. In are world we identity are self in two ways who we really are and who we what other to believe we are. This is us wearing a mask. In week five and six we had to write our entry was a creative piece—a short story, poem, drawing, or other creative form explore issues of identity. This was for me a poem and a drawing that went with my drawing on how we all wear mask.... [tags: Journal, identity, ]
728 words (2.1 pages)
- When thinking about having a baby, I have to consider the financial, physical, and emotional/cognitive effects it will have on me, my partner, and my family. • I am an elementary school teacher and my husband is a golf pro manager for Troon Golf Course Management Company. We presently live in the United States. Together, we make enough money to live a little more than comfortably. However, we have been saving for a new addition to our family for 2 years now. Taking into consideration that we have many friends and an extended family, it is safe to assume that we will have a fair boost in baby supplies from our shower.... [tags: Journal]
2139 words (6.1 pages)
- The Good Earth Type Two Journal—The Good Earth—Wang Lung, Olan, Lotus, Uncle “Are we not to see the moth-browed bride?”Pg.24 Tactless- The uncle is tactless because everyone already expects a farmer’s wife to be unattractive and he has no remorse to mock his nephew. “This woman is well enough!”Pg.28 Content- Wang Lung becomes content with his wife when he learns that she cares for him more than anyone else. “When I return to that house it will be with my son in my arms. I shall have a red coat on him and red-flowered trousers and on his head a hat with a small gilded Buddha sewn on the front…” Pg.34 Pretentious- Olan is pretentious because she wants to show the great house tha... [tags: essays research papers]
1219 words (3.5 pages)
- Have you ever thought that human activities could either enhance or damage our planet. Many people nowadays realize that there are some human activities that help the planet to be more sophisticated, while more other activities bring damage to Earth. In fact, there are not many activities made by humans that benefit the planet because many people tend to secure their own food and welfare even though such activities could harm the Earth. After the industrial revolution, the world had become much faster than it used to be in the middle ages.... [tags: Global Temperature, Industrialization]
950 words (2.7 pages)
- Journal of a Refugee Ellena Hicks Invasion of Earth The Proglaxt were a threat to the human race. They wanted everything and nothing. They sought the joy of killing; addicted to it like ecstasy. Pain from other people filed their hearts with immense elation. Capture was worse than death though, when it came to the Proglaxt. Capture meant torturous conditions, starved, with only an inch of life left, worked until bones collapsed, silenced, for speech was a way in which rebellion could start. This is why the human race was scared.... [tags: Earth, Moon, Solar System, Hope]
1896 words (5.4 pages)
- Gender of Nature: Mother Earth “Forget not that the earth delights to feel your bare feet and the wind longs to play with your hair.” -The Prophet, by Kahlil Gibran There is no voice more comforting than Mama’s. In the womb we are suspended in safe warmth, hearing every noise that Mama makes. And we don’t just hear her voice. We feel its vibrations, its muffled hum, through our ears and our entire forming bodies. It’s no wonder that that is often the only voice that can comfort us in the distress of our new little lives.... [tags: Essays Papers]
1857 words (5.3 pages)
- Jesus: The First Anarchist "In God We Trust," reads the American dollar, mouths the American government. The bosses put their hands on bibles and take office, they put their hands on bibles and swear to be truthful and honest and follow the teachings of the people's God. But are they following God's will. Have they ever been. JESUS: AN ANARCHIST. Throughout history Jesus Christ has been regarded as a revolutionary, but an anarchist. Yes, the answer. As time has passed and covered the once passionate spirit in commonality, however, Jesus' true meaning has been lost in Sundays and collection baskets.... [tags: essays research papers]
844 words (2.4 pages)
- Journal of Love *If you've been hurt in the past by people dont assume that you will always be hurt, open your heart to someone who you can trust and you will find true love, dont deny yourself of that feeling* *You don't come across that many people that give you butterflies, you just dont* "If two past lovers remain friends, they are either still in love, or never were." "You always overlook the little things in a relationship. It's the times when you wake at 4am and smell his cologne when you know you have made a mistake." "Isn't it funny how you can think you're completely over someone, but if you drive past his house, stumble upon a meaningful song you both shared, or even catch... [tags: Journal Entries Love Relationships Essays]
6299 words (18 pages)
