Debate Speech Opposing the That Euthanasia Should be Legalized

Debate Speech Opposing the That Euthanasia Should be Legalized

Length: 844 words (2.4 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Debate Speech Opposing the That Euthanasia Should be Legalized

Madame chair, fellow members of the opposition, members of the
proposition and members of the house we are all here today to debate
the controversial topic of Euthanasia and whether or not it should be
legalized. Members of the house the opposition vehemently cannot
accept the legalization of Euthanasia.

The term Euthanasia has came to mean an easy death which is what we
all want ,but will legalizing euthanasia provide us with this? To
legalize Euthanasia is to regard the deliberate and barbaric act if
killing a fellow human being as acceptable.

Our lives are a gift from God and all life on our planet is given by
the divine power of our God. God has final authority over our lives
and we should not do anything which would interfere with this. Since
our very beginning God has been involved in our lives, so I ask you
all is it not wrong to try and shut God out from our deaths?

Furthermore as human beings we are made in the likeness and image of
God. This does not mean that we look like God but that human life
possesses an intrinsic dignity and value because it is created by God
in his own image for the distinctive destiny of sharing in his own
life. By legalizing Euthanasia we would be disrespecting the sanctity
and value of life.

On the other hand the proposition have previously argued that
Euthanasia spares a terminally ill person from suffering intolerable
pain and that it is cruel to deny a person’s right to die. We believe
it is not our choice when or how to conclude our lives as we owe our
lives to God. If it was God’s plan for us to suffer then we must obey
his orders. We believe that there may be value in a person’s
suffering. Pope John Paul II said:

‘ Down through the centuries and generations it has been seen that in
suffering there is concealed a particular power that draws a person

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Debate Speech Opposing the That Euthanasia Should be Legalized." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Nov 2019
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=140637>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Freedom Of Speech Threatened On Campus

- In the debate, “Freedom of Speech Threatened on Campus”, four panelist argued either in favor or against the motion. In this case the winners of this debate where the pro side due to their good use of supporting arguments. As for the opposing team they lost audience support due to their weak presentation of arguments. This paper will focus on one of the opposing panelist whose arguments were unsupported. Shaun Harper the Director of the center for the study of Race & Equity in Education, of the University of Pennsylvania argued that freedom speech is not threatened in universities by speech codes rather students who are judging does students voicing their opinion are the ones who are threa...   [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Censorship]

Research Papers
1745 words (5 pages)

Gun Control: The Opposing Viewpoints Essay

- Gun control is an issue that is constantly being debated. There are people who are pro gun control and those who believe gun control is unconstitutional to the citizens. Many political leaders and organizations have strong opinions on gun control, which keeps the gun control debate publicized. Gun control is limiting or taking the right of citizens to carry or purchase a gun. Guns are used for protecting the citizens by police officers and the military, as well as for many personal reasons like hunting and self-defense....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, legal reform]

Research Papers
1182 words (3.4 pages)

Nature Vs. Nurture Debate Essay

- Nearly every member of the human race learns a language or more to the degree of proficiency only in the first few years of life. How children achieve this astonishing skill in such little time sparks controversial debates among linguists, psychologists, and scientists throughout centuries. Some believe that language is an innate ability possessed by all human beings due to the remarkable function of the brain while others maintain that language is learned from childhood experience. However, many are beginning to realize that nature and nurture go hand-in-hand when explaining how children develop their language(s)....   [tags: Linguistics, Language acquisition, Brain, Human]

Research Papers
1313 words (3.8 pages)

The Debate Over Islam And The Future Tolerance Essay

- The Debate over Islam and tolerance has taken place at Howard Kennedy School between Sam Harrias and Nawaz Maajid. Sam Harris is a Neuroscientist, author of the End of Faith, and letter to a Christian nation. Nawaz Maajid is author radicalFounding Chairman, Quilliam. Both of them wrote together the book Islam and the Future Tolerance. The maim question on the debate is whether Islam is a religion of peace or not, and both Sam and Nawaz have different opinion over this question. Sam Harris even thought he is an atheist thinks that Islam is neither a religion of war nor a religion of peace, because all religion has their toxic, and benign aspect....   [tags: Islam, Qur'an, Muhammad, Muslim]

Research Papers
729 words (2.1 pages)

The Pornography Debate Essay

- The Pornography Debate Pornography has been the topic of discussion in the court systems for years. Many would like to see legislation against it and software to filter it. The problem is it's not that easy and making laws against it would pose a problem against the first amendment. There have many issues brought up on the grounds that it is demoralizing to women and is filth for the eyes of children. But, is pornography really that harmful. There are many reasons why the government is having trouble putting restrictions on pornography....   [tags: Pornography]

Research Papers
823 words (2.4 pages)

A Rhetorical Analysis of the Stem Cell Research Debate Essays

- Stem cell research has been a heated and highly controversial debate for over a decade, which explains why there have been so many articles on the issue. Like all debates, the issue is based on two different arguments: the scientific evolution and the political war against that evolution. The debate proves itself to be so controversial that is both supported and opposed by many different people, organizations, and religions. There are many “emotional images [that] have been wielded” in an attempt to persuade one side to convert to the other (Hirsen)....   [tags: Genetic Engineering]

Research Papers
1511 words (4.3 pages)

Speech Codes And Regulations On Campus

- Some colleges are considering speech codes and regulations on campus due to allegations of racist speech and harassment. Although the reasons are legitimate concerns, these codes should not be placed on students because they do not only violate The First Amendment, but also promote administrative abuse of power, along with causing students to self-censor their speech, while teaching them to hide and or suppress their unpopular beliefs. There are some such as, Cinnamon Stillwell and Charles R. Lawrence III, which are in favor of speech codes because they consider some of the actions a form of harassment....   [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]

