Essay PreviewMore ↓
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were both early leaders in the struggle for black equality. Washington was probably the preeminent black spokesman at the turn of the century. DuBois was one of the founders of the NAACP. Both agreed that the goal was full participation by blacks in American society, economically and politically. The differences in their backgrounds caused both men to come to different conclusions on how that goal could be reached.
Booker T. Washington was born a slave. Growing up in the South, working to help pay his way through college, teaching black schoolchildren in the South, he was painfully aware of the inequalities that Southern blacks faced on a day-to-day basis. Washington knew that the time for confrontation had not arrived, but also that change was inevitable, that "progress in the enjoyment of all the privileges that will come to us must be as the result of severe and constant struggle rather than an artificial forcing" (Washington 5).
The reality of the South, Washington knew, was a system of white-dominated governments, courts, and businesses that kept blacks in economic slavery. A system that used intimidation, beatings, and the hangman's noose, to ensure that blacks remained second class citizens in their own communities; a system that ensured an economic stranglehold on the development of black businesses. Education, Washington believed, was the key to breaking that stranglehold; but not just the education of blacks, but the education of whites as well.
Blacks needed to remember that most of them were going to have to earn a living "by the production of our hands." That there was "as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem." and that no where except in the South is "the Negro given a man's chance in the commercial world" (4 and 5). Because of the size of the black population in the South, whites would eventually have to recognize blacks as their equals.
Whites had to realize that efforts to "curtail the fullest growth of the Negro" would only result in harm. Negroes would be "one third and more of the ignorance and crime… or one third of its intelligence and progress," he cautioned in a speech at the Atlanta Exposition (4). Both races needed to pursue policies that would result in "a blotting out of sectional differences and racial animosities and suspicions, in a determination to administer absolute justice in a willing obedience among all classes to the mandates of the law" (4 and 5).
How to Cite this Page
"Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois." 123HelpMe.com. 28 Feb 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Throughout history, ideological dichotomies appear among intellectual thinkers that seek resolutions to dominating conflicts of their time. Plato and Aristotle stage an early spilt in western philosophy: idealism and realism, respectfully. Both thinkers agreed that philosophers should seek understanding in the world as it relates to governance, justice, and knowledge. However, the division emerged as both thinkers arrived to different conclusion as to how society should reach an optimal state. Roughly 2200 years later, W.E.B DuBois and Booker T.... [tags: African American, Black people, Negro]
1210 words (3.5 pages)
- Compare and Contrast Essay WEB Dubois and Booker T. Washington are both very influential speakers from the civil rights movement. They are responsible for two speeches written ten years apart that had huge effects on their societies. Although both speeches worked towards a racially equal society, Washington takes a slower approach where blacks start at the bottom of society and work their way to better opportunities while Dubois is looking for quicker solutions, and is more demanding of equality as he believes everyone should have equal opportunity right away.... [tags: Black people, Race, White people]
884 words (2.5 pages)
- In class, we discussed the works of many amazing authors. Two amazing authors, and great leaders as well, that stood out to me the most would be Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Dubois. You could easily compare the two when talking about themes such as post slavery and the reconstruction era. Although they advocated for the same causes, each author had their own views on the subject in itself. There were many points that they strongly disagreed on such as economics, behavior, identity, and education as well.... [tags: Black people, African American, Race]
906 words (2.6 pages)
- In 1895, 30 years after the Civil War ended, African Americans still were not granted the rights they ever so desired. The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) has just died down after oppressing blacks for the first time causing African Americans as a whole to be fearful of the power whites held over our society. Confused and frightened on how to handle the state blacks were in, civil rights activist leaders Booker T. Washington and WEB Dubois began getting recognition from all US citizens due to their drastically different and distinctive ideologies.... [tags: African American, Black people, W. E. B. Du Bois]
1569 words (4.5 pages)
- FRS 2000 Research Paper The controversial discourse on race between W.E.B DuBois and Booker T. Washington defined much of the social, political, and economic issues in Black Harlem and other African American communities in the United States during 1910-1930. These two Black intellectual leaders supported entirely diverse views on how to empower and aid African Americans in freeing themselves from their often subhuman conditions. Although they share different perspectives on how African Americans can achieve equality towards gaining civil rights, they shared the same idea to uplift the Black race.... [tags: African American, Black people, Negro]
1212 words (3.5 pages)
- ... The name of the school was Tuskegee University, he was recommended by General Armstrong to run the school. Washington took on that responsibility and help raise money and promote the school, while doing that he reassured whites that the programs within this school would not threaten white supremacy or pose any economic competition to whites. W.E.B. DuBois started out his career as a writer, his first piece of literature was “The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study” in 1899. DuBois was also a professor at Atlanta University, while working at this university he opposed to Washington’s “Atlanta Compromise” speech.... [tags: differences, background, segregation]
1392 words (4 pages)
