Essay PreviewMore ↓
James begins his proposition with a hypothetical example. There would be a poll for all of the US citizens to take part in. They would vote to either keep the Civil War in our history, or to expunge it entirely and replace that time with a period of peace. He claims that only a “handful of eccentrics” would opt to get rid of it. I find this to be a very valid point, however it does have a fundamental flaw in it. Knowing the consequences and events that resulted from the Civil War allows us to decide whether or not the war was worth the pain and suffering it caused.
Yet ask those same people whether they would be willing in cold blood to start another civil war now to gain another similar possession, and not one man or woman would vote for the proposition. In modern eyes, precious though wars may be, they must not be waged solely for the sake of the ideal harvest (95).
To have a war for the sole purpose of having a war is ridiculous. Another civil war right now would hardly reflect the original Civil War and we would not be able to predict the consequences it might bring. All wars do not bring the benefit that James is looking for.
James agrees with the reflective apologists for war who claim that
[War’s] ‘horrors’ are a cheap price to pay for rescue
How to Cite this Page
"The Moral Equivalent of War by William James." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Introduction Photography opened the world’s view. “Until 1839 the world was blind. Vision was limited to the immediate spectator or the art of the artist, but the rest of the world and history could not see” (Horan 3). People imagine things and do not believe it until they see it. Unless someone has really seen it they believe what they want. Mathew Brady showed people what war was really like. Before Mathew Brady’s pictures people thought that war was an adventure and fighting was honorable but they never knew what it was like.... [tags: Civil War Photojournalism]
2820 words (8.1 pages)
- There is No Alternative to War There is an average of twenty ongoing wars in the world at any given time. Some are internal civil wars, others are between nations. But the purpose of this thesis is not to report warfare, but the act of it. This includes the evolution of conventional and nuclear warfare, the potential effect of a nuclear war and why it is necessary for nations to fight war. This analysis will be based on a study of Gwyn dwyer's seven-part series, "War". The only other references used to compound this thesis will be statements from former heads of state, as corresponding to the subject of war.... [tags: War Violence World History Essays]
978 words (2.8 pages)
- Why the Confederacy Lost was written to exam why the Confederacy lost the Civil War, to look beyond the commonly stated argument that overwhelming numbers and resources not only promised but were the reason for Northern victory. The desire was to find and look closer at other errors made, different possible reasons that would contribute to the loss of the Confederacy. Looking to go deeper into the influences that are often overlooked, or not given their fair share of credit. Editor Gabor S. Boritt and the five authors combined their essays to explain why the Confederacy lost not the South.... [tags: Confederate States of America, American Civil War]
1142 words (3.3 pages)
- WILLIAM CHILDS WESTMORELAND PAPER General William Childs Westmoreland is a figure that is inextricably linked with the Vietnam War and he is the man that embodies the event to the American people. To look at a timeline of his life is to look at a steady progression to his command in Vietnam. Beyond that he dealt with the aftermath. In effect, it was the defining feature of his life, and Westmoreland was the defining face of Vietnam. His were the policies that kept us in the war, and his were the policies that many claimed lost it.... [tags: vietnam war, american people]
2010 words (5.7 pages)
- In 1910 when James published, “The Moral Equivalent of War, the United States faced different conditions then contemporary society. War was looked upon as something civilized societies did not participate in. The peace movement was mostly supported by the wealthy. As James explains, “In modern eyes, precious though wars may be, they must not be waged solely for the sake of ideal harvest. Only when forced upon one, only when an enemy’s injustice leaves us no alternative, is a war now thought permissible.” At the same time, President Theodore Roosevelt had thought that industrialization and urbanization had made citizens “too accustomed to comfort, security, and leisure.” As a result, Roosev... [tags: Gender role, Gender, Gender identity, Masculinity]
1403 words (4 pages)
- Dolley Madison is a very profound name in world history, mainly because of her being our country’s fourth president. She is also known for her ability’s to host parties and gathering at the White House, with her riveting personality and her charismatic in her character traits and her way of living life. She didn’t entertain people like most of her time did with loads of alcohol and drinking, but with nice, clean, wholesome fun. She is one of the most unsung heroes of The War of 1812. As the British was trudging on Washington, Dolley was protecting it like it was her own.... [tags: James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Dolley Madison]
1074 words (3.1 pages)
- The Proclamation of 1763 set into motion a series of actions that would reverberate into a future that, at the time, the Crown and the Colonist could not have imagined the results of those actions. Decisions made by the Crown and responses to those actions by the Colonists created a complex situation that nearly 100 years later would tear apart a Nation that did not exist at the time the Proclamation was issued. A peace, ending the war between France and England, may have come to the colonies through the Treaty of Paris in 1763 but in the same year King George the Third of England issued a proclamation that was to be the first in a line of Royal decisions that would eventually lead to the s... [tags: United States, Slavery in the United States]
