Essay PreviewMore ↓
ABSTRACT: In this paper, I shall focus first on Heidegger's attempt to tackle the problem of 'metaphysics' and his wish to transcend it. Then, I shall try to evaluate his thoughts about transcending metaphysics in connection with his interpretation of Nietzsche's anthropology, which he considers to be the highest achievement in metaphysics.
In my presentation today I shall focus first on Heidegger's attempt to tackle the problem of "metaphysics" and his wish to transcend it. Then I shall try to evaluate his thoughts about transcending metaphysics in connection with his interpretation of Nietzsche's anthropology which he considers to be the top achievement of metaphysics.
At the beginning of his main work Being and Time Heidegger has made clear that his aim in writing it, was to deal with the meaning of Being in a concrete way and posed the question of Being as the primary question of philosophy today. Therefore it would be useful, as a first step, to take a look at the main reason which has led Heidegger to this assumption and consequently to the inquiry into the meaning of Being.
Heidegger asks the question of the meaning of Being with respect to a fact which, to his mind, characterizes our times and which he calls "homelessness". This fact is due to "the oblivion of Being", as a result of which Being "has abandoned us". (1)
The basic problem that worries Heidegger is related just to the recognition of this fact. He maintains that although Being has been investigated since ancient times in different periods, it has not yet been elucidated, because the question about the meaning of Being has been neglected. (2) Due to this negligence of the meaning of Being, man has lost almost all his connections with Being and lives now in a technical, artificial world: man has lost his "ground", he is "homeless" . (3)
Heidegger tries to find a way to help man to transcend this homelessness, which he considers to be dangerous for the present and the future of the human being. This is the reason why Heidegger, already in 1929, asks the question of "what is metaphysics?". He thinks that this question itself can open the way he is looking for, because it plays a very important role in putting the question of Being correctly and in settling the problem of homelessness of the human being.
How to Cite this Page
"What Heidegger Wishes To Transcend: Metaphysics Or Nietzsche." 123HelpMe.com. 24 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Nietzsche and Heidegger In this assignment, I will discuss what I have learned to perceive is the relevance of Nietzsche and Heidegger for theorizing religion. I will place great emphasis on Nietzsche's concept of the "Death of God," and how this concept is a challenge to modernity and religious consciousness. With the rise of science and empiricism, Nietzsche argues that it is practically impossible for a modern person to realistically believe in a Christian conception of God. However, the morality of Christianity lingers in the background, and, while still influencing people, Nietzsche predicts that the Europe of his time was soon to see a nihilistic sickness.... [tags: death of god, religion, power]
2429 words (6.9 pages)
- Heidegger’s Notion of Authenticity Martin Heidegger is one of the most influential and highly regarded existential philosophers of the 20th century. Born in Meβkirch, Germany on September 26th 1889, Heidegger began his plight with life and theories of existentialism. Early in his life, Heidegger was influenced by Kierkegaard, and Edmund Husserl, which taught him the ideas of hermeneutics and phenomenology. Together, their ideas helped create one of Heidegger’s main ideas, his emphasis on being an authentic human being or “Dasein,” which translates “there Being.” The authenticity or Eigentlichkeit (own-ness) Heidegger preached was that a human being should strive to be an individual,... [tags: Meaning of life, Existentialism, Martin Heidegger]
2175 words (6.2 pages)
- In the film, The Matrix, the human race is forced into a “dream state” by a powerful group that controls their reality. “The Matrix” is a false reality where people live an ordinary life. However, this reality, or illusion, is being forced onto people who readily accept it as truth. This concept is where Friedrich Nietzsche’s essay, “On Truth and Lies in a Moral Sense” (1873) begins its argument. Nietzsche begins his argument by explaining that we have a need to form groups or “herds”. To keep these groups together “a uniformly valid and binding designation is given to things” (452).... [tags: Friedrich Nietzsche]
987 words (2.8 pages)
- Explanation Nietzsche’s conception of the “social straightjacket” and the history of morality in relation to selfhood and social norms. Nietzsche starts his explanation of the genealogy of morals by evaluating the origin of a version of the word “good”. He posits that what is good is described by the person it is most useful for, essentially that what is “good” is subject to the perspective of the person who is on the receiving end of the action. Nietzsche also provides an alternative view to its origin, he claims that instead of “good” being defined by the person who benefits from the action, rather that the noble and powerful have claimed the right to define their actions and values as “go... [tags: Morality, Sociology, Friedrich Nietzsche, Value]
