Essay PreviewMore ↓
Abstract: In antiquity, the idea of padeia organically joined learning and education. In today's world it remains the essence of culture. However, philosophy is now characterized by a spirit of pragmatism that correlates present-day needs with actual sociocultural trends. Humanism can seem today nothing more than an illusion, an unrealizable utopia. Nevertheless, philosophy in its educative role should shape a attitude to life that is not only deep and universal but humanistic as well.
The present congress, developing the themes of the previous one ("The mankind at the turning-point"), concretizes them, marking a special role of philosophy in "education of humanity". In this aspect reference to the antique "paideia" notion, organically combining education and upbringing, is not casual. The motto of the last philosophical congress in this century grasps the tendencies and needs of culture which begun to show of late. That's what is the prerogative of philosophy as "a permanent watchman, guardian of culture".
He is so historically, socially and culturally determined that humanity greets a turn of centuries, the so much of millennia, jubilating and worrying at the same time. The situation so fraught with possibilities and dangers if not satisfied may lead to crush of the mankind that has proved bankrupt. We have found ourselves in the bifurcation process admitting as well "the end of history" in its most tragic sense.
Philosophy plays the most important part in formation, basing of new values, innoticing emerging trends, choice of arising variants.
Reflexing over culture as a whole philosophy allows to correlate the needs and potenties of the current moment with actual trends. Combining the prognostic and projective functions philosophy forms the sprouts of new world outlooks and conditions of "natural" refusal of obsolete, out of date ones. This role is not conspicuous: philosophical thought must be ready for the fact that penetrates public consciousness neither directly nor immediately, but implicitly, gradually, embracing the most diversified spheres of spiritual activity and only in long time achieving the status of the spiritual objectivized. So much more comprehensive, deep and prolonged its impact is. It has been correctly stated that these were Kant and Hegel who had the most influence over their contemporaries' minds (so few of them actually knew their works, at that). Well-known is Martin Luther King's role in stopping the Vietnam war, changing the whole mentality of the American nation, not so long ago allowing "witchhunt" and racism.
How to Cite this Page
"Humanism: Dangerous Illusion, Desperate Faith or Duty of Time?." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Jan 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Tim LaHaye is one of the most influential religious leaders in the United States today. In 2001, Evangelical Studies Bulletin named him as the most influential Christian leader for the past quarter century. He is mostly known for the Left Behind series of apocalyptic fiction, which he co-wrote with Jerry B. Jenkins. However, this paper will talk about LaHaye’s book, The Battle for the Mind, which is one of his most important works but was not included in the Left Behind series. In The Battle for the Mind, which was published in 1980, LaHaye discusses how conservative Christians could “take back America” around a conservative political agenda, and from the standpoint of the field of anthropol... [tags: christian, humanism, pray]
658 words (1.9 pages)
- Paradox of Faith In Fear and Trembling Kierkegaard examines the old story of Abraham being commanded by what is perceived to be god to kill his only child. Abraham had spent many years trying to conceive a child with his wife Sarah and finally successfully had a boy named Isaac. In what appears to be the test of ultimate sacrifice god, appearing as a burning bush, asks Abraham to take his only son to the mountain and kill him with a knife. The question most people ask is why would a god command Abraham to commit such an atrocious act.... [tags: Faith]
731 words (2.1 pages)
- The word humanism is a relatively broad term described by Merriam-Webster as, “a system of values and beliefs that is based on the idea that people are basically good and that problems can be solved using reason instead of religion”. While this seems a perfectly reasonable definition for the present day, it does not adequately apply to medieval society. If such a definition was used by a person from the 12th century, that person would likely be looked at incredulously and then swiftly called a heretic or a blasphemer.... [tags: Middle Ages, Feudalism, Humanism]
1481 words (4.2 pages)
- During the Hellenic Age which is sometimes known as the classical period for the Greeks and is dated c.500-300 B.C. In this time period the Greek culture flourish philosophy developed, sculpturing became more sophisticated, and the greatest of them all was the birth of humanism. Humanism is described as being “any system or mode of thought or action in which human interests, values, and dignity predominate” (“Humanism n.pag.). Humanism meant making men superior over all things and that men were supreme even over the Gods.... [tags: greek culture, hellenic age, humanism]
