Essay PreviewMore ↓
Today the software market is growing rapidly, despite the many controversies surrounding it. Most of this controversy is centered around Bill Gates's, Microsoft. Some say they are running a monopoly. Claiming they use their wealth and power to control other software companies by trying to persuade larger companies to not sell their products. They dominating smaller companies by buying them out and taking over their products. This has caused many people to be infuriated with what these people consider a monopoly. At the same time, those who disagree that Microsoft is running a monopoly, might propose that Microsoft is competing fairly. They are only out doing their competitors, not dominating them with wealth and power. Microsoft has the best product available since other competitors lack quality. When someone else produces something better, it will become the most widely used. I for one consider Microsoft to be running a monopoly, especially in the software and computer desktop market. To me it appears as though these markets are owned and controlled by this giant company. They are doing this unfairly, using their wealth to do as they please.
Microsoft's monopoly appears to be deceiving to many, but the word is getting out. Many claim they are using unlawful tactics to monopolize the software market. Rumors like this one are seeping out like a broken bucket full of water. There has been many law suits taken out against the software powerhouse, thus one of these contain evidence that Microsoft has violated the rights of its competitors. Deseret News author Anne Gearan writes an article titled "Will Microsoft's own words condemn it?" Within this article, she explains how Microsoft's head executive Bill Gates has discouraged Intel Corporation to not distribute a product called NSP (NSP represents Native signal Processing). This is a computer language that threatens Microsoft's. Gearan says, "Bill Gates had a three hour dinner with the head of Intel Corp. On July 7, 1995 Gates told a Microsoft executive 'the main problem between us (Microsoft & Intel) right now is NSP. We are Trying to convince them basically to not ship NSP." Bill Gates has unintentionally said too much. In his demand to stop Intel from distributing NSP, Gates causes Microsoft to lose the law-suit. In regard to the court case, Gearan claims, "The government found Microsoft guilty of using its money and influence to intimidate computer makers.
How to Cite this Page
"Microsoft's Monopoly." 123HelpMe.com. 26 Apr 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Since the early 1990’s, the United States government and the Microsoft Corporation have ensued upon a battle in the United States courts. The main issue at hand is ultimately money, but one more importantly, the supposed "Microsoft Monopoly." The federal government maintains that Microsoft's monopolistic practices are detrimental to United States citizens, creating higher prices and potentially downgrading software quality, and should therefore be stopped. Microsoft and its supporter’s claim that they are not breaking any laws and they are just doing what they do; making money and providing a service.... [tags: Economics]
1301 words (3.7 pages)
- I believe that Microsoft has the best intensions for society, because they are constantly developing the software market into a more competitive and challenging industry. Microsoft’s success as a company is partly due to its commitment to making the best product possible and strategic business practices. The first reason Microsoft is not a monopoly is because of the standardized quality of its OS. Second is the intelligent business practices Microsoft has engaged in through many of its business partners.... [tags: essays research papers]
1289 words (3.7 pages)
- The Microsoft Monopoly I. Introduction United States vs. Microsoft is one the largest, most controversial antitrust lawsuits in American history. Many claim the government is wrongly punishing Microsoft for being innovative and successful, arguing that Windows dominates the market because of the product’s popularity, not because of malpractice by the parent company. Others argue in favor of the government, claiming that Microsoft’s practices conflict with the free market ideal. There are many arguments for both sides of the lawsuit, but what the case really comes down to is this: does the government have the right to interfere in today’s marketplace.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Economics Essays]
1547 words (4.4 pages)
- On November 5, 1999, District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared one of the leading software companies in the world, a monopoly. The United States' government has what are called, antitrust laws, which prevent a company from having a monopoly on a market. The US charged Microsoft with violations of these laws, stating that they were thwarting such competitors as, Netscape Navigator, and other web browsers. The US justice department has accused Microsoft of being "engaged in massive anticompetitive practices." Bill Gates, owner of Microsoft, believes that the practices of Microsoft are in no way that of a monopoly, and are just forms of very aggressive competition.... [tags: essays research papers]
340 words (1 pages)