To begin with, nature is big. In the first issue’s article “Mother Earth”, the history of the world seems laid out in a quasi-mythical tale. “Earth was but one of a myriad of stars floating in infinite space.” The whole of the universe, with which nature remains implicitly identified, exceeds our abilities to measure, let alone comprehend - a myriad in infinity. Even in this cosmic understanding, that which is natural and surrounded is still itself huge. In an article in the first issue called “Try Love”, the argument concludes, “Let us be broad and big. Let us not overlook vital things, because of the bulk of trifles confronting us.” The natural is large; problems from artifice can be numerous, but each is only of trifling size - thousands of children surrounding one huge mother. Beyond being large to begin with, the maniacal focus in the publication on freeing nature and being freed into nature also revolves around a hope for future growth. As if ‘we’ were already failing to be “broad and big” enough, “The Tragedy of Women’s Emancipation” proclaims: “Salvation lies in an energetic march onwards towards a brighter and clearer future. We are in need of unhampered growth out of old traditions and habits” as if nature and life in nature knew no limits. The image is of not just a sprouting weed, but a whole forest growing out of a street. This rhetorical strategy of associating the concept of nature so crucial to driving the arguments of the journal with hugeness seems strangely sympathetic with and to industrializing urges of the time. The conflict between the temptations of big machines with big outputs and direct material gain versus little anarchic communities with little to offer but some vague sense of satisfaction can finally be resolved in an anarchy run by a big nature figure, a loving cow mother replaces the cruel leviathan father. This solution gives all the benefits and reassurance of something so-big-it-must-work and avoids all the downfalls readers would consider so endemic to ‘modernization’ .
Beyond simple scale, nature is inescapable. While a big nature appeals to childlike demand for an oversized mother who will ensure safety and grant all desires, the journal also shows nature as generally inevitable. Relying on one of many references to scientific certainty, “Liberty”, in the second volume, issue number three, reminds us: “the natural law of a social organism is as certain as, though less known than, the force of gravity. Like the latter it antedates, and is independent of, our knowledge of its existence, or of the law of its operation.” The natural law, suggesting the order inherent in ‘free’ ways of life, does not even need to be proven preferable to artificial laws so long as it is inevitable, the rhetoric suggests. No matter how much one tries to fight it, they can only impede the natural order of things, but never change it. Indeed, this sentiment, in argument form, makes up the bulk of the rest of the article. The natural law not only frames what is and is not tyranny, but even ‘proves’ the futility of passing any laws through the government.
And men, brought up in law-abiding communities in the deepest respect for the law, will, under the changed conditions of life, not merely condone the infliction of a penalty in excess of that provided by law, but will themselves assist, virtuously satisfied with their conduct because the society of which they form a part has decided that horse-stealing shall be so punished. On the other hand, there are numerous laws on the statute books, still unrepealed and unenforceable because the acts treated of are no longer held to be offences against morality. In other words, the morals of a people can be regulated only by themselves.
The trick is very simple, if a law is natural there is no reason to legislate about it, and if it is not natural no one will obey it. The rhetorical construction of nature as unavoidable already renders artifice more than avoidable - it is always already avoided. Rhetorical implications become argument: it would be impossible to describe any part of government’s power as belonging to government itself, because people only act based on nature. The closest government comes to legislation in this model is to prescribe behavior people already exhibit. The gist of this construction of nature is most clear in the case of a poem in volume three, number two entitled “The King”. In it, a dead king rots in nature, covered in lizards and “vile spineless things”, literally consumed by the overpowering feminine in his afterlife. “Faith lit his pathway with her loveliness; / Fair Hope’s voice called him from his barren fen; Love vainly strove to lure him with her grace.” As a feminine entity, nature is here the omnipresent mother, she tracks down her children and is always there for them to return to. Inescapable nature not only sets up a comparison in which government and artifice can never win, but simultaneously constructs the role of a feminine presence that is ineradicable and impossible to resist. The good mother must be always present and forever accepting of even her most lost children.
