Essay PreviewMore ↓
Abuse of Power in Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar was written in 1599 in England by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare has born in 1564 and died in 1616. Nobody really knows when exactly he was born but for the records it is assumed that he was born in April, creating an interesting coincidence with his death. He is the greatest writer of his century and probably of the modern era. He influenced many contemporary writers and created a new point of view in the poetry. He wrote 37 plays and 154 sonnets. In his work Julius Caesar Shakespeare shows us the change of power in Rome and the problems that Rome had there. Power is the ability to act with force. Shakespeare makes visible the abuse of power and the struggle to gain power in the biggest empire at the time. Shakespeare also shows that the power itself is more than a name or position. It is something that the people exercise. There is not absolute power, every power has limitations. Besides the servants every character in some way has his power. Although the biggest argument in Julius Caesar is the change of power in the rulers of Rome, Shakespeare tries to show us many different kinds of power and the use of it. As we can see during the play, people with power use power just for their convenience.
During the first part of the play, Shakespeare introduces the characters and the situations. He makes us notice how powerful everyone is. Throughout the different meetings and the dialogues we can feel the power of the personalities of some characters, which in the nearly future is going to make a difference. The rulers of Rome have so much power that they can control the freedom of the people as we can see when Caesar gave an order to Antony. "I shall remember. When Caesar says do this, it is performed" (1.2.12-13). Although this abuse of power made the conspirators act against him, Caesar did not have absolute power and in some situations Calpurnia, his wife, had control in him
"The cause is in my will. I will not come. / That is enough to satisfy the senate.
How to Cite this Page
"Abuse of Power in Julius Caesar." 123HelpMe.com. 20 Apr 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are undeniably two men who made history through their leadership expeditions on their respective nations. When comparing the two, one key aspect of how they made history comes into mind: their assassination. Hence, comparing the assassination of an American president to that of Julius Caesar reveals both similarities and differences. Ultimately, the major of comparing the two is through the similarity between the two assassinations. In this case, they were carried out by people who disagreed with Lincoln and Caesar’s authority and power, and how they used this power and authority.... [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Augustus]
1141 words (3.3 pages)
- Micah Carpenter Mrs.Padgett English 10C 15 December 2015 Persuasive essay What is “Julius Caesar”. It was a play based on the death of Julius Caesar. This play was written by the playwright William Shakespeare. This play consisted, in my standpoint of writing this, two main characteristic of rulers. The question is what are the two main characteristics of rulers. The two main types of ruling characteristics that are expressed in this play are pragmatism and a man of principle. Now the question is what is better.... [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Augustus]
897 words (2.6 pages)
- The Search for the Perfect Hero In the world today people consider a hero to be someone like Superman or Spider-Man. In the dictionary a hero is considered or defined as a person of distinguished courage or ability, admired for their brave deeds and noble qualities. Though a hero is thought to be free of mistakes they all have tragic flaws like everyone else. A tragic flaw is explained by Aristotle’s definition, which says that: a tragic hero as a character of great reputation and prosperity whose misfortune is not due to depravity or vice, for the hero is a virtuous man or woman but to an error in judgment resulting from a tragic flaw.... [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]
1455 words (4.2 pages)
- Brutus was a well-known person who loved Rome. His love for Rome led to him helping someone murder Julius Caesar, his leader. As a person do you love and care about your state or country so much that you would kill your leader to protect the people in it. Brutus cared so much about Rome and his people that he did just that. He lost his life for Rome, and it truly showed how much he cared for the people, which showed his level of honor. An honorable person is someone who is of high rank, has dignity, and highly respected.... [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]
646 words (1.8 pages)
- “Even the noblest men can be seduced by power; it has the power to kill, to distort, and to corrupt” Through this passage, Matthew Sims captures in essence how individuals often turn to betrayal and deception in order to gain their heart’s desires. This characteristic is not only present in life, but can also be seen in modern and classical literature, including the well known work of Julius Caesar. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the lust for power transcends any one individual and ultimately leads to death and corruption of not only Caesar, but also of Brutus and Cassius.... [tags: Shakespeare, Julius Caesar]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Jenny Holzer verifies in one of her truisms that “Every achievement requires a sacrifice”. She is trying to affirm to the readers that everyone achieves something in their lifetime but often they have to give up something in return. Holzer is trying to imply that people sacrifice something to gain something new, often an accomplishment. She utters that all successes require something to be taken away. To climb up high, some things are intended to be let go of. Ms. Jenny Holzer says that no matter what occurs, something is surely sacrificed for an achievement.... [tags: Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, AP Students, education]
845 words (2.4 pages)
- “A hero is an ordinary individual who finds the strength to preserver and endure in spite of overwhelming obstacles” (Christopher Reeve). Julius Caesar is a tragedy about a ruler that is murdered by a group of angry conspirators that go into a civil war against Caesar’s right hand man. By portraying the qualities of honorable Brutus, William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, proves that anyone with good intentions, nobility, and the ability to recognize flaws can be a true hero. People constantly say that it is the thought that counts and that the intentions of the heart mean more than the actions.... [tags: Brutus, Heroes, Shakespeare, plays, Julius Caesar,]