671 words (1.9 pages)
- “Hunting is not a sport, in a sport both sides should know they’re in the game”(Paul Rodriguez)."The Most Dangerous Game," an adventure tale that pits two notorious hunters against one another in a life and death competition, is the story for which Richard Connell is best remembered. First published in 1924, the story has been frequently drawn together as a classic example of a suspenseful narrative loaded with action. Connell's story raises questions about the nature of violence, cruelty and the ethics of hunting for sport.... [tags: The Most Dangerous Game]
1939 words (5.5 pages)
- In life, faith allows people to understand and remember great things. So when it seems that life’s path has gone astray, people turn to faith; but what is faith. Saint Augustine once said, “Faith is believing what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.” The definition of faith varies depending on a person 's cultural, social, and religious beliefs but the overall meaning of faith doesn 't change. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary believes the definition of faith to be “a strong belief or trust in someone or something, or belief in the existence of God : strong religious feelings or beliefs.” Although, everyone 's definition may be worded differently than the dictio... [tags: Faith, Religion, Belief, Reason]
1082 words (3.1 pages)
- There are several philosophies which have recently surfaced which most likely intend to debunk the certainty we are undeniably a creation. Since my adolescence I have witnessed and observed that most individuals in general, have converted to the “humanism proposition,” (HP) and become less attracted to the “creationist hypothesis” (CH). I have formed my attitude and/or outlook based on observation and collective research into what I refer to as the “Eventual collapse of the creationist perspective.” Hollywood, coupled with the upsurge of non-believers in our society-(America), is warring against the actual notion that we to some degree, shape, or form are created.... [tags: Humanism Proposition, Creation, Philosophy]
1285 words (3.7 pages)
- The Value of Life in The Most Dangerous Game He is hunched down in the bushes, a .22-caliber pistol in his hand. His blood-red lips split open in a smile as he watches his prey writhing, blood spouting from the wound, dry green leaves becoming wet crimson. Then, with a terrible pleasure, he places the gun against the skull of his prey and fires one last round. The hunter, brimming with sadism, drags his kill behind him, leaving a trail of blood behind on the ground. Human blood. This premise of man hunting man is one set up by Richard Connell’s short story The Most Dangerous Game.... [tags: Most Dangerous Game Essays]
1317 words (3.8 pages)
- Humanism The word “humanism” has a number of meanings, and because there are so many different meanings it can be quite confusing if you don't know what kind of humanism someone is talking about. Literary Humanism is a devotion to the humanities or literary culture. Renaissance Humanism is the spirit of learning that developed at the end of the middle ages with the revival of classical letters and a renewed confidence in the ability of human beings to determine for themselves truth and falsehood.... [tags: essays research papers]
1658 words (4.7 pages)
- Humanism Humanism was a new way of thinking that came about in fourteenth century, the time of the Renaissance. Many scholars refer to it as the "Spirit of the Renaissance." Humanism was a lay phenomenon that emphasized human beings - as opposed to deities - as well as their interests, achievements and capabilities. Humanism is derived from the Latin word humanitas, which Cicero, the noted orator of the Roman Empire, referred to as the "literary culture needed by anyone who would be considered educated and civilized." Humanism and Literature Humanists searched for wisdom from the past. They copied the lifestyles of the ancient Greeks and Romans. They also traced their families... [tags: Philosophy essays]
1235 words (3.5 pages)
What can we expect of philosophy today, what is it called and obliged to explain? While in the Renaissance epoch the idea of humanism was connected with confidence in human cognitive and creative capabilities, nowadays we are in a greater need of pondering on their destructive results. Having declared the achievement of noosphere, we now change the accent - why are actions of "the sphere of mind" so mindless? Raising the question of sources and causes of this contradiction, we begin to differentiate (on the level of higher and even highest education) between the sometimes identified notions of culture and civilization: the former as "striving for developing our abilities, transformation of ourselves" and the latter as "striving for transformation of environment, supremacy over the world" - natural, public, human.
"Culture is the direction, which we give to the development of our potentions" - J. Ortega-i-Gasset wrote. How can philosophy orientates this direction for transition of the evolution onto "the level of culture"?
