Essay PreviewMore ↓
To find the amount copper gains or loses on the electrodes using
different amounts of current each time during electrolysis. How the
changing of current affects the electroplating of copper.
Electroplating is generally carried out in order to improve the
appearance or corrosion resistance of the surface of a metal by
electrodepositing a thin layer of metal ion on it. The metal substrate
to be coated is made by the cathode in an electrolytic cell. The cell
used in electroplating contains an electrolyte which is usually an
aqueous solution containing a reasonably high concentration of an ion
of the metal which is to be electroplated on the surface. The cell
anode is usually a piece of the metal to be plated from solution; this
enables the anode reaction of metal dissolution to replace the metal
ion lost from solution by the cathodic decomposition.
There are many various factors that affect the mass deposited during
1). Current (A) - An increase in the amount of current increases
the amount of substance deposited in a fixed
amount of time, because there is more energy available to move
ions/electrons to the cathode from the anode. A smaller current will
pump fewer copper ions from the anode to the cathode in the same
amount of mass gained on the cathode is lower.
2). Time - The longer time can let more copper ions from
the anode to the cathode if the current are the
same. There are still more factors which can affect
the mass deposited during electroplating.
3). Distance between two electrodes - If the distance between the two
electrodes is greater, the copper ions
require to travel more from the anode
to the cathode. If the distance between
the two electrodes is smaller, the copper
ions need less energy to flow from the
anode to the cathode
How to Cite this Page
"Electroplating Experiment." 123HelpMe.com. 13 Nov 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Electroplating The problem was to discover which electrolyte is the best. An electrolyte is a liquid you electroplate in. Water, vinegar, and vinegar with salt stirred in it were the three electrolytes used. Which is the best electrolyte for copperplating a nickel. Is there a difference between these electrolytes or are they all the same. Electroplating is the process of coating with metal by means of electric current. When electroplating is really used it is more complicated than the process used in this experiment.... [tags: Papers]
550 words (1.6 pages)
- ... The volunteers were placed in the basement of Jordon Hall, Stanford’s psychology building where the mock prison was set up. Each six by nine foot cell housed three prisoners with three cots. Across the hall were the rooms for the prison warden and guards. There the prisoners would stay for twenty-four hours for the duration of the study. The guards however were put in three-man teams covering eight hour shifts and could return home until their next shift. The researchers would observe the participants’ behavior with hidden cameras and microphones.... [tags: Stanford prison experiment, Philip Zimbardo, Abuse]
1073 words (3.1 pages)
- ... But more importantly the voice recording was the same every time. The scientist actor also tried to replicate every meeting the same way so as not to change any variable. Controls seemed very important in this experiment. Because dealing with actual people has many possible outcomes that could happen. Saying something not quite the same could give the test subject a different attitude towards the actor in the room. Both the actor in the room and the actor scientist had to be very consistent.... [tags: Stanford prison experiment, Milgram experiment]
1042 words (3 pages)
- The Milgram Experiment (Hart) Stanley Milgram’s experiment in the way people respond to obedience is one of the most important experiments ever administered. The goal of Milgram’s experiment was to find the desire of the participants to shock a learner in a controlled situation. When the volunteer would be ordered to shock the wrong answers of the victims, Milgram was truly judging and studying how people respond to authority. Milgram discovered something both troubling and awe inspiring about the human race.... [tags: Stanley Milgram, Experiment, Obedience]
1574 words (4.5 pages)
- ... The study was meant to last for 2 weeks but had to be stopped abruptly after 6 days because the situation had gone out of control. Standing from a virtue ethics point of view, we would focus on individuals who are the executors of an action. Whether Zimbardo’s experiment is ethical or not is completely determined by what kind of person he is. People with good values do ethical things and people without those traits do unethical things. Deontology on the other hand, emphasizes on the morality of intentions behind actions and the processes during actions.... [tags: Stanford prison experiment, Ethics]
1024 words (2.9 pages)
- The power that a situation can have on a person is simply incredible. This power of situation and obedience go hand in hand, people get caught up in a situation because of the obedience they were taught as children. In society obedience is the key, allowing things to run smoothly and helps to prevent chaos. But in some instances that obedience can over take and cause a person to do things that they normally wouldn’t; whether it be following orders to an extreme extent or even doing things that people would consider to be inhumane.... [tags: lucifer effect, obedience, milgram experiment]
1779 words (5.1 pages)
