Evaluating the News Story About the Kilshaws Adopting Twin Babies

1664 Words4 Pages

Evaluating the News Story About the Kilshaws Adopting Twin Babies

In the week of the 16th of January 2001, Judith and Alan Kilshaw from

Flintshire, North Wales decided to tell the tale of their

controversial adoption of the "Internet Twins", to the Sun. This

turned out to be a big mistake for them and their recently adopted

twins, Belinda and Kimberley. The stories that ensued described the

Internet baby industry "lurid" by some magazines, and follow-up

stories labelled the Kilshaws as a "dirty, eccentric couple who aren't

at all fit to be parents". Shortly after the story got out, social

workers in Flintshire took the twins into custody and a judge later

ruled that they should "remain in the care of the local authority"

while courts in both the USA and the UK decided the fate of the

"Internet Twins".

One question we could ask is where the "Internet Twins" really belong

but the first question we should ask is who is most to blame for the

fact that these two American born, eight month old "Internet twins"

are now in the care of British Social Services?

The first person we would think of would be the natural mother of the

twins, Tranda Wecker. She was the one who put her two youngest

children up for adoption in the first place. She was the woman who

sold her babies to one family (the Allens), via the Internet, for

$6,000 because she was going through a divorce and did not have the

money to bring them up, then deceived the Allens so that she could

take the babies and sell them again (for $12,500) to the Kilshaws. Now

she has decided that she wants her babies back again. The idea of

parents making money from putting their babies up for adoption is an

awful idea. You can't pay money for a person because people are not

things that can be bought and sold, each person has a life and you

can't buy and sell life. If you look at Tranda Wecker as that kind of

Open Document