Essay PreviewMore ↓
An important factor in debates over health care and treatment strategies is the issue of cost. It is tremendously expensive to provide the state-of-the-art care that the modern hospital offers. Concerns about where the money will come from to care for elderly citizens appear to be making the case for "mercy killing" even more compelling. Under financial pressure, hospitals are exercising their right to deny such expensive healthcare to the aged or seriously ill.
We reserve the right to refuse service: Most people have seen these signs at restaurants and retail shops. But now, metaphorically, some hospitals are hanging such notices over their entryways by promulgating "futile care" protocols that grant doctors the right to say no to wanted life-extending medical treatment to patients whose lives they consider lacking in sufficient quality to justify the cost of care.
Unnoticed by the mainstream press, a disturbing study published in the Fall 2000 issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics reveals how far the futile-care movement, in reality the opening salvo in a planned campaign among medical elites to impose health-care rationing upon us, has already advanced. The authors reviewed futility policies currently in effect in 26 California hospitals. Of these, only one policy provided that "doctors should act to support the patient's life" when life-extending care is wanted. All but two of the hospital policies defined circumstances in which treatments should be considered nonobligatory even if requested by the patient or patient representative. In other words, 24 of the 26 hospitals permit doctors to unilaterally deny wanted life-supporting care.
How is such medical abandonment justified? Advocates of futile-care theory cleverly shift the focus away from the physiological effect provided to the patient and toward whether the patient has the "potential for appreciating the benefit of the treatment." Thus, the Cambridge Quarterly reports that 12 of the 26 hospitals surveyed prohibit treating people diagnosed with permanent unconsciousness (other than comfort care) based on these patients' supposed inability to know they are being treated. Never mind that several medical studies demonstrate that this condition is often wrongly diagnosed (40 percent misdiagnosis according to one British report). And never mind that such patients sometimes awaken unexpectedly, as recent headlines attest.
What is most disturbing is that these policies, if enforced, would prevent profoundly brain-damaged and dementia patients from receiving tube-supplied food and water because such care is considered medical treatment.
How to Cite this Page
"Doctor-Assisted Suicide and the Hospitals' Bottom Line." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Dec 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Morality of Assisted Suicide Deciding when to die and when to live is an issue that has only recently begun to confront patients all over the world. There is an elderly man lying in a hospital bed, he just had his fourth heart attack and is in a persistent vegetative state. He is hooked up to a respirator and has more tubes and IV’s going in and out of his body everywhere. These kinds of situations exist in every hospital everyday. Should physicians or doctors be allowed to assist patients, like this one, in death.... [tags: Papers]
1973 words (5.6 pages)
- Assisted Suicide: Rights and Responsibilities A woman suffering from cancer became the first person known to die under the law on physician-assisted suicide in the state of Oregon when she took a lethal dose of drugs in March, 1998. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act passed a referendum in November, 1997, and it has been the United States ' only law legalizing assisted suicide since then. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, more than 4,000 doctors have approved of the assisted suicide law (cited in "The Anguish of Doctors,” 1996).... [tags: Death, Medicine, Suicide, Assisted suicide]
1552 words (4.4 pages)
- As indicated by McLaughlin and McLaughlin (2008), governments must respond to the concerns of healthcare providers having conflicting roles in society as agents for both patients and for others. In the 1990s, the United States saw the emergence of many physician-owned hospitals specializing in certain high-dollar procedures such as cardiac care and orthopedics. The reasons for their development were many. First of all, physicians sought to funnel the better insured patients to facilities in which they had a financial stake.... [tags: healthcare, insurance, community hospitals]
1286 words (3.7 pages)
- The Vegetative State and Euthanasia Much media attention has been directed at the very practical use of euthanasia or assisted suicide on patients who are in a vegetative state or irreversible coma. The truth is that a significant number of such cases actually recover. This essay is devoted to those types, some very young, who would have been killed if euthanasia/assisted suicide had been legalized. Let's begin our consideration with a nine-year-old named Ryan Atencio. He was taken off life-support systems, except for a feeding tube, after being in a vegetative state following a massive head injury in a December 10, 1988 car accident.... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
2499 words (7.1 pages)
- Animal Assisted Therapy in Hospitals and Institutions Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT) is a means of therapy that is intended to help the patient's recovery advance, the patients can express themselves with and through the pet. Patients are allowed to pet, groom and walk, ride or swim with the animal giving them a chance to nurture and find companionship with the pet. Some of the goals are to improve a patient's social, emotional and/or cognitive functioning. The therapists seeks to achieve a better rapport with the patient channeled through the use of the animal that is assisting in the therapy.... [tags: helping a patient's recovery advance]
1093 words (3.1 pages)
- The Controversial Issue of Doctor-Assisted Suicide Imagine youu have just found out you are going to die within three months. Recently the questions have been changed form, "What am I going to do with the rest of my life?" to "When should I kill myself"? With painful and crippling diseases such as AIDS and cancer, and Alzheimers along with doctors such as Dr. Kavorkian, some people are choosing death over life. Doctor assisted suicide has been a very controversial subject in the past few years. Some states such as Oregon have passed laws which allow doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to patients who have less then six months to live.(Henin 1) Other state have tak... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
804 words (2.3 pages)
- A new survey published in the April 23 New England Journal of Medicine finds that few doctors have ever assisted a patient's suicide -- but that over a third would do so if the practice were legalized. "This is really not happening very often," says survey co-author Dr. Diane Meier of New York's Mount Sinai School of Medicine. "That's the most important finding. It's a rare event" [Associated Press, 4/23/98]. The survey was based on a questionnaire sent in 1996 to 3,102 physicians under the age of 65; 1,902 doctors responded anonymously.... [tags: Euthanasia, Physician Assisted Suicide]