First of all, philosophy must and can explain that we live in the world where striving for supremacy, and the so much violence as inevitable means (over nature, people and states, over oneself) has become inadequate, that the only reasonable and justified way is that humanism in its comprehensive contents of this notion. To explain that humanism is not an offer or a tip (as one sometimes considers so easily declared democracy in the post-soviet world), but the way, gained through suffering, a duty of our time which is cruel and confused. Doesn't this statement seem a contradiction or a dangerous illusion? "The condition of refusal of illusions concerning one's situation is the statement of society in which there is no need in illusions" - both C. Marx and E. Fromm said equally actual with an interval of a century. Knowing how far we are from this social statement, a philosopher understands that it is difficult to convince of humanism as the only real way both the embittered people, who haven't got new ideals instead of the ones thrown down, and the younger generation demonstratively refusing any belief in anybody or anything, but wanting such belief most of all. How can it be explained to the prosperous and fed up, who prefer not to think over "futile" questions, especially if their welfare has been achieved by means of these cruel inhuman ways what is the most frequent thing in nowadays Russia? How can one convince of fruitfulness and prospects of humanism in the world torn by contradictions, in which the fight for supremacy moved from under the "colors of philosophical doctrines" to the national and regional ones.
No doubt this task can not be solved on the level of declarations and starry-eyed idealistic summons. To convince a philosopher must be convinced himself. To have desperate faith or understanding that "one can't live like that" is insufficient. Can a philosophical view perceive objective social cultural premises, actual trends of the turn to humanism in public mentality, economic, political, juridical thinking, modern public life?
The modern world has never been so much correlated in economic, political, cultural, scientific aspects, correlated with global problems of ecological, military, medical character. Philosophy has a special role in the developing dialogue of cultures, in the process of their mutual understanding and enrichment. Playing the part of vessels connecting different epochs in culture, philosophy has always been upbringing the trinity of respect to the past, understanding of the present and care of the future. In the modern contradictory world philosophical thinking confirms tolerance to another's opinion, another's world outlook, confidence without fear of losing positions and reputation. Hopeful results of philosophy of peace are available in the modern political thinking. Quite long ago the results of he Rome club and then A. Toffler's practopia made one conscious of responsibility for the future, of necessity of "solving problems" instead of "taking decisions". Scientific results of recent years (the anthropic principle), testifying to their being unique, commit to special responsibility for preserving life and mind.
We live in the world which hasn't yet become conscious of that even if there is a way to distract from the ethic point of view, strength can not solve any tasks (even on the level of "taking decisions"). The events of recent years and even months - Karabakh, Yugoslavia, Chechnya - convince of that. And what about the people in trenches, terrorism and blackmail? Of course, it is much more difficult for these people than for a philosopher to come to understanding, and there will be quite a few victims on the way from confrontation to consent. A philosopher knows best of all to what the society and the separate person condemn themselves if they stake on compulsion, ignoring personality, "humanistic nuances which are as valuable as life itself" (A. Camus). To counterbalance the destructive chose of everything that can be bought for money, of power, of even knowledge as commodity, of consumery attitude even to friends and relatives, to nature, humanistic ethics considers it natural and most productive to respect people as well as oneself, to love nature, life, thought and creative work. The humanistic value of "philosophical attitude to life" is not to strive after imposed values, not to poison life with malice or groundless illusions, but to have inner strength, inner god. The Bible says: "If there is no God in a soul, it is haunted by an evil spirit". Sociological, philosophical, psychological researches are the evidence of the fact that social conflicts are most frequently roused by people who are in discord with themselves, who failed to realize themselves in anything or to determine themselves in the system of life values. Speaking about evolution on the "level of culture", let us remember the definition of culture as such that is working, tilling, in accord with nature and oneself. Have we been bought up and do we bring up in a proper way? Wanting our child to become "somebody" we seldom care he should become himself, realize himself in the direction in which different components of welfare could at least not exclude one another. And, once again, understanding that we need quite a different society for that we recognize it as a most actual task to bring up in the new generation people not only deeply and comprehensively, but differently that is humanistically educated whose education would be organically combined with upbringing as in the antique "paideia".