Research Papers
1307 words (3.7 pages)

The Speech On The National Anthem

- Lately, everyone has seen or commented on Kaepernick kneeling the National Anthem. There are non-supporters like Stephen Duncombe defines Kaepernick protest as “Ethical Spectacle, [a] strategic use of a symbol, sign or gesture to seek a cultural shift” (Jenkins). Supporters like Mat Bonesteel of The Washington Post states “[Kaepernick] protest could have sparked needed conversations on … subjects: [such as] on the treatment of black Americans… on patriotism’s place in society; on the importance of symbols” (Gass)....   [tags: African American, Black people]

Research Papers
1138 words (3.3 pages)

Freedom Of Speech : The American Bill Of Rights

- Freedom of Speech The First Amendment was ratified along with the American Bill of Rights in 1791. It is deprived from the English Bill of Rights, but there is a major difference. The English Bill of Rights only stretched the freedom of speech for Parliament, but the American Bill of Rights provided the right for all citizens ("First Amendment Freedom" 1). Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers believed that all citizens should have no restrictions on what they wanted to say. This building belief was and still is essential for democracy to thrive ("First Amendment and" 1)....   [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]

Research Papers
1088 words (3.1 pages)

Essay on The Debate Over Taxing Fatty Foods

- The Debate Over Taxing Fatty Foods Madam/ Mr chair, ladies and gentlemen. Of course the introduction of the fat tax, doesn't instantly ensure that obesity levels and overweight issues will immediately drop and that medical problems related to obesity will suddenly disappear, but it does increase the average persons incentive to stop and think about what they are doing to themselves and become aware of the dangers they inflict on their bodies. The increased price of a muffin compared to maybe a fruit salad costing half the price and carrying half the calories, is bound to appeal more then a stodgy, fat packed, mound of dough destined to morph you into its twin....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
809 words (2.3 pages)

interiorly close to Christ, a special grace.’

Suffering can have a place in God’s plan and it enables the sufferer
to share in Christ’s agony and his redeeming sacrifice. When we suffer
we will not be alone God will be with us to share in our suffering.

Members of the house we the opposition are deeply worried about the
severe consequences which will arise from the legalization of
euthanasia. If Euthanasia does become legal Dr K.F. Gunning believes
it will not be controlled properly

‘Once you accept killing as a solution for a single problem, you will
find tomorrow hundreds for which killing can be seen as a solution.’

If we as a nation allow Euthanasia to be legalized which we think will
be relatively harmless this may start a trend that will consequently
result in something currently unthinkable becoming accepted. The
proposal put forward today to legalize Euthanasia is wide open to
abuse, and would ultimately lead to involuntary Euthanasia because of
shortage of health resources. Doctors may pressure weak and vulnerable
patients into believing they should end their own lives just to save
money. In the long run we fear that if Euthanasia does become legal
people will be expected to commit Euthanasia as they become an
unreasonable burden on society.

To legalize euthanasia would put pressure on the elderly, poor,
terminally ill to end their lives. To legalize euthanasia we would be
killing off anyone who is seen as disadvantageous such as alcoholics,
drug addicts and the homeless. Isn’t this what Hitler carried out
during the second World War? Members of the house if this is what our
civilized society desires then we are ashamed to be part of it.

The proposition have argued that euthanasia would never be legalized
without proper regulation and control mechanisms in place. I believe
that if we do legalize the act of euthanasia it will be impossible to
keep it under control. follow on from this point I do not believe
doctors should be able to ‘play God.’

Since doctors give patients the information on which they will base
their decisions about euthanasia, any legalisation of euthanasia, no
matter how strictly regulated, puts doctors in an unacceptable
position of power.Doctors have been shown to take these decisions
improperly, defying the guidelines of the British Medical Association,
the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the Royal College of Nursing.An
Age Concern dossier in 2000 showed that doctors put 'Do Not
Resuscitate' orders in place on elderly patients without consulting
them or their families. Do Not Resuscitate orders are more commonly
used for older people and, in the United States, for black people,
alcohol misusers, non-English speakers, and people infected with Human
Immunodeficiency Virus. This suggests that doctors have stereotypes of
who is not worth saving. Should they have the ultimate power to decide
who should live and who should die - I think not.

I believe that if a person expresses a wish to die because they are in
pain that there is effective pain relief to free them from this pain.

Palliative care is physical, emotional and spiritual care for a dying
person when cure is not possible. It includes compassion and support
for family and friends.

Competent palliative care may well be enough to prevent a person
feeling any need to contemplate euthanasia. Dame Cicely Saunders
founder of the modern hospice movement believes;

‘You matter because you are you. You matter to the last moment of your
life and we will do all we can to help you die peacefully, but also to
live until you die.’

Effective palliative care gives the patient and their loved ones a
chance to spend quality time together, with as much distress removed
as possible. They can (if they want to) use this time to bring any
unfinished business in their lives to a proper closure and to say
their last goodbyes. Good palliative care is the alternative to
euthanasia. If it was available to every patient, it would certainly
reduce the desire for death to be brought about sooner.

Euthanasia is wrong in so many ways: morally, religiously and
ethically. Do we as a civilised society wish to be part of a country
which pressurizes our weak and vulnerable people into an early grave?
If we do then legalizing euthanasia is the way forward but if you have
any shred of decency then you will realize that euthanasia is cold,
heartless, barbaric murder and no good can or ever will come of it.
Return to 123HelpMe.com