Essay PreviewMore ↓
Works Cited Missing
Reflexivity has recently been designated as an indicator of postmodernism in anthropological texts. In this context, the practice is attacked as self-indulgent narcissism, but its true scope reaches much further. While some ethnographic texts exhibit an overemphasis on the author, and his position within the work, this is one extreme of the range reflexivity, which also serves as a methodological tool, unincorporated into the writing, and as a means to account for the ethnographers biases and affects on his informants. This entire span of meaning is shown in anthropological research and writings, in varying manners and to different ends.
An poignant example of reflexivity in writing is the much critiqued and criticized essay by Renato Rosaldo, “Grief and a Headhunter’s Rage”, wherein he explores his reactions to and understanding of Ilongot headhunting, as based on his personal experiences with death, or lack thereof. He argues that “most anthropological studies of death eliminate emotions by assuming the position of the most attached observer,” a precarious position which often leads to “actual indifference.” (15) He also acknowledges that reflexivity can easily slip into self-absorption, wherein one loses sight of differences which do exist.
Despite attacks, by Michaelson and Johnson, that “Michele’s death gives Renato a newfound sense of ethnographic authority, a sense that he is ‘capable of feeling everything that the Ilongot do,” he never, in fact, makes this claim. (Behar, 171) Rosaldo, after sharing his experience of his wife’s death, and the grief that followed, emphasizes that the “statement should not lead anyone to derive a universal from somebody else’s personal knowledge.” (15) The author’s own experience does not give him a full understanding of the Ilongot, nor does he claim that it does so, but allows him to understand his informants explanations of headhunting which he had previously dismissed, not equating grief with rage. “Ilongot anger and [his] own overlap, rather like two circles, partially overlaid and partially separate.” (10) Or, as Marcus states it, “in any attempt to interpret or explain another cultural subject, a surplus of difference always remains.” (Marcus, 186)
Renato also briefly addresses the question of authority raised by reflexivity, and the admission of one’s shortcomings. What was once accepted as absolute truth is now being questioned, as the ethnographer acknowledges his own subjectivity, and “with the realization that [the] objects of analysis are also analyzing subjects who critically interrogate ethnographers.
How to Cite this Page
"Ethnography." 123HelpMe.com. 26 Feb 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Ethnography Introduction Beginning with the early stages of savagery to the complex civilizations in the 21st century, the need to compete remains an important aspect in the continual evolution of mankind. Competition took various forms throughout history from the bloody attempts to kill a mammoth in order to provide nourishment, to the violent battles between two opposing sides taking place on college football fields every Saturday afternoon. Another form of competition involving severe contact on a scale par with football is the sport of rugby.... [tags: Ethnography]
4063 words (11.6 pages)
- An Ethnography of Modern Witches The growing practice of Neo-Paganism in America has caused many to turn their heads. The misunderstanding of the religion has caused many to equate the practitioners with the popular conception of typical "witches," that perform black magic rituals, satanic sacrifices, and engage in devil-inspired orgies. After many years, the Neo-Pagan community has cleared up many misconceptions through the showing that many of them do not engage in activities, and are rather participating in a religion, just as those would that participate in a Christian community.... [tags: Witches America Neo-Paganism Ethnography]
1800 words (5.1 pages)
- Charles Marius Barbeau’s Ethnography and the Canadian Folklore Born on 5 March 1883, in Sainte-Marie-de-Bauce, Charles Marius Barbeau is widely seen as the first Canadian educated anthropologist. He graduated from Université Laval in Québec, from his studies of law, in 1907; he never practised law. Upon graduating, Marius was awarded – as the first French-Canadian recipient – the Cecil Rhodes scholarship which allowed him to study at Oxford University where he was introduced to the emerging field of Anthropology.... [tags: Ethnography Canadian Folklore]
3955 words (11.3 pages)
- Ethnography Works Cited Missing Reflexivity has recently been designated as an indicator of postmodernism in anthropological texts. In this context, the practice is attacked as self-indulgent narcissism, but its true scope reaches much further. While some ethnographic texts exhibit an overemphasis on the author, and his position within the work, this is one extreme of the range reflexivity, which also serves as a methodological tool, unincorporated into the writing, and as a means to account for the ethnographers biases and affects on his informants.... [tags: Ethnography Reflexivity Anthropology Essays]
1202 words (3.4 pages)
- “In any war story, but especially a true one, it's difficult to separate what happened from what seemed to happen.” - Tim O’Brien, The Things They Carried It is not only war stories that create confusion, both for their writers, and their readers, about the nature of the truth they tell. Is the truth in a “true” story what the writer experienced, or the truth of what “really” happened. If the story is about other people, is the truth what the writer sees them do, or what they think they are doing.... [tags: Social Studies]
2334 words (6.7 pages)
- Introduction Postmodern anthropology can be described as a method to write about cultures in a certain way, by scrutinizing and interpreting the information gathered. Postmodern ethnographers believe that it is the way we interpret information that must be studied and that the voice of societies should be advocated through an informant. They also believe that to do this the use of collaborative ethnography is of vital importance. Collaborative ethnography is a relationship between ethnographers and informants.... [tags: Anthropology ]
1628 words (4.7 pages)
- Ethnography One of the most complex and interesting aspects of cultural anthropology is the ethnography. The idea of being able to read stories about groups of individuals is something that is intriguing to many people. With the ethnography, the authors many times feel that they have control and understanding over the individuals that they are writing about. Furthermore, many of these authors assume that the individuals among whom they are living and studying exemplify the entire society as a whole.... [tags: Writing Literature Essays]
