Distinguishing Panavision And Bensusan

Distinguishing Panavision And Bensusan

Length: 1303 words (3.7 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Distinguishing Panavision And Bensusan

The law regarding jurisdiction determination was far from crystal clear even before the internet came of age, and courts are now having a difficult time reconciling the "purposeful availment" and related "effects" tests used in traditional jurisdiction analyses with the new paradigms in information transfer made possible by the internet, and in particular by the World Wide Web (WWW). These difficulties are apparent in Panavision, Int'l. L.P. v. Toeppen, 938 F. Supp 616 (C.D. Cal. 1996), and Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 937 F. Supp. 295 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). Both cases involved trademark infringement and dilution suits stemming from the alleged use of the trademark on the WWW. Each court came down differently on the jurisdiction issue, and rightly so, but neither court's analysis was very satisfying when one attempts to distinguish the two cases.

In Toeppen, the defendant had formed a plan to find prominent registered trademarks which had not yet been registered as internet addresses, and register them as his own, with the expectation that he could sell them at a substantial profit to the owner of each mark should that owner desire to do business on the internet using that internet address. The court used a three-part test for specific jurisdiction, the first part of which was the "purposeful availment" test, which in turn became an "effects test" when the claim is in the nature of a tort. After deciding that the claim was tort-like, the court used the "effects test" and found that Toeppen's acts were 1) intentional, 2) aimed at California, and 3) caused foreseeable harm to the plaintiff. This was at the heart of the court's reasoning in exercising jurisdiction.

The facts in Bensusan start out very much like Toeppen, but diverge at a point, resulting in a decision to decline to exercise jurisdiction. In Bensusan, which proceeded Toeppen by ten days, the defendant, a Missouri jazz club, had set up a web page the contents of which contained an allegedly infringing use of the plaintiff's trademark, "The Blue Note". The plaintiff, owner of the mark for a New York jazz club, wanted the New York district court to interpret state law so that it could exercise jurisdiction over the Missouri club. It refused to do so because, under a similar "effects test" to that used in Toeppen (the court here also found the claim to be in the nature of a tort), there was no foreseeable harm to the plaintiff.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Distinguishing Panavision And Bensusan." 123HelpMe.com. 26 Feb 2020

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Distinguishing Between Chemical And Physical Changes Essay

- Lab Title: Distinguishing Between Chemical and Physical Changes in Matter Purpose: The objective of this lab is to determine if there are chemical or physical changes that occur after mixing various forms of matter. To do this the following items are mixed together and macroscopic changes are observed and recorded: Starch + I2, Food coloring + NaOCl, Food coloring + CH3COOH, Red cabbage + NH3, Red cabbage + CH3COOH, NaHCO3 + NH3, NaHCO3 + CH3COOH, Na2CO3 + CH3COOH, MgSO4 + CH3COOH, MgSO4 + NH3 and MgSO4 + Na2CO3....   [tags: Chemistry, Chemical reaction, Ammonia]

Research Papers
2239 words (6.4 pages)

Distinguishing Between Power and Authority Essay

- Distinguishing Between Power and Authority Power is the ability to change the behaviour of another perhaps against their will, the term "power struggle" implies that one side has used power over another to determine the outcome in their favour. This also leads to the suggestion that power can involve the use of coercion either by diplomatic, financial means or by force. The difference between power and authority lies with legitimacy. Authority by its very definition means 'legitimate power' and according to Jouvenel those who are subject to authority accept it voluntarily without coercion or the threat of brute force....   [tags: Papers]

Free Essays
466 words (1.3 pages)

Essay on Ethical Behavior Is Distinguishing And Performing Ones Actions

- Synthesis Paper Ethical behavior is distinguishing and performing ones actions accordingly. The trouble with this statement stems the questions of what is considered as “right.” The definition of this word varies according to individuals, customs, and beliefs. Ethical behavior represents a value system that has been developed from a logical analysis of society, established by fairness, integrity, the desires and privileges of people and oneself. Ethical leadership comprises of two aspects. First, ethical leaders have to perform and make ethical judgments....   [tags: Leadership, Ethics, Scientific method, Management]

Research Papers
1158 words (3.3 pages)