1007 words (2.9 pages)
- A Thematic Unity for Heidegger's Was Heisst Denken. ABSTRACT: This essay is primarily an analysis of Heidegger's Was Heisst Denken. I aim to provide a thematic unity for this enigmatic text, thereby rendering Heidegger's thoughts on thinking more available to those investigating the nature of human rationality and thinking. The procedure is to gather together some of the sundry themes and puzzling features resolved by unpacking this sentence: 'Most thought-provoking in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking.' The chief results of this study include the establishment of a global logic to the text, the identification of 'being-thoughtful' as the proper phenomenon to be st... [tags: Heidegger Was Heisst Denken Essays]
3469 words (9.9 pages)
- Aristotle and Heidegger Allowing Personal Accountability A disquieting article recently appeared in The New York Times. The article chronicles the story of Larry W. Peterman, resident of Provo, Utah, owner of a successful adult video store, and defendant in a case in which he was charged with selling obscene material. During Peterman’s trial, the following information came to the fore, "As it turned out, people in Utah County, a place that often boasts of being the most conservative area in the nation, were disproportionately large consumers of the very videos that prosecutors had labeled obscene and illegal.... [tags: Philosophy Martin Heidegger Essays]
6686 words (19.1 pages)
- The Question: State your understanding of the philosophy of F. Nietzsche. What does he mean by saying "God is Dead". Nietzsche's philosophy is that of a radical view as it calls for the complete reevaluation of morals and blatantly attacks the Judeo-Christian tradition in modern society. He believed one should dare to become who they are. In order to ascertain one's full potential as a human being, the ethic system of which by society runs, must be changed as it only hampers one's will to power.... [tags: Philosophy Atheist Atheism Friedrich Nietzsche]
752 words (2.1 pages)
- Nihilsmo, Fin de la Metafisica y Secularizacion en el Pensamiento de Nietzsche, Heidegger y Vattimo ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to articulate Nietzsche's criticism of morality which is centered in his experience of the death of God and the end of the subject of Modernity. Nietzsche considers nihilism as a nihilism of morality, not of metaphysics: it is morality and its history that has given rise to nihilism in the Occident. That is why Nietzsche separates himself from metaphysics as well as from morality and science, which differs from Heidegger's reasons.... [tags: Spanish Essays]
4093 words (11.7 pages)
- Theory and Praxis in Aristotle and Heidegger ABSTRACT: The discussion of Heidegger's “destructive retrieve” of Aristotle has been intensified in recent years by the publication of Heidegger's courses in the years surrounding his magnum opus. Heidegger's explicit commentary on Aristotle in these courses permits one to read Being and Time with Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Metaphysics. My paper analyzes a network of differences between the two thinkers, focusing on the relationship between theory and praxis.... [tags: Aristotle heidegger Essays]
3463 words (9.9 pages)
- Friedrich Nietzsche was born near Rocken a small town in the Prussian province of Saxony, on October 15, 1844. Ironically the philosopher who rejected religion and coined the phrase "god is dead" was descended from a line of respected clergymen. Nietzsche completed his secondary education at the exacting boarding school of Pforta. A brilliant student, he received rigorous training in Latin, Greek, and German. In 1864 the young man entered the University of Bonn to study theology and classical philology.... [tags: Philosopher Biography Nietzsche]
1599 words (4.6 pages)
- The Future of Philosophy
- Nihilsmo, Fin de la Metafisica y Secularizacion en el Pensamiento de Nietzsche, Heidegger y Vattimo
- The Originality of Levinas: Pre-Originally Categorizing the Ego
- Heidegger's Critique of Cartesianism
- Being and Humans in Heidegger's Letter on Humanism and in his Contributions to Philosophy
- Reinterpretación Filosófica de la Paideia Trágica
What is the role that the question of "what is metaphysics?" is expected to play in putting the question of Being? According to Heidegger the basic error committed in connection with the question of Being stems from what he calls metaphysical thinking, which is a way of thinking we come across all along the history of philosophy. This way of thinking always asks "what is Being?", which is a wrong way of putting the question of Being; it has never asked what the meaning of Being is. (4) This is why Heidegger, in his Dasein analysis that he makes in Being and Time(1927) insists on investigating the meaning of Being. This investigation which is based on revealing the existential meaning of Dasein as anxiety (Sorge), (5) is a first step towards putting the question of Being adequately.
