Essay PreviewMore ↓
The Bloody Sunday was undoubtedly a very traumatic event for the Irish
people. Fourteen Irish men did not deserve to die and this was the
most horrific attack that took place during the troubles. Feelings of
bitterness between nationalists and unionists still last today because
of it. The Irish people demanded an explanation on why
Bloody Sunday happened and were given the Widgery Inquiry not long
after the event. The result of this inquiry did not satisfiy or
appease the Irish people as it cleared the army of all charges and
blamed the victims of Bloody Sunday for starting the troubles.
Improvements in science and technology as well as the existence of new
evidence about what happened on the day have led to a new inquiry
being set up by Lord Saville. The result of this inquiry has not yet
been published but perhaps it may arrive at an interpretation, which
may be palatable to all.
There have been many interpretations about what had happened on that
day of Sunday. Sources A and B are excerpts from newspapers. They were
both written on the same day, yet they have entirely differing
viewpoints. Source A is taken from The Daily Mail, a conservative
newspaper, so therefore it is more likely to favour the opinions of
the British Army. When reading it you get the impression that the
paratroopers did act responsibly and that they had the situation under
control although this is not the opinion of most Irish people. It
tries to suggest that it is the victims of Bloody Sunday who caused
the event as it mentions an account from one of the officers who was
there that day. He claims that they didn’t fire at the marchers until
they started throwing nail bombs and acid bombs at the army.
This article also brands the new inquiry set up by Lord Saville as “an
absolute disaster”. It tries to suggest to the reader that it is
How to Cite this Page
"The Bloody Sunday in Derry in 1972." 123HelpMe.com. 19 Aug 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Bloody Sunday in Derry in 1972 In this essay I am going to try to explain what happened after ‘Bloody Sunday’ and why there are such different interpretations of the event. I am going to look at 4 different sources; 2 newspaper reports, an ITN news report and also a video of a BBC documentary. I will also use my own knowledge to interpret the sources. After the event an enquiry known as the, ‘Widgery Report’ came to a verdict that the army was not to blame for what happened where as Nationalists see the verdict as wrong and believe this is a reason which has stopped independence in Ulster.... [tags: Papers]
1476 words (4.2 pages)
- In the leaf of Those Are Real Bullets- Bloody Sunday, Derry, 1972, by Peter Pringle and Philip Jacob, it describes the horrid scene on this hellish of days- "Barney McGuigan lay on the pavement in a pool of his own blood and brains, his head blown open by a paratrooper's bullet. Peggy Deery was near death in the hospital, the back of her leg torn away. Frantic relatives searched the morgue for their loved ones. On that day, known ever since as Bloody Sunday, British paratroopers opened fire on unarmed Irish Catholic demonstrators in Derry, killing thirteen and wounding another fourteen.... [tags: European Literature]
507 words (1.4 pages)
- 'Bloody Sunday', as it became known, has produced many different interpretations of events. Since January 1972 people have recorded diverse versions of events depending on where they were or which faction of society they belonged to. The sources used for the purpose of this essay are all from the media. The first two are from news paper reports written 27 years after the event following new revelations made during the partial disclosure of evidence submitted to the inquiry lead by Lord Saville, commissioned by Tony Blair.... [tags: Bloody Sunday,history, 1972, ]
1182 words (3.4 pages)
- Since the beginning of time, there have been incidences where people or countries have been owned or dictated by another country or group of people. At times this governing by different countries can lead to times of peace and an opportunity for both sides to benefit. But sadly, more often than not, this exchange of power is not done in an agreeable manner; but rather in a way that includes a malicious and most often unnecessary show of might. This show of strength is usually done with the help of the military under false or misguided judgment generally based on greed, the need for control, and religion.... [tags: European History ]
1634 words (4.7 pages)
- The Bloody Sunday January 1972 has produced such different historical interpretations of what happened on bloody Sunday for a number of different reasons. The two big divides in what happened on that day are down to politics, religion and culture and the social society at that time in Ireland. As we know Ireland was facing many troubles politically and religiously, there seemed to be many marches and protests against the discriminate laws that persecuted the catholic people in Ireland.... [tags: Papers]
842 words (2.4 pages)
- The Bloody Sunday [IMAGE] [IMAGE] “Sheer unadulterated murder" -MAJOR HUBERT O’ NEILL ---------------------- Contents Page Page 3 Introduction and NICRA 4 Internment 5 Parachute regiment and Bogside 6-7 Bloody Sunday 8 Consequences of Bloody Sunday 9-10 Why did it take so long for another inquiry to be set up. 11 Bibliography Q1. What happened on Bloody Sunday.... [tags: Papers]
