Essay PreviewMore ↓
Toward the end of last semester, I registered for this class mainly for one reason: I had had Emily as a professor before, I liked her class and her teaching style very much, and I wanted to again take a class she was teaching. This was my first opportunity to do so, and I jumped on it. In the bulletin, the class was described as the Graduate Writing Seminar, and through the grapevine, I found out it was not a creative writing class, but instead, a study in critical feminist pedagogies.What the hell, I thought. Iíll take it anyway. After all, I really just wanted to take another class with Emily, whatever the topic might be.
Over winter break, I started thinking about who else would be in the class. I am sure some of the usual suspects would be in Dixon 432 on that first day. Sure enough, when I walked, in I saw Alicia, Megan, Kate, and Kelly, just as I had expected. Before that first day, however, the number one thought going through my mind about this class and the makeup of my classmates was, of course, just how many males would be in that room. For a while, I thought I may be the only one, but I shook that thought out of my mind pretty quickly when I reminded myself that, after all, this was grad school, and the guys here were actually open minded and weren't afraid to take a class containing the prefix fem. I was right. In walked to see Gary and Leon. I had had classes with both of them before, and I knew their ways of thinking, so I felt ìsafe.î (Though I must admit that when Gary first proclaimed himself a ìfeministî in Sharon Lewis' class last semester, my initial thought was ìthis guy just wants to get laid.î That was stupid and wrong.)
So here I was, one-third of a population of a class that was certainly not going to be the topic of discussion for the next 5 or so months. I was ready to accept that. The program here at MSU had given me many chances to expand my thinking in ways that I had not previously been exposed to, and this class was yet another in that long line.
How to Cite this Page
"I Was a Willing Participant." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Nov 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Participant Observation as the Most Effective Method of Understanding Society All case studies require either overt or covert observation to collect the information necessary to complete the study. Both covert and overt have their advantages and disadvantages; they both add different but similar ideas and theories to a study. These two methods have been used in a variety of case studies but the ones that I am going to focus on are James Patrick’s study of Glasgow gang’s, Laud Humphreys study of the tea room trade in America and Ann Oakley’s study of first time pregnancy with women in the UK.... [tags: Participant Observation]
553 words (1.6 pages)
- Aphra Behn shattered walls for sexual freedom of women in literature in the seventeenth century. She was called the first professional woman writer in English. Many of her works all have strong female roles holding sexual power. In Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own, she states, “All women together ought to let flowers fall upon the tomb of Aphra Behn, which is, most scandalously but rather appropriately, in Westminster Abbey, for it was she who earned them the right to speak their minds.” She was one of the first female authors to speak candidly about the sexual passion felt by women, which was deemed ill-suited in her time.... [tags: Analysis, Sexual Freedom]
754 words (2.2 pages)
- Sexual Empowerment of Women in Behn's The Willing Mistress and The Disappointment "All women together ought to let flowers fall upon the tomb of Aphra Behn, . . . for it was she who earned them the right to speak their minds." (Woolf 91) Born in 1640, Aphra Behn broke gender stereotypes when she undertook a thrilling (if unrewarded) life as a spy for the Crown, but it was her scandalous career as an author which truly achieved many firsts for women. She was the first woman to support hereself financially by solely relying on the profession of writing, and many readers argue that Oroonoko--her passionate tale about the institution of slavery--was the first English novel.... [tags: Willing Mistress Essays]
1976 words (5.6 pages)
- The Advantages and Disadvantages of Participant Observation as a Research Method This essay will examine how participant observation is used as a research method. In the main body of this essay, this idea will be addressed by pointing out advantages and disadvantages of participant observation. I will give examples to support my argument. Participant observation is the main research method favoured by interpetitivists. It involves the researcher participating in a social group to observe and experience the world as a participant while still observing the group for future analasys of their behaviour from the researchers point of view.... [tags: Participant Observation]
493 words (1.4 pages)
- Assess the usefulness of participant observation in sociological research. In this short essay I will give a skilled weighed argument of the usefulness and non-usefulness of a participant observation. I will back up the points made during this piece with sociologists I have studied. After, which I will then reach a conclusion where I will justify the argument in depth. Observation means watching behaviour in real-life settings. A covert participant observation is when the subject(s) you’re studying doesn’t know that you’re actually studying them.... [tags: Participant Observation]
1065 words (3 pages)
- The Usefulness of Participant Observation as a Sociological Method Unlike other research methods participant observation allows the sociologist to look at people in their natural environment. It is often referred to as a naturalistic approach. The research does not artificially interfere with people’s lives and they are free to act as normal. This allows the researcher to gain an insight which surveys cannot produce. This is illustrated by a well-known quote: “As I sat and listened, I learned the answers to questions I would not have the sense to ask if I had been getting my information solely on an interview basis.” By W.F.... [tags: Participant Observation]
610 words (1.7 pages)
- The Major Participants in a Courtroom The major participants in a criminal trail include the judge, prosecuting attorney, defense counsel, clerks of the courts, bailiff, and the court reporter. At trail, whether if the charge is a felony or misdemeanor or even if the trail is a court trial or jury trail, the defendant is entitled to a fair trial before an impartial judge and a honest jury in an atmosphere of judicial claim. The judge presides over the trial proceedings and exercises those duties and power imposed by the law.... [tags: Judicial Courts]