- The Microsoft Monopoly Issue The best position on the Microsoft monopoly problem is one best for the general public, those who are and will be using Intel-PC products. This position is in opposition to Microsoft and to support the State and the public. This will consequently give the public better choice, thereby keeping the price of the product down and benefiting the general public. To understand why this position is the best choice two simple questions must be answered. The first is, is Microsoft a monopoly.... [tags: Argumentative Economy Essays]
1507 words (4.3 pages)
- Microsoft's Monopoly Today the software market is growing rapidly, despite the many controversies surrounding it. Most of this controversy is centered around Bill Gates's, Microsoft. Some say they are running a monopoly. Claiming they use their wealth and power to control other software companies by trying to persuade larger companies to not sell their products. They dominating smaller companies by buying them out and taking over their products. This has caused many people to be infuriated with what these people consider a monopoly. At the same time, those who disagree that Microsoft is running a monopoly, might propose that Microsoft is competing fairly. They are only out... [tags: Technology Essays]
1677 words (4.8 pages)
- Microsoft Monopoly This paper will show my opinion of Microsoft being branded a monopoly. I feel this example shows supply and demand in addition to monopolistic competition. This entire ordeal is over a free browser that Microsoft includes with windows for free and gives out on the internet for free just as Netscape and most other browser companies do. The government feels that Microsoft is creating a demand purely for their products by forcing its browser on suppliers and controlling prices.... [tags: essays papers]
888 words (2.5 pages)
- Microsoft and How It's a Monopoly Since 1990, a battle has raged in United States courts between the United States government and the Microsoft Corporation out of Redmond, Washington, headed by Bill Gates. What is at stake is money. The federal government maintains that Microsoft’s monopolistic practices are harmful to United States citizens, creating higher price and potentially downgrading software quality, and should therefore be stopped. While Microsoft and its supporter’s claims that they are not breaking any laws, and are just doing good business.... [tags: Papers]
1676 words (4.8 pages)
- Microsoft: Thank Goodness it is a Monopoly Many people, with the government are trying to label Microsoft as a monopoly. Why is there any delay going around doing that. There is no reason to brand Microsoft as a monopoly. There is part of monopolistic competition and supply-demand acting on this case. The whole trial is about the free internet browser, Internet Explorer, that Microsoft gives out free and includes with its Operating system, Windows. Netscape does the same marketing of its product except that it does not have any operating system to sell with.... [tags: essays papers]
638 words (1.8 pages)
- Macro-Problems for Microsoft Microsoft vs. the Government is an interesting case that affects both the way we look at and use the free market. It affects many people, including the individuals high up in government, the employees of software companies, and, of course, the consumer who buys software products. The key issue affecting these people is whether or not Microsoft, the largest operating system provider who has a monopoly on the operating system software market, uses its monopoly to suppress the other competing software companies.... [tags: Monopoly Lawsuit Microsoft Essays]
1238 words (3.5 pages)
As we use our computers in everyday life, we can notice that nearly everyone uses products by Microsoft. I still have yet to find a computer that does not contain some product produced by Microsoft on it. An aspect to consider in Microsoft's monopoly is how much of the market do they really own? In the Deseret News, Scott McNealy wrote an article titled, "US right to challenge Microsoft? Yes". In this article, he gives a considerable estimate of how much of the desktop computer market Microsoft owns. McNealy says,
"One thing we are learning every day from the events taking place
in Washington D.C., is that Microsoft's monopoly in the desktop market
is indisputable. The protestations of Bill Gates and his lawyers aside,
Microsoft's operating systems control 90 to 95 percent of this class
If Microsoft really does own this much of the market, it should speak for its self that they truly do monopolize this market. Although, McNealy is the chief Executive of a Microsoft competitor, Sun Corporation. His information seems to be reliable. If this information is true, some say this much control over a market has a great effect upon all of us as the consumer. We should take into consideration the quality of the products and the price we pay for them. We should also take into consideration how this much control can effect the future development of the products. With this kind of a lack of competition, This could hold back future products from reaching their full potential. The value of the products we purchase should be questioned. Others say, if Microsoft really does control 90 to 95% of the market, it's because their products are the best available right now. Microsoft offers the best product for the best value. I think Microsoft can produce good products. They can dictate the price and quality of the products distributed with this much control over the market. We should question whether or not better products are being held back.
