Essay PreviewMore ↓
Jonathan Livingston Seagull
Jonathan was not an ordinary seagull. For a thousand years, seagulls have spent their whole life on scrambling after fish heads. But Jonathan saw something different. He thought that life should not be just eating and fighting, even seagulls should have a reason to live. For him, his meaning of life is to fly. We all wish that we could spend all our time on doing things we like, just as Jonathan spent all his time on his beloved flight. However, the success in finding his meaning of life didn't bring with him any honor, but caused him to be an object of shame and irresponsibility, and to be banished due to his neglect to finding food.
After having been banished, Jonathan was full time practicing flying and made great progress. He thought he had found his own heaven, and wondered why there are so few seagulls enjoying themselves in the heaven; "heaven should be flocked with gulls!" Therefore, besides finding his own meaning of life, he eventually returned to the place that once had expelled him, and help the fellows there to find their purpose of life. This is what I like most in the story. "You don't love hatred and evil...you have to practise and see the real gull, the good in every one of them, and to help them see it themselves" Jonathan was unselfish and lenient. He wasn't hostile to those who forced him out of his homeland, on the contrary, he learned to love them and help them. To forgive and love your enemy is even more difficult than finding the meaning of life, but Jonathan, a little seagull, managed to act it out.
While Jonathan carried on practising, he found out that" this world isn't heaven at all". Heaven is being perfect, is not limited by time and space..."there is no such place". So, heaven is somewhere that we can never step out foot in. Very often, people do their best longing for the best result, they like to be perfect and try their best to be perfect. They have an idea of heaven in their mind and are upset all the time because they can never achieve it, we all have too many flaws.
How to Cite this Page
"Jonathan Livingston Seagull." 123HelpMe.com. 24 Aug 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Jonathan the Freed Prisoner Both Jonathan Livingston Seagull (a novel by Richard Bach) and “The Myth of the Cave” (a short story written by the commonly-studied philosopher, Plato) are commonly referred to as allegories. An allegory is a work of art that possesses a hidden moral or political message beneath its actual appearance. In many ways, one could easily interpret both of these superb writings to hold the same meaning. One presentation that holds true to this is that Richard Bach’s character, Jonathan, compares to the prisoner that escapes in Plato’s work, “The Myth of the Cave.” Metaphorically, both of these characters are held as prisoners in their life, but then later are freed and... [tags: Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Richard Bach]
1279 words (3.7 pages)
- The world is a vast place, separated by broken up landmass, but united by beliefs, languages, and similar interests. The world is made up of societies, but what exactly is one. The definition of the word society is, “the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community”. In simpler terms, a society is made up of people, collectively and individually that decide what to make of it. So what does it take to make it a good one or a bad one. The answer is simple, but it’s also very hard to understand: the answer is the choices people make.... [tags: Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Richard Bach]
1087 words (3.1 pages)
- Jonathan Livingston Seagull Jonathan was not an ordinary seagull. For a thousand years, seagulls have spent their whole life on scrambling after fish heads. But Jonathan saw something different. He thought that life should not be just eating and fighting, even seagulls should have a reason to live. For him, his meaning of life is to fly. We all wish that we could spend all our time on doing things we like, just as Jonathan spent all his time on his beloved flight. However, the success in finding his meaning of life didn't bring with him any honor, but caused him to be an object of shame and irresponsibility, and to be banished due to his neglect to finding food.... [tags: Jonathan Livingston Seagull Essays]
1119 words (3.2 pages)
- The book tells the story of Jonathan Livingston Seagull a gull who believes seagulls are meant for much more than just fighting for food. He has a passion for flying and for learning. For his strong beliefs he is marked and an outcast and sent to live alone. He however continues to fly and learns all he can learn. He never gives up on what he believes in. Part one of the Book begins with The Breakfast Flock fighting for bits of food. While everyone else if struggling to feed themselves Jonathan is out by himself practicing.... [tags: Literature Review]
1514 words (4.3 pages)
- Richard Bach’s existential novella, Jonathan Livingston Seagull, a rhapsody of joy and triumph; the triumph of the seagull metaphor for all humans against the prejudice of his species and socially imposed traditions. Written in the parable form in a very simple and clear language, it tells story of a seagull named Jonathan Livingston who crosses all barriers of society to achieve his dream of flying against the Council Flock of Seagulls which is designed to marginalize him. Jonathan Livingston Seagull a story is almost a fictional account of a seagull, which travelled against all odds of the flock to freedom.... [tags: freedom, novella, existence]
1657 words (4.7 pages)
- Allegory a word by definition means, contains a moral, political, or religious meaning. Both stories, (Jonathan Lingston Seagull, and Plato, “Myth of The Cave.” The Republic. Vol. VII, contain a religious meaning. Jonathan Lingston Seagull and the free prisoner are similar in many ways because both characters experience a religious awakening, return, and rejection. In both stories the characters Jonathan and the free prisoner both experience a religious awakening. Jonathan’s episode with religion is being what we as Christian’s call a disciple, meaning to spread the word of God, however; that is not exactly what Jonathan is.... [tags: Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Richard Bach, Prison]
783 words (2.2 pages)
