Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Definition of science
What is the importance of time in history
History has the relation with science
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Definition of science
History as a Science Before the question of whether history is a science can be answered, one needs to know exactly what a science is; it's definition. When we imagine science, most of us will immediately think of experimentation, with test tubes boiling, or mechanical objects spinning around. Although this is true, this is not all there is to science. Science is a methodical discipline of studying the phenomena of the universe and recording, measuring and analysing the data. Perhaps even producing theories before experimentation, or if experimentation is not possible. For history to be a science it must follow the methods of science. Scientific method is a method of procedure that consists of systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing and modification of hypotheses. History, however, is not systematic or methodical and can not be regarded as a discipline. At the end of the eighteenth century there were three weaknesses in history. The first was that historians did not always use primary sources in the study of history. There was a tendency to rely on secondary sources of evidence even among some of the great historians. The second problem was where eighteenth century historians failed to see that "times change" and civilisations from different eras have different aims and expectations. The third problem was that the teaching of history was not organised in a very systematic way. The main emphasis was on Greek or Roman history, or legal history. This basically says that history used to be random and unsystematic and that now it has changed. Modern historians, however, do try and use primary sources whenever they can and they are more thorough in their work, however, the study of science can not be controlled. What this means is that whereas in science one can set up an investigation, perform a controlled experiment (where there are certain aspects that are varied or maintained), and take precise readings, in history, the results are obtained as they are found. These historical results could be documents hidden away in the basement of an old house for hundreds of years, which are then found and give a slightly different view of history to what the historians thought. These findings then have to be fitted into the timeline by the historians and could end up changing the historians' ideas of reasons for why the events occurred.
History is important and gives us information on what has come before, it gives us a look back on where we have been and what we are becoming. It also reminds us where our knowledge and wisdom came from. History is for critical thinkers, it is for those who will not blindly accept what is handed to them. It is for those that would rather come to understand things.
History is a discipline based on textual accounts of the past however it became necessary to look closer. A group of French historians watched as countless historians drew the same conclusions from the same experiences time after time, divorcing themselves from the “new social scientist adventuring among the economies and societies of the present.” The Annales school is interested in a science of humanity, human activities. “The function of the historian is not to declare that such a thought is objectively right or wrong but to state, or to suggest, what circumstances, in a particular time, made it thinkable.” The scholars of the Annales school used non-historians as much
John Lewis Gaddis, in his book, The Landscape of History, generates a strong argument for the historical method by bringing together the multiple standpoints in viewing history and the sciences. The issue of objective truth in history is addressed throughout Gaddis’s work. In general, historians learn to select the various events that they believe to be valid. Historians must face the fact that there is an “accurate” interpretation of the past ceases to exist because interpretation itself is based on the experience of the historian, in which people cannot observe directly (Gaddis 10). Historians can only view the past in a limited perspective, which generates subjectivity and bias, and claiming a piece of history to be “objective” is simplistic. Seeing the world in a multidimensiona...
It’s truly fascinating how there are so many different approaches to history, how so many different types of minds and schools of thought can come together to study the events of the world’s past. There are so many ways to approach what happened in our past, and the groups of historians previously mentioned are only a fraction of the actual number of different ways of researching and thinking that exists as it pertains to the study of history. History is in some ways, always a mystery, and all historians, regardless of schooling, training or biases, seek to accomplish one goal: to understand what occurred before us and why, and to use that knowledge to learn how the world was shaped into the world we live in today.
Intellectual history as a discipline and as a way of thinking about the world has a history. Ideas and ways of thinking and ways of understanding the world have a history. Considering the history of human achievement whether we are talking about political history, economic history, military history, and gender history nothing compares in raw measure to our living history. This history includes what we think is possible or what is impossible. How we think about the world determines our relationship to it. Human thought has a history, which the way we think in modern times is not the way people have understood it or thought about it. Humanity changes how we think about the natural world, what is out there to be known? What is the stuff of the world? Why things happen? What is good evidence?...