- The Harcourt Essen Experiment The aim of this investigation is to: 1) find the rate equation for the reaction between hydrogen peroxide, potassium iodide and sulphuric acid by using the iodine stop clock method and plotting graphs of 1/time against concentration for each variable. Then to find the activation energy by carrying out the experiment at different temperatures using constant amounts of each reactant and then by plotting a graph of in 1/t against I/T, 3) to deduce as much information about the mechanism as possible from the rate equation.... [tags: Chemistry, Science, Experiment]
1470 words (4.2 pages)
- Background Knowledge: Osmosis definition: Diffusion of water molecules through a semi permeable membrane from a higher concentration to a lower concentration until the concentration on both sides is equal. Osmosis in animal cells: The cell membrane is the partially permeable membrane in animal cells. If the cells were placed in distilled water they gain water, swell and burst. This is known as haemolysis. Osmosis in plant cells: The cellulose cell wall of plant cells is fully permeable. Therefore it’s the cell membrane of a plant cell which acts as the semi-permeable membrane, deciding what gets into and out of the cell.... [tags: Science Experiment]
582 words (1.7 pages)
- Materials and Methods: Subjects The cDNA was produced by reverse transcriptase from total RNA by using superscript II (Invitrogen). The cDNA were from the lung which was obtained commercially from Ambion, HASM which was extracted in house and HBEC which was obtained commercially from Lonza. Primer Design Oligonucleotide primers were designed by obtaining the reference sequences for uPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 from National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The sequences were checked using NEBcutter (V2.0) to identify the common restriction enzymes sites that are not included in the sequences to be able to clone into pcDNA3.... [tags: cDNA Experiment Results ]
1285 words (3.7 pages)
- This report aimed to replicate Stroop's (1935) experiment. Using the repeated measures design and a sample of 20 students, differences in verbal reaction times on two tests were observed. The one-tailed hypothesis predicted that it would take longer to say words in the Cc, this is the conflicting condition where the colour of the word differs from the colour that the word describes. It was found that, using the t-test for related data, this hypothesis could be accepted as the obtained value was much greater then the critical value.... [tags: Stroop 1935 experiment]
2635 words (7.5 pages)
distance between of the electrodes is far
4). Surface area of electrodes- The surface area of the electrodes
number of ions that can be lost or gained at
the same time. If the surface area of the
anode is greater, there will be more copper
that can be deposited on the cathode.
Therefore the greater surface area; more
more reactions may occur at the same time.
5). Concentration of the electrolyte- When the copper electrodes are
into a concentrated solution, there are
more ions that can be discharged in the
reaction. Therefore, in a higher
solution, there is more
6). Temperature- Temperature can give more energy to the copper to
When the temperature is higher, there is more
available for the copper ions to move from the anode to the
cathode. When the temperature is low, there is less energy
available for the copper ions to move from
the anode to the
I predict that the outcome to be is that as the amount of input
increases, the amount of copper being gained increases. I predict
that, initially a higher current will result in more copper being
transferred onto the cathode, but with a much poorer standard of
adhesion. And that repeats carried out at lower currents will be
characterised by small amounts if better adhered metal being
transferred. The optimum conditions will be a compromise between these
two, a layer of metal plate applied as rapidly as possible yet
maintaining a high degree of adhesion.
I have decided that, since it would be easy to control metal ion
concentration, electrolyte PH, and the nature and amount of all
substances present in the electrolyte simply by mixing one large
reserve of electrolyte, it would be wrong to alter one of these
factors. Another factor affecting electroplating, is the amount of
cathode and anode that is submerged in the electrolyte, in my opinion
it would be easiest to overcome this possible inaccuracy by ensuring
that during all repeats both are completely submerged.
Current and time are both easily varied, and from precious work I know
that current makes a great difference to the way in which the metal is
deposited on the cathode whereas time tends more to effect quantity of
material transferred. Therefore I have decided that the optimum
conditions are most likely to be found through a variation of current.
I will do this whilst keeping all of the other factors as uniform as
possible. I will also carry out a series of pilot test, using the same
method as described for the main procedure to find a suitable range in
which to conduct my repeats. The volume of the concentration of the
electrolyte was decided by doing some small tests in advance and
observing which volume is best for electroplating. I found out that
40cm3 is the correct volume to use for my experiment. I also carried a
few tests to decide the lengths; it was decided by whether the certain
various lengths are best for electroplating. And by my results I found
that 5cm was the best length to use.
