Essay PreviewMore ↓
Sixteen year old Vita Wallace is an activist for children’s rights. In her argument, “Give children the vote,” she attempts to show that an injustice has been made to citizens of the United States. Wallace’s major claim, or thesis (McFadden, 2003), is that citizens under the age of 18 shouldn’t be denied the right to vote on account of age. Rather, she argues, children should be allowed to vote at whatever age suits them individually. By saying individually, she is using a qualifier, words and phrases used to limit and modify the overgeneralization of claims (McFadden). It is important that Wallace uses the term individually, because she recognizes that an age limit would be inappropriate for some children. After this point, most of the essay is dedicated to her opinion on why it is important for children to vote. Wallace’s uses appeal to the reader’s values, also known as warrants (McFadden). The emotional pleas may cause the audience to stop and consider her logic, but lack of facts and evidence leaves the argument unconvincing. With her jumpy writing and scattered thoughts the argument is hard to read, and even harder to believe. Therefore, I found the essay to be unsuccessful in persuading my opinion.
The logic and evidence used to support her major claim, known as grounds (McFadden) is hard to find. The strongest evidence in the whole essay is statistics of eligible adult voters. With this information, she points out that only 36-40 percent of eligible adults actually vote. However, 25 percent of the population is under the age of 18, leading to Wallace’s statement that “Although elected representatives are responsible for all of us, they are responsible to only a few of us” (Wallace, 1998, p. 146). This statement would be effective but Wallace loses her credibility at the end of the paragraph when she calls politicians and voters selfish. By doing this she is using a fallacy, statements based on poor logic and mistaken belief (Clark, p. 81). By saying they are selfish she is using an Ad Hominem argument, which is an attack on the person rather than the issue (Clark, 1998, p. 83).
Throughout the essay Wallace develops many minor claims, which are secondary statements supporting the major claim (McFadden). Right away she discusses “Discriminatory laws” which prevent high school drop-outs from getting their driver’s licenses.
How to Cite this Page
"Should We Really Give Children the Vote?." 123HelpMe.com. 16 Nov 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Give Children the Vote. “What I suggest is that children be allowed to grow into their own right to vote at whatever rate suits them individually,” argues Vita Wallace as her major claim in the essay “Give children the vote” (1998, p.147). This is a thoughtful argument by Wallace, but I disagree with it. In this essay, Wallace presents her opinion, but the major claim could also be presented as a fact, judgment, or policy (McFadden, 2003). Throughout the essay, I see the interesting approach Wallace takes to try convince the audience.... [tags: Essay Critique Children Voting Rights Essays]
1223 words (3.5 pages)
- Children Are Too Young to Vote On February 22, 2004, I finally turned 18. I was an adult. I was supposed to be responsible. I had rights I never had before. And I was old enough to make my own decisions. Although I passed up buying cigarettes, joining the military, and getting a tattoo, I did embrace the chance to vote. I remember walking into the town hall for the first time, filling out my voting card, and feeling the sense of adulthood. When I was sitting there voting I realized how little I actually knew about the candidates.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays]
859 words (2.5 pages)
- Many people keep complaining about how the government is a complete failure, but if you do your part and vote, you can make a change in the government system. Voting is your opinion on paper that could make a change in America on how a leader runs this country. Americans should have the ability to vote and voice their opinion but a lot of us do not take advantage of freedom of speech. It is our responsibility as citizens to elect officials that we feel will be honest. These officials need to help make our country better and a safer place.... [tags: Politics]
1176 words (3.4 pages)
- Women's Right to Vote After reading Francis Parkman's article, "Women Are Unfit to Vote", I found myself both offended and annoyed. His arguments were not only shaky, but they were also illogical. He states that the family has been the political unit; consequently, the head of the family should be the political representative. He goes on by stating that women have shared imperfectly in the traditions and not in the practice of self-government. Lastly, he suggests women might vote that men should go off and fight in war.... [tags: American America History]
969 words (2.8 pages)
- The Reason Women Given the Vote in 1918 Women were not treated as equals with men before the second half of the eighteenth century. They had to marry, obey their husbands and have children, only receiving little education. In the eyes of the law they had little power and men were their superiors. For example, once they were married, everything they owned belonged to their husband, this meant that if they separated the women would be left with nothing, not even her children, as they too, belonged solely to the husband.... [tags: Papers]
1939 words (5.5 pages)
- Women's Failure to Gain the Vote Between 1900 and 1914 Women had started to campaign for the vote and in 1900 the vote became more public. The general view in 1900 was that men and woman had different roles in society. Men were strong and born to govern, women were born to be governed and should be kept at home. The view of men was one of the reasons why There are many reasons why the women did not get the vote in 1914, but it was not simply men against women. The most important reason was people's attitudes.... [tags: Papers]