- A young seagull who loves to fly is banished from his flock, but after mastering flight, returns to share these new discoveries with his old flock. A man kept imprisoned in a dark cave is introduced to the outside world, and later returns to the cave to tell his fellow prisoners about it. On the surface, both Jonathan Livingstone Seagull by Richard Bach and “The Myth of the Cave” by Plato have almost childishly simple plots. In both, a character leaves his home, learns something, and returns. However, these stories gain a deeper significance when the reader views them as allegories.... [tags: Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Richard Bach]
1094 words (3.1 pages)
- This epigraph begins the book "Bridge Across Forever" by the famous American writer, philosopher and essayist Richard Bach. And he is perfectly suited to his novel-parable "Jonathan Livingston Seagull", reflecting the idea of a book about the perfection of a rational being, not limited by time and space. The process of reading the book is incredible emotions and thoughts. It is quite obvious the analogy of the world gulls and the world of men. Seagulls speak, think, aspire to freedom, have the will and intellect in general exhibit properties superior beings, that is, Homo sapiens.... [tags: Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Richard Bach]
892 words (2.5 pages)
- Anton Chekhov includes many dimensions to the plot of the Seagull in order to add increased depth to the story. The conflict, climax, complications, and denouement of the play all benefit from the wide range problems that Chekhov implants through the characters. In addition, the complex character relationships add to these events, without confusing the reader. These four events all rotate around the play's four main characters, Nina, Irina, Treplev and Trigorin. The play's central conflict is between Treplev and Trigorin, who holds the love of both Irina and Nina.... [tags: Seagull Essays]
995 words (2.8 pages)
- Jonathan Swift is known as one the greatest satirists in literature. His experience in religion, politics and science allow his works to be considered genius in the world of writing. Swift’s writing laid the foundation for several satirical successors. Swift was born in 1667 in Dublin, Ireland. His father had passed away “right before [he] was born” (Draper 3531). He was left “in the care of relatives” for the first three years of his life, while his mother returned to England to take care of business (Cody).... [tags: Jonathan Swift]
1729 words (4.9 pages)
- Effective Satire in God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater
- The Character of Chief Bromden in Ken Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
- The Tragedy of Brutus in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
- Ordinary Control Freaks in Judith Guest's Ordinary People
- Comparing Like Water for Chocolate and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
- Two Types of Love in Plato's Symposium
To a certain degree, I feel worried for Jonathan and those who spend their whole life on "looking for meaning". Jonathan was no doubt, a very splendid case, but how many Jonathan Livingston seagulls are there in the world? Jonathan succeeded, because he was extraordinary, he was gifted. For ordinary people, we all have limitations. It's not possible for us to turn a blind eye to our actual ability. Otherwise, you would only repeat trial and failure thousands and millions time. And at the end, who suffers? Even if you don't feel anything about that, unconsciously, your "resolution" has already cost you a lot of time, or even your whole life. Devoting too much to what you consider as meaningful is sometimes like taking a fatal risk.
If we understand this concept, then we certainly won't agree with this: "Don't believe what your eyes are telling you. All they show is limitation..." Can we really do that? If we don't trust our eyes, what can we trust upon? We learned from setbacks and failure, we are too familiar with our own strength, we all know about our limitations because they are all just lying before our eyes. So how can we possibly act out that "aphorism"? Why can't we just accept the way we are rather than pushing ourselves to extreme and suffer?
To me, this quote is best for people to get over their failure, to console themselves, to help them feel better, just as someone said "experience is the name everybody gives to their mistakes". However, the solution to completely root out this problem is: to admit your limitation, to love your flaw, and to bring your goal from heaven back to earth.
"Why, Jon, why is it so hard to be like the rest of the flock, Jon? Why can't you leave flying to the pelicans, the albatross? Why don't you eat? Jon, you're bone and feathers!" this was what Jonathan's mother told him. To be honest, I completely agree with her. Why is it so hard to go with the flow? Making something totally different from what we are now having is a harsh task, not only to the advocate, but also to the rest of the society. It's hard to change what has been defined as convention, what you have believed in for so long, and you may not even want to take the trouble to change. All these would only spoil the harmony of the society. We are all bone and flesh, we won't be staying in this world long. The why should we try to disturb the peace and quietness of this world? Why not make the world an easier place for everyone to live in? To bring about new idea and reform doesn't necessarily do good to us, conflicts are aroused especially when the newly introduced concept is against the original one... What is shown in this story is a very ideal case. Somehow, human beings are not seagulls.
Jonathan Livingston Seagull is similar to Tuesdays with Morrie as well as many other books. All of them try hard to remind people that living is not existing, it should have meaning and love, which can give you happiness that substantial material can never buy. With all these everyday lectures, these books sell over millions of copies! But actually, how many people can really apply them in reality? We all have heard of them before we read these books, and after reading them we only hear one more time on the same topic out of a thousand. I understand what the author wants to convey but I simply cannot agree with him. Sometimes, we can do things without meaning. Life is actually a good example. Why do we need to live? Even if we are not here, the world can still take care of itself. Even if you don't get a purpose for your life, it doesn't affect your health...Whether you act with meaning or not, you all face the same fate in the end, so does it really matter so much what you have done during your lifetime? Nevertheless, without a goal, you won't persist in so many things, you know when you can give up, when to relax, when to be lighthearted...the biggest reward you have is an easier life.