Essay PreviewMore ↓
Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth and King Lear are the four most prominent and revered works that William Shakespeare had ever produced, though the first three that I mentioned seem to be recognized as more superior to King Lear. The opinion of many critics and others who are familiar with the bard’s work, myself included, feel that King Lear is one of, if not, the greatest achievement in William Shakespeare's repertoire. Many people, however, on the other side of the token, feel that King Lear is not his best play by far which puzzles me as a reader. To envision such a plot and story line filled with war, love, death, deceit, and madness was written in the early part of the 17th century is virtually unimaginable and more likely to happen in the "anything goes" spectrum of today's literature and television.
King Lear was written about 1605 and is very similar to its most recent predecessor, Othello (1604), in that both have the face of evil appear in its coldest and inhumane forms. Many of the intricacies in Othello seem to rub off in that of King Lear. I do wonder if the fact that both plays were written virtually one on top of the other that Shakespeare overlapped the two plots twisting and turning them just enough to maintain the separatism in both plays. Was Shakespeare writing both plays at the same time with his mind focused on a specific type of tragedy? Was Shakespeare displeased with one or the other when he wrote them? these are some of the questions that are raised in my mind when I read the similarities of the plays and comprehend how close together they were produced.
In reading the texts on King Lear there seemed to be a vast amount of criticism concerning the play involving its adaptability for stage, its dramatic clearness, and its acceptability. The basis of King Lear's unpopularity among the "fab' four" seems to be due to the extreme painfulness of the catastrophe, its dramatic defects, and a failure to most readers to grasp peculiar effects that Shakespeare includes in the play.
How to Cite this Page
"Free King Lear Essays: The Tragedy of King Lear." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Nov 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Edmund of King Lear as Nietzsche's Free Spirit In King Lear, Shakespeare creates a brilliant tragedy whose plot is driven primarily by its villains. Of these, Edmund stands alone as a man who makes his fortune, surrounded by those who seize fortune only when it is handed to them. Shakespeare's ability to create a vivid, living character in the space of a few lines of speech triumphs in Edmund, who embodies a totally different moral system than that of Shakespeare's era. Three centuries later, Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy of the Free Spirit would respect these values.... [tags: King Lear essays]
2789 words (8 pages)
- Folly in William Shakespeare's King Lear In "East Coker," T. S. Eliot pleads "Do not let me hear / Of the wisdom of old men, but rather of their folly…." (Eliot 185) The folly of old men must surely be a central trope in any discussion of Shakespeare's imposing tragic accomplishment, King Lear. Traditional interpretations of the play, drawing on the classical Aristotelian theory of tragedy, have tended to view Lear's act of blind folly as hamartia, precipitating the disintegration of human society.... [tags: William Shakespeare The Tragedy of King Lear]
2870 words (8.2 pages)
- Most critics of King Lear take the position that he was a tragic hero. However, there are critics who believe that he might be a comic figure. This paper attempts to discuss whether King Lear is a tragic hero or not, looking at the works of two critics, each taking opposite sides. On the one hand, there is A.C. Bradley, who takes the position that King Lear is a tragic hero because he demonstrates all the characteristics of a tragic hero as Bradley saw it. On the other hand, G.... [tags: Essays on King Lear]
1426 words (4.1 pages)
- Action and Observation in King Lear Auden once asserted that Shakespearean tragedy is necessarily parabolic, pertaining to the only myth that Christianity possesses: that of the 'unrepentant thief'. We as the spectators are thus implicated in the action since each of us 'is in danger of re-enacting [this story] in his own way'.1 The sufferings of the hero could be our own sufferings, whereas in Greek tragedy, such a notion is precluded precisely because the misfortunes of a character can be traced back to the discontent of the gods.... [tags: King Lear Essays]
2304 words (6.6 pages)
- The Power of Language in King Lear It is often difficult to gain entry into a work of such complete and dazzling genius as King Lear--reading Shakespeare can sometimes feel like trying to get a good long look at the sun on a cloudless day. And yet there are moments when one comes across passages that, by the sheer force of their lyrical, poetic beauty, leap off the page and resonate so strongly within one's mind that they become a kind of distillation of the entire play. One can read this play again and again, and still be struck anew by Shakespeare's utter mastery over language; surely there is no other writer who had so full a sense of, and who used to such merciless ends, the pow... [tags: King Lear essays]
1901 words (5.4 pages)
- King Lear is one of the most complex Shakespeare’s tragedies, borrowing its tragic elements from several types of tragedies popular during the Elizabethan Renaissance. The play highlights a flawed character and the impact of fate and free choice, and the protagonist’s realisation of the consequences of his mistakes. Finally, tragedy ruins the hero, results in his downfall and leads to catharsis. Lear, because of his flaws, loses his authority as a king, his identity as a father, and his sanity. Unlike other tragedies, there is no salvation for the tragic hero or any sign of optimism in the conclusion, but the audience recognises the restoration of moral order.... [tags: Tragic hero, Tragedy, Poetics, William Shakespeare]
1703 words (4.9 pages)
- King Lear In King Lear, the unnatural elements seem to always dominate the natural elements throughout the play. There exists a reversal of order in the play where the evil prosper in the downfall of the good, and where man's life is meaningless and arbitrary. King Lear, the tragic hero, dies in the end despite the torment and agony he had to endure to regenerate and repent. But it is the worthless destruction of countless other lives because of Lear's own personal tragedy that supports the view of the brutality and the meaningless of man's life in the play.... [tags: free essay writer]
737 words (2.1 pages)
- Transformation of the Tragedy in Oedipus Rex, King Lear, and Desire Under The Elms Over the course of time, many things tend to transform significantly. Such is the case of tragic literature and the cathartic effect it has on the reader, which has deteriorated a great deal from Sophocles' writing of the true tragedy, Oedipus Rex. King Lear exemplifies partial decomposition of catharsis, whereas Desire Under The Elms epitomises an almost total collapse of the cathartic effect. It is assumed that the lower the social status of the tragic hero, the weaker the ability of the 1990's audience to identify with the character's flaw.... [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]
4722 words (13.5 pages)
- King Lear Act I Scene i: Set in the royal court, the first scene of Shakespeare's King Lear pivots upon the refusal of the aged monarch's youngest daughter, Cordelia, to follow the suit of her sisters Goneril and Regan in professing love for their father, and Lear's wrathful decision to disown Cordelia. Nevertheless, Act I, scene i of Lear begins with a parallel subplot about the bastard Edmund's treachery toward his father Gloucester and his brother Edgar. At the start of the scene, we first see the loyal gentlemen Kent and Gloucester discussing Lear's intention to leave the realm to his daughters and their sons-in-law.... [tags: essays papers]
1528 words (4.4 pages)
- Shakespeare's Plagiarism of King Lear In creating the tragedy play King Lear, William Shakespeare plagiarized many sources in getting the base-line story, but it required his genius and intellect to place them together to create the true tragedy with its multiple plot lines that his play turned out to be in the end. The story of King Lear (or as it started, King Leir) is first seen in literature in the year 1135, contained in Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae. Other authors placed King Leir into their stories including; John Higgins in A Mirror for Magistrates (1574), by Warner in Albion's England (1586), by Holinshed in The Second Book of the Historie of England (1577)... [tags: Biography Biographies Essays]
1657 words (4.7 pages)
It is wonderful things like this that do make works such as King Lear one of the best works that William Shakespeare had ever produced.