Essay PreviewMore ↓
Privacy protections for medical records present a regulatory nightmare. Medical records are critical to quality care since they give a doctor a patient's history; they are key to preventing dangerous drug interactions, complications from allergies, and harmful drug side effects. Medical records also play a key role in medical and health system research. The information in a patient's medical records, however, can be used for much more insidious purposes; denial of medical care, denial of employment, character assassination, and extortion are all consequences of medical information falling into the wrong hands. The difficulty of balancing these needs has resulted in a thin patchwork of regulatory protection of medical information; as one commentator has noted, federal law protects video rental records more thoroughly and completely than medical records. 
Some legislators and administrators have advocated the use of "unique health identifiers" (UHIs) in order to allow doctors and researchers to properly access medical records while preventing some forms of misuse. When Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in 1996, they specifically included a requirement for the Department of Health and Human Services to develop standards for UHIs by 1998.1  The Clinton Administration, however, indefinitely postponed creating this standard, saying that further legislation protecting medical record privacy needed to be enacted before they would promote a UHI standard.  In this age of ubiquitous networks and nearly free-flowing information, UHIs tip the balance between privacy and accessibility too far to one side; unique health identifiers pose a unique threat to privacy.
Undeniably, UHIs offer several benefits to the medical community, particularly in the areas of patient care and research. Proponents of unique identification claim such a system would improve the quality of medical care by allowing doctors and other medical agencies to obtain a complete medical history quickly.
How to Cite this Page
"Privacy and Unique Health Identifiers." 123HelpMe.com. 23 Jul 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
Commitment To Privacy: The Dual Goals of The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA
- In 1996 the federal government passed a law called The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) with “dual goals of making health care delivery more efficient and increasing the number of Americans with health insurance coverage” (Nass & Levit). The 1990’s brought about the realization that the medical industry would be run more efficiently by computerizing medical records. Title II of HIPPA, titled Administration Simplification, addresses the not only the patients right to privacy but also the issue surrounding electronic transmission of health information.... [tags: confidenciality, health care, records]
1260 words (3.6 pages)
- HIPAA Identity theft has always been in the back of my mind whenever I use my debit card but I wasn’t too concerned about my health information until I learned about HIPAA. It is a very important set of rules and standards that protects our privacy. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA is a statute endorsed by the U.S. Congress in 1996. It offers protections for many American workers which improves portability and continuity of health insurance coverage. The seven titles of the final law are Title I - Health care Access , Portability, Title II - Preventing Health Care Fraud and Abuse; administrative simplification; Medical Liability Reform; Title III – Tax-related He... [tags: Healthcare]
1003 words (2.9 pages)
- ... “Confidentiality guarantees interests of patients and caregivers were aligned so doctors could treat patients privately”. (Chicago Tribune, Cory Franklin). Patients feel open to the doctors, which helps the patients to tell them any detailed information, which may be very important for the doctors to know so they can treat the patients in a correct manner. The act had a tremendous amounts of reasons for which it needed to be in law. The act was meant to amend the internal revenue code of 1986, to improve portability and continuity of Health insurance coverage for a large number of groups.... [tags: confidentiality, clients,s ervices, privacy]
1063 words (3 pages)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, most commonly known by its initials HIPAA, was enacted by Congress then signed by President Bill Clinton on August 21, 1996. This act was put into place in order to regulate the privacy of patient health information, and as an effort to lower the cost of health care, shape the many pieces of our complicated healthcare system. This act also protects individuals from losing their health insurance if they lose their employment or choose to switch employers.... [tags: Electronic Protected Health Information]
885 words (2.5 pages)
- The Australian Health Care System is regarded world class for its effectiveness and efficiency. It consists of the mix system of health providers in both the private and public sector. The funding mechanism is highly advantageous to its entire citizen, which consists of the 30% Rebate, Pharmaceutical Benefit and Medicare. In particular, Medicare has been ensuring all Australian nationals with access to free and low cost medical, optometric, hospital care with special option to private health services in special circumstances.... [tags: Healthcare]
1176 words (3.4 pages)
- ... If a patient gets hospitalized and the family or friends are trying to obtain information on that patient it is up to the patient to choose and limit the information they want to give out. Some of the patients’ rights include the following the right to receive a notice of privacy, the right to amend, a right to request a special method of communication. If a patient believes their rights are being denied they can make sure first they have a right to get their records, and make sure their medical records are available.... [tags: information, privacy, health, agencies]
596 words (1.7 pages)
- In most cases privacy and security risks apply to both paper and electronic records. With the growing demand for the electronic health record (EHR) system, the transfer from paper to electronic can be risky. For this project we were asked to compare and contrast the security issues between maintenance of paper medical records and the EHR system, also we were asked to discuss what requirements and issues need to be considered when doing a conversion to an EHR. Inappropriate access is one of the most common ways a patient’s record is at risk.... [tags: Health Care]
1082 words (3.1 pages)
- Privacy of Digitized Personal Information Privacy of personal information is a fundamental right of any person. No one wants his/her private details to be known to other people, especially ones who they are not familiar with. However, human society is based on cooperation between people. Society simply cannot function without this vital interaction between two human beings. No one is that capable or skillful enough to fulfill his/her daily requirements alone. The very fabric of society exists because a person has to depend on other people to get things done.... [tags: Private Privacy Information Argumentative Essays]
3497 words (10 pages)
- You would think that employee privacy rights only apply to employees that you currently have but it really begins with the hiring process. Companies can reduce the number of labor related incidents during the first step of recruiting by setting up a cost-effective, yet reliable drug testing system. According to Kevin Troutman (2005), "People who abuse drugs are a hazard to companies because they miss work, file more workers' compensation claims, make errors, steal and create safety concerns for other employees".... [tags: Employee Privacy Technology]
1413 words (4 pages)
- Workplace Privacy Background As a director for the American Red Cross of Santa Monica, not only am I constantly faced with policy and personnel conflicts, I am also responsible for finding solutions to those conflicts. Recently, I was charged with the task of finding a solution to a problem we (as a chapter) had never dealt with before. The American Red Cross is an apolitical organization. During the recent elections, a supervisor in my office sent out emails to many of our colleagues and her friends stating her opinion regarding Proposition 22 (the proposition referring to the status of gay relationships).... [tags: Workplace Privacy Essays]
3092 words (8.8 pages)
UHIs also present several benefits for medical research. As the GAO stated in a 1999 report to Congress,
Medical information is used for a number of research purposes...while such research is sometimes conducted without information tied to identifiable patient records, other research relies on personal identifiers to track treatment of an individual over time, link multiple sources of patient information, or verify such information. 