2346 words (6.7 pages)
- The Build Up to Bloody Sunday On Saturday 5 October 1968 a civil rights march was organised, but it was stopped before it had really begun by the Royal Ulster Constabulary. The RUC broke up the march by using batons, which left many members of the march severely injured. Broadcasters around the world were filming this incident. The incidents in Derry had a big effect on many people around the world but particularly on the Catholic population of Northern Ireland. For two days after this march there was serious rioting between the Catholics and the RUC.... [tags: Papers]
1931 words (5.5 pages)
- The Effects of Bloody Sunday Bloody Sunday marked the day of a out lash of great hatred which burns strong even today. Bloody Sunday started when the Catholics started a march for civil rights; better housing and comparative costs for the housing as Protestants had better housing for the same rent as the Catholics did even when they had the worst housing. The march also focused on Interment, and the infringement on their rights because of that; Interment meant that the police could arrest anybody slightly suspected of being part of the IRA and committing terrorist acts or is likely too in the near future.... [tags: Papers]
1245 words (3.6 pages)
- Bloody Sunday Troops were sent into Ireland in 1969, to sort out the troubles. Catholics in Derry’s bogside area built barricades to protect themselves in early 1969. They felt that they could expect no protection from the police. The situation continued to deteriorate in the following months, with some explosions, which damaged electricity and water supplies. The explosions were blamed on the IRA, but really were the work of the Ulster Protestants Volunteers (UPV), who were trying to discredit the Catholics.... [tags: Papers]
1423 words (4.1 pages)
- Bloody Sunday The events that took place on Bloody Sunday, 30th January 1972 have been discussed frequently and certain aspects of the event highly debated. The events of the particular day were of significant influence in further procedures in N. Ireland an on other related events. The event began after an illegal march took place in the centre of Derry, N. Ireland; the police and government banned the march as it was thought it would provoke violence.... [tags: Papers]
1705 words (4.9 pages)
newspaper is printed for those who favour the British Army. It tries
to make the reader feel sympathy for the paratroopers and to make them
believe it was the victims of Bloody Sunday who created a riot on the
streets of Derry, not the army and that a suitable solution for civil
unrest was an armed response.
Source B is another article taken from a newspaper. This time it is
The Guardian, a pro-labour newspaper, so it may be more likely to
favour the views of the Irish people. It was written by John Mullin,
an Ireland correspondent. In my opinion this may suggest that his
interpretation would be more accurate, as he has spent time in Ireland
and may have more knowledge of what happened on January 30th 1972.
This article sympathises greatly with the victims of Bloody Sunday.
The writer uses language to create an impression that the dead were
vulnerable victims of British paratroopers and places largely the
blame on the British Army. When he mentions “dum-dum” bullets he makes
us aware that the army were using illegal weapons during the day. He
also mentions how “worthless” the evidence was during the Widgery
Inquiry. He claims that there is no real evidence to suggest that the
victims were holding or even near any weapons that day.
Although sources A and B were written on the same day, they offer
quite different interpretations, but in my opinion both are quite
biased. Source A defends the paratroopers and blames the victims while
source B defends the victims and blames the paratroopers. Both views
are as divergent as they were in 1972. These sources don’t really help
me to understand what happened on the day as they display opposing
viewpoints. On studying them you don’t know which one to believe. I
don’t think that anyone can give an honest or unbiased interpretation
about what happened on the day of Bloody Sunday. Perhaps the Saville
inquiry will help clarify the matter.
Source C is an interview with a man called Daniel Porter, who recounts
a conversation that soldiers were having in a pub about clearing the
bog in Derry. When reading this you get the impression that the
soldiers weren’t planning on killing people that day and the only
reason they were going to Northern Ireland was to clear the bog.
Although the decision to clear the bog really happened after Bloody
Sunday took place.
This man seems to be just another ordinary person, so why should we
take him more serious than the civilians and paratroopers who were
there on the day of Bloody Sunday. Even though he is an ordinary
person I don’t think its fair to dismiss his opinion.
This source may be quite biased as it gives the reader an opinion that
the soldiers were not planning on causing trouble that day. This man
was drinking in a military town so therefore he maybe familiar with
the soldiers. He isn’t going to portray them as the people who fired
shots on Bloody Sunday, and this interview only selects certain
information, which makes it very misleading for the reader. All in
all, the source contributes little to our knowledge of Bloody Sunday
leaving us with yet another interpretation.