We have just learned how widely used Microsoft's products are, but how have they distributed their products to be so widely used? Some say Microsoft has forced its products onto the consumer, thus causing its competitors to be pushed out of the picture. Others say that couldn't be true, because how could they force a consumer to purchase their products. It's a free market and the consumer always has the right to purchase as s/he pleases. For myself, I consider Microsoft to be pushing out the competition by forcing their products onto the consumer. When Microsoft sells one program, there is usually another program you buy with it. When we buy these package deals we eliminate the possibility of purchasing the other program from another Manufacturer. This appears to be a common practice in all free markets, but it is even more so in the software market. In Newsday, Susan Benkelman wrote an article titled "Microsoft Warned". In this article she discusses a law suit taken out against Microsoft. Implying that Microsoft is being accused for illegally distributing their Internet browser. Benkelman claims "the company made anti-competitive licensing agreements that require personal computer manufacturers to sell the browser." This claim has been made against Microsoft, because they were selling their Internet browser with Window 95. Since so many computer users have or will purchase Window 95 this made it widely available. Benkelman continued "In this case, the Justice Department was backed up by Netscape Explore who owns 70% of the market. Netscape claims, 'Microsoft is using the market dominance of Windows 95, to unfairly gain the upper hand in the browser market." By this article, it appears Microsoft is using its market control to reach out into other markets.
This giant company has done more than just stretched out its wings and tried to fly. They are reaching for greater heights when it comes to expanding their company. They are growing strongly and boldly. Some say they are trying to run a monopoly, and they are trying to do it unfairly. These people say this because, in Microsoft's demanding way they try to control the software market. To them it appears as though they don't want to compete fairly, but they do want to have full ownership of the market. Others might say Microsoft is only trying to produce the best product they can. Saying Microsoft is competing as fair as everyone else. I feel Microsoft is trying to monopolize the market the wrong way. They are using their enormous bundles of money to buy as much of any market they can get a hold of. When it is necessary, they try to sneak things by the consumer and other companies. For example: In the Deseret News, author Eun-Kyung Kim wrote an article titled, "Microsoft says it tried to improve Java computer language". Eun-Kyung shows both sides of a dispute between Microsoft and Java. Java is a computer language that runs on a variety of computers. Sun Corporation offered Microsoft to work with them on a deal to improve Java. While in the process of improving Java, something went sour. Sun Corporation says "Microsoft tried to 'Pollute' Java and sell it," while Microsoft claims "we were only trying to improve it. In Kim's article she states, "the Justice Department contends that Microsoft illegally tried to alter Java because it considered it a threat to Windows." As such Microsoft denied the accusation. Although, Microsoft lost the case, which alluded to the lose of their Java sales. The Judge stated, "Microsoft is trying to portray itself as a competitive company aiming to produce better products." They do portray themselves like this to many, but they are becoming more noticed for other things.
Even though Bill Gates is leading Microsoft to be the most successful company, he is still hated by many. In the New Republic, writer David Shenk titles an article, "Slamming Gates". Shenk explains why Bill Gates has become an easy target for haters to pock fun of. There is website called "Boycott Microsoft." This website was created when Microsoft began giving Explorer 3.0 for free. This was Microsoft's effort to destroy a smaller competitor. Shenk States,
"In a properly functioning competitive environment, rivals who create better
products could withstand such pressure. But when Gates is faced with a
competitor he can't easily be beat, he either crushes or purchases it--
thus ELIMINATIONG the competition. The basic model in the industry today
is to be bought by Microsoft or to go out of business." He also stated. "Marc
Andreessen, Netscape's co-founder, has publicly compared Microsoft
to the Mafia."
With this kind of intimidation the competitors are running for their lives. Some of these haters have compared Microsoft to the Mafia. Such accusations seem harsh , but true in some We have discussed the many controversies surrounding Bill Gates's, Microsoft. There have been many claims against this giant company. They have been found guilty of trying to monopolize the market illegally. but the law hasn't found them guilty of monopolizing the market. Although, many people believe they are, many think they aren't.
Gearan, Anne. "Will Microsoft's own words condemn it?" Deseret News 20 October 1998,1+.
McNealy, Scott. "US right to challenge Microsoft? Yes" Deseret News 16 Jan. 1999, 1+.
Kim, Eun-Kyung. "Microsoft says it tried to improve Java computer language" DeseretNews 11 Dec. 1998, 1+.
Shenk, David. "Slamming Gates" NEW REPUBLIC 26 Jan. 1998, 20-23.
Benkelman, Susan. "Microsoft Warned" Newsday Oct. 21, 1997, A3.