1560 words (4.5 pages)
- William James Basie's Biography During the heyday of the swing era, many big bands flourished. Duke Ellington, Benny Goodman, Glen Miller, and Chick Webb fronted big bands that could swing, but none of these legends could swing like the Count Basie Orchestra. Count Basie proved that a big band could still swing, without losing the spontaneity so essential to jazz. William James Basie was born August 21, 1904 in Red Bank, New Jersey (Hare, par. 3). His father was a coachman and caretaker for a wealthy judge, and his mother took in laundry to help with the family's financial situation.... [tags: William James Basie Biography]
1339 words (3.8 pages)
- The War of 1812 In June of 1812 James Madison, proposed that congress should declare war with the largest navel powers in the world, Great Britain. This declaration was the result of several years of poor relations between the two nations. Madison presented a list of grievances against Great Britain and brought it before congress, after weeks of debates they voted for war on June 18th, 1812. The issues of British impressment of American sailors, the failure to respect the United States neutrality in their war with France, and the arming of Native Americans who attacked American colonists were the key deciding factors.... [tags: War of 1812, United States]
1060 words (3 pages)
- Captain Mack and Billy Mack’s War by James Roy are both "heart warming and thought provoking" (Reading Time) insights into the tangles of childhood and early adolescence. Published by University of Queensland Press (UQP) in 1999 and 2004 respectively, both explore the theme of how choices define who we are and what we become. Both of these books explore unlikely friendships, with two central characters in completely different settings, they are intriguingly written in a mixture of narrative methods but are a relaxed and enjoyable read.... [tags: James Roy]
1637 words (4.7 pages)
By agreeing to this, James implies that there is only one alternative to a land with war, and he does not care for that one alternative. This alternative, according to James, is degeneration. He claims, “human life with no use for hardihood would be contemptible” (96). War is not the only home for hardihood, nor is it the only thing standing between our world as it is and a “cattleyard”. These are all biased opinions or unfounded judgments by James. One can never truly tell how a life without war would be without having lived in one.
James asks “Where is the sharpness and precipitousness, the contempt for life, whether one’s own, or another’s?” (98) He asks this implying that we would not have these things in a peaceful society. I find that I consider contempt for life to be a rather bad thing. Not only can it potentially cause racism when fighting in a war with a foreign country, it is also dangerous to have contempt for one’s own life. James uses this as a positive side effect of war, but I find it just another reason to avoid war if at all possible.
After reading all of his support for war, one might not think of James as a pacifist. However, he admits to his own idea of a perfect world, and this consists of a “reign of peace and a gradual advent of some sort of socialistic equilibrium” (98). He admits that he sees war as absurd and impossible from its own monstrosity. This goes against his whole article, but it happens to be the only thing that he wrote that I agreed with. However, it seems a bit contradictory for him to say this after professing his support for war.
In the conclusion of his article, James proposes an idea that, he thinks, will end the need for wars and will still provide the people with the ideals of hardihood and discipline. This is to “coal and iron mines, to freight trains, to fishing fleets in December, to dishwashing, clothes-washing, and window-washing, to road-building and tunnel-making, to foundries and stoke-holes, and to the frames of skyscrapers…” (99). If this is indeed all that is needed to gain the benefits of war without unnecessary bloodshed, then I don’t see why he bothered to say we needed war at all. We could maintain this lifestyle without war and establish a peace-economy. I agree that we could survive very healthily simply by working as such, but I disagree as to why we should do it. I do not believe that we need this “hardihood” that James speaks of, and I do not believe that we need war or any moral equivalent to do well.
However, with the pretty picture that James paints with war, it is hard not to find any positive elements. He uses patriotism as one of the reasons why we should partake in war, and I concur. Only in times of war or times of crisis do people see the patriotism that really makes a country proud. With that said, I do not believe that this patriotism is worth waging war for. It certainly is a positive side effect, but is not something we should actively seek out by means of fighting other countries. It also has a high price. Besides the lives lost in war, we also potentially create racism and hatred towards the enemy. It is easy to feel as though one’s country is superior to the enemy’s when they are consumed in the extreme patriotism that is caused by war. This leads to a chain of events that lead to typecasting and ultimately racism.
With all of the prices one has to pay and with all of the negative consequences that come from war, it is hard to fathom what could possibly be worth the trouble. For this, I find that war is wholly unnecessary, and I believe that we can flourish under a peace economy. James’ theory of going against nature is an unorthodox way of bypassing war, and I find it acceptable. However, I do not feel that we absolutely need this “hardiness” that James so adamantly believes in. It is my humble belief that we could live peacefully and happily as well as have our society thrive.