According to Heidegger, Being (das Sein) should not be investigated through an inquiry into entities (das Seiende) as is done in the history of Western philosophy until now, but through an inquiry into Nothing (das Nichts) which Heidegger assumes to be identical with Being. (6) Investigation of Being through Nothing presupposes the question of "what is metaphysics?". This latter question is very important, because it plays a double role: on the one hand it secures the possibility of investigating Being through Nothing, and on the other hand it makes possible to transcend metaphysics . (7)
Metaphysics, as the basic occurrence (Grundgeschehen ) of Dasein or Dasein itself, (8) is a way of thinking that has to be absolutely transcended. The possibility of transcending it, rests on its being a basic occurrence of Dasein. Such a transcending can occur only in Dasein. On the basis of this occurrence it is possible to go beyond entities ( das Seiende). But here we need to pay a special attention to the meaning of metaphysics.
'Metaphysics' in its initial sense -as the title of Aristotle's book- means "what comes after the issues of physics?", that is the issues which come after the issues treated in Physics. This meaning of metaphysics has changed in the Middle Ages: it was made to convey "what is beyond the physical". Heidegger finds this change in the interpretation of metaphysics -in which meta is understood in the sense of 'trans' and metaphysics in the sense of "what is beyond entities ('über' das Seiende)" very crucial for the history of metaphysics. (9)
Thus, on the basis of this meaning of meta - trans, Heidegger considers "metaphysics" both as an occurrence of Dasein as well as a way of thinking which has started with the end of Pre-Socratic philosophy, continued throughout the history of Western thought and found its accomplishment in Nietzsche's thought. (10) In order to transcend metaphysical thinking which has caused the oblivion of the meaning of Being, it is necessary to reveal the nature of this thinking, i.e. to show that this thinking is capable of grasping Being only as entity (Seiendes), and not Being as Being.
This way of grasping Being, by reducing Being to "spirit, matter, power, will, substance, subject, energeia, etc.", has concealed the "truth of Being". It has never managed to express "Being in its truth and truth as unconcealment (alhJeia). (11) Thus, in spite of the fact that metaphysical thinking aims at understanding Being, because of its incapacity to think of Being in its truth, has prevented the establishment of the relation between man and Being. (12)
Heidegger proposes another way of thinking, more adequate for the investigation of Being and for understanding its truth. This more adequate thinking starts investigating Being by asking the question of "what is metaphysics?". This question is more appropriate to begin with, because it questions both "what metaphysics is" and "what is beyond metaphysics", (13) in other words it inquires into Nothing.
This inquiry into Nothing presupposes a thinking capable of grasping "Being in its own truth and truth as alhJeia" and of reestablishing the relation between man and Being. This is what Heidegger calls substantial thinking (das wesentliche Denken). (14) Thus, inquiry into Nothing leads thinking beyond metaphysics and by attempting to reestablish the relation between man and Being is expected to change "the essence of man". (15)
The aim of Heidegger's ontological investigations appears to be a new anthropology which, by reestablishing the relation between man and Being, will save man from his homelessness. This is an anthropology which takes its point of departure from the question of Being as the sole and prime question of thinking, (16) investigates Being by means of a metaphysical question -the question of Nothing- and tries to reach the meaning of Being through the existential meaning of the concept of Dasein as anxiety (Sorge). Heidegger has followed a different way of thinking, because he believed that in order to save man from his homelessness we need to approach him in a way which is quite different from that of metaphysics, i.e. we need to approach man without asking the question of "what is man?".
Heidegger has attached great importance to the endeavour of grasping man without asking the question of "what is man?", because this sort of question has given rise to the homeless condition of man today. In connection with this point, it can be said that he has intended to reach an understanding of man which has an open horizon, i.e. an understanding which bears the possibility of further development. Only such an understanding of man can transcend metaphysical anthropology which , according to Heidegger, finds its culminating point in Nietzsche's philosophy.
Why does Heidegger consider Nietzsche's philosophy to be metaphysical? One reason is that he considers "metaphysical thinking" to be a thinking that goes beyond entities and another one that he assumes that there is an inner connection between the history of European thought and Nietzsche's philosophy. His conception of metaphysics leads Heidegger to consider also Nietzsche as a metaphysician, and as philosopher who must be overcome, in spite of the fact that he acknowledges his special place in the history of philosophy.