- Comparing W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington W. E. B. Du Bois and Booker T Washington had very different views about their culture and country. Du Bois, being born in the North and studying in Europe, was fascinated with the idea of Socialism and Communism. Booker T Washington, on the other hand, was born in the South, and like so many others, had a Black mother and a White father. Thus being born half-white, his views and ideas were sometimes not in the best interest of his people. William Edward Burghardt Du Bois was born on February 23, 1868 in Great Barrington, Massachusetts.... [tags: Papers Compare Contrast Essays]
1359 words (3.9 pages)
- Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were both early leaders in the struggle for black equality. Washington was probably the preeminent black spokesman at the turn of the century. DuBois was one of the founders of the NAACP. Both agreed that the goal was full participation by blacks in American society, economically and politically. The differences in their backgrounds caused both men to come to different conclusions on how that goal could be reached. Booker T. Washington was born a slave. Growing up in the South, working to help pay his way through college, teaching black schoolchildren in the South, he was painfully aware of the inequalities that Southern blacks faced on a day-to-day ba... [tags: Blacks in American Society]
1090 words (3.1 pages)
- Women should not have the chance for an academic education. They should be trained to cook, clean, and take care of children. What better way would a woman help society. Would she help her neighbor more by teaching them mathematics they will never use or by helping their neighbor raise children. This is similar to what Booker T. Washington claimed about African Americans. He stated that the African Americans should attend vocational schools rather than receive an academic education so they could better further social change.... [tags: African American Rights]
1695 words (4.8 pages)
- When it all comes down to it, one of the greatest intellectual battles U.S. history was the legendary disagreement between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois. This intellectual debate sparked the interest of the Northerners as well as the racist whites that occupied the south. This debate was simply about how the blacks, who just gained freedom from slavery, should exist in America with the white majority. Even though Washington and DuBois stood on opposite sides of the fence they both agreed on one thing, that it was a time for a change in the treatment of African Americans.... [tags: American History Analysis]
1164 words (3.3 pages)
"There is no defense," Washington said, "or security for any of us except in the highest intelligence and development of all" (4). He believed that as blacks became educated and started businesses, whites would come to realize that blacks could contribute to society and treat them as equals. Since blacks made up one-third of the population of the South, once whites realized that blacks had money, they would allow blacks to participate because no race of people "that has anything to contribute to the markets of the world is long in any degree ostracized" (5).
While W.E. B. Dubois agreed with Washington that education was important, he disagreed with Washington's conclusion that equality was inevitable. Born in Massachusetts after the abolition of slavery, raised in the North, and educated at Harvard, DuBois advocated a policy of confrontation to secure the legal rights of blacks.
DuBois' education and upbringing had instilled in him a belief in morals and morality based decisions. Since blacks were citizens of the United States and entitled to equal treatment under the law, DuBois felt that they should be demanding it. Securing those rights, said Dubois, "is worth more than lands and houses," that a people who "cease striving for it, are nor worth civilizing" (DuBois 6).
If the founders of our country truly believed that "all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights," then blacks had a moral obligation to use "every civilized and peaceful method" available to secure those rights (7). That the country had an obligation "by candid and honest criticism" to correct the wrongs that had been inflicted on blacks by local and sate governments in the South (7). That the "black men of America" had a duty, "a duty stern and delicate," to object to any delay in that process - even if it meant criticizing other prominent black leaders (7).
Whites living in the North needed to accept the results of their failure to fully enforce the laws of the country after Reconstruction. This failure had allowed individual states to disenfranchise blacks, and for the "legal creation of a distant status of civil inferiority for the Negro" (6). The North should not think that she could "salve her conscience by plastering it with gold," or that she was not responsible for her past inaction (7).
While I think that DuBois' ideas were the correct ones, I think his timing was wrong. Attempts by blacks to exercise their rights at the turn of the century would have resulted in reports of "rioting" or "local unrest" by "outside agitators" that had been put down by the "heroic efforts" of local officials. Lacking a method to get around the reporting of local news by local papers would have meant a fragmented and bloody struggle in most Southern communities. Protests would have been reported inaccurately, if at all, and totally one-sided on the side of the white community. DuBois may have had the benefit of an intellectual's knowledge of moral ascendancy, but as a friend of mine commented while we were watching a jousting tournament at a Renaissance Fair, "You know, it's hard to finesse 300 pounds of armored illiteracy."
Perhaps Washington was right that the time for "demanding" equality had not yet come. Perhaps fifty additional years of learning that blacks weren't really any different meant a more educated white populace. Perhaps fifty additional years taught blacks that there were whites that supported their efforts to achieve equality. Perhaps blacks and whites really did learn a little about each other. And when dogs and fire hoses were turned upon blacks in the spotlight of national television coverage, circumventing the control of local authorities, perhaps those additional fifty years of learning helped the majority of Americans realize that there was just something inherently wrong about denying any citizen their legal rights.