Difficulty Distinguishing Between Comedy and Tragedy in Shakespeare's Plays

- Difficulty Distinguishing Between Comedy and Tragedy in Shakespeare's Plays Shakespeare’s theatrical works are generally categorized into three all encompassing groups: the uplifting comedy, the lamented tragedy, and the excruciatingly boring history play. However, things can get a little confusing when you end up with a comedy like Measure for Measure or a tragedy like Titus Andronicus. Often we find that many of Shakespeare’s plays do not fit into their ascribed categories, but is it the plays that don’t fit the categories, or the reverse....   [tags: Papers]

Free Essays
471 words (1.3 pages)

Distinguishing Between Psychological Hedonism and Ethical Hedonism Essays

- Distinguishing Between Psychological Hedonism and Ethical Hedonism Philosophers commonly distinguish between psychological hedonism and ethical hedonism. Psychological hedonism is the view that humans are psychologically constructed in such a way that we exclusively desire pleasure. Ethical hedonism is the view that out fundamental moral obligation is to maximize pleasure or happiness. Ethical hedonism is associated with the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus who taught hat our life's goal should be to minimize pan and maximize pleasure....   [tags: Pyschology, Informative]

Free Essays
325 words (0.9 pages)

Distinguishing the Difference in News Coverage among International and Domestic

- Distinguishing the Difference in News Coverage among International and Domestic Images Not Included Identifying a Variance in News Coverage It became evident throughout our investigation that separating domestic news source sites from international news source sites would be beneficial in addressing our question of the variance in coverage among these news sources when identifying natural disasters throughout the world. With the objective of properly addressing this inquiry, we decided upon a proposition in order to accurately identify whether a difference in news source coverage truly exists....   [tags: News Media TV Essays Papers]

Research Papers
3785 words (10.8 pages)

Essay on Distinguishing between a Lay Magistrate and a Stipendiary Magistrate

- Distinguishing between a Lay Magistrate and a Stipendiary Magistrate Introduction: - Magistrates sit on a bench in the magistrates' court and hear around 98% of all criminal cases. Many Magistrates' deal with summary offences including, driving without insurance and common assault. The Magistrates listen to the case in hand, and then have to decide weather the defendant is guilty or not guilty. They have to come up with a suitable punishment for a guilty plea aswell. There are two types of magistrates, lay magistrates and stipendiary magistrates....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
858 words (2.5 pages)

Gram Staining Is An Important Tool For Distinguishing Between Two Main Types Of Bacteria Gram

- Introduction Gram staining was developed by Christian Gram in the 1800’s, a Danish bacteriologist. (Smith and Hussey, 2005) It was the first differential staining technique and most common used in microbiology. Furthermore, bacteria are transparent and cannot be seen through the microscope. For that reason, Gram staining is an important tool for distinguishing between two main types of bacteria Gram-positive and Gram-negative. The Gram stain differentiates the Gram positive and gram-negative on the basis of their cell wall structure.(Menard, et al.,20150) Most bacteria gram positive or gram negative but they are a few gram variable bacteria and very small bacteria without a cell wall that...   [tags: Gram staining, Bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria]

Research Papers
1679 words (4.8 pages)

Housing Tenure is Less Important Now for Distinguishing Between Social Classes

- Housing Tenure is Less Important Now for Distinguishing Between Social Classes "Does housing in general, and home ownership in particular, comprise anything more than just a class-related distributive outcome?" (Hamnett 1995:257) Hamnett posed this question in 1995 in his paper 'Home Ownership and the Middle Classes'. He went on to investigate possible answers in much the same way as I intend to discuss the contention that housing tenure is now less important for distinguishing between social classes than in the 1950s....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
1764 words (5 pages)

Distinguishing if a Relationship Exists or Can be Established between the Height and Weight of Students Ages 12-16

- Distinguishing if a Relationship Exists or Can be Established between the Height and Weight of Students Ages 12-16 The aim of this investigation is to distinguish if a relationship exists or can be established between the height and weight of students ageing from 12 yrs to 16 yrs in year groups 7 to 11 in a mixed in a boys and girls school. To execute this investigation I have to acquire information from Mayfield School survey, this will provide me with the relevant data which will be interrogated and analysed to investigate the hypothesis....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
2587 words (7.4 pages)

Related Searches

The Bensusan court also noted an additional requirement in the New York long arm statute that the defendant derive substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce, and found that requirement lacking here.

