Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
vertical farming thesis
essay on vertical farming
essay on vertical farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: vertical farming thesis
From jetpacks to teleportation and even cloning, humans have many ideas for the future. One fairly new idea is vertical farming. Vertical farming is a very promising idea, which may take off in the near future; however, the benefits currently do not outweigh the disadvantages.
Dickson D. Despommier is a microbiologist, ecologist, and Professor of Public Health in Environmental Health Sciences at Columbia University. In Despommier’s book, The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century, vertical farming is the idea of farming goods such as vegetables, fruits, and even some animals in a controlled environment (3). In other words, vertical farming is essentially the act of farming vertically inside of a tall building. Although some may laugh at the idea of farming indoors, it is not an entirely new concept. Despommier states “crops like strawberry, tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, herbs, and a wide variety of spices have made their way to world supermarkets in ever-increasing amounts over the last fifteen years.” (Despommier, 4). However, Despommier’s idea of vertical farming highly contrasts the greenhouses that currently exist. Despommier plans to have buildings at least 30 stories high that can produce enough food to comfortably feed 50,000 people (Despommier, Vertical Farming).
So why should we consider vertical farming? Three main reasons that Despommier lists are climate change, very few farmland available, and cheaper costs. Despommier believes that vertical farming can drastically help with climate change because once vertical farms are established, there will be no need for traditional farms which will allow them to convert back to forests and reduce the carbon dioxide in the air (Chamberlain). The rapidly growing po...
... middle of paper ...
...r, Dickso. Vertical Farming. Environmental Information Coalition, 8 Apr. 2008. Web. 30 Oct. 2011. .
Roach, John. High-Rise Farms: The Future of Food?. N.p., 30 June 2009. Web. 30 Oct. 2011. .
Cox, Stan, and David V. Tassel. Why Planting Farms in Skyscrapers Won't Solve Our Food Problems. N.p., 3 May 2010. Web. 30 Oct. 2011. .
Countryfarm Lifestyles. Vertical Farming: What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of a Vertical Farm? . N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2011. .
Kuang, Cliff. Farming in the Sky. N.p., 4 Sept. 2008. Web. 30 Oct. 2011. .
After reading McKibben and Hurst’s articles in the book Food Matters, both authors present arguments on “industrial farming”, and although Hurst provides a realistic sense on farming, McKibben’s suggestions should be what we think about.
The idea of the family farm has been destroyed by large food corporations. As discussed in class, industrial farming typically leads to the mass produ...
Animal and plant husbandry due to human growth has transformed into factories that pump out foodstuffs in higher quantities than imaginable centuries in the past. This is done through the use of monocultures, which produce one single crop in high quantities, and factory farming, compact animal lots that grow the animal as quickly as possible for slaughter. The shift to monoculture farming and factory farming was due to the rapid increase in population and advancements in farming technology, for example pesticides. In recent years the focus has shifted to escaping factory farming through organic farming. Organic farming produces foodstuffs without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or any other artificial factors. Organic farming focuses on natural development of organisms. Author Michael Pollan in his essay “The Animals: Practicing Complexity” describes his time at an organic farm and describes Polyface Farm as profitable, efficient, cheap,
Even though some people think modernizing is the key to a successful economy in the future, it doesn't mean that the farming industry should be reduced to the back burner when thinking about what is contributing to the ever-growing economy. My point here that agriculture is vital to America’s economy and should not altered should interest those who live in farming communities. Beyond this limited audience, however, my point should speak to anyone who cares about the larger issue of making sure agriculture is seen as an important asset that benefits citizens and other industries that utilize the products that are
With an ever increasing world population, massive third world hunger, and with an estimation that a child dies for every two seconds world-wide from starvation; this does not even take into account the number of people who are mal and undernourished, there is a great promise in the use of this technology to benefit not only the farmers, but also societies worldwide. We have been able to genetically modify plants so that they may be more resistant to insects, so that there is less pesticidal toxins sprayed. We have designed plants that require less water, less soil nutrients, preserving precious recourses. We have designed plants with higher yield, shorter seasons, plants that need less land to grow; we are said to be living in a time where we have the healthiest, most well-tested plants in the history of this
Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,
As Jensen points out, farming and industry accounts for the vast majority of total water usage in the world (477). The increasingly scarce resource is a necessary ingredient when growing food. Technology continuously improves to make it easier for farmers to grow crops while using less water. Scientists at the University of Georgia utilize what they term “variable rate irrigation” to let farmers automate the current systems of irrigation to water only the crops that need it (Gies). This is an example of retrofitting current farms, but there is a new way of farming coming to cities that reuses practically all of its water and stakes claim much less acreage in the process. The future of agriculture belongs to vertical and urban farming. These types of farms reduce the use of water, chemicals (such as pesticides, herbicides and fungicides), soil and space (The Economist). These farms are so cutting edge that they are mostly in the experimental stages. Firms like Famgro farms are testing “stackable” farming systems that can scale with demand, even further reducing waste. Famgro’s stackable farms are ideal for cityscapes where land is at a premium; furthermore, reaping the added benefit of being in close proximity to the customers that they serve. Customers will enjoy high quality, fresh produce at only a slightly
Every new technology has advantages and disadvantages, aims and limitations. As each new technology is released though, we ourselves weigh up the profit and productivity against the cost and ethical dilemmas. Still, as reserch continues, technological advances will undoubtedly become a huge part of the Australian commercial farming industry. The question is when.
Currently, agribusinesses’ dominate the U.S food production, employing unethical practices in order to maximize profits at the expense of the environment, animal welfare, and even our health. Economically, other methods of harvest often “require higher capital and petroleum energy inputs” that lower “the return to the farmer/rancher” (L34) which results in farmers using other more convenient methods that higher their
Tom Urban (1991) was the first to coin the term industrialization of food describing it as: “a process by which consumers wants and needs were fed back into a production and distribution system to provide desired quantity, availability and price” (p. 4). Beginning in the early part of the 20th century agriculture was transformed from a diversified system of small-scale farmers who labored in the field to a complex system of large, technologically-dependent manufacturing of commodity crops like corn and soy (Dimitri, Effland & Conklin, 2005, p. 1). This emerged in response to changes in farm policy and the industrialization of other sectors of society that encourages industry to “get big or get out”.
Since factory farms are the most popular ways to farm, the farming industry is being overrun with them. “…In the U.S. only 3% of farms now generate an astonishing 62% of that nation’s agricultural output” (Farrell). Dominating the farm industry, factory farms are slowly taking over conventional ways of farming. Supporters of the factory farms have many reasons that factory farms are beneficial. “Because factory farms are so large, they achieve ‘economies of scale,’ producing much more food at cheaper prices than smaller farms” (Farrell). Factory farms are able to make more food at a more affordable cost for consumers. According to Factory Farms: Are They Good for Consumers?, factory farms produce food cheaply, produce more efficiently, provide employment, and gross in large amounts of capital. Farrell believes that supporters ...
The definition of conventional farming is “Intensive farming or intensive agriculture as an agricultural production system characterized by a low fallow ratio and the high use of inputs such as capital, labor, or heavy use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers relative to land area.” Conventional farming is the method that a majority of farmers use. Although they have to use a lot more chemicals and fertilizers, conventional farming is cheaper than organic farming. Conventional farming has significantly higher crop yields than organic thus, producing more money, making it much more farmer friendly. Conventional farmers also use genetically engineered seeds that are sometimes referred to as “miracle seeds” because of their ability to fight against certain diseases or produce higher yields. The technical term for these seeds is HYV’s or high yield varieties (Qaim). Conventional farming also incorporates the use...
Farming is going downhill. The Census of Agriculture said, “the amount of cropland harvested was nearly 2 percent more in 2012 than 2007.” That means that farming is not as good as it used to be. It is much harder to find farmland, and the prices of dairy products and seeds are going
Technology has served as the prime force in removing the farmer's hands from the soil. This technology has come in the form of machinery - and bigger and more "advanced" machinery - and in the form of chemical fertilizers. In a book review of Kent Meyers' The Witness of Combines, Pat Deninger writes:
Thompson, Paul B. and Stout, Bill A. Beyond The Large Farm. Westview Press, Inc.: Colorado 1991