1009 words (2.9 pages)
- THESIS STATEMENT The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the senate’s fear of losing their political relevance. PURPOSE STATEMENT Through critical analysis and research it has been shown that Caesar’s gain in power worried the senate. INTRODUCTION July 13, 100 B.C., to the Romans this day was the thirteenth of Quintillus. In the year 653, on this day, Rome had been founded. This date would soon have another meaning to the Romans, because this day was the day that Gaius Julius Caesar was born.... [tags: corruption, senate, power, Roman Empire]
1181 words (3.4 pages)
- In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus faces an internal conflict involving his best friend Caesar becoming the ruler of Rome. Brutus must decide whether to let Caesar live, knowing he would be a bad ruler for Rome, or whether he should kill him for the good of the people. Based on Brutus’ knowledge, his decision to kill Caesar was justified with reason, being innocently misled and manipulated, and the intention of doing what was best for the general good of Rome. Julius Caesar was murdered before being crowned the ruler of Rome due to fear that his personality and many of his characteristics would lead to his rule being one similar to a dictatorship.... [tags: brutus, tragic hero, play, rome]
970 words (2.8 pages)
- Tragic Hero Essay Sometimes our friends keep us from achieving our goals. We make sacrifices to make our friends a part of our goals and achievements. If a friend gets left out, we stay behind with them to keep them from being alone. Some achievements require us to leave out our friends. This is what happens in the case of Julius Caesar. He became the ruler of Rome, leaving out his good friend Brutus. Brutus and other conspirators assassinated Julius Caesar turning him into a tragic hero.... [tags: essays research papers]
599 words (1.7 pages)
- Search for Identity in Judith Guest's Ordinary People
- The Gospel According to John
- McMurphy, Rebel with a Cause in Ken Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
- Upton Sinclair's The Jungle as Socialist Propaganda
- McMurphy as Hero of Ken Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
- Cassius as Tragic Hero in Julius Caesar
Hath begged that I will stay at home today" (2.2. 76-87). In the Roman times the women did not have the complete freedom and they were consider like a second class person. In the situation that Caesar was performing the point of a woman, was view bad, even more in the case of the ruler of Rome. Shakespeare make visible that the conspirators had power before the ides of March, maybe not as much as Caesar. In a dialogue between Cassius and Brutus show us that Brutus is powerful enough and is more apt to be the ruler of Rome than Caesar ."..there was a Brutus once that would have brooked / Th' eternal devil to keep his state in Rome / as easily as a king" (1.2. 168-170). Although Cassius was talking about one ancestor of Brutus, he made Brutus think of the change of power in Rome and in a dark way about the conspiracy. If Caesar would not abuse of his power, the conspirators would not planned the conspiracy and to try change the power of Caesar for Brutus's power.
The act 3 became the most important act of all the play, for Caesar's death and also for some interesting passages of power. During the Cesar's funeral, Brutus shows us his power in his speech and in the response of the people "Who is here so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak, for him have I offended. I pause for a reply. Plebeians none, Brutus, none" (3.2. 34-37) Brutus justified the conspiracy and make that the people of Rome agree with him. After Antony's speech the plebeians realize "there's not a nobler man in Rome than Antony" (3.2. 128) and the power that Brutus had already gained was Antony's. After that speech we can notice of two interesting things that probably could change the direction of the play. The first one is if Brutus would not let Antony have a speech, in that point Brutus had enough power to decide that. The second one is if Brutus would make his speech more emotional and show that he was nobler than Antony. Although let Antony have a speech was for showing respect for the friend, the results were so much different.
In the act 4 we can see that the main decisions are being taken for the future of Rome. Antony, Octavius and Lipidus became the rulers of Rome. They have so much power that they can decide the life of the people. They are doing everything for keep their power, even killing members of the family if it is necessary. Octavius asked Lipidus if it's fine killing his brother for the future of Rome. "Your brother too must die. Consent you, Lipidus? Lipidus I do consent" (4.1. 3-4). The power corrupts the people who get it. The Ides of March for Brutus and the conspirators was a movement for freedom. The conspiracy against Caesar was for the good of Rome and not for the good of the new rulers itself. Although Brutus and Cassius got more power after the ides of March, they were not the rulers of Rome. The ambition and the necessity to gain more power make them forget the objective of the ides of March. In a discussion between Brutus and Cassius, Brutus tells Cassius what was happening and remember him the objective, reminding him the ides of March "Let me tell you, Cassius, yourself are much condemned to have an itching palm, to sell and mart your offices for gold to under servers" (4.3. 9-12). In the two last acts is where all the change of power itself changes in the struggle between Brutus' and Antony's forces.
Although Mark Antony was the most important leader after the Caesar's death, Octavius got the power of Rome after Brutus and Cassius died. Octavius was the new emperor for being Julius Caesar's great nephew. A few years after Octavius was in power, his friend Mark Antony became his rival of power. Antony combined forces with Cleopatra, the Egyptian ruler, against Octavius. Octavius won that war against Egypt. The senate gave Octavius the name of Augustus. Augustus was a wanted emperor for the Romans. Although he was the most powerful person in Rome, he worked for Rome and made the Roman Empire stronger but he had as well as powerful leader made huge mistakes. He got married thrice for political convenience. Shakespeare lived in the renascence when the history, the arts and the science of the ancient cultures stopped to be forgotten. Four centuries the people read Shakespeare and became a symbol of the mankind with his literature. The problems of the power as Shakespeare shows us have had place since the firsts cultures appeared. The leaders and the powerful people always were corrupted for the power, and they used the power for their convenience.