Unique Health Identifiers would provide a simple means of linking various sources of patient information without giving up the patient's name or other personal information, thereby protecting a patient's identity during a medical study. Also, by linking patient information, Unique Health Identifiers provide researchers with the means to track an individual in perpetuity without any information that truly identifies the individual.  Also, through compilation of anonymous patient data, researchers can better understand the spread of disease throughout the population-a great aid to epidemiological research.
There is also an argument as to how UHIs could better protect privacy in the system through preventing accidental disclosures of information and unauthorized access. Use of a coded identifier would prevent both authorized and unauthorized users from accessing information out of curiosity or spite unless they had the patient ID or access to the algorithm for generating identifiers. Such an identification number would serve a purpose similar to a bank account or credit card number, giving the lab technician or researcher the minimum amount of necessary information. 
Unfortunately, the implementation of such a system would have significant dangers. The sensitivity of medical data warrants special protection that would be degraded by unique patient identification. Simson Garfinkel notes, "Today, medical records have an expanded role-a role that doesn't involve primary healthcare. They are used by employers and insurance companies to decide who should be hired and insured...even marketers are buying up medical records in search of sales leads."  Because medical records are often used for such purposes, linking them to a unique patient poses a threatening "brave new world," where complete profiles of individuals are maintained on large corporate mainframes. 
Lack of confidentiality of medical information can also degrade healthcare and health research. Since medical records are often involved in employment or insurance decisions, doctors often report alternate diagnoses for potentially stigmatizing diseases  or simply refuse to report their diagnosis . Without accurate and complete information, medical information is rendered useless. UHIs would merely exacerbate this problem. A stigmatizing disease or condition is easily known to anyone who has access to the patient's records; linking a complete history under a single unique identifier would allow employers, insurers, and snoopers to obtain information easily and quickly.
Even with further privacy protections, recording a patient's entire history and linking it to a sensitive piece of identifying information could prove damaging to privacy. If, for example, a young man had been treated for a form of venereal disease, such information would be inextricably linked into his medical records. While he might wish that this information be kept private, it would be accessible to every doctor, nurse, and hospital attendant who had cause to view his medical records. Linking patient information to a unique identifier would further remove a patient's medical records from his control, further degrading medical privacy.
While Unique Health Identifiers offer some potential benefits to the healthcare industry and medical researchers, the threat posed by linking a patient's entire medical history underneath a single string of characters poses too great a threat to ignore. Further legislative or regulatory protections of medical information could protect against some of these threats, but would also give rise to new questions about how to balance the need for access with the level of protection afforded to this extremely sensitive information. Even with further legislative protections, UHIs would further degrade an individual's control over his medical information. Implementing Unique Health Identifiers at this point in time would only tip the legislative balance further towards accessibility, attacking the concept of privacy that lies in the foundations of our culture, rights, and laws.
 Wymore, Eric. "Current public law & policy issue: it's 1998, do you know where your medical records are? Medical record privacy after the implementation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996." 19 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 553
 "Public Law 104-191: HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996." (110 Stat. 1936; Date: 8-21-96; enacted H.R. 3103). Text from: United States Public Laws. Available from: Congressional Universe (Online Service). Bethesda, MD: Congressional Information Service.
 "Privacy Concerns Delay Medical Ids." Times [New York] 1 Aug. 1998, Late Ed.: p. A10
 Protecting Electronic Health Information, Committee on Maintaining Privacy and Security in Health Care Applications of the National information Infrastructure, National Research Council (Washington D.C., 1997)
 United States General Accounting Office, MEDICAL RECORDS PRIVACY: Access Needed for Health Research but Oversight of Privacy Protections Is Limited. Washington, GPO, 1999
 Garfinkel, Simson. Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century. Boulder, CO: NetLibrary, 2000
 Branscomb, Anne Wells. Who Owns Information: From Privacy to Public Access. New York: Basic Books, 1994
1 See §1173 of