Also, nature has youthful beauty. In the first issue of Mother Earth, the flagship article explains the history of nature in terms that make Earth unmistakably a young mother, “she renewed herself, the good mother, and came again each Spring, radiant with youthful beauty, beckoning her children to come to her bosom and partake of her bounty.” Nature’s youth not only implies a relative trait against which all human-made construction can never appear more - almost sexually - attractive. The attempt to make nature look nice is nowhere so transparent as in this attempt to cast it as actually young and beautiful. Indeed, even its temporary failings can be excused by Earth’s renewal each spring. If some part of nature is dangerous or undesirable, it will soon be corrected in the regular course of the seasons. In volume five, number six, “The Esthetic Side of Jewtown” explains,
Life is too strenuous in Jewtown to preserve the bloom of youth. Among the younger ones there are some who are very beautiful beneath their coating of filth, with the clove skin and large, soft, black eyes. They give themselves a coquettish appearance.
The truly horrid part of life in the Ghetto, we learn, is that it covers or takes away the natural beauty of women. Artifice cannot destroy nature, because nature is big and inescapable, but it can blemish its beauty temporarily. This identification of nature with youth and beauty combined with the opposition of nature and the state sell anarchism almost exactly the way one might sell diet soda: government is actually too ugly to appreciate, gorgeous young women prefer anarchy.
In classic advertising style, Mother Earth also describes nature as saturated with love. In the first issue, when describing a budding relationship crushed by the coldness of artifice and modern living, “The Tragedy of Women’s Emancipation” explains that “poetry and the enthusiasm of love cover their blushing faces before the pure beauty of the lady. [Her admirer] silences the voice of his nature and remains correct.” The article condemns his correctitude as exactly the basic problem of modern living - its disconnect from love and contact. Tragically, the beauty of the lady, just as that of the kindly mother Earth, has been tainted to block the “poetry” and “enthusiasm of love” the article considers natural. In contrast to the authentic state of love the various ‘systems’ of which anarchism complains give us poor simulations of affection: marriage and the nuclear family. In volume 3, number five, the article “Light and Shadows in the Life of an Avant-Gard”, we learn
The poor women, thousands of them, abused, insulted, and outraged by their precious husbands, must continue a life of degradation. They have no money to join the colony in Reno. No relief for them. The poor women, the slaves of the slaves, must go on prostituting themselves. They must continue to bear children in hate, in conflict, in physical horror. The marriage institution and the "sanctity of the home" are only for those who have not the money to buy themselves free from both, even as the chattel slave from his master.
Nature offers real love, civilization offers a slavery titled love. These stark terms of opposition function to set up an understanding of a loving motherly nature that makes it obviously superior to the uncaring childlike cruelties that comprise the artificial world.
As is often thought, nature is also connected with freedom. It is quite arbitrary to say that those things to which a life in ‘nature’ is conducive represent the content of freedom. For instance, in nature one is not free to vote or go to work, and yet this is considered irrelevant to questions of liberty. In volume two, number three, of Mother Earth, the article “Liberty” proclaims that “whatever may be the form of social institutions, if it does no more than to declare and enforce well-known rules of natural justice, then I am free.” The simplistic opposition between the compromises of ‘artificial’ life and the freedom of nature is best exemplified in the pithy quote “Liberty escaped into the wilderness” from the journal’s founding article. This unbounded freedom seems excessively unrealistic as a description of a mother, and yet it is precisely the freedom that mothers lacked that the journal constructs nature as having in spades.