585 words (1.7 pages)
- Participant Observation Participant Observation is the study of a culture or society usually carried out by living for an extended period of time with its members. The participant-observer takes part in everyday life and carefully records such things as behaviour, events and conversations, in order to obtain a fully rounded picture of beliefs, social groupings and customs. There are two different forms of Participant Observation: Overt observation is when the subjects are aware they are being observed and allow the observer in to their lives, this is often the most criticised form due to bias, Covert observation is when the subjects are not aware they are being ob... [tags: participant-observer]
490 words (1.4 pages)
- The class attended for my Participant Observation Assignment was a yoga class at the Recreation Center at State University. Such a class is for one session and is forty-five minutes in length. During this class, we covered beginning yoga moves at a slow pace so everyone felt comfortable. The nature of the class consisted of simple yoga moves, serine atmosphere, and relaxing music. Learning theories that were address, applied, and by the instructor wanted us to use were Skinner’s Operant Conditioning, Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, and Observational Learning.... [tags: Participant Observation 2014]
2100 words (6 pages)
- Willing and Knowing ABSTRACT: This paper discusses W. K. Clifford's classic paper, "The Ethics of Belief," and the significance of his use of the locution "knowingly and willingly" in the context of morally irresponsible ignorance. It is argued that this locution can point to a very subtle and important distinction in the premisses of ethically responsible belief formation. An analysis of willful ignorance is then given. It is argued that, strictly speaking, there is no such thing as willful ignorance: what is called willful ignorance in ordinary language is just the phenomena of getting oneself knowingly to believe something by willingly and knowingly altering the evidence for one's belie... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Papers]
2123 words (6.1 pages)
And I got what I expected. But I got more as well. Iím at the point in this class where what I have ìlearnedî canít really be spelled out in very clear terms. I canít say this class has taught me any tangible fact, at least not in the way the Research or Theory classes did. I wonít look back on this class and say to myself, ìthank God I took critical feminist pedagogies because now I will have no problem finishing grad school and going on to bigger and better things in my professional life.î Thatís not what this class was about. Yes, I learned theories. Yes, I learned concepts. And yes, those theories and concepts will, in the long run, help me along the rest of the M.A. path, but that wasnít the point. Not at all.
When I look back on this class, I will look at it in two ways. Before taking this class, I had the utmost respect for women. That certainly did not change, nor did I expect it to. But then again, this class was not about women. It did not male-bash, nor did it female-praise. Going into this semester, I half-expected it to do one or the other, or even a combination of both. I donít know why, really, because my grad school experience to that point had been nothing but freeing and open-minded. Yet, nonetheless, I expected this class to be the most volatile one I would have taken to date, at least for me. It wasnít.
I will also look back on this class for what it was, and for what it did do for me. It opened my mind, as all my classes here have done to some degree. While I am not currently a teacher, and frankly, I am not even sure if I ever will be, this class has showed me that the methods and pedagogies that we examined can be applied to everyday life, and do not (should not) be relegated to only the classroom. The readings in class, my research for the final paper, and the style in which the class was taught all helped me greatly in my approach to writing, both for myself and for how I see others. It has shown me that there is more than one way to do something, and there is especially more than one way to teach.
I went to good schools all my life, from kindergarten on through college. I had female teachers from day one, probably more females than males in fact. Looking back, there was a glaring lack of minority teachers in the schools I went to, having only white teachers for every class (except Spanish) for every year until I hit college (and even there, I had only one black professor in 4 years). That is not to say that only females or minorities can teach in the tradition of the feminist pedagogies we have discussed all semester, but it is to say that I had never been exposed to them before grad school. This class has done what I expected it to do by continuing the positive aspects of the grad school experience for me.
Now what? Will I run out and change the world? Will I convince writing teachers all across America to use creative writing as an effective composition tool, or to allow their students to help in the development of their syllabi? Or maybe I can start a lecture series on WAC, or preach about the teachings of Susan Jarrat and Adrienne Rich? I donít think so. I donít have time. What I can do is be myself. I can use what I have learned here and take it out to whoever wants to listen. I am not about to tell educated, well-read, learned people that they have been thinking incorrectly all their lives. But I can change my own ways of thinking. And you know what? Iím getting married less than 6 months. Iím a part-time comic. I have a full-time ìregularî job. Iím a 25-year-old white male living what appears to be a full, interesting, yet relatively normal life. And just maybe I can show people how Iíve changed my ways of thinking along those avenues of my normal life. I will have children someday, and rest assured they will respect people for who they are and not treat them differently for who they arenít. I can instill in them the values and ideals that were passed on to me by my parents, but altered in my own experiences. And those experiences certainly include this class, as well as all my classes here at MSU.
So, in short, this class hasnít taught me a thing. But it wasnít supposed to teach. It wasnít about that. (Okay, it was about teaching, but the class itself wasnít trying to teach.) It was about sharing, and about letting others know that there are different ways of doing things, different ways of thinking, different ways of acting. And I donít think those things can be ìlearnedî as much as they need to be shared. You canít teach thinking unless the student is a willing participant. And looking back, I can certainly say I was.