625 words (1.8 pages)
- Understanding Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide This paper will address some of the more popular points of interest involved with the euthanasia-assisted suicide discussion. There are less than a dozen questions which would come to mind in the case of the average individual who has a mild interest in this debate, and the following essay presents information which would satisfy that individual's curiosity on these points of common interest. Euthanasia and assisted suicide are legal in the state of Oregon and in the country of the Netherlands; these are the only two jurisdictions in the world where laws specifically permit euthanasia or assisted suicide.... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
1159 words (3.3 pages)
- Euthanasia and the Will to Live The denial of food and fluids to Terri Schindler-Schiavo, the 36 year old Florida woman in a vegetative state since a heart attack, has caused Americans to ponder the fact that any one of them could be in this woman's place for a variety of reasons, like an auto accident, fall, mishap, etc. And most Americans don't want to be treated by their family as Terri is being treated by her husband - being denied food and fluids in order to hasten death. It is appropriate to be appalled, but no one should be shocked.... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
596 words (1.7 pages)
- “Dogs do not have many advantages over people, but one of them is extremely important: euthanasia is not forbidden by law in their case; animals have the right to a merciful death.” ― Milan Kundera, The Unbearable Lightness of Being One of the most controversial topics that is being debated today, both morally and legally, is assisted suicide, sometimes known as active euthanasia. Assisted suicide is the act of directly intervening in order to end the life of a terminally ill patient (i.e. administering a large amount of sleeping pills).... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
3190 words (9.1 pages)
This is all very ironic. It wasn't much more than 20 years ago that withdrawing tube-supplied food and water from a patient due to cognitive disability was virtually unthinkable in clinical medicine. Indeed, it would have been a crime in many jurisdictions. However, by the early 1990s, in the wake of the Nancy Cruzan case, virtually all states permitted families to decide to withdraw tube-supplied nutrition and hydration as a matter of the "right to die." Today, throughout the country, conscious and unconscious cognitively disabled people are intentionally dehydrated to death almost as a matter of medical routine when families consent.
The bioethical principle justifying the ending of profoundly brain-damaged people's lives by dehydration, until now, has been autonomy: Patients and their families should be able to make this difficult and "intimate" decision free from having the values of others imposed upon them. But proponents of futile care, often the same bioethicists who argued for allowing families to refuse tube feeding, are now telling us that doctors should be allowed to refuse tube feeding based on their personal values even if families want the care continued. This makes no logical sense unless the goal all along has actually been to make sure that profoundly brain-damaged people die. Seen in this light, the seeming paradox disappears. If "choice" gets the dying done, great. However, if the "wrong" decision is made, futile-care theory will be imposed. Either way, in the culture of death it is heads we win, tails you lose.
While brain-damaged patients receive most of the attention in discussions of futile-care theory, they are not the only ones being refused treatment. In the 26 futile-care policies reviewed by the Cambridge Quarterly, treatment of patients who have a permanent dependence on life support only available in the ICU is denied in eight, treatment for end-stage illnesses in six, and treatment for severe dementia patients in four. Some futile care policies don't even identify the maladies for which treatment will be refused but leave it to doctors to decide on a case-by-case basis.
But what happens if the patients or families object to the denial of care? Many futile-care policies establish review procedures under which hospital ethics committees, originally established as mediating bodies to help families and physicians negotiate the proper approaches in difficult cases, are given adjudicatory authority to determine whether patients receive treatment or have it terminated. This is the approach adopted in 1997 by the Alexian Brothers Hospital of San Jose (which has since been sold to Columbia HCA), those currently in effect in many Houston hospitals (as described in the Journal of the American Medical Association), and at the Mercy hospitals based in Philadelphia, whose futile-care policy was reproduced in the July-August 2000 edition of Health Progress, the official journal of the Catholic Health Association. Under each of these protocols, once the committee decrees that the desired treatment is "futile" or "inappropriate" the case is closed. Thereafter, the treatment can never be provided in the hospital even if the family or patient finds a doctor who wants to provide the care.
Once the committees have issued death decrees, patients have three options: acquiesce, find another hospital (a highly unlikely enterprise), or sue. As to litigation, stacking the legal deck in favor of doctors and hospitals is a primary purpose for crafting formal futile-care protocols. As the Cambridge Quarterly article points out, "physicians are likely to get better results" in court if they follow hospital bureaucratic dispute-resolution mechanisms prior to terminating care. Of course, this is little more than blatant bootstrapping: Like Napoleon crowning himself emperor, hospitals proclaim the right to refuse wanted treatment because they themselves said that they could. Unfortunately, considering that judges and juries are often loath to gainsay doctors, it is likely to be effective bootstrapping, leaving desperate patients and families literally nowhere to turn.
Even though lives are literally at stake, the media have generally ignored the futile-care issue, viewing it as too arcane to be of interest to the general public. Patients and families need to be prepared to fight for wanted care if they are to surmount the barriers that the purveyors of the new medicine are increasingly erecting between defenseless patients and wanted life-sustaining treatment. They may even want to have a lawyer on call. (Yes, it really is coming to that.) At the very least, patients should obtain assurances from their physicians that their own medical decision-making will be respected and that "Doctor Knows Best" futile-care protocols will never be imposed upon them.
Spring, Beth and Ed Larson. Euthanasia: Spiritual, Medical and Legal Issues in Terminal Health Care. Portland,OR: Multnomah Press, 1988.