· Glass beaker
· 1-24V Power Source
· Variable resistor
· Cable wires
· Top pan balance (accurate to 2dp)
· Copper II Sulphate solution
· Carbon electrodes
1. Connect two terminals of circuit.
2. Attach carbon anode to positive terminal of circuit.
3. Attach carbon cathode to the negative terminal of circuit.
4. Pour 40ml of copper II sulphate into the beaker.
5. Lower cathode and anode into the beaker containing copper II
6. Record masses.
7. These steps are repeated two more times.
8. Next averages are found.
9. These should be put into a table.
From my previous found out, stated out in a table it shows what
figures should be used for the real experiment
The experiment was timed for a fixed time interval of five minutes.
The range of current:
Once the carbon electrodes had been measured and placed in equal
distance in the beaker, and the copper II sulphate solution was there,
the power source was turned on. 0.2A was kept constant for five
minutes so the current does not fluctuate by the variable resistor.
After the five minutes the electrodes were removed from the solution.
Making sure that the reading for the mass is accurate.
The electrodes should not be blown on or wiped, instead they should be
shaken. So this does not interfere with the readings and results. The
surrounding temperature has to be roughly constant through out the
experiment in order to make it a fair test. Also the solution have to
be the same amount, in this case I will be repeating 0.2A, 1.0A and
0.6A twice because they are in order of low, medium and high range of
my experiment and also I could take the average results of them. After
each experiment the electrodes are put into ethanol again to clean the
excess copper sulphate solution, which might affect the change in mass
RANGE OF MEASUREMENTS
My investigation is to see how the different currents affect the
amount of mass of copper deposited. Therefore current has to be varied
in every test. I am going to investigate the current at 0.2A, 0.3A,
0.4A, 0.5A, 0.6A, 0.7A and 1.0A. It is possible to get easily in the
lab, and it can indicate by a normal ammeter as well; it can reduce
the effect of temperature rise in the reaction. The advantage is that
the results will be reasonable results because they are not too high
or not too low. The experiment will be left for five minutes as I
think it is a reasonable tome for the experiment.
· Glass beaker
· 1-24V Power source
· Variable resistor
· Cable wires
· Top pan balance (accurate to 2dp)
· Copper II Sulphate solution
· Copper electrodes
Ø First connect the two terminals of the circuit.
Ø Using the ammeter to measure the current flowing through the
Ø Then use the variable resistor to adjust the resistance of the
circuit to the required current.
Ø Next attach a copper anode to the positive terminal of the circuit.
Ø Then weigh a copper cathode and record its mass.
Ø Then weigh a copper anode and record its mass.
Ø Then attach the copper cathode to the negative terminal of the
Ø Then pour 40ml of copper II sulphate into a beaker.
Ø Then lower the cathode and anode into a bath of copper II sulphate
solution, ensuring that both are fully submerged.
Ø Then leave the circuit complete for five minutes.
Ø Then put two drops of alcohol on the electrodes after removing after
Ø Then allow drying by shaking them.
Ø Then weigh the cathode and subtract the mass from the new mass, then
its area divided it.
Ø Thus is the amount of copper transferred per unit area.
Ø Next weigh the anode and subtract the new mass from its starting
Ø Then is divided by the area of the copper electrode.
Ø This is the amount of copper transferred per unit area.
Ø Then the process is repeated with the same current flow twice, or
until three concordant sets of results are available.
Ø Then the results recording should continue while altering the
Ø Next present the results for every repeat in table form.
Ø Lastly, find the averages.
Copper Sulphate can be toxic and should not be swallowed. Although the
variable resistor will eliminate the danger of shorting, care should
still be taken when working with electricity and liquids, avoid
contact between the two elements. Ineffective electroplating can
produce a finely divided solid of copper, avoid contact between this
and the eyes, and also avoid digesting it. Hands should be washed
thoroughly after each experiment. The usage of safety glasses is
necessary in case of violent reactions occurring and electrical
devices are in operation. The usage of aprons is required as chemicals
may be spoil or stain the clothes of the chemists. Gloves should be
also used due to the usage of chemicals so they do not cause damage to
The ammeter is also a safety precaution to ensure that the current was
not too high, and the current should be controlled and kept at
constant level of decrease or increase. Electric equipment should be
handled with dry hands so that electrocution does not occur. It is
essential to set up the circuit properly, especially to set up the
ammeter; we have to make sure that the positive of the ammeter
connects to the positive of the circuit. And the negative of the
ammeter connect to the negative of the circuit.