1625 words (4.6 pages)
- Ethnography Works Cited Missing Reflexivity is a qualitative method of research that takes an ethnography one step further, displaying the personal thoughts and reflections of the anthropologist on his informants. Ethnographies generally take an outside or foreign perspective of a culture, like reading a text, and reflexivity introduces a new component of inside description. Here, the anthropologist may describe personal interactions and experiences with natives and use this inside information to make additional conclusions about the people being studied.... [tags: Reflexivity Anthropology Essays]
1085 words (3.1 pages)
- Ethnography Personal experience and reflexivity should be used within anthropology as a tool to reflect on the culture that is being studied and not a refocusing of attention on the self. Works such as Dorinne Kondo’s “Dissolution and Reconstitution of Self,” use the idea of reflexivity as a mirror in which to view the culture being studied in a different manner. This use of reflexivity allows for the focus to stay on the culture being studied. A move away from this is the new branch of humanistic anthropology represented in this essay by Renato Rosaldo’s “Grief and a Headhunter’s Rage” and Ruth Behar’s “Anthropology that Breaks Your Heart” allows anthropologists to use reflexivity as a w... [tags: Anthropology Culture Reflexivity Papers]
894 words (2.6 pages)
- Ethnography Works Cited Missing Anthropology is defined, in the most basic terms, as the study of other cultures. This field can subsequently be divided into more specific sects, and contain more precise defining characteristics, but this definition is essentially all that is needed. Anthropology is a science that attempts to look at other cultures and draw conclusions to questions that are raised while studying. An anthropologist is someone who accepts what is presented before them and is driven by an urge to understand each presentation as thoroughly as possible.... [tags: Anthropology Culture Reflexivity Papers]
983 words (2.8 pages)
The realization, or recognition, that informants have agency is in fact a part of the ethnographer’s positioning. There are shifting power relations between the two parties which both indirectly, and in this case directly, affect the anthropologist’s distance from the culture which he is studying. The “distance is not fixed, for one can move along a continuum from a moment of complete identification …to unsympathetic, even hostile, alienation and distance, on the other. At no time, however, is this distance or positioning a neutral ‘fact’.” (84) While the admission of subjectivity and biased, shifting position may detract from the classical “intellectual arrogance” of authority, it contributes to a “more honest appraisal of the anthropological enterprise”, which “would take these other elements …as integral to the process of understanding…For a discipline so solidly rooted in the empirical and experimental…it is particularly ironic that these modes of knowing virtually disappear in the usual holistic, traditional anthropological monograph.” (85)
It is this last statement which brings to the surface another facet of reflexivity, that of its use in the field, but not in the texts. Marcus explores the uses of reflexivity in a number of disciplines, and within anthropology, at a variety of stages. As a methodological tool, “the value if rhetorical self-awareness is in drawing our attention to the constructions through which, as professionals, [anthropologists] have learned partly to read but which still mask many difficult and misleading assumptions.” (198) This can be attained without the inclusion of reflexivity in one’s written work, though I believe the latter to be valuable as well. The problem with this, however, is that the “kind of reflexive ‘act of location,’ while potentially a practice of key importance, all too often becomes a gesture that is enforced by politically correct convention,” and is thus meaningless. (199)
Marcus also draws attention, as do many of the aforementioned authors, to the problem of truth and authority. Early into his essay “On Ideologies of Reflexivity”, he explores how the “premise that there is no possibility of a fixed, final, or monologically authoritative meaning has radicalized anthropology’s internal critique of its own forms of representation by challenging the authority on which they have been based. It has also undermined the practice of a kind of interpretation from which authoritative meanings could be derived.” (186) This seems useful within the field, as a form of self-critique, but becomes a larger issue for those attempting to argue that anthropology is in fact a science. Behar addresses this conflict, noting that “the critics of the kind of anthropology that matters to [her] claim that the price anthropology must pay to survive into the next century is to become a science, or risk becoming nothing.” This can be done, they say, if anthropology’s “’grotesque tendencies’…are reined in and anthropologists are enjoined ‘to abandon the pleasures of subjective narrativity’.” (163-164)
This latter critique, based on categories and borders and concerned only with the pragmatic, is clearly dismissed by Behar, who is much more interested in the theoretical shifts and trends actually taking place in her discipline. She believes that “the new focus on the possibilities and limits of identification is making anthropology finally and truly possible by leading us toward greater depth of understanding.” (165) This hope invested in the practice of reflexivity, shared by Marcus who believes that it marks a “crucial turn”, opening ethnographies to new possibilities, is admirable, but not without disharmony.
While reflexivity, in both writing and research, may expose a new truth, one based on position, distance and subjectivity, it destroys the traditional preconceptions of what truth is, as it acknowledges that there is no absolute truth, and that the “natives” may have as much authority as the trained anthropologist. Authority is again in a contradictory position as the admission of faults both discredits the author, and reinforces his authority on the basis of “I was there.” Likewise, the practice, in ethnographic texts, is problematic as it may easily become contaminated, either as a “PC” gesture, or as narcissistic self-indulgence, the author becoming the focal point of the study. These dilemmas plague the application of reflexivity, but do not discredit its worth altogether. When used methodologically, as well as in one’s writing, it is a valuable tool, capable of bringing honesty and humanity into our work, and our discipline.