553 words (1.6 pages)
- Exploring Why Women Failed to Gain the Vote 1900-1914 In the middle of the ninetieth century, very few men had really considered the issue of woman’s rights. The status of women in Victorian society was not high and in the terms of legal rights, women were level with children, criminals and lunatics. If a woman was married, her husband owned her property as well as his own. The justification for this state of affairs was that men were said to be the decision makers, who carried the responsibility of supporting a family.... [tags: Papers]
519 words (1.5 pages)
- Why Women Failed to Get the Vote Before 1914 In this question I am going to highlight all the key points and sources of women failing to gain the vote before 1914. Votes for women were always a relatively low priority. Parliaments before the Great-war were composed entirely of men and concentrated more on the Irish home rule, serious industrial issues and threats from Germany. As the outbreak of war begun in 1914, women dropped their fight for the vote and concentrated more on the war cause.... [tags: Papers]
842 words (2.4 pages)
- About time to give animals their rights, right. Animal – what comes to your mind when you hear this word. Perhaps something furry, something feathery, something slimy, something with a beak or lots of sharp teeth, - right. I am sure this what comes to almost everyone’s mind when they think “Animal”. However, do you think of life, a beating heart, and receptiveness to stimulants, feelings, and a struggle for survival amidst tremendous odds. Take a minute to stop and think of this; after all, animals aren’t the cuddly stuffed toys that you see in department stores.... [tags: social issues]
2079 words (5.9 pages)
- Exploring Why Women Failed to Gain the Right to Vote Between 1900 and 1914 There were several reasons that women did not gain the right to vote between 1900 and 1914, both long-term and short-term. Long-term reasons include the opinion many people held at the time that women and men had ‘separate spheres’. They believed that women belonged in the private sphere- in charge of bringing up children, cooking etc and men should be in the public sphere- work, politics etc. Henry Labouchere said “I shall break down all attempts to break down the barrier which nature has placed between men and women” because these roles were thought to have been ordained by God and couldn... [tags: Papers]
662 words (1.9 pages)
Another one of Wallace’s minor claims is that ability to read and write should not be used as a criterion to vote. Wallace cites historical examples of literacy tests that were once used to test whether one could vote or not. Literacy tests were eventually banned because they could be manipulated to ensure discrimination (Wallace, p. 147). Here again she is using values of democracy, liberty, and freedom to support her claim. Her values are connected by backing, which is information that supports the warrant (McFadden). I think that Wallace had a good idea to compare literacy tests to driver license exams because discrimination is a universal taboo. However, in the next few sentences Wallace claims that children wouldn’t attempt to vote unless they could read or write. Wallace also believes that she wouldn’t have even wanted to vote until she was at least 8 or 9, but may have taken an interest sooner. Wallace once again bases this part of her argument on her own experience, rather than evidence from others. I find her argument to be unsuccessful because she tried to speak for everyone by generalizing her experiences.
One of the strengths I noticed is that Wallace is aware of many counterclaims, arguments which others would say, that refute a claim (McFadden). For this reason she is well prepared and offers several rebuttals, arguments that refute a counterclaim (McFadden). However, I found her rebuttals to be based on fallacies rather than evidence. For example many people may argue that politicians would just try to con kids into voting a certain way, Wallace rebuts that children would not fall for this and if they did, not for long. However, this is not only her opinion, but a hasty generalization, caused by drawing conclusions from insufficient evidence (Clark, p. 82). Wallace makes assumptions about how kids will act based only on her personal behavior.
Wallace’s final minor claim is that states do have the power to change the voting age requirements. She then cites the Fourteenth Amendment saying that it is legal to change the voting age starting at state level. This is excellent information but once again is lost by the remainder of the paragraph. It is one of her stronger points, but doesn’t mention it until the last page. This seems like information that she should have included sooner. In general I thought the final page of the essay was difficult to read. I became lost in a jumble of information that I thought was poorly placed at the end of the essay when it should have been towards the front or middle. Wallace finally had a good opportunity to enhance her major claim, but she lost the audience due to poor organization.
Although Wallace used universal values in trying to persuade the audience the argument failed for three reasons. The majority of the paper fails due to overall lack of credibility and evidence. This is because she bases much of her argument only on personal experience. The final reason I found her essay unsuccessful was the overall choppiness of the paper due to poor organization. Overall, Wallace’s argument may have been more successful if she would have focused on actual evidence rather than opinion.
Clark, I. (1998). “Give children the vote” The genre of argument. Boston Thompson Heinke.
McFadden, J. (Sept. 12 & 14, 2003). Intro to Toulmin Lecture. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA.
Wallace, V. (1998). “Give children the vote” The genre of argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark Boston Thompson Heinke p. 145-48.