From the experiment and by looking at the graph I have presented, it
can be worked put that the amount of change in mass is directly
proportional to the change in current. It is meaning that the amount
of mass lost and gained during the experiment of electrolysis depended
on the amount of charge that is put in so the more you put in the
greater the amount of mass lost and gain.
From the graph when the best-fit line is drawn I can see that they do
line up but for the cathode graph it is not as perfect though. This is
because of some errors had occurred during the experiment. Comparing
to the actual amount of mass lost I am not very far off. The method
and the equation I have mentioned early on in background knowledge can
calculate the actual mass change.
The prediction I have predicted has come out to be exactly the same as
the experiments, which is that the change in mass will be proportional
to the change in current. The graph of the results of the experiment
when compare with the one of the actual mass it looks quite the same
but some are anomalous, the anomalous results were circled in the
graph to distinguish from the other values.
Due to my results, it shows that during the process the anode loses
mass because the copper atoms lose electrons and become copper ions,
Copper atoms à copper ions + electrons
Cu(s) Cu2+ (aq) 2e-
The electrons released at the anode travel around the external circuit
to the cathode. There the electrons are passed on to the copper ions,
Cu2+ (aq), from the copper II sulphate solution and the copper is
deposited or copper plates on to the cathode.
Copper ions + electrons à copper atoms
Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- à Cu(s)
According to my results it showed that when the current increases, the
mass gained on the cathode also increased. They are directly
proportional to each other. The mass gained is directly proportional
to the current in the circuit. It is because when the current is 1A,
there is one unit of electrons that have been discharged, and become
copper cation. These ions have been attracted by the cathode, at the
same time, the gained electrons from the cathode, and become copper
atoms again and deposited on the cathodes.
Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- à Cu(s)
1 mole 2 moles 1 mole
We require 2 moles of electrons to produce 1 mole of copper atoms from
1 mole of copper cations. Also an increase in current means that there
is more resistance which occurs in the solution. This gives out heat,
which is an exothermic reaction. This meaning that there will be more
collisions and more ions with enough activation energy to carry out a
successful collision. Therefore the rate is increased.
I am very pleased about the results that I have obtained. They are
accurate, and they can enable me to prove that the theories in my
predictions are correct. There are several points that I think I have
done quite well to obtain these results. The method, which was used,
was reasonably good and the correct apparatus was used well also. It
was very simple to set up and carry out, using the method which was
chosen. It was simple and safe procedure. But there was room for
Using the purest copper available could also make the results more
accurate. By using a digital ammeter to secure a much more accurate
reading on the current flow. Using the digital rheostat, to keep the
current the same, the sliding rheostat is much harder to use as moving
it to try and establish a constant current flow was very hard. Using
the current rheostat, the current readings were fluctuating and were
complex to maintain its stability. The copper II sulphate solution
should be kept constant and stable.
I would use all the apparatus to its full potential. This would make
my results even more accurate. All my results fitted the pattern. I
would carry out another experiment but this time change the
concentration of copper II sulphate solution every time the experiment
was carried out, but in different concentrations. I would keep all the
other variables the same and see if the change in concentration
affected the mass gained on the cathode.
The experiment went quite well as I expected, except some occasional
errors that have occurred during the experiment. The errors that
occurred causing some of the result to be odd could have been that:
ü The electrodes I used were not the same for some of the experiments.
Since the practicals were done on different days.
ü The starting time was sometimes delayed, which might have caused the
mass to increase.
ü The surrounding temperature was not the same through out the
experiment but theoretically the surrounding temperature does not have
the affect on the decomposition of the solution.
ü The amount of current might have caused the decomposition to be
different because if the amount of current was increased due to the
conductivity of the solution. This will cause the decomposition to
ü The results that I have corrected I think that they are accurate
enough to the actual results to be obtained.
ü It is accurate enough because for some of the experiments I did them
twice to get the average result. This method is the best way to make
the result accurate as possible.
ü The experiments could have been improved by that the rheostat could
have been change to an electric one, which is more accurate and it
would have given better results.