Because the focus in each case is on different aspects of the test, it is sometimes difficult to tell that both courts are using essentially the same test. Toeppen focuses on whether to apply the "effects test" at all (whether the claim is in the nature of a tort), and then glosses over the rest of the analysis. If one applies the analysis only this far in Bensusan, the facts are the same. Both cases are infringement / dilution actions, both in the nature of a tort, and both involved intentional acts aimed at the plaintiff. The Bensusan court's arguments about "several affirmative steps" being required to access the allegedly infringing mark is no defense in this context. According to the abbreviated analysis above, jurisdiction should not depend on how easy it was for users to access the allegedly infringing page. The infringement is the same whether it is on the front cover of a book or in the middle of Chapter 8. Toeppen muddies the water further by attempting to distinguish Bensusan because it says the defendant in the instant case was not "doing business" in California. Toeppen fails to realize that the Bensusan court made essentially the same finding ("There are no allegations that King...conducted any business ...in New York.").

Except for the "claim in the nature of a tort" analysis, the Toeppen court does not go into much depth in any of its arguments for the exercise of jurisdiction. Because of the confusing elements noted above, a casual observer may base the different outcomes on the "shmuck test", characterizing the defendant in Toeppen as a greedy cybersquatter who deserved what he got, and ignoring the real differences in the facts of the cases. There are dangers with explaining away the allowing of jurisdiction in Toeppen as justified by the "shmuck" test. First of all, even shmucks have a right to avoid being sued in a jurisdiction in which he does not have adequate ties. Secondly, our categorizing Toeppen as a shmuck is based on the perception that he has done something wrong. All he did, however, was stake out a claim to an internet address with the expectation that it might have value at a later date. Without any prior caselaw that a trademark owner necessarily had a proprietary right to that internet address (indeed, there are some good arguments that the trademark owner shouldn't have such a right), Toeppen seems less like a slimy shmuck than a shrewd opportunist who thought he had found a good investment and was merely trying to exploit it. The better reasoning is to recognize that there are differences in the cases. Indeed, the dispute in Toeppen had less to do with any website that the defendant set up that it did with the fact that the defendant was arguably keeping the plaintiff from legitimately using its trademark. Bensusan is the far better case to use for analysis of jurisdiction issues where potentially infringing trademarks show up on web pages.

In the background of this discussion, and yet always relevant, is the more general Due Process Clause requirement that even if the effects test is satisfied, the exercise of jurisdiction must "comport with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice." International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945). One of the most frustrating details about extending jurisdiction through cyberspace and into the physical space of other states is that while recognizing that the internet has been instrumental in making our world smaller, the court system itself has not followed the rest of us and made use of its advantages. Talk of advances in information technology bringing distant parties together through the magic of cyberspace seems rather empty coming from a judge in front of whom parties must still physically appear, and a court system which will not accept testimony given over the internet. In a court of law, there's still no next-best thing to being there. As the gap grows wider between public use of the internet (and accompanying susceptibility to out-of-state jurisdictions) and courts' antiquated insistence of personal physical appearance, notions of "fair play and substantial justice" in the exercising of jurisdiction in these cases gets lost along the way. If courts are to become increasingly willing to extend jurisdiction to those persons who use the internet, let them take an additional step and reduce the physical and financial burden of being haled into court. It is not unimaginable that we might someday have in all courthouses at least one "cyberspace courtroom", in which courts can arrange for distant witnesses and parties to participate in trials all over the country, decreasing the burden on the party which is forced to participate in a trial far from home or work. Admittedly, this creates all new problems for courts regarding verification of internet testimony, the Constitutional right to confront witnesses, and undoubtedly a host of others. Still, if the internet is to become a part of our everyday life, then we as officers of the court have an obligation to ensure that the machinery of justice is maintained well enough to serve its citizens and deserve their respect.

Return to 123HelpMe.com