What makes Nietzsche a metaphysician in Heidegger's eyes, are the key concepts of his philosophy, such as the will to power, nihilism, the eternal recurrence of the same, the superman, justice etc. . (17) For example, according to Heidegger, "the eternal recurrence of the same", which constitutes "the concealed essence of Time", is "the last metaphysical name of Being". (18) Another example is the way that Heidegger understands Nietzsche's superman. Although Heidegger considers Nietzsche's concept of superman to be the culmination of metaphysics, he objects that this concept does not help to transcend metaphysical thinking and consequently cannot become a different new beginning, while his own concept of Da-sein that never refers to something real, but asks about the truth of Being (das Seyn), can become such a new different beginning. (19) But, this role of Da-sein as the enlightenment of Being itself(das Seyn) is something to be realized in the future. (20)
And now the question arises: is it Nietzsche's concept of superman a metaphysical concept in the Heideggerian sense, i.e. a concept that points at something "beyond entities (das Seiende)"? If we take into consideration some characteristics of superman, the truth of this Heideggerian claim seems doubtful: first of all superman is, according to Nietzsche, "one type of human being. In the Antichrist we read that this type is "a type of human being, whom we often meet at present and have met in the past, a type of human being who has come by chance, as an exception, but never because he was aimed at". (21) This is a type of man, who is " against metaphysics", "faithful to the earth", "early born", "new", "nameless", " fearless", " godless", " first maker", "stateless", "European"; he is the "tragic man", "the philosopher". This very much "valuable type" is one who has achieved to free himself from the value judgments of his time and can see reality as it is. This "tragic philosopher" who understands the meaning of "the eternal recurrence", says "yes" to life as it is, i.e. to life with all its problematic sides and suffering. He is not a stranger, he is not "homeless"; he is "reality itself". (22) This type of man is one who can see reality with his own eyes, who has his own thoughts, his own work. (23) He can create his own values, he can make a new evaluation of reality, he can "reevaluate values". Thus, this type of man is the "meaning of the earth". (24)
Now, if these are the main characteristics of Nietzsche's superman, it is hard to claim that this concept -as well as Nietzsche's anthropology in general- is metaphysical. Consequently it can be claimed that what Heidegger wishes to transcend is not Nietzsche's "metaphysics", but Nietzsche's anthropology and Nietzsche as a philosopher in general.
As a conclusion it is possible to say that what Heidegger tries to do, with the aim to transcend Nietzsche, is a "phenomenology of metaphysics" (25) -phenomenology understood here in Hegelian sense. In this way, he thinks, he can help man to reestablish his relation to Being and overcome his present condition, i.e. his homelessness. On the other hand, we can say that what Nietzsche does is a phenomenology of human reality: he looks at the different ways that human being evaluates reality and he builds his anthropology on this ground. (26) Thus, it is possible to ask: which of these two anthropologies is in fact more helpful in facing the problems of the human being, as well as those present-day world.
(1) Martin Heidegger, " Brief Über den Humanismus",Wegmarken. GA.bd.9.Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klosterman,1976, p.339.
(2) Heidegger, Sein und Zeit. GA, Bd.2 Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann,1977, p.3.
(3) Heidegger , "Profesör Heidegger 1933'te Neler Oldu?" translated by Turhan Ilgaz, Ýstanbul: Yapý Kredi Yayýnlarý, 1993, p.28.
(4) Heidegger, Metafizik Nedir? (Was ist Metaphysik?), translated by Yusuf Örnek, Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 1991, p.11.
(5) Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, p.242.
(6) Heidegger, Metafizik Nedir? p.40.
(7) Heidegger, ibid, p.41.
(8) Ibid, p.41.
(9) Ibid, p.38.
(10) Ibid, p.11.
(11) Ibid, p.11
(12) Ibid, p.10,12.
(13) Ibid, p.43.
(14) Ibid, p.50.
(15) Ibid, p.10.
(16) Ibid, p.19.
(17) Heidegger, Nietzsche, GA. Bd.50, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann 1990. p.6.
(18) Heidegger, Metafizik Nedir? , p.18.
(19) Heidegger, Beitrage zur Philosophie ( Vom Ereignis ), GA. Bd. 65, Frankfurt am Main:Vittorio Klostermann, 1989, p.296.
(20) Ibid, p.297.
(21) Friedrich Nietzsche, Der Antichrist, 3, Werke in drei Banden, Hrsg. von Karl Schlechta Wissenschaftliche Buchgeselschaft, Darmstadt,1994.
(22) Nietzsche, Ecce Homo, Warum Ich Ein Schicksal Bin, 5, op. cit.
(23) Ýoanna Kuçuradi, Nietzsche ve Ýnsan, Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, Ankara, 1995, p.75.
(24) Nietzsche, Also Sprach Zarathustra, Vorrede, 3. op. cit.
(25) Richard Wisser, "Martin Heideggers vierfaltiges Fragen. Vor-laufiges anhand von 'Was ist Metaphysik?' ", in: Metafizik Nedir?, p.67.
(26) Ýoanna Kuçuradi, ibid, p.20-26.