Even though historians are required to deduce what is accepted as understanding, they inevitably view history through a modern lens which provides a framework for the future similar to human scientists. Therefore, the assertion appears to be true to a certain extent as historians are forced to understand the past while human scientists must look to change the future. Yet, the past and future appear to be interchangeable in terms of importance for both the historian and human scientist attempting to derive knowledge.
173). Historians are not searching to raise their bias through the past; they are merely looking to tell the origin stories of our world. History, at its heart, is the search for objectivity and verified facts through primary sources. The theory that claims that our recorded history is filtered through opinions and contemporary ideas, could not be further from the truth.
History was not made by its self, but by the people. Humans have created a very great impact on the world physically, and though many other reasons. People have created the evolution of things: research, discoverers, philosophers, and many other people have changed how the world is, and how it is ran by. Every person has their own way of thinking, many of them don’t even think at all to create a new thing, a new reason of humanity. Now everything now has a definition to it, how its created, who discovered it, if an animal show how they are created, laws are not put in effort, even religion has its explanations.
When the first athlete tees off on Thursday morning during Masters week at Augusta National Golf Club, golfers all over the world reset their internal clocks. (David Owen 13) A golfer’s new year begins in April. For golf fans, the first glimpse of Amen Corner is proof that winter is gone and spring is here. (David Owen 14) For those who do not play golf, the Masters is the one tournament that lures people to watch due to the beauty of the course. During this long weekend, all eyes are focused on the blooming azaleas. Sam Snead once said, “If you asked golfers what tournament they would rather win over all the others, I think every one of them would say the Masters.” (14) The Masters Tournament is the most prestigious
I may conclude my discussion by saying that both historian’s and human scientist’s tasks are to some extent similar because they all try to understand its area of knowledge. They also wish for the changes in the future, but however, historian does not concretely do this but he only provides the knowledge. The person that obtains the knowledge is the one that may conclude to change the future. History and human sciences also both deal with bias when providing knowledge and may therefore not be as reliable as they should be.
History is very important for everyone, and everyone should learn about history. Learning History can help to learn about people situation and life from the past. It also helps to know about many events and even some fact from the past. When people want to learn history, they should search about any subject or event from the past and tries to learn the both side of the subject. They also need to try to find what is hidden from that subject, so they can learn more about it. They also need to find out who wrote the subject that they learn about, for not all the historian show the bad side of the event, and they just show the good side. When people know they both side the can have a good judgment about the event. For example, before taking the
History is not only a valuable part of knowledge, but opens the door to many other parts, and affords materials to most of the sciences. And indeed, if we consider the shortness of human life, and our limited knowledge, even of what passes in our own time, we must be sensible that we should be forever children in understanding, were it not for this invention, which extends our experience to all past ages, and to the most distant nations; making them contribute as much to our improvement in wisdom, as if they had actually lain under our observation. A man acquainted with history may, in some respect, be said to have lived from the beginning of the world, and to have been making continual additions to his stock of knowledge in every century.
History is a story told over time. It is a way of recreating the past so it can be studied in the present and re-interpreted for future generations. Since humans are the sole beneficiaries of history, it is important for us to know what the purpose of history is and how historians include their own perspective concerning historical events. The purpose and perspective of history is vital in order for individuals to realise how it would be almost impossible for us to live out our lives effectively if we had no knowledge of the past. Also, in order to gain a sound knowledge of the past, we have to understand the political, social and cultural aspects of the times we are studying.
Learning about history helps us learn about the humanities own reflection and what’s good or bad about it. This is just like a diary , people and by people I mean historians , just wrote what they saw and what seemed to cause a major change in society and we just happen to be reading it a couple of years later. I believe that historians actually wrote historical truth because it makes sense and it has been scientifically proven
I define history as important events that have happened in the past, and the ones that are presently happening. At some time or another everything will be considered history. History tells a story, whether it’s written, painted, carved, or sung; a collection of events that someone explains to you that is usually important.