At the same time, the infinite youth, beauty, and inescapable freedom in and of nature primarily complement its fundamentally orderly state. Perhaps in one of the most bizarre fixations of anarchist literature, the journal seems careful to point out the extreme orderliness of life in anarchy. In this kind of reconciliation of total freedom and total justice one can actually see the neurosis of liberalism tentatively suggest what it most wishes simply come true: good freedom and good order. The very first issue, in the article “Without Government” we are told that, there are qualities present in man, which permit the possibilities of social life, organization, and co-operative work without the application of force. Such qualities are solidarity, common action, and love of justice. To-day they are either crippled [sic] or made ineffective through the influence of compulsion; they can hardly be fully unfolded in a society in which groups, classes, and individuals are placed in hostile, irreconcilable opposition to one another
Again, like an orderly housewife, nature maintains a world that works, but without even so much as a broom. Instead, nature works through qualities always already present in people, as natural beings. It is through this sort of argument that anarchism can define government into such a position that it doesn’t even make sense to consider, having already had all its greatest advantages stolen over to the side of nature.
Simultaneously, nature’s great assets will be willingly sacrificed to her children in cheerful martyrdom. Like the constructed role of a ‘good mother’, nature “sees the bleeding feet of her children … hears their moans, and she is ever calling to them that she is theirs” beginning in the founding article of Mother Earth. The article continues to encourage the exploitation of nature because nature is asking for it, here with increasingly vivid maternal imagery. Mother Earth keeps sources of vast wealth hidden within the folds of her ample bosom, extended her inviting and hospitable arms to all those who came to her from arbitrary and despotic lands--Mother Earth ready to give herself alike to all her children. But soon she was seized by the few, stripped of her freedom, fenced in, a prey to those who were endowed with cunning and unscrupulous shrewdness.
The rapaciousness of artifice and modern civilization becomes its primary characteristic when put in the terms of a kindly mother fallen prey to vicious quasi-Oedipal domination. Here, again, the journal’s construction of nature as feminine serves the direct political function of discrediting political opponents such as the state, capitalism, and religion. However, the indirect effect of such a construction may be more historically significant, as the natural world becomes increasingly feminized in particular ways. It is impossible to simply associate nature with feminine, because there is too much to each category. Here the generality is retained on the term of nature - to the degree that it’s distinction from artifice can be kept plausible - and specificity is given to the feminine. Mothers should, in this account, sacrifice everything to their children, no matter how abusive they may be to her. Indeed, every praised trait of Mother Earth is a thinly veiled suggestion for mothers to fulfill. That Mother Earth is huge, inescapable, free and orderly says, at some level, that all good mothers are this way. Thus we end with a political theory laid out in Mother Earth that various artificial systems are bad because they are inferior to a young, beautiful martyr of an omnipresent loving mother who provides both freedom and order.
In conclusion, the journal Mother Earth deployed rhetoric in various forms to craft a particular feminine version of nature that explicitly worked to delegitimize particular systems of oppression and implicitly functioned to worship an ideal maternal version of womanhood. The journal’s preoccupation with issues of concern to women, such as marriage, prostitution, birth control, and sexuality coincided with its normalizing urge to encounter (some) people as children of nature who could frolic freely within the limitless provisions of their mother’s great world. However, there are actually two possible roles for a subject here, children or mother herself. Politics and men immediately appear infantilized against the mother of nature, supplying a ready-made excuse and index for predicting their actions as irresponsible yet lovable children, but for many women Mother Earth was not their mother, but to be their role model. Nature was a mother whose private sphere expanded to one large planetary home and material limitations in age and restriction were erased by scientific appeal (and pure fiat) to render life in nature simultaneously completely free and problem-free. As a solution to the troubles of political theory, the journal instead invented a superhero character to replace the tired images of a drudging, used up, and insensitive nature with a glossy new young, beautiful cover girl - Mother Earth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Earth_(journal)